WWW Wednesday & “Would You Go Sky-Diving?”

A screenshot of a facebook post in the group GENEALOGY HELP in which a user says "Done with this group. to many grammar police and premadonna's in it".  Three subsequent replies point out the errors in spelling and grammar in the supposedly-exiting member's post. (Said member has not, in fact, exited.)

Today’s prompt from Long and Short reviews is, “Would you go sky-diving?”. Ever since kindergarten when the janitor made our merry-go-round go super-super fast and I got flung onto the grass throwing up, I have been very sensitive to motion sickness and hyper-aware of G-forces. So…no, no. Probably not.

WWW Wednesday

WHAT have you finished reading recently? RFK: Raging Spirit, Chris Matthews; End of the Road, Gord McGill. Also finished The Hidden Coalition, which was about LBJ, Eisenhower, and 1950s politics. Interesting for the general history, but I don’t know that it really carried its thesis — that LBJ and Eisenhower were secret collaborators — beyond the title.

WHAT are you reading now? Nosing into both More Days at the Morisaki Bookshop and The Thirty-First of March, the latter being a short memoir of the last days of LBJ’s administration.

WHAT are you reading next? Who knows? I still have a JFK biography by Matthews, and a book on the Hoffa vs RFK tussle that might get my attention considering I just read about the trucking industry, and I’ve a book on the Gospel of Mark by Amy-Jill Levine which I’d planned to read in tandem with my Bible in a Year project. (As it happens, I’ve left the second messianic interlude and am now back in 2nd Kings/2nd Chronicles.) However, one never knows with me: last week I posted WWW Wednesday and decided to tackle End of the Road which had been absent entirely.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

The War against Truckers

A few months ago, video surfaced of a ‘truck driver’ deciding to execute a U-turn in the middle of a busy highway. If you are familiar with the physics of truck-trailers, you’d know immediately how insane and irresponsible a move that is. It met with the inevitable, tragic result: an SUV, not expecting such imbecilic behavior, plowed into the sudden obstacle. Three people were all killed; the ‘driver’, a recent immigrant with an un-tested CDL, looked annoyed. How the hell does that happen?

End of the Road: Inside the the War Against Truckers is a history of how absolutely antagonistic governments and market forces have grown to be towards that vital percentage of workers who keep the blood of modern economies flowing. While it’s largely about the American labor market, author Gord McGill has worked in Canada and his insights and experience cover Australian trucking as well: he’s a man who has freighted goods in all three countries. McGill mostly writes about the American market, but some of the forces he writes about are in effect across North America in general even if the specific legislation that feeds them varies by country. McGill’s targets are a mix of both deregulation and regulation, but both are tied to labor. The main thrust of this book is that completely opening access to trucking has made the labor pool shallow and treacherous: because US CDL licenses are not graduated the way other Western countries’ are — with multiple levels indicating increasing proficiency in more varied and demanding situations — a kid who graduates from a diploma mill can be thrown in well over his head. Responsible companies, with hundreds of thousands of dollars on the line, would presumably not want an inexperienced driver driving their equipment on huge contracts, right? You’d think, but jiggle the variables a bit and the law of average wins out. What if the driver isn’t driving your equipment, but has instead been seduced into leasing his own? He wrecks the rig, he’s liable for it, not you, and paying new drivers jack while accepting some levels of accidents (new drivers are 70% more likely to ‘hit something’ and 40% more likely to be in a serious collision) is evidently more cost effective than paying experienced drivers what they’re worth. This is especially true when the new drivers are FOB immigrants who can’t speak English and who have been recruited with a promise that it will help their bid for citizenship. The poor pay and baptisms by fire that many new drivers encounter leads to an incredible amount of turnover, so corpos and the government constantly fret over ‘driver shortages’ and throw CDLs at anyone capable of putting on a pair of boots despite the fact that there are more registered CDLs in the country than could ever find work — if they were active. McGill writes that many young drivers would leave the industry if they could, but they’re debt slaves: they have to pay for their ‘training’ and the rig they had to lease as part of their hiring contract.

Drivers, especially on-the-road drivers who spend most of their time on the open highway shuttling goods from terminal to terminal, are highly mythologized in American culture, hailed as modern cowboys of a sort. There have to be reasons a man would forgo seeing his wife and children more than a few times a month, to being incapable of making regular social plans, to knowing he might end his day peeing in a jug and sleeping on the side of the road. There used to be: a reliable paycheck and the prestige that came from being a king of the road. These days, though, the pay envelope is lighter and lighter, and truckers are reduced by technology to being just one more drone. Their trucks are infested with tech that spies on them, and routes are handed down from on high rather than being left to their experience, local knowledge, and shared information with other drivers. Much of these tech measures have been inflicted against a declining pool of experienced, safe drivers to counteract the gross negligence of new hires, who often have no knowledge of English or local road cultures, committing outrageous errors. It adds insult to injury, and is made even worse by the fact that local knowledge is often superior to those GPS routes — new drivers often find themselves driving in places where a truck has no right to be.

McGill covers a lot of other ground here, like analyzing the role of brokerage firms — who connect drivers and firms with loads, often manipulating both parties — and reviewing the various organizations who claim to speak for truckers. Many of these are certainly not spokesmen for drivers: the huge corporations who drive down wages by having the government subsidize their training of 90-day wonders are antagonists of the ordinary driver, not his friends; and the Teamsters, while previously being titans of (corrupt) labor, now only represent a meager portion of them and are often as dismissive of drivers’ interests as the corporate powers. During the Freedom Convoy, for instance, when drivers and their rigs aimed for Ottawa to protest the COVID regimes, the Teamsters followed the party line. Why? Because the men who run these organizations are not and have never been drivers themselves: they’re the same soft-handed out of touch ‘professional managers’ that can be found in every overwieldly and unproductive corporation and ngo.

As infuriating as this book was, I enjoyed being pissed off — mostly because I’m the son of a driver and the nephew of many others. I grew up in truck yards, watching my dad pore over maps with other drivers and discuss road conditions. I’d watch with fascination as these men hurled straps over their loads and tied them down, and began meticulously looking over their rig before hitting the road. I have heard complaints like McGill’s for decades — the grumbling over electronic systems that are constantly making the entire rig break down, the feeling that you’re not your own anymore. Part of what makes End of the Road work, I think, is that even when he’s pointing out that immigrant drivers are a huge part of the problem, he’s not treating them as the problem — he even argues that they themselves are being exploited, since many have no idea how radically challenging the North American landscape is to driving than to what they’re used to. He keeps his fire on the collusion between profit-hungry corpos and the government, rather than the working man.

Related

Pedal to the Metal: The Work Lives of Truckers. Written in the 1980s, this already showed how technology was starting to degrade the king of the road.

Trucking Country : The Road to America’s Wal-Mart Economy. I used to have this one but it focused so much on economic and regulatory policy I let it go. Reading End of the Road makes me think I need to hunt down a used copy again..

Quotations

Yet nothing has been done to beef up lax training systems, and efforts to remove the incompetents from the road have only just begun. Instead, veteran seasoned truckers like myself, people with a lifetime of safe operation and clean driving records, are forced to work under ever more punishing scrutiny and surveillance technologies that insult our professionalism. Trucks themselves are now built to accommodate lower-skilled drivers, perpetuating a cycle that further degrades the respect and honor once afforded us. Life on the road continues to deteriorate in numerous ways: there’s not enough parking, truck stops are closing or converting to fast food only, and surveillance technology and the flooding of the industry with recent arrivals have completely upended our culture. How we relate to each other, how we are treated at customer facilities—it’s all part of a pattern of dehumanization.

Truck-driver training is exactly back-asswards in America. Most new truckers, once they have learned the bare minimum to pass a state CDL exam, are sent out on their own to crisscross America without any experience whatsoever. The results are about what you would expect.

If there were an actual shortage of truckers, trucking companies wouldn’t get away with barely paying minimum wage, would they? If the market for drivers were this hot and this desperate, maybe a guy with two decades of experience and a near perfect driving record would get offers more befitting his profile? In a properly functioning market economy, wouldn’t the shortage boost the price of truckers’ labor a little higher than what one might expect at a fast-food restaurant, a job often advertised as a stepping stone for teenagers into adulthood, and one not meant to pay that much? What are we missing here?

Scratch beneath the surface of the ad copy for any truck-driver training school or local- and state-funded retraining program, and the government grants and subsidies become immediately apparent. From funds doled out by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to Pell Grants to $47 million in extra funding from the Biden Administration in a 2023 handout, it is clear that the trucking industry is awash in taxpayer largesse, and unless we recognize this corporate-welfare program for exactly what it is, the money will continue to flow.

Another clothing-related issue might not seem like a big deal but is revealing about the nanny-statism animating certain Australian workplaces. Even when working outside in heat exceeding one hundred degrees Fahrenheit, you must wear a long-sleeved shirt for any job, regardless of the task. The stated concern is that you might get skin cancer at some point in the future, and the assumption is that you, a grown adult, are not to be trusted to apply sunscreen. “It’s for your own good, mate,” was the near universal reply whenever I spoke with Australians about this. Nanny statism runs so deep in their society that it’s like talking to the proverbial fish about water. It is inconceivable that you may have legitimate agency, as an adult, to make your own decisions about the clothes you wear or whether to apply sunscreen.

While sitting there, I noticed he had a flat-screen TV showing a square for every driver camera in the fleet, and nearly all of the cams were on or displaying a cycle of all those twelve-second clips running together. I could watch any guy in the company—and so could the people who claimed they would never do that.

The data is clear: truck-involved collisions on American highways started ticking up in 2016, which is when English language proficiency enforcement was waived. So what is the argument for this waiver? Who benefits? Major corporations, that’s who, for which this simple requirement is a hurdle to incremental increases in shareholder return.

Dhillon recalled telling Biden Administration officials that a “person crossing the border with no experience . . . gets a work permit in two months, and within one month gets their CDL. Well, they never even drove a car in this country, so why are we doing this? This is not even an issue [just] for the trucking industry. This is a national security issue.”.

The modern labor movement has a problem in the divergence of interests between its members and its leadership. Most union leaders today come from what Barbara Ehrenreich referred to as the “Professional Managerial Class.” They are university trained and credentialed and more often than not have never sweated a day in their lives—not to earn their keep, anyway. They also have fixations on those cultural issues which obsess the progressive political class and often offend regular working men and women.

The people who insist that aesthetics don’t matter, that trucking is strictly business, and a truck is just a tool to get work done as cheaply as possible, are missing or ignoring the fact that in virtually any other trade we could all be making more money in fewer hours without spending weeks away from home. Clearly there is something about trucking—incomprehensible to the spreadsheet brain of your average accountant—that draws us to it, but we don’t agree on what exactly that means or what we’re willing to compromise to be here. As for me, I’ve had enough of being a half-assed cyborg in today’s highly surveilled, mostly automated fiberglass and plastic aero trucks. I’m glad that many fuel-saving features are available for those who want them, but I’m an American—I shift gears, I piss standing up, and I resent not having a choice. When I wake up early in the morning I put on steel-toed boots and a pearl-snap shirt and I set out to do my job with dignity, respect, and, when possible, good cheer. I do the right thing even when I’m not being watched by the cops, a safety manager, or the safety manager’s AI assistant. I treat my work with a level of seriousness appropriate for an environment where a lack of skill, or more likely one lapse in judgement or attention, can easily kill half a dozen innocent people—as news reports show with increasing frequency despite our electronic babysitters. Is there still a place for me in the trucking industry? After thirteen years of professional driving all I can say is that I honestly don’t know. I’m about to take a huge step in my career and an enormous financial risk to find out—by buying an older, less automated truck and putting it to work full-time. We’ve all heard the cliché “Trucking isn’t a job, it’s a lifestyle.” That’s true. That’s why the freedom to live in accordance with one’s own values is so critically important. What I’ve come to realize is that if I can’t do this job my way, there’s no point in doing it at all.

Posted in Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Top Ten Tuesday: Chansons et Livres Français

Today’s TTT is books from new-to-us authors we’d like to read, but given that today is Bastille Day, I’m going to salute la belle France instead! There was a period (2012 – 2013) in which I was besotted with France, so much that I even ordered a book on learning French. (French: How to Speak it and How to Write It. Dover.) The mood eventually left me,but I remember the period fondly. Today, I’m going to do a mix: first, some books from that period, along with pieces of French music that bring back the old feeling. (Someone, Wordsandpeace I think, requested that I share some of my favorite French music on July 1. I did mean to.) All the French is from Google translate. Mais d’abord….

Teaser Tuesday

The people who insist that aesthetics don’t matter, that trucking is strictly business, and a truck is just a tool to get work done as cheaply as possible, are missing or ignoring the fact that in virtually any other trade we could all be making more money in fewer hours without spending weeks away from home. Clearly there is something about trucking—incomprehensible to the spreadsheet brain of your average accountant—that draws us to it, but we don’t agree on what exactly that means or what we’re willing to compromise to be here. – Gord McGill, END OF THE ROAD: INSIDE THE WAR ON TRUCKERS

Top 10 du mardi

(1) A Life of her Own, Emile Carles. I really owe this one a re-read, because it’s fascinating in itself — the memoir of a schoolteacher in the early 1900s who taught her village schoolchildren to think freely and question the state and their culture — but it played an important role in my own political biography. Carles’ leftism was anti-authoritarian, allowing me to begin reading anarchists like Emma Goldman and then find myself surprised to be in the company of right-libertarians.(One of these days I’m going to do a paper on Emma Goldman and Ayn Rand — both Russian emigres, both individualists, with very different worldviews.)

‘Beware of politicians, beware of silver-tongued orators, do your utmost to judge for yourself, and above all, take advantage of the beauty life offers.”

(2) Citizens: A History of the French Revolution, Simon Schama. A comprehensive and eye-opening book. One comment from my notes that leaps out: at one point the revolutionaries were so intoxicated with fighting the king that even when he was trying to fix things in a way they’d like, they obstructed him anyway.

Et maintenant, un peu de musique….

(3) “Mon Oncle” soundtrack. I adore Jacques Tati’s movies, at least those with M. Hulot. The soundtrack is a happy place in its own right. I listen to it several times a week. (It’s only 30 minutes — don’t be too impressed.) I can almost imagine Wodehouse writing Bertie Wooster to this music…

(4) Avalon Jazz Band. Man alive, I love listening to Tatiana Eva-Marie and the Avalon Jazz Band.

Un retour aux livres…

La Belle France: A Short History, Alistair Horne. A lovely narrative history of France.

French Women Don’t Get Fat: The Secret of Eating for Pleasure. When I read this, I had just changed my diet from the ‘normal American diet’ to one that ruled out processed foods. I was doing this to minimize salt; I wound up losing, almost inexplicably, well over a hundred pounds. I read a lot on food and food culture in 2012 as a result, in large part because I was trying to figure out What Am I Doing Right and How Can I Do More Of It?

Bringing up Bebe: One Mother Discovers the Wisdom of French Parenting. In my twenties I was starting to think about the possibility of children and fatherhood, and thus reading books like this and Unschooling: increasingly, this book was part of a course in French culture, which I was loving. I recently tried to explain to someone why I enjoy Japanese literature so much — it’s because it makes me aware of a coherent culture, one with rules that are learnable and are generally intended to make life more humane and meaningful. My French kick at this time was communicating something very similar.

Sixty Million Frenchmen Can’t Be Wrong. A general review of why ‘we’ like France but not the French. I suspect I would argue with this book a lot more now from economic terms — I didn’t read Hayek until the very end of December 2012 — but it captures my mood from this year.

Et maintenant, encore de la musique !

“La vie en Rose”, Edith Piaf. I found this via Saving Private Ryan, I think, though I got really into 1930s – 1950s pre-rock vocalists in the early-mid 2000s. Couldn’t very well forget to mention it here! I also enjoy Dean Martin and Louis Armstrong’s versions of it, which have a mix of English and French lyrics.

“I Will Wait for You”, Umbrellas of Cherbourg. Umbrellas is a romantic drama about a young couple who fall passionately in love, but then the man is called to serve France in war: they decide to consummate their relationship in case they are forever separated, which leads to a little croissant in the oven. Drama ensues as la fille must choose what to do. Unfortunately, the best version of this song from the movie — where they are singing together before the night that changes everything — has been removed from youtube. Oh! Everything in the film is sung. Everything.

This is technically ten books or titles, but there are two tracks I cannot not mention. The first is “Flower Duet“, performed by sopranos , Sabine Devieilhe & Marianne Crebassa. I’ve shared it before in flower-related posts. The other is a mix I have been listening to for fifteen years on youtube: somehow it has survived copyright strikes and other vagaries of fate. I wake up, I make coffee, I put this on. When it goes off, I know it’s time to get showered for work.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | 14 Comments

The Little House

Cover for Kyoko Nakajima's LITTLE HOUSE
“Whatever I write now will no longer be secret. […] I think I should consider this carefully.”

The Little House is a strange, lovely, sad little novel.  Our narrator, for the most part, is an aging and retired housemaid named Taki.  “Housemaid” is not quite the right word for her, as she operated in a time when ‘maids’ were more like personal attendants and their mistress’s right hand.  Taki, in her twilight years, has earned a little money selling a book of housekeeping tips – but this is not that kind of book, she says.  It is instead her looking back from the close of life to a time when she was at her happiest, her heart at its most content:  late 1930s & early 1940s Japan.

“Uhhhh,” the contemporary reader might say. “When World War 2 was starting?”   One of the common themes of this book is how generations experience history differently.  Taki’s nephew Takeshi, who keeps reading Taki’s notes, cannot fathom that she viewed Tokyo as light-hearted in the same months that saw the military effectively taking over the government, but for Taki that was something happening in the capital. A few government officials had gotten into trouble with the military? She needed to give the little master his treatment, for he had polio and was still trying to rebuild strength in his legs. She needed to go to the market to get vegetables for dinner tonight, and then she and the Mistress could enjoy tea.  Taki’s life is consumed with the domestic: this is first and foremost a novel about the intense bond between a woman and her mistress Tokiko — a bond so intense that Taki will contemplate actions to protect Tokiko even if it hurts their relationship.

This bond begins developing before the war, in the ‘halcyon days’ of the 1930s when Tokiko’s husband’s business is booming. All is not cherry blossoms and warm sake, though: Tokiko’s son, Kyo, is stricken with polio and loses the use of his legs for a few years. As much as it pains Taki to see the boy she’s coming to love as her own son hurt so, it does mean that she’s not dismissed the way she might’ve once the household’s only child had gotten into elementary school. She grows ever closer to the family, even sitting with them at dinner. While this is not a novel about the war, the war does intrude on their lives — threatening Taki with marriage (Japan wants women making babies or making munitions, one or the other), and then taking away a young friend of the family who Tokiko is especially and perhaps indelicately attached to. Licit and illicit attachments surround Tokiko, as she is a woman who inspires people to fall in love with her. But ‘fall in love’ is a tricky phrase, one we tend to associate only with erotic or romantic love. The relationships here are more complex. The cultural framing is also very different, with intense attachments forming that are neither platonic nor romantic but something else entirely. Taki is captivated by her mistress, but what that captivation means is left to the reader — as even her nephew, who published her private notes posthumously, is not sure.

The challenge with a little book like this is that it is difficult to talk about the story and its impact without spoiling anything, but when I started reading it I found myself unable to do anything else; my read of this was interrupted only by the need to sleep. I loved Taki’s bond with Tokiko, and her desire to save her mistress from making a mistake even if it might strain their trust. The story was compelling in and of itself –  two women with an intense bond experiencing Japan’s drift into war and destruction,  a friendship tested by one woman’s love for someone she could not possess – but adding to the interest is the fact that we are reading something that the ‘author’ chose not to publish herself. Her story is not completed or told by her: some facts we only learn at the end when Taki’s nephew shares what he has learned. It is a sweet story of love in the ruins — a compelling, but haunting one.

Quotations

There’s no need for more books saying the same thing: one is enough. That in itself is a lesson in economy.

She would often say that some of the girls she’d been at school with now lived in a much higher class of residential development and others were renting somewhat grander houses than hers, but if you look above yourself there’s no end to it. She was just happy to own a house that suited her.

The toy business was booming, with military toys such as fighter planes that flew around and around, and figurines of the Three Human Bombs—the brave soldiers who sacrificed their lives in the siege of Shanghai—fairly flying off the shelves, and Japan-made Kewpie dolls were selling well abroad, too.

I can’t wait to see what a fantastic specimen Shirley Temple will blossom into. It’s all down to good nutrition, you know. If we Japanese focus on nutrition to produce beautiful women, we can catch them up. It sounds like a line from the movie Priest of Darkness, but if you only eat whitebait and fried tofu, the bits that should curve out don’t curve out, and the bits that should curve in don’t curve in. You have to eat beefsteak. And fried in butter, to boot. Add two or three drops of soy sauce. That’s the sort of nutrition we need.

‘I never heard about that, Nan, are you sure it’s true? I keep saying this, but you really shouldn’t go making things up, you know,’ he said, lecturing me as always. That’s what happens when you try telling people the truth.

The stupidest type of maid is the one who burns something she shouldn’t burn. The average type of maid is the one who burns something when she is told to do so. And an excellent maid is the one who can judge for herself without being told when to burn something that her Master, out of his own weakness, can’t bring himself to burn, and then when she is scolded for it, apologizes for having done something wrong.’

It’s late, so I’ll stop writing for today. Whatever I write now will no longer be secret, since Takeshi is also reading this. In other words, I have a reader. Meanwhile, that young editor may get back in touch. In which case I might let her read it, too. I think I should consider this carefully.

What on earth was torturing an elderly woman like that, her face crumpled as she wept, full of regret for her memories?

Posted in historical fiction, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Promise and the Dream

Book cover of THE PROMISE AND THE DREAM, with photos of Martin Luther King Jr and Robert F. Kennedy.
“I remember telling him he had a chance to be a prophet. But prophets get shot.”

The Promise and the Dream is inherently interesting in being a joint biography of two men who were very active public figures in the 1960s – at first as near-antagonists, then as allies in spirit, and then brother-martyrs in death.  One might reduce it to being the story of how the two men ‘experienced’ the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s:  1965 would be the Civil Rights movement’s high water mark,  culminating in a confrontation in Selma that would lead to the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights bill. 

 The most interesting part of the book is RFK’s – not because MLK is dull, but because he’s  both known and consistent, whereas the 1960s were a period of stress, profound loss, and  change for RFK.   The Brother K have an ambivalent attitude toward Civil Rights when JFK assumes office,  viewing the ‘Negro problem’ as something they’d to address in a placatory manner at most, simply to get it out of the way so that he could focus more firmly on issues that were more urgent for him, like the presence of a Communist dictator – and Soviet missiles – in Cuba. The Kennedys wanted to play a cautious game,  progressing on Civil Rights without upsetting the coalition applecart,  and they did not like King staging mass protests.   The Kennedy administration would in fact begin wire-tapping King,  for strategic rather than punitive reasons. They wanted to know what he was up to, and if there was damaging information out there, they wanted to know before anti-King politicians did so they could distance themselves from him. A moral paragon like JFK couldn’t consort with an adulterer, after all!  (That was sarcasm, gentle reader.) Part of what changed RFK’s attitude was suddenly being thrust out of power by his brother’s death: he no longer needed to protect Jack, and so his own strict moralism, and his preference to learn through exposure – visiting poor neighborhoods in the ghetto, in Appalachia, etc –  led to him becoming increasingly possessed by a desire to help the worst-off in America.  Of course, this book has such a sad, brutal ending – both men living under the pall of knowing they might die, and then dying.  It’s remarkable that when RFK and MLK were talking regularly, they were antagonists – and when they were allies,   they acted like ships passing silently in the night. 

This was a bittersweet book to read;  seeing RFK mature as a man through trials of the spirit is inspiring, but then the brutality of his death – and the random savagery of it, from a man who is still coldly unrepentant –  is jarring.

Quotations

“Jack travels in that speculative area where doubt lives,” a family friend, Charles Spalding, once said of these two Kennedy boys. “Bobby does not travel there.”

With Bobby Kennedy, it was different. Already by the 1950s, one word had attached itself to him with astonishing frequency and tenacity: ruthless. No person and adjective were ever so inseparable.

“No one became a friend of Bob Kennedy at first meeting,” Edwin Guthman, the veteran newspaperman who later became his press secretary, once wrote. “You had to go through something with him, to test and be tested. But once the bond was formed it was indestructible.”

Civil rights were a crusade to one and a problem to be managed for the other.

As dogmatic as Kennedy could be, he sensed what he didn’t know and what he needed to know. He was curious and, within the limits of his beliefs, open-minded. He was fearless, willing to subject himself to other, sometimes hostile points of view, but he was also naive and self-righteous, convinced that his good intentions should insulate himself from criticism.

He laid out a list of tenets: that “welfare” programs (in quotation marks in his printed text) were invasive, degrading, and counterproductive; that good jobs were the key to urban revival; that slum residents — the dropouts, the unemployed, welfare recipients — weren’t liabilities at all but valuable, untapped resources; that private groups — labor unions, universities — and businesses were crucial to any solutions; that urban problems were soluble, but residents had to take the lead in solving them.

When he returned to Hickory Hill that night, Kennedy was still shaken by the experience. “He said, ‘I’ve just come in and seen a family live in a room smaller than our dining room, with their tummies distended and sores all over them because they don’t have enough to eat and they don’t have healthcare,’” Kennedy’s eldest daughter, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, later recalled. “‘Do you know how lucky you are? Do you know how lucky you are? Do something for this country.’”

Around two thirty that morning, Kennedy checked in again on his pair of young speechwriters. He found Walinsky asleep, typewriter still in his lap, and Greenfield passed out on his bed. Greenfield awoke to find Kennedy tucking him in. “You aren’t so ruthless after all,” Greenfield told him. “Don’t tell anybody,” Kennedy replied.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

WWW Wednesday and Places we Miss

The entryway to a bar, taken from the rear, showing three men standing around an fishook-shaped bar.

Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is “places we wish were still around”. I know a lot of my Millennial people will say “Blockbuster!”. And I get it: Blockbuster was a Friday night ritual for me, too: the diet cokes and Klondike bars (they cancel each other out, true story) at the checkout desk were always tempting. The main attraction was discovery, though, seeing something off the radar. These days I can type in something random into my stream platform of the month (I rotate) and pick something if the trailer looks interesting. When I think of places I wish were still around, it’s places like “My grandparent’s house at Christmas”, or “My godsister’s house when she didn’t live two hours away“. But mostly I think of the Harmony Club, which was a BYOB bar & hangout spot where for many years I spent weekends, non-family holidays, random Saturday mornings, etc. as a third place. We’d sit outside and people-watch if the weather was clement, or hold up inside if it wasn’t. The building was sold, its owner passed, and his former business partner moved off to Atlanta. The Harmony Club is unique because it was the Harmony Club: the other scenarios I mentioned I miss because of the people, but the Harmony Club’s bar housed all kinds of art, antiques, and artifacts — and, because it was only a half-block away from our downtown’s primary tourist attraction, we’d get random visitors. That led to interesting conversations, arguments, and stuff I cannot categorize. Like this!

Shot of a dimly lit bar in which a group of four young women are dancing in a circle, standing in an environment framed by antique radios, a movie screen, and a table with ceramic sundries on it.
These were…activist theater people who wandered in during movie night and then danced for us.

When I began writing a series of character dramas set in a small river town, a fictionalized version of ‘THC’ became one of its primary settings — so part of me, at least, still visits. Now, for WWW Wednesday!

WWW Wednesday

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Warren Harding, John Dean. And as of 10:41 pm last night, The Promise and the Dream.

WHAT are you reading now? Working on finishing The Hidden Coalition and RFK: Raging Spirit. The first one is 80% done, the latter more like 60%. but a fast read. I’m also halfway through The Frozen Hours, a NOVEL (LOOK, LOOK, SOMETHING NEW!) by Jeff Shaara on The Korean War. And Angle of Repose.

*sigh* I may have a problem.

WHAT are you reading next? Possibly JFK: Elusive Hero. Of course, my options abound. I’ve got my RFK vs Jimmy Hoffa title, plus a few other things….

A Kindle shelf depicting The Promise and the Dream, The Letters of John and Abigail Adams, Building the Great Society, Communion, Camelot's Court, End of the Road, and The Rupture.
Posted in General | 8 Comments

Warren G. Harding

A book cover with a photo of Warren G. Harding, displaying the title Warren G. Harding.
“[We must] make sure our own house is in perfect order before we attempt the miracle of Old World stabilization. Call it selfishness or nationality if you will, I think it an inspiration to patriotic devotion—to safeguard America first, to stabilize America first, to prosper America first, to think of America first, to exalt America first, to live for and revere America first.” –

What do I know about Warren Gamaliel Harding? Mm….he’s the “return to normalcy” president, he pardoned Eugene Debs whom Wilson had put in jail for daring to criticize him, there was a huge scandal in his administration, and he died in office and made Calvin Coolidge the answer to an obscure trivia question. (What president was sworn in by his father?). So, with that ignorance in mind, let’s read John Dean’s biography.

Wait. John Dean? The John Dean? Well, I suppose he’d know a thing or two about presidents falling from grace because of scurrilous subordinates. Warren Harding is the total opposite of that contemptible schmuck who did the Millard Fillmore biography: whereas they wanted to assassinate Fillmore’s character posthumously, Dean wants to appraise Harding and argue that he’s been very much abused by history. Harding appears from the start to be a good man, marrying a woman who had had a child out of wedlock despite how out-of-bounds that would have been at the time. This is an odd biography to read because its subject is so very undramatic: he’s no severe idealist like Wilson, or a bounding adventurer like Teddy Roosevelt; he’s Mr. Warren, sittin’ on the porch, and why don’t you come sit a spell? The lemonade is nice and cool. That’s not being facetious: when Harding was campaigning for presidency, he did a front-porch campaign in which journalists lived in a little cottage in the backyard. The main thrust of this book is that Harding was an ordinary, strikingly decent man who made some poor staffing decisions and found himself libeled for decades because of it. We find him constantly striking to lower the temperature in the United States — not an easy thing to do given the labor unrest in the US as the economy tried to adjust back after Wilson’s war. His presidency, save for the scandal, was not shaping up to be dramatic: Dean believes Harding saw himself as a steward with a charge to keep, one who did his best to organize government operations for more efficiency( like creating a budget office) and hiring competent specialists to manage things. That did not mean he was a tender-heart: he vetoed the Bonus Bill which would have engorged the debt by giving returning veterans large bonuses on top of the benefits (insurance, occupational training) they were already getting, and he took action to break a coal strike as winter approached when the two sides could not come to an agreement.

One thing I learned from this book (beyond Harding buying a newspaper when he was 19 for $300) was that Harding did not fall from grace until he’d already fallen away — he died just two years into his presidency. His health had been failing since a bad bout with the flu, made worse by his insane work ethic and stress from finding out that the head of the Veterans Bureau was selling government goods on the cheap and falsifying records to cover it up. A train trip west appeared to be restoring him to health despite excitement like being sung to by young ladies. Dean paints a picture of a nation heartbroken by the sudden death of a good man growing in his administrative skills, whose character was assassinated after his death because of a scandal that emerged only in the Coolidge years. Harding had signed off on giving the Navy permission to lease some of its oilfields to a commercial interest, and the nation soon learned that a lot more was being leased out than authorized, with chicanery across the board. Dean does not believe Harding was culpable in any of this. Personally, I expect to read more about the Teapot Dome scandal in a Coolidge biography, so for now I will withhold judgement.

This was a truly enjoyable biography; I admire decent men like Ford and Carter who did their best in an overmighty office, and I think Harding is among their number. I must say, I’m glad to have met Mr. Harding. Perhaps I’ll visit his front porch again. (I’m afraid Mssrs. Debs and Bryan are calling for my attention, and Alice Roosevelt is demanding it, but we shall see. Truman and Eisenhower are glaring at one another in another part of the room, and then LBJ waits in the shadows, smug in the knowledge that I will find him far more interesting than I’d like.)

Quotations

 Harris says his roommate would “sit down with his face to the wall, head in hands and soak [a subject] up. Then when he was through, he would jump up with a yell and shout, ‘Now, darn it, I’ve got you,’ and slam the book against the wall.”

The idea of owning and running the newspaper appealed greatly to the nineteen-year-old looking for work. But even with the help of his friend Jack Warwick, who was interested in joining him, they didn’t have the $300 necessary to make the acquisition.

In the three decades that Harding edited the daily and weekly Star, he wrote thousands of editorials. Seldom heavy-handed or malevolent, his editorials were often witty, provocative, and thoughtful. But there was one subject—more specifically, one man—whom Harding attacked relentlessly in his early years at the Star: the rent-gouging, real estate grabbing, hard-nosed, and heartless money-lending Amos H. Kling, Marion’s richest citizen, and, as it turned out, Harding’s future father-in-law.

Those who knew Florence Kling believe that her affair, and pregnancy, with Henry Atherton “Pete” De Wolfe was an act of defiance toward her father. Pete De Wolfe, a sandy-haired, hell-raising neighborhood boy from one of Marion’s oldest families, lived across the street and was one year her senior. His only distinction was Marion’s youngest drunk.

“[We must] make sure our own house is in perfect order before we attempt the miracle of Old World stabilization. Call it selfishness or nationality if you will, I think it an inspiration to patriotic devotion—to safeguard America first, to stabilize America first, to prosper America first, to think of America first, to exalt America first, to live for and revere America first.” – Warren G. Harding

Harding gave newsmen special attention when they came to Marion for his front-porch campaign. To accommodate them, he had a special bungalow built near the rear of his property on Mount Vernon Avenue. Reportedly, once or twice a day Harding visited the press quarters to “greet them personally by name, borrow a plug of tobacco or a stogie, and … answer all [their] questions in a friendly way, without evasion … . He was ready to pitch horseshoes or exchange stories off the cuff with almost all reporters; and by relying on their discretion and that of their editors, he kept an intimacy with them that made them friendly to him.”

“Mr. President, that’s no way to answer us,” she announced. “We demand a yes-or-no answer now!” William Allen White, no fan of Harding’s (as he later made clear), recorded the event: “We were shocked … . But the President straightened himself up. The stoop seemed to come out of his shoulders. A certain dignity enveloped him. He said: ‘My dear woman, you may demand anything you please out of Warren Harding. He will not resent it. But the President of the United States has the right to keep his own counsel, and the office I occupy forbids me to reply to you as I should like to do if I were elsewhere!’”

In September 13, the newspapers were told the crisis had passed and soon Dr. Mayo went home. Later, Florence Harding described her near-death experience. She had seen her father Amos and other dead relatives, and walked through the “valley of death,” as she described it. “There is one thing that counts when you are down in the Valley,” she had decided, and that was: “What have you done for human beings? … How much have you done for … those you love?”

By the time the party reached Yellowstone National Park, Harding was in fine spirits. He was feeling too good for Florence, who gave the public a glimpse into their marriage when she publicly scolded him. The presidential party was departing from Yellowstone when a flock of attractive females stopped the president’s car so they could give him flowers and a serenade. Secret Service agents tried to pry the young women from the running boards of the open car, but the president ordered that the women could sing another song. When the party started to leave, the president suggested they return later, which pushed the matter too far for the Duchess. Florence lit into her husband: “Warren, I watched you while those girls were here! It took you just as long to say good-bye to those girls as it did for you to run through three thousand tourists yesterday at Old Faithful.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Teaser Tuesday with Bobby

Today’s TTT is “Books with ____” in the title. I…don’t really have anything, so here’s doubled-barrelled RFK.

Teaser Tuesday

“All of it — all the words about whether Bobby Kennedy is a ruthless, mechanical rich guy or a genius mellowed by great tragedy — all of it is superfluous when you see him coming up to a high school football team that is practicing for a game,” he wrote, as he watched the awestruck boys watch Kennedy watching them. “Bobby Kennedy can be every inch of the worst SOB we’ve ever had. Everything he does in public can be a facade. But standing on a football field with kids, nothing matters. There is something between them that is powerful.” THE PROMISE AND THE DREAM

“In 1946, when Jack was just starting off in politics and running for Congress, he didn’t even like having his brother around. ‘Black Robbie’ he called him, viewing him as too serious, too earnest, too much the straight arrow. One strategy for keeping him out of the way back then involved sending this twenty-year old family member to work in an East Cambridge Italian neighborhood where the campaign didn’t expect to get many votes. It worked surprisingly well. Bobby ended up spending his time playing softball with the local kids and making a hit. Later the campaign would credit Bobby’s own style of community outreach with cutting the rival candidate’s margin in those wards.”” RAGING SPIRIT

While it may seem unusual that I’ve only posted one book review in the last week, I’m almost done with three books, so….feast and famine.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Happy rebellious Fourth!

Once an honest man could go from sunrise to its set
Without encountering agents of his state or government.
But a sorry cloud of tyranny has fallen across the land,
Brought on by the hollow men who did not understand
That for centuries our forefathers have fought, and often died,
To keep themselves unto themselves, to fight the rising tide;
That if in the smallest battles we surrender to the state,
We enter in a darkness whence we never shall escape.

When they raise their hands up our lives to possess,
To know our souls, to drag us down, we’ll resist.

Wat Tyler led the people in 1381
To meet the king at Smithfield to issue this demand:
That Winchester’s should be the only law across the land,
The law of old King Alfred’s time, of free and honest men.
Because the people then, they understood what we have since forgot:
That the government will only work for their own benefit.
And I’d rather stand up naked against the elements alone
Than give the hollow men the right to enter in my home.

Stand up, sons of liberty, and fight for what you own.
Stand up, sons of liberty, and fight, fight for your homes.

So if ever a man should ask you for your business or your name,
Tell him to go and —- himself, tell his friends to do the same.
Because a man who’d trade his liberty for a safe and dreamless sleep
Doesn’t deserve the both of them, and neither shall he keep.

I hope my fellow Amerikaner had a joyful, rebellious Fourth. I myself treated red lights like stop signs, and stop signs like caution lights. (Downtown Selma has a sick obsession with useless red lights: they’d make an anarchist of anyone.) I also spent eight hours on a porch with friends and family. (Fuzzy navels and cigars were also present, but I enjoyed the latter only in aroma and the former not at all.) I make a point of not posting on the weekend, but as a red-blooded patriot I could not let the Fourth go unobserved. I end with Walt Whitman, who speaks truth regardless of who is in power.

To the States or any one of them, or any city of the States, Resist
      much, obey little,
  Once unquestioning obedience, once fully enslaved,
  Once fully enslaved, no nation, state, city of this earth, ever
      afterward resumes its liberty.

You may look forward to Warren G. Harding.

Photo of Warren G. Harding, pointing at the camera
“”I was president, you know. For eight hundred days. The only other president he’s done an incomplete history for was JFK. Bet you feel odd about ranking me at the bottom now, eh? Did I mention I owned a radio station at age 17?!”

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Wilson

“Somebody had to do it! I am the Chosen One.”

Does Woodrow Wilson deserve more than a two-hundred-page biography? Given his historic impact, yes. Am I gracious enough to grant him one? That remains to be seen. Do I really want to spend hours of my life reading about the man who won reelection under the slogan “He Kept Us Out of the War,” only to lead the United States into that very war, and then prosecute Americans for speaking against it? Who jailed political opponents and shuttered newspapers? Do I want to spend several hundred pages trying to find the human being behind the president who expanded segregation throughout the federal civil service? Not particularly. There is nothing I like about him; even his idealism, expressed in pretty words and inspiring lofty thoughts, they are but a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal when set against the man’s overweening pride and profound outrages committed against Constitutionalism. So, H.W. Brands, do your best.

As this is part of The American Presidents series, edited by Schleisinger Jr, it’s a quick read. I could have finished it days ago, but I don’t like Wilson and I’ve been finding RFK, Nixon, LBJ, and Eisenhower more interesting to read about. Brands is impressively impartial, trying to take Wilson’s idealism seriously while at the same time not ignoring the civil liberties travesties committed during his administration. While Wilson allegedly altered course on entering the war because the Germans were set to resume unrestricted submarine warfare — endangering the lives of Americans who decided that taking a pleasure cruise through a war zone is a grand idea — Brands also includes the more realistic pressure-point — the economy. American banks were loaning money to all the European powers for their war efforts, but because England and France were more readily accessible, much more American money was sunk into the Entente cause: if they failed, the American economy could be thrown into upheaval. When I asked about this aspect of the war back in college, my professor/mentor told me I was too cynical for my own good, but now I have Brands at my back. I’ve never read about the peace process before, so I was surprised to learn that Wilson was viewed as a bit of an interloper for participating directly, and his position — that the American people were overwhelmingly for his measures, aside from a few morons whose future gibbets would scrape the sky (his words) — was undermined by the Republicans sweeping Congress. The book ends, of course, with his debilitating stroke and the very curious role played by his wife in ‘helping administer’ the nation, as well as a reflection on Wilson’s legacy has risen and fallen over the last century — reaching a zenith in the post-WW2 era when the United States did what he wanted and assumed a dominant role on the world stage.

In the end, Brand suggests that Wilson died too late: had the stroke that enfeebled him killed him, he might have been remembered as a hero, a martyr even — but the actions of the federal government during his weak years helped poison his legacy, as did a growing conviction that American involvement in the war had profited no one but the defense contractors and other businesses who benefited from Wilson closing his eyes to labors’ demands. This proved a more interesting book than I expected, though if I read another Wilson title I don’t think it will be this year: I suspect the Truman-Nixon bloc is going to continue consuming my attention.

Quotations

“The Democrats will be very likely to abuse power if they get it,”[Wilson] predicted. “Men are greedy fellows as a rule.”

“Whether you did little or much,” Wilson answered, in what McCombs characterized as a haughty tone of voice, “remember that God ordained that I should be the next president of the United States. Neither you nor any other mortal or mortals could have prevented that.”

Mere mortals wrestled with doubt and confusion, but the self-assured Wilson possessed, to judge by his manner, a direct line to heaven. He wouldn’t have put it quite that way, but he did think God was usually on his side, and the alliance afforded him a moral serenity few could match.

The growth in federal power, however, had a darker side—the side Wilson had feared before taking office. Even as the CPI rallied Americans behind the war effort, the Justice Department hounded those who wouldn’t come along. The Sedition Act of 1918 prohibited “disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the uniform of the Army or Navy,” as well as any language that tended to bring the government or the military “into contempt, scorn, contumely, or disrepute.”¹⁵

As the sedition law and its companion, the 1917 Espionage Act, were eagerly enforced by Attorney General Gregory and his successor, A. Mitchell Palmer, the measures effectively stifled questioning of the wisdom of the war or the high-mindedness of American leaders. The socialist and labor leader Eugene Debs, for one, was arrested for opposing the draft and spent the duration of the war (and beyond) in federal prison. Radical unionists of the Industrial Workers of the World were jailed, and many of them were deported. To assist in this regimentation, the Justice Department enlisted the quasi-official American Protective League, whose 250,000 members spied on their neighbors and reported any activity deemed insufficiently enthusiastic regarding the war.

When Orlando laid claim to the Adriatic port of Fiume on grounds that the language, population, and culture of the city were overwhelmingly Italian, Wilson put him off with a joke: “I hope you won’t press that point with respect to New York City, or you might feel like claiming a sizable piece of Manhattan Island.”

You cannot throw off the habits of society immediately any more than you can throw off the habits of the individual immediately. They must be slowly got rid of, or, rather, they
must be slowly altered.” Waxing metaphoric, he said, “You cannot in human experience rush into the light. You have to go through the twilight into the broadening day before the noon comes and the full sun is upon the landscape.”

No one wanted to accept responsibility for the debacle that the war had become in the popular mind. When Wilson died, Americans mourned him respectfully for a moment, then made him a scapegoat for their collective disillusionment. Journalists and historians reexamined the American intervention in the world war and accounted it fool’s game. “We have been played for a bunch of suckers,” wrote Harry Elmer Barnes in a widely endorsed indictment of Wilson’s wartime diplomacy.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 10 Comments