Moviewatch, May 2026!

BUCKLE UP! May 2026’s moviewatch is….eclectic. Or, as President Bush might say, eckalectic. “Oh, God, he’s doing presidents again” you say? Yes. Yes, I’m doing presidents. And other stuff!

Frost/Nixon, 2008.   Watching this because I’m fully in the presidential bottle, and by god I might as well finish it off. The film is about a British comedian  with aspirations standing who sees interviewing the recently resigned and generally disgraced President Nixon as a step to bigger and better things. Nixon sees it as a way to pay his lawyers off, and for the first hour or so, Nixon wipes the floor with his interlocutor. Nixon’s faced off against Brezhnev and Kissinger,  this televised toff is no match. But then,   Frost’s desperation to sell his show, and one of his researchers’ crusader fixation on taking Nixon down, result in an ambush where Nixon is on tape talking about dealing with Hunt, one of the principles of the bungling Watergate caper.   The result is a reversal of sorts, though – to be  blunt – I have literally never heard the name David Frost except in connection to this movie and book, so I still think Nixon got the long-term best of him.  I will say, though, as a movie, this is terrific character drama even if they invent things like Nixon calling Frost in the middle of the night while drunk and exposing his soul as a man who had been spit on by the elites all his life,  and who by god was going to show those bastards once and for all. I prefer Hopkins’ Nixon to Langella’s, but Langella  and Sheen are quite good in this film. At the end, when Nixon is admitting that yes, he failed – he let down the American people –    Sheen’s eyes are shining not with the glow of a man who just bagged a trophy, but as a man who appears to be caught up in the intimacy of seeing another man’s soul. And then the crusader barges into the tape again and ruins the moment, sneering that Nixon’s political legacy is that now moron corpowriters like himself  affix -gate to every bit of political wrongdoing. Nixon’s political legacy is nuclear arms treaties, the end of Vietnam, the end of the draft, the opening of China.  What’s history going to remember you for, you sniggering little weasel?  I don’t even know your name.  (Which is ironic, because you’re played by the guy in Galaxy Quest who doesn’t have a name and only dies to prove the situation is serious.)

Nixon: Did you have a pleasant evening last night?
Frost:  Mm, yes.
Nixon: Do any fornicating?
Frost: O_O ?!
Producer:  David, we’re going live in 3, 2, 1 –
Frost:  O_O

Death of a President, 2006. Technically this is a rewatch though  I haven’t watched it since it came out in 2006. This is an alt-history documentary about how the world changes after the assassination of George W. Bush.  As I remember – and my memories are old enough to get drafted and almost old enough to drink beer –  at the time I’d become increasingly concerned with the expansion of the police and surveillance state in the US, and was primed for a movie that attacked it.  I was impressed by the integration of real footage and the story – i.e. putting real-world happenings into a fictitious narrative.  Now we just call that ‘the news’, but in fact the seemingly mundane ‘sources’ of this movie are what drive its effect. This looks like actual interviews, it looks like actual footage.  It’s interesting to have watched this twice in very different political tempers – when I first watched in 2006 I was angry about Bush and the expanding police / surveillance state  and was then surprised by the artistry of the movie. Now I was watching it off a Kennedy assassination read and pondering my age. Now when I saw the rioters I could tap in not to the rage  of those years – we’ve all given in on data surveillance –  but the irritation of someone who works for a living of seeing young people who don’t blocking streets and yelling twitter slogans.  I get the anger, but are you doing anything with it other than posting memes and causing trouble for people who have no connection to the issue-makers?  Are you doing anything, even something as small as using browsers or extensions that kneecap the Watchers, besides dropping dramatic tweets?   Late thirties me / early forties me and mid-twenties me frequently scream in silence at one another in my mind.   I take some comfort in knowing I am not alone.  Quoting Paul Kingsnorth:

“When I look back on this now, I’m quite touched by my younger self. I would like to be him again, perhaps just for a day; someone to whom all sensations are fiery and all answers are simple.”

The Final Days, 1989. Based on the Woodward book about the end of the Nixon administration.  Lane Smith plays RN: I love  Smith, being introduced to him as the villain coach in The Mighty Ducks and then The Villan Lawyer in My Cousin Vinnie. Lane was the main reason I kept watching this movie, because after the high-octane experiences of NIXON and FROST/NIXON it was …dull.  There was only one scene that grabbed me, when Nixon breaks down in tears  praying while Kissinger looks on awkwardly. 

9/11: Inside Air Force One.  Documentary.President George W. Bush is in Sarasota, Florida when the Twin Towers are hit;  he jumps in Air Force One but learns that Washington is targeted, and then a plane is regarded as a threat to AF1 so it spends part of the day  doing circles above of the Gulf and frustratedly trying to find out what’s going on.

Mars Attacks, 1996.  A space invaders….spoof?  I watched this several times in the late 1990s  and was dimly aware that a lot of people in it were’ famous’, but  – boy howdy, how did I not remember Natalie Portman in this?   I’ve had a thing for her since seeing her in Attack of the Clones!  And kid-me missed the fact that Jack Nicholson played two different roles:  now, having watched so much of him,  I clocked him immediately as the sleazy casino-hotel owner. Another “Whoa, is that –” moment was seeing Jack Black as a gung-ho infantryman; the first time I ever noticed him as an actor was in Airborne.     If you haven’t seen this, it’s a comical SF-action movie in which Earth is invaded by goop-heads from Mars, who over-run North America until the music of Slim Whitman stops them.

Invaders from Mars, 1986.    This remake of a 1950s movie starts off as a very suspenseful, creepy story about a boy who sees the adults in his life becoming zombified by a mysterious crash site. At first, I was thinking that this is probably not a movie to be watching right before bed – but as the dialogue grew clunkier  and the alien invaders were sighted (they’re walking boogers),  such fears diminished and I continued watching in a spirit of ‘what in the hell is this?”

Independence Day, 1996.   A rewatch, but it’s been a very long time.   The endgame is a bit silly (humans uploading a virus to an alien ship to stop its invasion of Earth), but the build-up and character drama is good. I’d suspect Mars Attacks was a parody of this if they hadn’t been released in the same year.  (Do you really need me to precis the plot? It’s Independence Day.) 

Starship Troopers, 1997.  SERVICE GUARANTEES CITIZENSHIP! Would you like to know more? 

A rewatch. The novel is better, but the movie does have Denise Richards…

Nuremberg, 2025.  Immediately after World War 2,  the United States proposes to put Hermann Goering and other surviving members of the Nazi High Command on trial. A psychiatrist is tapped to ensure that the men are mentally fit to stand trial and will not commit suicide. The shrink finds himself distracted, even seduced,  by Goering’s humanity rather than his monstrosity – at least, until footage of the death camps is aired publicly for the first time.  Excellent character drama, and it was nice to see Colin Hanks: I’ve enjoyed his work since Roswell  in the early 2000s.  Russell Crowe delivered  “der Dicke” well. 

“You are NOT Alexander the Great! You’re a fat man in a cell.”

“Just because a man is your ally does not mean he is on your side.”

Babette’s Feast, 1987. A Danish film about a small Protestant community in Jutland whose spiritual leaders, two beautiful sisters, receive a French maid. On the occasion of the sister’s father’s 100th birthday, the French maid Babette – who, we find, used to be a chef – asks to hold a French feast. The Puritans are very nervous about the whole ‘eating for pleasure’ thing, but once they enjoy a five-course meal that involves different wines, they all prove very chatty. My summation is as accurate as someone drinking a century-old wine and going “Mm, tastes very good. Rich flavor.”   It’s a deep movie that will improve with re-watches, no doubt. 

Kung Fu Hustle, 2004.  A boy with a kung fu gift is humiliated while trying to protect an innocent girl as a youth; he resolves to join the Evil League of Evil, the “Axe Gang”.  The Axe Gang are really the Hatchet Gang, but Axe probably sounds cooler. While on a mission for the Hatchet Gang, the boy runs across the girl – now grown up – and is inspired to repent of his evil ways and fight the Axe Gang’s Kung Fu secret weapon, Old Man Who Fights for Pride and Resolves to Kill or Be Killed. 

These last two movies were at the home of my godfather; my godmother vowed that next time we’d watch a rom-com that did not involve subtitles.  Speaking of!

There’s Something About Mary, 1998. Continuing my quest to watch the movies other people my age were watching when we were young. This was evidently sponsored by Dunkin Donuts, since everyone is drinking it.  It’s a fairly stupid movie;  Ben Stiller hires Matt Dillon to find an almost-girlfriend of his; Dillon, a skeevy guy, falls for the girl.  Actually, a lot of guys fall for the girl.  I’m not sure why people were talking about it in high school. I guess there were some…’shock value’ scenes in this, but we’ve degenerated so far in – holy hell, 28 years – that almost nothing registered.  I’ve watched John Waters at this point: a dog on cocaine is nothing.

My Date with the President’s Daughter, 1998. A rewatch. A loving rewatch.  The president’s daughter, Hallie, is desperate for a social life and escapes her detail while they’re distracted by the president wandering around in a crowd to run into a mall. There she meets Will Friedel, aka ERIC FROM BOY MEETS WORLD.  He’s been bet by his friends he can’t score a date to the dance, and after he has a happy meeting with Hallie in a clothing store,  he asks her if she wants to go. Pick you up at seven? “Big white house, you can’t miss it.”    Will is evidently not tuned into C-SPAN, as he has no idea what 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue means until he’s in.  He also has no idea who Hallie is, as the demur president’s daughter promptly forces him to help her ditch her detail so they can have a lovely night together. The kids’ fathers resolve to find them – together!  Meanwhile, after the kids get in trouble, they figure – what the hell? This is their last night of freedom so they might as well play it to the hilt. This movie, like Airborne, is cocaine nostalgia for me.  I think Friedel was my entrepot for this,  but it became a VHS classic I watched to death.  The amount of dialogue that came to mind while watching this is insane.  My high school brain had very poor prioritization skills.   Also: OH. MY. GOD, Nicole de Boer (Ezri Dax) has a minor part in this. 

Original Disney movies, man, those were the days. I’m still trying to find a way to rewatch PRINCIPAL TAKES A HOLIDAY, another favorite from that period.

W.  2008. Oliver Stone.  Again, a rewatch, but I watched this when it first hit DVD back in the day, and back when I was in Anakin Skywalker to Ben Kenobi “I HATE YOUUUUUUU” mode in re: Bush.  I decided to rewatch this because (1) I’m still working on the presidential bottle, (2) I’ve been binging on Bushkies and (3) It offered connections to both my other Oliver Stone films this spring and  arguing with my past self.  Josh Brolin plays W, a wastrel who wants desperately to please his father James Cromwell, paterfamilias of the esteemed Bush clan; Richard Dreyfuss skillfully uses Bush’s desire to please HW to manipulate him into doing the will of the Beast.  The film is a back and forth between George W growing out of his youthful indolence into a measured politician, but one who still carries insecurities and the desire to be taken seriously.   One of the best scenes to me is  still when Dick Cheney stands up and gives a geopolitical lecture to the Cabinet, one that points to controlling the middle east as key to controlling oil:  I’m relatively sure I’d already run into Jim Kunstler preaching peak oil at this time, so I was unexpectedly riveted.  I will say that a son worrying about his father’s health hits a lot differently after ~28 years: a young college kid doesn’t absorb near as much of that scene as a man entering his middle ages does.  One aspect of this film – the rivalry between George W. and Jeb – was completely lost on me in 2008, because until the 2016 elections I had no idea who Jeb Bush even was. (Please clap.)  This film didn’t take me back the way I thought it would; the only actors I really liked were James Cromwell and Dreyfuss. Brolin’s Bush seemed a lot more reactive and childish than feels appropriate: granted, I’ve just come off listening to a very serious Bush read his memoirs of this point so the see-saw is not exactly balanced.

Also, Ioan Gruffudd played Tony Blair! I hadn’t encountered Hornblower yet, where he plays good ol’ Horry. 

George HW Bush: What kind of life are you cut out for, exactly? Partying? Chasing tail?  Driving drunk? Who do you think you are, a Kennedy? 
George  W: ….
Me: XD 

George W: Laura,  politics ain’t a library. It’s a kick-ass skull-crushing war, an’ I lost

Dick Cheney:  80% of the world’s future energy reserves are right here in Eurasia where the prize ultimately lies. Oil. Gas. Water. 
Me: The middle east is famous for its ample freshwater reserves. 

Dick Cheney: 40% of the world’s oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Control Iran, control Eurasia, control the world. Empire.
Me:  Well, hey, at least we’ve reduced that to 20% now.

(Actually, I paused the movie and looked this up: the only way Cheney’s claim even approaches reality is if maritime oil shipping is the only  oil shipping counted. )

Karl Rove: What about that swagger of yours?
Bush: In Texas we call that walkin’

The Devil Wears Prada 2, 2026.    A rare in-theaters watch for me, with the ladyfriend of course,  I’d forgotten most of the story of Devil Wears Prada, except “Anne Hathaway is abused by her boss Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci is also present”.  Anne Hathaway is enough to get me to watch any movie. This  movie is more about the state of journalism than fashion:  Anne’s character is a journalist  whose publication is closed down, but the dramatic speech she gives at an awards ceremony lands her a job invite at the same fashion magazine she worked at twenty years ago as a personal assistant.   I won’t give any spoilers, but it turned out to be a sweet story. The ladyfriend approved of the soundtrack.  I probably should have re-watched the original film, because I’d forgotten one character entirely.

Just for giggles, I checked my moviewatch logs for the original, and:

“The Devil Wears Prada, 2006. Anne Hathaway plays an aspiring journalist who lands a job at a fashion magazine with a psycho boss. Stanley Tucci also appears. “

Glad to know my memory is “dead on balls accurate”, as Marisa Tomei put it so eloquently in My Cousin Vinnie.

Star Trek: The Undiscovered Country, 1991. CHERNOBYL AND THE FALL OF THE USSR….IN Spaaaaace!  For whatever reason, this remains High School Me’s favorite Star Trek film. Maybe it’s the eternal wisdom: “There is an old Vulcan proverb; only Nixon could go to China.”   The plot:  a Klingon moon goes kablooey, limiting the Klingon Empire to fifty years of life. Spock reaches out to the emperor, Gorkon, and says – hey, how’s about you and me do a little perestroika?  Then it turns out – whoopsasdasie – Starfleet has people of its own who don’t much like this idea of namby-pampying the Klingons. An action-spy thriller ensue, with a bonus prison escape.   The amount of hamming it up while quoting Shakespeare by Christopher Plummer is still delightful.  I did not expect to take this as seriously as I did; I mean, aside from a Star Trek action movie.  I’ll be honest: my Star Trek bona fides aside, it’s been a long time since I really did a re-watch of the original Trek movies,  though I did start one on this blog a couple of years ago. (I think I stopped at Search for Spock in March ‘25. Whoopsie.)   Anyway, I…got unexpectedly into it, both the Klingon’s dread of extinction and the criminal mystery despite knowing perfectly well that at some point Odo and Joseph Sisko are going to be indicted as co-conspirators.

Kirk: Don’t believe them. Don’t trust them.
Spock: They are dying.
Kirk: Let them die.

Comms: Report back on the double, do you read?
Uhura: We’re to report back at once.
Chekov: But we cannot abandon Captain Kirk!
Valeris:  Four hundred years ago, workers who found their livelihood threw their wooden shoes called sabot into the machines to stop them.
Chekov  & Uhurua: (blank stares )
Valeris: ….hence the word, sabotage.
Uhura: We are experiencing technical difficulties;  all backup systems are inoperable.
Chekov: Excellent!  I mean…too bad.

Chekov: Course heading, captain?
Kirk: Second star to the right….and straight on ’til morning.

I had planned to watch Pressure, the new Brendan Frasier movie where he plays Ike, but I had conflicting plans on Sunday (historical society meeting) and my local AMCs were evidently doing a one-week only run and aren’t showing it next weekend. Bizaare.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

May 2026 in Review

So ends the merrie month o’ May; the green buds are no longer swelling, but bursting into full flower. Summer is here, what I….lovingly….call the Great Sticky Siege. The outside world is quickly becoming not a place of warmth and flowers and gentle breezes, but oppressive heat, despairing humidity, and enough mosquitos to supply a blood drive. May was shaping up to be a very busy month at first, but adverse reactions to a new medicine took me out of the running for a few days. In book-adjacent news, one of my favorite authors has just moved to Birmingham and has mentioned his interest in hanging out with readers, so I’m looking forward to that. He and I have met and talked several times in person (…in Birmingham, when he was doing events at Samford), but I’d much rather hang out at Miss Myra’s and have real fellowship. The month featured three five-star bolded titles, one of which I’ve not yet reviewed, and the other of which marked the end of the Harry Potter Full Cast Audio Editions. Sure, I started listening to them again, and I’ve talked two friends into trying them, but the first time is always the most special. The bolded titles were: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Being Nixon, and Maverick, the latter a biography of Thomas Sowell. It’s hard to summarize an intellectual biography, but I really don’t want to short-round him. While I haven’t read a lot of Sowell, the two titles I have read (Black Rednecks and White Liberals; Basic Economics) played a huge role in my own intellectual development.

America @ 250

I’m not going to list titles because almost all of my reading this month was America @ 250 adjacent, aside from Harry Potter. The project is not developing as I’d intended — with multiple tracks — but has been mostly fixated on biographies, particularly of presidents with some outliers like Thomas Sowell. The Midwest Survival Guide could technically count as a celebration of American ‘places’, I suppose. One highlight was beginning to read Gore Vidal’s “Narratives of Empire” series where he tells the story of the American Republic from Burr to the mid-20th century via character-centered novels.

Science Survey

Finally, blood in the water! I read Neil deGrasse Tyson’s work on alien encounters.

Coming up in June

For those who are weary of biographies, Doug Brode is releasing Shelli: R-Evolution in mid-June, so I’ll definitely be reading that. (I haven’t read any SF this year.) It’s third in a series following a human and synthetic detective team. I’ll also be reading more biography and history, though probably more oriented toward the Revolutionary period. Part of me wants to jump back into my formal Hail to the Chief trek, though, picking up with Garfield, but I haven’t read ANY of the niche topics I wanted to cover — like the role of Indians in the Civil War, that sort of thing. I also need to get to my copy of GIRLS by Freya India, finish my Birzer history of the Declaration of Independence, and check out End of the Road, which is very intriguing to me because my family is full of truckers.

Brace yourselves for Moviewatch….

Posted in General | Tagged | 6 Comments

All the Best, George

. All the Best is a collection of Bush Sr’s letters, diary entries and emails, prefaced by him and read to varying degrees by his family — including “Bar” whose first particular entry is heartbreaking. As a 1990s kid, there was special joy for me in listening to George H.W’s grandfatherly voice, and learning about him as man. I must say I was…thoroughly surprised by how candid “Poppy” could be in his letters, at one point discussing teenage necking trends with his mother and signing off as Dr. George H.W. Bush, Sexologist. But…that was ’41, a man who even in his senior years surprised his family by jumping out of planes in his 90s. This collection of letters and diary entries takes us from his youthful days as a Navy pilot to his early days as an elder statesman; although the lackluster readings from his kids diminished it somewhat, I enjoyed myself thoroughly.

Until recent years, I’ve regarded Bush Sr as something of a reedy aristocrat; while that’s true in some ways — good ways, with a concern for propriety and a sense of noblesse oblige — reading Bush Jr’s memoir of him and this has improved my regard for him. While born to privilege, he did not hesitate to serve in World War 2 and nearly died there; thereafter, he pursued college and then struck out on his own in Midland, Texas, where he and his young wife “Bar” endured dust storms and hardship while they waited for hard work and inspiration to resolve into material success. Bush Sr’s complaints about his son George W. are hysterical in retrospect: young W. had a tendency to try and say too much at one time and was a clumsy speaker. One of the most poignant parts of the early memoir-in-letters is learning of the death of his young daughter, Robin, to leukemia: the presentation makes this all the more weepy by having Barbara Bush read the letter in which George HW writes about their struggle to save Robin, in taking her to specialists only to see her wither away. It is one thing to hear one parent talking about seeing a young, innocent child die before their eyes: but to hear Barbara read her husband’s letter, to have both parents involved, was a masterstroke in immersion, even if it came via sympathetic sorrow. “Bar” appears in a few more letters, all emotionally charged.

As the book progresses, there is a shift from personal to professional interest; that is, the more Bush rises in public prominence, the more we’re reading about China, managing the RNC through the Watergate crisis, and conducting the Gulf War. A series of letters takes us through Bush’s annoyance that the president was being slandered, to deeper dismay that Nixon was involved, and finally total disappointment (once the tapes were aired) to find that his chief was ‘completely amoral’. As the chair of the RNC, he felt he had no choice but to encourage Nixon to resign. (Nixon would remain one of Bush’s pen pals, though: there are at least a half-dozen missives in here written to RN wishing him well or thanking him for policy input.) While modern versions of this book have been updated and expanded, my version ended in the 1990s without any reactions to 9/11 or his son’s presidency. The image of HW that emerges here is that of a deeply serious citizen, who despite being part of the stoic ‘greatest generation’ is remarkably tender-hearted where servicemen and children are concerned — and a man with a wonderful sense of humor, sometimes bawdy. His letters were part of his humor, as he’d sometimes send out joke memos as president, or stern instructions not to feed Ranger, the family dog who was beginning to resemble a miniature cow. The letters are often funny in what they contain, like his 1999 admission that he used his impaired hearing to tune out of small-talk conversations, looking confused if asking a question or just outright ignoring what was said or asked. I know many men who are accused of selective hearing, so I couldn’t help but laugh — and ditto for his note thanking a friend for a gag gift of a desktop bow and arrow, which he’d been using to attack family members’ keesters all morning.

This was quite an experience; part of the attraction for me was some subtle nostalgia, of course, encountering again the first president I ever remember, who in some part of my brain retains the title in perpetuity the way John Paul II remains ‘the pope’. More than that, though, I enjoyed learning about him — not as a president, but as a man. George W’s 41 started me on this path, but reading his own words, sometimes in his own voice, made the learning experience special. Learning about his sense of humor was probably the biggest thing I’ll remember about this book, but I also enjoyed the behind-the-curtains look into how history was experienced. From my perspective, Watergate and the fall of the Soviet Union are simply historic events — but these letters make them real, especially Bush’s stress as he negotiated with a Soviet Union which was beginning to fall apart, but still militarily potent and potentially paranoid. Another important aspect was Bush’s perspective; I liked him struggling with memory as he attended the Japanese emperor’s funeral, or was allowed by Japanese hosts to fly over the same area he was shot down in as a young man — the young fighter pilot who hated the enemy now having aged into a gracious statesman who shook hands and accepted the hospitality of men he very well may have tried to kill decades before. I will say this is arguably a better book to read than to listen to: as much as I enjoyed listening to “Poppy” talk, a lot of the letters just lacked any gusto and this was especially salient when the text was emotionally charged.

Related:
41: A Portrait of my Father, George W. Bush
Decision Points, George W. Bush. (Also read by the author.)

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews, World Affairs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lincoln

Gore Vidal’s Lincoln is a fictional rendering of President Lincoln across five years, from his rise to power to his sudden end at an assassin’s hands in 1865.  Unlike the modern film Lincoln, Vidal does not try to give us a saint. Instead  he instead labors to draw a picture of someone far more interesting, a human being in all his complexity. His Lincoln is weighed down with purpose, but still funny;  an idealist who still dips his hand in blood. He is a statesman, yes – but also a politician, whose fights with his own Cabinet are often more pressing than those with the Confederacy he will not name.   It was…quite the book, and I anticipate reading more of Vidal’s fiction.

I only know Vidal as an essayist, principally against American empire,  so I had no idea what to expect from this.  I was wholly pleased and across the board. While we follow a fairly conventional track – Lincoln kicking things off with his inauguration, trying to figure out the best course of action for dealing with the Confederacy,  and filling out his Cabinet – that aforementioned item is arguably more present in the narrative drama than the actual War of the Rebellion, to borrow the name Union papers used at the time.   Most of the men therein are ambitious, and they meant to be president themselves one day  unless they can somehow displace Lincoln’s authority in the present. They think he’s terribly weak, without a vision or will. They are men of vision, by god! One of them has the idea to start a war with Europe to inspire the Southrons to the defense of their countrymen  –  or perhaps the total conquest of Mexico would do?   Lincoln manages them ably,  does his best to lead through the war despite a surplus of Union officers who cannot or will not fight,  and eventually brings up Grant just as the South’s starting advantage of zeal for their homeland and a supply of excellent officers – is being overtaken by the north’s industrial might and inability to run out of men.   There are no time markers in the book aside from events mentioned, so if you’re going into this not knowing a rough timeline of the war, you may be surprised to find yourself at Appomattox Courthouse not knowing the time of day.  (Readers so un-read in the war, however, are probably not interested in a massive Lincoln novel to begin with.)  Another thread follows a young Confederate sympathizer who works as a pharmacist;    he anxiously wants to bring down the man who the narrators variously call The Tycoon or The Ancient, but  he can never find the right opportunity when the time is ripe. When the assassination does happen, it’s from left field.

This was quite the read! Vidal offers a rich feeling of being in the 1860s,  especially for the Union government holed up in a very Southern city, a city surrounded by the South (Maryland to the North, Virginia to the south):  there is a strong sense of paranoia there made worse by the city’s easy exposure. There are no walls, only a few bridges dividing DC from ‘Enemy Country’. The star of the book, though, is how deftly Vidal handles Lincoln’s complexity of character – his humor and iron both.  Vidal is plainly present to deliver critiques of his heavy-handiness,  but it’s done in a way that the reader can appreciate both the harshness and the despairing motivation.  Similarly subtly developed is Lincoln’s changing stance on slavery,  as he continues maintaining he has no interest in destroying slavery but only stopping its expansion…to the adoption of emancipation as a war measure.
I will be reading more of Vidal, I think! His Washington, DC would be interesting to pair with Democracy by Henry Adams given that they’re both about the soup and nuts of politicking in DC but at different eras of the Republic’s life.

Quotations

“Well, [the president] must have been pleased about Chattanooga?” said Harris. He looked at Emilie, challengingly. “The rebels ran from us like so many rabbits.”
Emilie responded in swift kind. “If that is true, Senator Harris, it must have been the example you set them at Bull Run and Manassas and Chancellorsville and Fredericksburg…”

Lincoln took the lengthy message from Nicolay. “By he way, did not have the smallpox but varioloid, which is the same thing but doesn’t sound quite as bad. Anyway, it was nice, for a change, having something I could give everybody.”

“Mr. Lincoln” — Buchanan’s voice dropped to a whisper — “The office of President of the United States is not fit for a gentleman to hold.”
“Well, that’s lucky for me, I guess,” Lincoln tried to make a joke, but the old man is serious.
“You will see what I mean, sir.”

Posted in General, historical fiction, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

WWW Wednesday, America @ 250 Edition

Today’s Long and Short reviews prompt is: animals we’d like as pets. Ideally I’d one day like to have a more rural home (as in, no neighbors but deer) with chickens and even a horse.

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Gore Vidal’s Lincoln novel, which I quite liked.

WHAT are you reading now? All the Best, George, a collection of George HW Bush’s letters and diary entries — introduce by ‘Poppy’ himself and read by his family, including Barbara.

WHAT are you reading next? The Declaration of Independence: A Radical Experiment in Liberty, Brad Birzer. Or maybe something else. I’m still bronc-riding a new medicine this week and haven’t done any reading since (gasp) Saturday.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Top Ten Books From My Favorite Authors

Today’s treble-T is “Books By My Favorite Authors”, which is unfair but I shall do my best. But foist, Teaser Tuesday!

Today Jupiter radiates twice as much heat as it receives from the Sun. Early on it would have glowed much hotter, baking away the water from its innermost moon, Io. From Io’s perspective, Jupiter looms like a giant saucer in the sky, so it would have acted like a heat lamp. WHEN AMERICA HAD TWO MOONS

And now:

Top Ten Books from My Favorite Authors


(1) Jayber Crow, Wendell Berry. Although I love Brother Berry’s nonfiction, my first experience with him was Jayber.

(2) Tales of the Black Widowers, Isaac Asimov. Is — are? — Tales ‘foundational’ literature? No. The dear doctor is known for other titles, but I love his Black Widowers stories. I used to re-read them at meals regularly.

(3) Lords of the North, Bernard Cornwell. I have read a lot of Bernard Cornwell, a term which here means “at least 54 titles”. Lords of the North, though, number three in the Saxon Stories series, always springs readily to mind because it had a unique plot, and it’s the lowest Uhtred or any of Cornwell’s characters has ever been in a story. Back in 2010 when I first read this, I immediately followed my book-reading with the audiobook.

(4) Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis. This one was a hard one, because I love so much Jack has written — but Surprised has the signal virtue of being the Lewis work I’ve re-read the most times. I re-read it less for what it chronicles, but for his presence.

[My father] relied wholly on his tongue as an instrument of domestic discipline. And here that fatal bent toward dramatization and rhetoric produced a pathetic yet comic result. When he opened his mouth to reprove us he no doubt intended a short well-chosen appeal to our common sense and conscience. But alas, he had been a public speaker long before he became a father. Words came to him and intoxicated him as they came. What actually happened was that a small boy who had walked on damp grass in his slippers or left the bathroom in a pickle found himself attacked with something like Cicero on Cataline, or Burke on Warren Hastings; simile piled on simile, rhetorical question on rhetorical question, the flash of an orator’s eye and the thundercloud of an orator’s brow, the gestures, the cadences, the pauses. […] While he spoke, he forgot not only the offense, but the capacities of his audience. All the resources of his immense vocabulary were poured forth. I can still remember such words as ‘abominable”, “sophisticated”, and “surreptitious”. You will not get the full flavor unless you know an angry Irishman’s energy in explosive consonants and the rich growl of his r’s.”

(5) Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child, Anthony Esolen.

If you take a peek at my Classics Club list, you’ll see four works translated from the Latin by Esolen. He has been a favorite for liberal arts / humanities reading for many years now, though I cannot remember when I stumbled on him. He’s one of two authors (the other being Bill Kauffman) who could write an article without a byline and I’d recognize his ‘voice’, so to speak.

(6) How Dante Can Save Your Life, Rod Dreher. I was tempted to mention Crunchy Cons here since it’s the work that introduced me to Dreher, but his Dante book came around for me at just the right time — and I had the good fortune to thank him personally for it back in 2022. He is currently working on a book about American Weimar.

(7) Tolkien’s Sanctifying Myth, Brad Birzer. Man alive, I love reading and listening to Brad Birzer. I found him via Liberty Classroom, where he has lectures on American history, as well as the intersection of politics and science fiction. He has such a wonderful voice for speaking that, like Esolen, I look for his lectures on youtube.

(8) The Demon Haunted World, Carl Sagan. Speaking of voices, I can’t miss Carl. I owe this book — on the importance of skepticism in the information age — a re-read.

(9) Look Homeward, America!, Bill Kauffman. I gotta go with my first book by Bill (he told me to call him Bill, we exchange Christmas cards). Just going to quote my review:

 Look Homeward, America collects the stories of eccentric individuals who, in a century marked by the advance of corporate and state power, rebelled against the machine. Planting their flag above small towns and in the countryside, they held on what they regarded as valuable and defied or attempted to resist the march of a more inhumane world. Bill Kauffman is a sympathetic soul, a die-hard “placeist”. He calls himself the anarchist love-child of Henry David Thoreau and Dorothy Day, and Look Homeward is his tribute to peaceable troublemakers like his ‘parents’. They are farmers and social workers, politicians and miners, men and women whose faith is the family and the local community. They champion self-reliance, local interest, and peace; they scorn war, industrial agriculture, big business, and government bureaucracy.

Fun fact: the artwork that is the frontispiece of Look Homeward is called “Spring in Town” by Grant Wood. A print now hangs in my bedroom, along with several Jack Vettriano pieces and posters of Frank Sinatra and Audrey Hepburn.

(10) The Consolations of Philosophy, Alain de Botton. When I first found Stoicism, I searched on Youtube for resources. This was in 2008 or so, long before Stoicism had a strange revival, so I was surprised to find anything. I found a TV show based on this book, and an episode “Seneca on Anger”, that lulled me into watching the series, buying the book, then reading all I could of de Botton.

Blog news: I’m working on a review for Lincoln as well as Maverick, but I gave my brain the weekend off and just watched movies. Currently reading Kennedy & Nixon (there is no escaping 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue this year) and When the Earth Had Two Moons.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Hated by All the Right People

What’s happened to Tucker?”, Rod Dreher may have asked himself in not so many words. Since Carlson aired an interview with a young troll whose name I’ll not give further mention, and failed to press the boy on his antisemitic and generally racist reviews, Dreher and Carlson have had a falling out.  Dreher cannot understand what he reads as antisemitism from Carlson’s camp:  personally, I don’t equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism, but platforming the troll without asking him any hard questions was damned strange, if not outright vile. When Senator Ted Cruz was on, evincing his total support for Israel and antagonism towards Iran, Tucker mercilessly grilled him: that was, in fact, the reason I listened to my first TC show.  I’m not much for TV personalities, but seeing a neocon get put on the spot was a dish too tempting not to try.  “What’s Happened to Tucker?” is also the subject of Hated By all the Right People, which tracks  Carlson’s journalistic career from being a ‘young tyro’ at The New Republic through his TV heights,   broadcasting every night into a president’s ears – and beyond. 

 Hated is also already slightly dated, given that the general “Tucker sold his soul to the Devil to be near Trump” premise is now completely moot. Because of Carlson’s refusal to roll over on the Epstein files or aggressive support for Israel and its Highlander approach towards Iran,  Tucker has been denounced by the Donald as a loser with a “low IQ”.  Of course, the Donald being who he is,  they may be holding hands and skipping through the tulips before  his second term is up.   Hated by all the Right People is an interesting book, a history of a man who saw changes in journalism coming and made leaps of courage accordingly, struggling at first but then making a success of himself after an unexpected breeze blew in from south Florida.  The author has an obvious distaste for his subject, which is never promising, and this manifests itself through a multitude of quotes that are framed to diminish him. One example: the author says Carlson evinced antisemitic views by claiming  that the Jewish Zelensky had attacked Christian churches.  Zelensky’s government  has in fact attacked Orthodox churches within Ukraine,  but for nationalist rather than religious reasons. 

I knew very little about Carlson before reading this:   he was not someone I paid attention to until he announced he was going to interview Vladimir Putin. That struck me as novel and potentially interesting, but I wouldn’t wind up listening to one of Carlson’s interviews in  full until the aforementioned Cruz roast.  I enjoyed learning about his life, even from someone who was sharply critical  of Carlson’s work.  I was interested in journalism in high school, so reading about Carlson’s beginnings as a newspaper and magazine reporter were especially interesting. Tucker thought that televised journalism had a lot of potential and transitioned early,  despite the advice of friends and peers. While he did struggle, eventually he began getting traction – but  Marshall McLuhan’s admonition that the medium is the message started doing its work, and soon  Carlson was engaged in projects where arguments and outrage were more salient than measured discussion. When Carlson launched his own online news project in The Daily Caller, he openly admitted that he was chasing clicks – and while he wanted to create a right-of-center equivalent to The Huffington Post,  his desire for that monster ‘engagement’ led to sloppier, more provocative headlines. Breitbart would run as a rival and eclipse the Caller in clickbait, leading to the Caller trying to outdo it.   

 It was when Tucker returned to the big screen, though, that he really took off.  He landed a show on Fox that rode the wave of the Trump upset, and Carlson rode it well in part because he was not one of the party faithful. He presented himself as someone wary of Trump himself, but outright antagonistic toward Trumps opponents. While it’s easy to read that as insincere,   speaking from personal experience  it sounds legitimate: I know a lot of Republicans and conservatives who don’t like Trump, will actively disparage him, but they so loathe who he speaks against – the ‘woke’, the DC elite, etc –   that they’ll rally around the flag, anyway. Tucker’s teasing evidently intrigued Trump, tickling his ego but denying him satisfaction just enough: the Donald began calling Tucker to chat about the show, and after Carlson recovered from the oddity of the President watching his show faithfully, he began using it to speak directly to the president: ultimately, however, Carlson’s deeply rooted convictions against foreign wars and resentment of Israel’s influence on foreign policy – combined with whatever leverage Netanyahu has over Trump –  have resulted in a falling out since Carlson spoke out against the Iran strikes of last year that “totally demolished” Iran’s nuclear program.  Ultimately, Tucker continues to ride high: he may have been banished from Fox News, but just as he jumped from magazines to TVs and then took advantage of new online-only papers, so now he is an independent media personality with a podcast that rivals and sometimes outstrips other leading podcasters like Joe Rogan.

This is definitely a mixed bag of a book: the author’s dislike for his subject leads to a lot of misrepresentation, but the man and the currents he’s been involved with are interesting subjects in themselves – especially if you’re a libertarian with strong foreign policy views yourself!   I thought the story was most interesting from the journalistic angle, since we’re watching the field evolve over the course of thirty years. I don’t think that evolution has been a good one, either: one reason Tucker was not on my radar until last year or so is that I don’t ‘watch’ news, either on TV or on my computer; I prefer reading it, in part because Neil Postman made me think critically about information and how its presentation affects how we are able to process it. We have all seen news degenerate from long thinkpieces to clickbait titles with little substance: it entertains without informing, and unfortunately Carlson has been part of that transformation.

Next up: I am closing in on the end of Lincoln, and am still working on my review of Maverick by Jason Riley. The problem with the latter is that it’s an intellectual biography of a man, so it’s not easy to precis.

Posted in Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 13 Comments

WWW Wednesday & Long and Short Prompt

This has nothing to do with books, but considering how many presidential books I’ve read recently it might as well have

Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is, “A Typical Day in My Life”. I’m as-yet unmarried and as-yet still working, so my day to day is fairly predictable. I wake up at 7, make coffee, read substack and blogs, and then get ready for work. It’s at work where things get…..unpredictable. I work at an urban public library, and we get all kinds. I don’t mean a delightful mix of crotchety old bibliophiles and giddy kids, either, but a rogue’s gallery of eccentrics, cranks, and downright nuts — some dangerous. (I’m not kidding: one former ‘patron’ of ours is currently in jail for straight-up murdering a woman in a bookstore.) My day to day work varies: while I have consistent library-man things to do (monitor the computer lab, answer reference questions, conduct historical research, shelve books, fax, scan, etc), my department gets all kinds of requests. People might ask us to help them with something with their phone, for instance: one man so frequently created issues for himself on his phone that I’ve learned a lot about Android just having to search for answers. While some days it’s quiet and I can dig into old newspapers with the contentment of a nesting hamster, other days I’m asked so many questions I will eat lunch in my car just so I can steal some peace and quiet. After work, I generally go home, unless there’s some social event in town where I can pop in. Last week, for instance, I went to a historical preservation society meeting, and sometimes there are talks at the local bookstore. Since so many of my friends left town after the tornado, I don’t get to hang out with them in the evenings the way I used to. I sometimes have responsibilities like board meetings or choir practice, but generally I go home to read, listen to podcasts/lectures, and watch a movie. (Not all in the same evening, of course.)

WWW Wednesday

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Take Me To Your Leader, Neil deGrasse Tyson, as well as the full cast audio presentation of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

WHAT are you reading now? I started reading Lincoln by Gore Vidal; it’s part of a series of novels he did on ‘American Empire’. It’s a fatty with small text, so I may be chewing on it a while.

WHAT are you reading next? Most likely Brad Birzer’s new release: The Declaration of Independence: A Radical Experiment in Liberty.

Firefly-O-Versary

A Firefly + ST TOS wallpaper which is so perverse I have to love it

Facebook reminded me that 16 years ago today I posted, “Watching the first episode of Firefly”. Firefly has been one of my favorite stories since, so…why not share ten favorite quotes?

(1) “May have been the losin’ side. Still ain’t convinced it was the wrong one.” – Cap’n Mal

(2) “Somebody tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back!” – Cap’n Mal

(3) “No more runnin’. I aim to misbehave.” – Cap’n Mal

(4) “Well, look-at-this! Seems we got here just in the nick of time. What does that make us?”
“Big damn heroes, sir.”
“Ain’t we just?” – Cap’n Mal & Zoe

(5) “You know, they say mercy is the mark of a great man. (stab) Maybe I’m just a good one. (stab) Well, I’m all right.” – Cap’n Mal

(6) “This landing is going to be interesting.”
“Define ‘interesting’.”
“‘Oh God, Oh God, we’re all going to die'”? – Cap’n Mal & Wash

(7) “I cannot abide useless people.” – Warwick Hallow

(8) “What’d y’all order a dead guy for?” – Jayne

(9) “Ah, I love the pitter-patter of tiny feet in combat boots. SHUT UP!” – Cap’n Mal

(10) “Can’t stop the signal.” – Mr. Universe

See less

Posted in General | Tagged , | 16 Comments

Take Me To Your Leader

Aliens have been in the news of late, as Congress held hearings on ‘UAPs’ in ’23 and ’24, and the Biden and Trump admins both began moving to release some of the government’s ‘Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon’ or UFO files. Just in time comes Neil deGrasse Tyson’s book on aliens, and he should know a thing or to since he hails from the same city the Men in Black are headquartered in. The book is casually written and thus a light read, but still saturated with a range of science — chemistry, physics, astrophysics, etc. It opens by Tyson sharing his fascination with aliens as a kid, and from there roams far and wide. Tyson uses both pop-culture depictions and science to analyze our conceptions of aliens, and how anthropocentric they are: he invites us to consider how truly weird and mind-blowing aliens might be. Imagine how strange life on Earth — with whom we share part of the same DNA, the ‘part’ varying on species — is. How much more incredible must be life on other worlds? After reviewing reasons we may not have encountered alien life yet (namely, distance and rarity of life), Tyson wraps up with some good ol’ fashioned UFO debunking. This includes testimony from recent Congressional hearings, too — he is not impressed. I enjoyed this well enough, but it’s a light, fast read, and didn’t run into anything I was unfamiliar with aside from his specific criticism of some of the ’23/’24 testimony.

And with that, I’ve finally broken ground on the Science Survey for this year.

Quotations

In fact, we know more about the surfaces of both the Moon and Mars than about our own ocean bottom. Want evidence of that? In 2005 the nuclear submarine USS San Francisco collided with an uncharted sea mountain.

If Aliens landed in Los Angeles, their first impression might be that Earth’s dominant life-form is the automobile. An obvious conclusion. When one gets injured, another version of that life-form shows up to haul it away and get repaired. Some of the larger life-forms on the freeway carry multiple automobiles within them. To the Aliens, these car haulers are surely pregnant.

In science, there’s no such thing as a credible claim or a credible witness, only credible evidence. (Remember Percival Lowell claiming that Mars had canals?

Posted in Reviews, science, science fiction | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Teaser Tuesday & CC Spin 44

Teaser Tuesday

“If Aliens landed in Los Angeles, their first impression might be that Earth’s dominant life-form is the automobile. An obvious conclusion. When one gets injured, another version of that life-form shows up to haul it away and get repaired. Some of the larger life-forms on the freeway carry multiple automobiles within them. To the Aliens, these car haulers are surely pregnant.” – Neil deGrasse Tyson, Take Me To Your Leader

Classics Club Spin 44:

On Sunday the Classics Club spun up #9, which for me is…

Posted in General | Tagged , | 2 Comments