Savage Gods

Savage Gods is a crisis memoir: at least, that’s the closest I have ever come to describing it. It’s my weirdest book – my weirdest non-fiction book, anyway – and every time I look at it I have two simultaneous feelings: that I don’t ever want to go through that again; and that I wish I could write another book like this. Of course, there is a relationship between difficult times and good writing, just as there is a relationship between troubled authors and brilliant prose. Not always, of course, but often. There’s a reason so many of us end up divorced alcoholics.
– Paul Kingsnorth, Mar 2026.

Savage Gods is a challenging book to review because of its nature: it is a meditation, or perhaps a rumination, by the author on his continuing search for meaning and the role of writing and the word in that search. Paul Kingsnorth fell in love with Nature from an early age and got into the green movement owing to his love of its beauty; in his twenties, he was a firebrand activist, writing for The Ecologist magazine and in the habit of chaining himself to things to stop their being bulldozed for parking lots and the like He traveled the world meeting people who were also fighting back against — what was it? Globalization, corporate rule, McWorld, industrialism? Something he could see but not yet define, though later he would call it The Machine. He realized in his long visits with traditional societies, though, that there was something missing in the West, some life had gone out of it completely: the West was desecrated, dehumanized, and so he decided to retreat to create a more human life for himself, his wife Jyoti, and their children. They found a rural cottage in Ireland and began trying to live a plainer life.

It is there that Paul writes these meditations, telling part of that backstory even as he ponders at length over the power words and writing have over him — how they demand he serve them even as he wonders if the abstract nature of the written word, of language, separates him to some degree from reality, even as it gives him the capacity to understand and think about it. There’s a lot of mysticism in this: Paul, despite being raised thoroughly secular, is God-haunted, and he conveys some of his interior arguments as dialogues between himself and the Norse gods Loki and Freya. I don’t know what I would make of this if I stumbled upon it by itself: as someone who knows Paul’s story, though, I found it incredibly interesting to view him in a transition point. I know that Paul’s journey will lead him further away from the material to the transcendent — from Buddha to Wicca to eventually to an Eastern Orthodox monastery in Ireland, where suddenly The Word will become all the more interesting as a concept. This is a strange book, the thoughts of an artist in anguish because he longs to write but finds he can’t quite catch the wind in his sails, the thoughts of an activist who is now turning trying to restore earth rather than “set the world on fire“, as the against me! song put it. As someone who is just a little younger than the age Paul was, but who has already gone through that transition from ideologue-warrior to someone seeking meaning through stewardship and creation instead of politics, I found it compelling despite its strangeness. This is a fascinating piece, but it’s not for everyone.

Highlights:

Money whips us around like a tornado, money and capital, greed and ambition and hunger and power, they uproot people and scatter them about and we all keep our heads down as the Machine passes through, drizzling us across the landscapes of the world, breaking the link between people and place and time, demanding our labor and our gratitude, hypnotizing us with its white light, transforming us into eaters, consumers of experience and consumers of place, players of games, servants.

I had a plan. The plan was to settle, to have some land, to root myself and my family. To escape from the city, to escape from the traps. To grow our own food, educate our own kids, draw our own water, plant our own fuel. To be closer to nature and further from the Machine. To be freer, to be more in control. To escape and, at the same time, to belong. To learn things I didn’t know anything about but wanted to, because I felt they’d make me a better, rounder adult person: planting trees, keeping hens, managing woodland, carpentry, wiring, building, all the small skills required to run a few acres of land and to be part of it. On top of that, to bring up our young children at home. And on top of that, to write books: truer books than I had ever written before. To write something great, something real, something so intense that nobody could read it without dimming the lights first.

Something I’d been writing about for years, in that book and elsewhere: human cultures come from places. They arise from them, curl out of them like smoke from hot ash. People do too. We’re not free actors. We can’t just skip from peak to peak, buzz from city to city with no consequences. I knew this, so why didn’t I know it?

The middle-class Europeans blockading summits and waffling about Negri and Fanon bored me to tears. They were rootless; they were as lost as me.They came in by plane or train from some other European city, they put on their black masks and Palestinian scarves, shouted at some fat cats, got tear gassed and then went home. Empty gestures, empty words, and I was empty too. But in the Baliem Valley in Papua or the Lacandon jungle in Mexico found something else; something older, deeper, calmer and very much more real. I found people who belonged to a place. I had never seen this before. Where I grew up, there was nothing like it. It had—it still has—more meaning to me than any other way of human living I had seen. I wanted to know: what would that be like? And could I have it?

I wanted to be a tree, but I am not a tree. I wanted to sing to the forest, but no one ever taught me the words, and I don’t suppose they ever will because there is no one in my world to teach me. Nobody here has known the words for centuries. I was born in those rootless suburbs and they have given me a rootless soul. I am not a tree. I am some kind of slinking animal in the hedgerow. I am a seed on the wind. I am water. I am coming to the rocks at the lip of the fall.

Take a story from a place and drop it into another place and it doesn’t necessarily make sense, at least not at first.Like people, stories don’t always travel well. Nothing belongs everywhere, and some things only belong somewhere. But some stories, when they travel, can spark strange new things in unmeasured hearts.

We stumble on alone, and our smartphone apps and robots that can order a curry for us from the Internet and toy drones for Christmas and regular doses of antidepressants and celebrity TV—all the great swirling ocean of bullshit we have surrounded ourselves with in lieu of life, in lieu of living—this is our civilization’s equivalent of a middle-aged executive buying a red sports car and sleeping with his secretary.

I feel that words are savage gods and that in the end, however well you serve them, they will eat you alive.

I thought I could make it all fit if I could just muster enough cleverness. But the world is not short of cleverness and not much is right. Now I know this is a god my words refuse to serve. No more cleverness. No more opinions. Opinions are easy to come by. Stillness is the really hard work. Not knowing is the hardest work of all.

‘In Western Civilization,’ says the poet Gary Snyder, ‘our elders are books.’ Books pass on our stories. Books carry the forbidden knowledge and the true. Books are weird things, inhuman things, abstract things, but they are gateways, at their best, to the world to which the drum and the fire and the sweat lodge used to take us. The Otherworld. At her best, the writer is a shaman, a priestess, a summoner.

The only reason to write is because you can’t not write; because something sharp and heated is pushing you through. We write, I write, because of life’s brevity and the need to blaze.

Late May. I am in the field, scything the grass and the docks down. I am mowing shirtless in the rain and I remember why I came here and suddenly, in an instant and just for an instant, I am here. I am nowhere else. I am the field and the motion of the scythe and the falling of the rain and the movement of the muscles in my back and shoulders, the sideways motion of my stiff hips and I think nothing at all. I just mow. I just move. I just am. For a moment, I just am. Sometimes, when you least expect it, you are given a gift.

If you mistake the map for the territory, though—if you start to believe that reality will bend to your will if you just grip it hard enough—then you are asking for trouble.

Recently, at a conference in America, I watched Martin Shaw, my mythologist friend (everyone should have a mythologist friend), tell the story of The Odyssey over the course of a week to a crowd of 200 people. It was quite something. When you hear an accomplished oral storyteller tell a story, you are brought up hard against a fact that everyone in a pre-literate culture would have known from experience: a story is a living thing. When the storyteller begins, some strange animal lurches into the room, curls around the roof beams, intervenes, changes everything. A story is a summoning from the otherworld. And some tales want to have their way with you.

Posted in Religion and Philosophy, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Top Ten More Books I Didn’t Review

Today’s treble T is “Book we didn’t review”. In 2020 we did a similiar topic, “Books We Loved But Didn’t Review”, and I gaze upon that list I realize: I still haven’t reviewed `em. Well, most of them. I did get around to reviewing The Way of Men.That may change this year since I’m doing purposeful re-reading. Today, I’m going to list ten more books I haven’t reviewed, drawing on my “What I Read in ______” lists. The amount of unreviewed titles is….oof.

But first, three teases:

[Our friend] arrived late because he’d been arguing with a man selling red T-shirts with pictures of Stalin on them.
“Do you realize,” he had said, pointing at the merchandise, that this is the greatest mass-murderer of the twentieth century?”
“Don’t blame me,” said the man, “I just sell T-shirts.” – Paul Kingsnorth, One No, Many Yeses

This field: it belongs to us, to me and my wife, because we paid for it and we have a piece of paper lodged with a lawyer somewhere that proves it. But my lifetime will flicker out and this field will still be here, as it was before I came. I am passing through this field like the heron sometimes passes above it and foxes come through every night and red-tailed bumbles drone past on their way to the hedgebank petals. I am here now, and then I will be gone again. So the field does not belong to me, really. Do I belong to the field? Probably not that either. I would like to. But I have only been on this land for three years. I have only been in the country for three years. I am a blowin, as we are called in these parts. You can’t just turn up in a place and claim it. A place needs to claim you. – Paul Kingsnorth, Savage Gods

Observation can tell more about the observer than about the environment being observed. It reflects the values, beliefs, and worldview of the witness. We see through the lens of our interests, and understanding. […] Hiking with a birdwatcher is quite a different experience than hiking with a geologist — one points out the flicking wings of a Ruby-crowned Kingler, the other notes the lavender glint of Lepidolite mica. Neither may notice the changing cloud formations that spell tomorrow’s snow. […] What we see is largely who we are and what we have learned to see. There is no such thing as an objective observer.” – “Eyes Wide Open”, What We See: Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs

Feminism against Progress, Mary Harrington. A critique of the sexual revolution and related technologies from unexpected quarters.

The Hardest Job in the World: the US Presidency,  John Dickerson. An analysis of the post that argues that foreign policy consumes the office, and yet it’s rarely an issue that voters care about.

Several books by Anthony Esolen, whose writing I love but fear I can’t do justice to, despite re-reading them. Such books include Life under Compulsion, In Defense of Boyhood, and Ironies of Faith.

We Have Been Harmonized: Life in China’s Surveillance State, Kai Strittmatter. I have a great introduction written for a review of this, but I’ll need to go back and re-read it to write the actual review bit.

Men on Strike: Why Men are Boycotting Marriage, Helen Smith. I have a mostly-full review written for this, but don’t like it.

How Emotions are Made, Lisa Feldman Barrett. Such a good neurology read and I neglect it still.

Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian Dissidents, Rod Dreher. On the approach of soft totalitarianism.

The Professor in the Cage: Why Men Fight and Why We Like to Watch, Jonathan Gotschall

Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren’t Growing Up, Abigail Schrier.

Anxious Generation, Johnathan Haidt

Posted in General | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Sidetracks

Gary Oberg grew up in Minnesota hunting and fishing, and has continued to do so for seventy years — mostly for fun, but sometimes for business as he was also a mechanical engineer who designed reels and other sporting equipment. Here he shares forty stories of his adventures in the wild, set mostly in Minnesota and Canada but reaching Alaska, too. While I was expecting something like Giant Whitetails, this was more about mishaps and adventures Oberg and his friends got into while hunting and fishing. Moose appears to be Oberg’s prey of choice, at least in this collection: he and his friends are constantly making deep treks into the wilderness to find and shoot them. There are are fishing stories, too, both on land and sea and sometimes on ice: Oberg has special passions for walleye and halibut. Not all of the stories actually involve hunting and fishing: he includes, for instance, his memories of biking to Alaska with his wife on the Alaskan Highway, or the ALCAN. If you aren’t remotely interested in hunting or the outdoors, there are still amusing stories here — like Oberg doing some night fishing, and then being startled by the sight of a human head breaking the surface. Turns out a resident on the lake liked night swims and was curious about his floating neighbor! Another one sees Oberg and his hunting party arguing over whether they should duct-tape a failing part on their moose-meat wagon: Oberg and a friend make a trek to the nearest city, only for the mechanic to say, “Ehhh, duct tape would work, my welding options for this are pretty dismal.” All in all, an enjoyable if not memorable collection.

Related:
The Other Side of Selma, Dickie Williams. Many hunting stories mixed in with the “Selma in the 1960s” stories.
Giant Whitetails, Mark and Terry Drury

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Ends of the Earth

When Neil Shubin was a young biologist, he got his start looking for fossils in the poles, where now frozen wastelands were once jungles teeming with life. Doing science at the poles is uniquely challenging and physically demanding, sometimes to the point of being life-threatening. Here, Neil Shubin remembers and records his and others’ forays into the Artic and Antartic regions, where amid savage winds and persistent gloom scientists seek to advance our knowledge about Earth’s past, present, and future. A mix of memoir, history, and science, Ends of the Earth is an interesting frozen sundae of science topics: hydrology, geology, oceanography, and climatology which could have got even more varied had it mentioned the IceCube Neutrino Observatory in Antarctica.

Shubin’s other works have been tightly focused, but this one is more loose as we bound back and forth between the two poles and the topics between them. There’s a lot covered here: Shubin’s memoirs from his own polar visits, where he learned how to survive amid the brutal cold and offers tips for aspiring Shackletons; the history of Antarica, Greenland, and the Artic’s exploration; reviews of how glaciation was discovered to work, and how glaciers have shaped the landscape; and ruminations on what the shrinking of the ice caps holds for us, past and present. There’s also a bit of Artic politics, since the north pole is ringed with nations, some of whom have missiles pointed at each other constantly. I was amused to learn of a dispute between Canada and Denmark over a lifeless rock called Hans Island: evidently they would take turns planting their respective flags and leaving a bottle of whisky or schnapps to make good the claim. I find Antartica particularly fascinating given its varied landscapes, but despite liking Shubin and enjoying the book well enough, it never pulled me in the way I expected.

Related:
The Ice at the End of the World, John Gertner

Posted in Reviews, science | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

WWW Wednesday + Long and Short Reviews Prompt

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Um…Bloodlands, from a week ago. (I’m reading, I promise, I’m just reading too many things at once.) I also finished reading And Then You Die of Dysentery, but I don’t know if that counts given that it’s basically a bunch of pixel art memes for aging millennials. Gift from the ladyfriend that was a nice palate-cleanser after Bloodlands.

WHAT are you reading now? Oh, boy. Well, there’s the book about WW2 Lisbon, which is interesting enough but not as unputdownable I’d expect a book full of spies to be; The Ends of the Earth which is about science at the poles; and a galley proof of A Field Guide to Selma Architecture, which I helped in some of the research. I have also been reading What We See: Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs, by various authors.

WHAT are you reading next? Hmmm. Well, these just arrived in the mail for the Great Re-Read! (The red book is Cathedral, Forge, and Waterwheel: Technology and Invention in the Middle Ages. )

Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is ….”What to read if you want to understand ____________”. So, let’s say you want to understand why postwar American cities look like asphalt vomit with chunky bits of Dollar Generals and McDonalds boxes mixed in, instead of cities that we’ve been building since the concept of building things near each other struck Grog and Ugg way back when, then there are three books I’d reccommend: James Kunstler’s Geography of Nowhere, which is probably the most accessible and funny; Suburban Nation, which is the most useful given its pictures; and Crabgrass Frontier, which gives more historical context.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Top Ten Love Freebie + Teaser Tuesday

Today’s TTT is a “love freebie”, so I’m going to go with substacks I “love” reading. But first, the tease!

Polar ice can take almost infinite shapes as it crystallizes, moves, and melts. The area around McMurdo Station exhibits this diverse world of ice in microcosm. The mountain ranges near McMurdo look like a dessert that would have pleased Rendu; the ice covers the mountains like a pure white syrup, filling canyons and valleys as it flows. Elsewhere ice looks like glass that has shattered into shards, strips, or chunks ranging in size from a small car to an entire skyscraper. The nearby sea is covered by ice that looks like a layer of foam at one time of year, a quilt of polygons at another, and a folded blanket at still another. Part of the awe of seeing a polar vista comes from imagining how a chemical formula as simple as H2O can underlie worlds of shape and movement that are almost magical in their variety. (The Ends of the Earth, Neil Shubin)

So, substacks! I’ve developed something of a substack addiction in the last few years and could probably spend an entire day doing nothing but sipping coffee and reading there. It’s a fascinating platform, especially because it’s easy to find commentors’ blogs and the fact that substackers frequently write about thoughts inspired by others, creating an unfolding conversation. I’d like to use today’s freebie to share ten of them: not necessarily my top ten favorites, but an interesting cross-section.

(1) GIRLS, Freya India. GIRLS takes as its subject the effects of social media and the digital world on young women — Gen Z women like herself. She has written some of my favorite articles on substack, period, like “What’s Become of Us“. Her archives are really interesting stuff. Freya has done interviews with other substackers I read.

(2) Rod Dreher’s Diary. This substack began as Dreher’s musings on religion, beauty, and culture, and later began including political pieces after he left the magazine he edited to move to Europe. He’s an intense, thoughtful writer who I found fascinating twelve years ago when I first stumbled on his writing. Dreher has to be the best-value-for-money on substack, because he posts every single weekday and sometimes on a weekend if he’s reading something interesting and has to share insights from it. His posts can be long, with a reflection that incorporates multiple books: yesterday’s post, for instance, drew on Hannah Arendt, Robert Putnam, Mary Harrington’s substack, and The Triumph of the Therapeutic.

(3) Word and Song, Anthony Esolen. This one is unique in Esolen’s approach, which is not to sound off on things in the news, but rather contribute to the preservation and restoration of culture by sharing music, books, poetry, and films which are especially beautiful or have something to say to the human heart – and he reads the poetry! Esolen is one of my favorite authors because he is so saturated with western literature.

(4) The Abbey of Misrule, Paul Kingsnorth. Kingsnorth edited a collection of Wendell Berry’s essays, and is a fellow critic of the inhuman and unsustainable industrial system, and the culture it creates to maintain itself — something he calls The Machine. When I began looking into him, I found his most interesting substack, an ongoing critique of industrial modernity from an Orthodox perspective that’s very nature-oriented. Paul Kingsnorth recently was one of the guests at a conference in Birmingham called Resisting the Machine, and is featured on the left above, with Rod Dreher on the right — I was sitting in the back near the coffee machine, hence the muddled photo)

(5) Pilgrims in the Machine, Beth McGrew. This substack’s subtitle is “Being human in the age of acceleration”: it touches on culture and simplicity. (A….lot of my substacks have a ‘humanity vs modernity theme…)

(6) Mary Harrington, aka “The Reactionary Feminist”. Harrington is the author of a book called Feminism against Progress, which I need to reread and review; in it she scrutinizes and attacks the sexual revolution and all that followed from a feminist perspective.

(7) Urban Speakeasy, Andy Boenau. This one is all about human-oriented urbanism, transporatation, etc. His most recent post is an open letter to the next HHS secretary that points out the health minefield created by America’s awful awful awful awful awful awful auto-oriented urbanism.

(8) Aaron Renn. As with Kunstler, this is an author I began following long before substack was a thing: I’m not sure how I encountered him, but when I began reading him his principal subject was masculinity, modernity, and Christianity. That’s still the core of his writing though he’s expanded a bit over the years, and has recently published a book called Life in the Negative World.

(9) Sean of the South. Sean Dietrich is a southern humorist whose pieces are often heartfelt articles on people who find joy amid pain and suffering. He’s the author of numerous books, too, from novels to memoirs and essay collections.

(10) The Free Press. Started by Bari Weiss, this is a platform for a host of indie journalists that doesn’t skew toward one ideology or another. It’s nice to get thoughtful reportage, including critical or investigative writing, that doesn’t go into histrionics or exhultation over the subject.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 18 Comments

Bloodlands

On a scale of 1 to 10, how demoralized, depressed, and soul-dead do you want to be? Ten? Well, have I got a book for you! 1 Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin examines the grim fate of Eastern Europe from 1933 to the death of Stalin. Beginning with Stalin’s imposed famines on Ukraine, moving through the Great Terror, the devils’ alliance in which the two dictators divided Poland between themselves and began butchering its people, and then Hitler’s attempt to create an invincible European empire by attacking the Soviet Union, at the same time mass-murdering millions. It is six hundred pages of murder, inhumanity, ideology, and insight — and while well worth reading, readers going in should brace themselves for its inhumanity, which begins with the evil systems themselves and then spreads to former victims.

Bloodlands is an interesting book, both in the horrors it captures and the way it integrates them into broader European history as a whole. Snyder writes that people tend to treat the Holocaust like something separate, a unique tangent that Hitler went on that was unrelated to any other part of European history — and that comparatively little is said about the Soviet death tolls, in large part because of the fall of the Iron Curtain and the inability of Soviet historians to say anything that would rebuke the Stalinist regime. Not only does Snyder look fully at Stalin’s famines, the great terror, and other mass killings from the Soviet side, but he fits them into the perspective of what Stalin was trying to create and what powers he feared. Despite knowing about the Russo-Japanese war of 1905, I’ve never considered how sharply Stalin feared more expansion from Japan in Asia, let alone that he viewed a Germano-Polish-Japanese encirclement as a very real threat to his dominion. The same is true for Hitler, though as mentioned the west is far more familiar with the Hitlerian death toll than Stalin’s. Even so, Synder reframes the western understanding of Hitler’s hateful actions toward European Jews. Stalin followed up on this sadism with the Great Terror, which began as a way of purging anyone who wasn’t behind Stalin’s interpretation of Marxism, and his regime, but expanded to persecute ethnic minorities. Things would get worse, though.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop act shocked the world, declaring nonaggression between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Each was the long-avowed ideological enemy of the other; each drew life from hating the other and blaming it for all the world’s ills. And yet it had a purpose soon exposed, for the two unions soon divided up Poland between themselves, and there the blood truly began to flow as both powers attacked Poland’s intelligentsia, making sure the occupied territories were deprived of leadership. It was during this period that the Katyn Massacre took place, a mass shooting from the Soviets that murdered more than 22,000 Jewish Poles. Now, however, Hitler threw his hat into the running for the most homocidal man in European history. Hitler, having been isolating Jews from Reich-controlled society and shifting them to concentrating camps — decided that the Final Solution would no longer consist of expelling Jews from the Reich, but exterminating them even as the German army suddenly attacked the Soviet Union and its conquered territories like Ukraine. Synder points out that there is a difference between concentration camps and death camps, and that virtually all of Hitler’s “death factories” were in the Bloodlands: he intended, after the defeat of Stalin and the Soviet Union, to depopulate an area of as many as thirty million and then de-industrialize it, focusing instead on agriculture to feed the Reich. The enormity of Hitler’s demonic hate for the Jews was made manfiest in the fact that even while the German armies were actively retreating from the advance of the Soviets, Jews in cities that were about to conquered by the Soviet army were urged to take trains to “safety”. Those who took the chance were gassed.

It is in the back and forth between the Nazi and Soviet powers that this book truly waxes horrific, because we are witnessing the same people being murdered and brutalized by two different powers, both hateful against minorities despite the fact that one of them was ‘internationalist’. (At Yalta, Stalin would insist on making countries of the bloodlands more ethnically homogenous, forcefully moving Germans, Poles, and Ukrainians about to make it happen) Terror and death were constant, and in the end the victims became horrors themselves: German residents of Poland, for instance, were treated as enemy aliens and entire villages were raped — and these were not necessarily new settlers, but German-speaking Poles who had lived there for generations.

This is a….harrowing book. I stopped reading several times to focus on something else, just for a break. Snyder makes the text especially effective by opening up with a real person who lived, loved, laughed, and perished at the hands of these awful men and their collectivist cronies. This makes the horror personal, closing the door that might allow us to slip into the world of abstract statistics. But what makes it worth continuing through, though, is Synder’s thoughtfulness — both in trying to understand the way Stalin and Hitler were incorporating this evil into their attempts at creating some idealized empire, and in groping for what this dark part of European history has to say to us.

  1. To be honest, Bloodlands is not the most depressing book I’ve read. That would be something like The Rape of Nanking, The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History, or The Empire of Illusion. The latter’s section on the porn industry will make a reader want to hang the likes of Hugh Hefner. Still, this would make the top five easily. ↩︎

Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 8 Comments

WWW Wednesday + Memorable Friends

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Conversations with Carl Sagan, a collection of interview transcripts; and I’m within 30 pages of finishing Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. It ends a bit like War and Peace, with an essay that’s connected to the foregoing book but is distinct.

WHAT are you reading now? Nosing into Lisbon: War in the Shadows of the City of Light, a history of Lisbon during World War 2. I’d also started looking at Lonely Vigil, a history of coastwatchers in the Solomons. Goodbye Darkness has kicked the year off with a WW2 mood, I suppose!

WHAT are you reading next? Very possibly Neil Shubin’s new release, Ends of the Earth: Journeys to the Polar Regions in Search of Life, the Cosmos, and our Future.

Napier Hall

Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is, “A Story about a Memorable Friend”. Move-in day for my college dorms was a full weekend and a day before classes started, and I arrived at Napier Hall as soon as possible — eager to experience both the college town I would grow to love, and the wonders of high-speed internet. In my first weekend there, I stumbled into the same guy several times — literally, as we bumped into each other in the bathroom, getting breakfast at the “caf”, etc. We bought brought books to the dining hall and wound up becoming friends, despite very different political leanings: he was a Bill O’Reilly conservative, and I was an earnest and zealous progressive. We both loved history, though, and enjoyed arguing with one another other and a mutual friend, a Buddhist libertarian who liked cigars. (We’d stay talking in the dining hall until the staff were putting chairs up and giving us the stinkeye — boy, do I miss that.) Since we had the same major, we were in a lot of classes together. Although I’ve mellowed over the years, back then I still tended to be very formal and serious, and he had the kind of personality that would bring my own fun side out — so we’d do stuff like go on night walks through the town and parks, investigating stores that were still open, etc. Possibly my favorite memory stemmed from a running joke: we’d made up some organization called “The Elders of Napier”, some secret society that met in the attic and did secret-society things. I created a fancy letterhead, got a sheet of stationary, and printed an invitation to a meeting of the Elders of Napier and slid it under his door. My friend, having forgotten about the joke, took it to the RA (the student-supervisor who made sure no one was smoking pot or running a brothel out of their dorm rooms). I walked out one day to refill my water bottle and was shocked and hilarified to see my friend and two RAs holding the invitation in the hall and trying to figure out who these Elders were and how they had attic access.

We’d watch movies together, and I still remember the moment in Das Leben der Andern when we both yelled at the TV in shock that subjects of East Germany had their typewriters registered. Eventually we had a falling out when a political argument went too far, probably connected to the 2008 election — one I abstained from because Obama bitterly disappointed me as senator when he voted to renew the Patriot Act. A few years later, though, we reconnected on facebook and discovered to our mutual amusement that both our politics had changed and become more mutually libertarian and anti-state. Happily, though, we still disagree on enough that we can enjoy energetic discussions, only now we can’t bang on the table or gesture wildly for emphasis.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Conversations with Carl Sagan

When I began trying to build my own worldview back in 2006, Carl Sagan’s books were instrumental in giving me a scientific orientation — and a scientific education. By the time he first appeared on the blog (November 2007), I was a rapacious enough fan that I’d read the overwhelming majority of his pop-sci books. For those who missed his time in the sun( he died rather young, weakened by a rare blood disease), Sagan was an astronomer and prominent science advocate who featured in the PBS show Cosmos, still an extraordinary watch today. When I spotted this book I had to give it a try: Conversations is a collection of interview transcripts with Sagan ranging from the seventies to May 1996, months before he died: they range, too, in tone and depth, as sometimes Sagan can go into more technical details (when being interviewed by science magazines) but on other occasion it’s similarly casual, as with his interviews on the Charlie Rose show.

Several things popped out at me while reading this: first, Sagan’s scientific versatility, as he had training in biology and chemistry and in fact did his astronomical work in that vein — trying to identify chemical compounds from the Voyager data. Two, although I’ve often heard that Sagan was poo-pooed by the scientific establishment for being a popularizer, these interviews also demonstrate that Sagan’s tendency to speculate and think out loud in public — on air, in columns, etc — grated them. They wanted him to do his imagination work in the presence of his peers, not the public — despite the fact that his charisma and imagination excited the public, too, and made him into a rare celebrity-scientist. Sagan used his high profile to advocate for better science education — no more football coaches teaching chemistry, please, and focus on the lab instead of textbooks — as well as speak on public policy issues that needed to be informed by science, like global warming and ozone damage. Sagan was particularly frustrated by the fact that, after the Cold War was over, the American government continued to sink so much of its GDP into the military instead of focusing on problems or investing in the future. Those familiar with Sagan won’t find any surprises here, especially not if they’ve read books like Pale Blue Dot and The Demon-Haunted World: the latter third of the book is dominated by interviews that were inspired by book launches there.

Although most of this was familiar content to me, it was nice to revisit Sagan after so long.

[T]he enormous amount of radio energy that we’re pouring out today
is due to three sources. One is the high frequency end of the AM broadcast
band, another is just ordinary domestic television, the third is the radar
defense networks in the United States and the Soviet Union. Those are the
only signs of intelligent life detectable on Earth from .a distance. It’s pretty
sobering. It’s often asked, if there is extraterrestrial intelligence how come
they don’t come here? Now we know. Just listen to what we’re sending out.

At the tin1e of the launching of Viking 1, Sagan wore two NASA badges, one
identifying him as a scientist and the other as a correspondent for Icarus, a
scientific journal he edits. It was as though he was having a hard time deciding whether he was a scientist or a writer.

“The Soviet Union has collapsed. The Cold War is over. Presumably we’re not obliged to invade lots of other nations.We can protect ourselves for a fraction of that $300 billion, and the money saved could do an enormous amount to solve many of
our other problems.” (If only, Carl, if only….)

PT: Science saved your life.
CS: This is not the first time I almost died. This is my third time having to deal with intimations of mortality. And every time it’s a character-building experience. You get a much clearer perspective on what’s important and what isn’t, the preciousness and beauty of life, and the importance of family and of trying to safeguard a future worthy of our children. I would recommend almost dying to everybody. I think it’s really a good experience.
PT: Probably once is enough for most people.

PT: Coming as you do from a hard-science background, how do you think
psychology is doing as a field? A lot of the issues in your book are big areas
in psychology.
CS: I’m not a psychologist. I don’t have a comprehensive surveillance of the
whole field, so all I can do is give you an offhand impression. The thing I’ve been most appalled by is the sense of so many psychotherapists . . . that their job is to confirm their patients’ delusions rather than help them find out what really has happened. It took a long time to convince myself that’s what’s happening, but it certainly is happening.

We have a society based on science and technology, and at the same time we’ve arranged things so that almost nobody understands science and technology. That’s a prescription for disaster as clear as anything.

Posted in Reviews, science | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Teaser Tuesday

Today’s TTT is books we were excited to see released in 2024, but I read both of the books whose release I was looking forward to, so today’s it’s just a tease from Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin.

The logic of the Soviet system was always to resist independent initiatives and to value human life very cheaply. Jews in ghettos were aiding the German war effort as forced laborers, so their death over pits was of little concern to authorities in Moscow. Jews who were not aiding but hindering the Germans were showing signs of a dangerous capacity for initiative, and might later resist the reimposition of Soviet rule. By Stalinist logic, Jews were suspect either way.

That’s a…grim one. Let’s try again…

[T\he enormous amount of radio energy that we’re pouring out today
is due to three sources. One is the high frequency end of the AM broadcast
band, another is just ordinary domestic television, the third is the radar
defense networks in the United States and the Soviet Union. Those are the
only signs of intelligent life detectable on Earth from .a distance. It’s pretty
sobering. It’s often asked, if there is extraterrestrial intelligence how come
they don’t come here? Now we know. Just listen to what we’re sending out. (Conversations with Carl Sagan)

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment