Keep Cool with Coolidge!

“I am for economy. After that I am for more economy. At this time, and under present circumstances, that is my conception of serving the people.’’

Calvin Coolidge has long been one of my favorite presidents; I think as a child I was drawn to his nickname of Silent Cal, with its reputation for taciturnity; later on, I respected his approach to government — keep the government working efficiently on the few problems within its Constitutional aegis, and let the people otherwise tend to their own lives. Amity Shlaes’ Coolidge is similarly admiring, opening with an “Under Coolidge,” passage that underscores how the economy grew as the government continued to be scaled back, with annual surpluses being applied against the debt of World War 1. Part of the excitement of the Coolidge age owed somewhat to technological progress — the growth of telephones, electricity, and radio — but Coolidge’s policies and interests were part and parcel. While I thought I knew the general gist of Coolidge’s life, there were quite a few surprises in here — and now that I see Shlaes has written other books I’ve already been interested in, I suspect she’s going to appear here again.

Coolidge’s life begins the way a lot of presidential biographies around this time did, the blue-blooded Roosevelts excepting: farmer, law school, public life. Coolidge cut a fairly thorough streak across the range of public offices: city councilman, state legislator, mayor, etc. While Mayor Coolidge had already demonstrated his preference to keep budgets trim and the government clean, it wasn’t until he was Governor that Coolidge achieved a name for himself. Following an attempt of the Boston police to unionize, most of Boston’s cops left their patrols completely, walking off the job. Hooliganism soared in the Hub City, as businesses began being broken into and set fire to seemingly for sheer amusement. Coolidge allowed local authorities the chance to take action first, but eventually — as the threat of solidarity strikes reared its head and people began dying — he would act decisively, arranging for militia troops to restore order in the city and issuing the dictum — “There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, anytime.” Ultimately all of the striking cops would be fired and replaced — by officers now receiving higher wages. The strike had been broken, but managed to achieve one of its aims — if not for the actual participants. As governor, he maintained his focus on keeping the government on a firm financial basis.

One thing that struck me as interesting about Coolidge was how seriously he took business and economy. He was fascinated by trade and its power, and — as he was elected vice president and then became president — he considered seriously the arguments for free trade. The Republican party at that time was extremely pro-tariff, maintaining that they protected American enterprise and generated healthy income for the State. They did indeed do that, as my last President read (on Benjamin Harrison), indicated: one attack on him was that the government was making too much money from tariffs. However much he was tempted, though, Coolidge ultimately chose to keep using the horse that worked. He was also obsessed with proper budgeting: he paid an enormous amount of attention to the government’s budget and to tax structures and incentives, and was aware of how many politicians thought the laws of economics stopped working if there was an emergency. Even Coolidge’s interest in aviation was dressed up in budget economy: he mused that using airplanes might allow for cost-savings in the navy. (I’m assuming the line of thinking is that if scout planes can survey a wide range of territory, fewer ships are needed to patrol and existing ships can be deployed to where they’re needed — just speculation, though.) Coolidge’s interest in new technologies also applied to the radio, which he made ready use of — to the surprise of modern readers who expect “Silent Cal” to recoil from microphones in horror. The only time he distanced himself from a microphone was at a wedding that was being recorded; presumably he had no interest in his table chatter being saved for the ages.

Midway through his time in office, Coolidge experienced a dreadful loss when his youngest son Calvin Jr died of a blood infection. While I’ve read in other accounts that this destroyed Coolidge’s interest and energy: Shlaes doesn’t give that impression, as the saddened president simply goes back to work fighting Congress over finances. Worst was to come, at least for the nation, as great floods broke out along the Mississippi and the government was hounded for relief. Although Coolidge did dispatch Herbert Hoover to assess the situation, he firmly believed that disaster relief was the province of the State governments, not the national one, and to date most presidents had supported that measure. The scale of this was different, though, as thousands in multiple states were displaced and hard-pressed. Hoover did an impressive job moving some government resources to where they could help, and in organizing private-sector charitable contributions — work that would lay the stage for his own run. (The amount of immediate Federal relief — through military operations and supplies — totaled about $7 million.) When his own Vermont was similarly hit by floods, Coolidge had to take the same policy: he couldn’t do for the goose what he wouldn’t do for the gander. This was consistent and showed integrity, but people in need tend to care less about precedent and principle and more about not dying. He would ultimately endorse federal response at the infrastructure level, just not the “Throw money to say you’re doing something” level. Coolidge chose not to run in 1928, perhaps because between his son dying and the pressures of office — he’d witnessed two men destroyed by it, Wilson and Harding — the Federal City held no more joy for him. Shlaes comments that he also deeply mistrusted the Wall Street boom and suspected a crash was on the way — I may have to read 1929 to see if it remarks on that aspect. He died shortly before the Roosevelt administration took charge, living a quiet life broken only by his frequent shock at Hoover’s deficits.

I don’t want to give the impression that this book is 600 pages of Calvin Coolidge, Frugalimus Rex. The human Calvin frequently shows up — bringing his ailing son Calvin Jr a rabbit to admire from his sickbed, the man patently delighted by airplanes even as he pretends he’s only interested in their efficiency prospects, his patented brand of dry humor — but fiduciary responsibility was a major priority for him, from his days as a mayor on. (Interesting, that — Coolidge has to join Grover Cleveland on the list of POTUSes who have served as mayor and governor, a kind of executive cursus honorum!) At any rate, I greatly enjoyed this and am playing with the idea of reading a Hoover biography, then 1929 or Shlaes’ history of the Depression, THEN reading a proper FDR biography because No Ordinary Time doesn’t quite do it for me.

Yes, dear reader, this year will remain solidly in the hands of History for the moment. But be of good cheer! We all know easily I find other windmills to go a-tilting at.

Quotations

“The great majority of Americans,” continued Barton, “are neither radicals nor reactionaries. They are middle-of-the-road folks who own their own homes and work hard and would like to have the government get back to its old habits of meddling with their lives as little as possible. […] “It sometimes seems as if this great silent majority had no spokesman. But Coolidge belongs with that crowd, he lives like them, he works like them, and understands.”
Nixon: ‘Great silent majority’? Kind of…rolls off the tongue. Yes, I like that.

“Isn’t it a strange thing,” he asked Barton, “that in every period of social unrest men have the notion that they can pass a law and suspend the operations of economic law?”

“I do not think that human existence is quite so much on the basis of dollars and cents as he puts it. . . . He nowhere enunciates the principle of service.”

In this strange interregnum period, Coolidge found comfort, and even humor, in humility. One early morning in the Willard bedroom, a sound woke Coolidge. A strange young man had broken in and was going through his clothing. In the morning light, Coolidge could see that the burglar had taken a wallet, a chain, and a charm. “I wish you wouldn’t take that,” Coolidge said. “I don’t mean the watch and chain, only the charm. Read what is engraved on the back of it.” The burglar read the back: “Presented to Calvin Coolidge . . . by the Massachusetts General Court”—and stopped dead in shock. He was robbing the president. It emerged that the burglar was a hotel guest who had found himself short of cash to return home. Coolidge gave the burglar $32, what he called a “loan,” and helped him to navigate around the Secret Service as he departed.

One day, as they walked together down the street, Coolidge held his silence, then finally said to Starling, “Well, they’re going to elect that superman Hoover, and he’s going to have some trouble. He’s going to have to spend money.” He went on, “But he won’t spend enough. Then the Democrats will come in and they’ll spend money like water. But they don’t know anything about money.” They would want Coolidge to come back again, but he wouldn’t be available.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Benjamin “I’m More than the Guy Between Cleveland Terms” Harrison

Chris Hemsworth saying "Is he, though" and making a mocking face

What do I know about Benjamin Harrison? Well, he was a core part of the Cleveland Hero Sandwich, the thin bit of meat between two enormous Cleveland halves. And his granddaddy was president for a month before dying and giving John Tyler the chance to go “Look at me. I’m the captain now.”

It’s a bad sign that this review is 100% memes, right? I just felt the need to inject some personality, because this book is so Inside Baseball it took me days to read it. Usually I can knock out these American Presidents books in a day, because they’re all 200 pages or fewer. The only other AP book I’ve dragged my heels on was Woodrow Wilson and we all know how I feel about him. I’ve mentioned before that I’ve noticed these AP books have an author whose particular interests add a certain dimension to the text — a surgeon writing about Garfield, a legal historian discussing Taft, a presidential candidate writing about presidential candidates (that’s Lincoln by George McGovern — I may circle back, we’ll see) — but in Calhoun’s case, it’s exhaustive political wonkery. This has come up before; one of my JFK reads spent a ludicrous amount of time following JFK during his 1960 primary season, and I wondered about the author’s priorities. Is it interesting that Richie Rich from Bahston went into West Virginia mining towns? Yes, but is it worthy of that many pages? By the same token, is it interesting that Harrison —

An author sleeping. (Not THE author, THE author has a proper beard and not a three-day beardlet.)
zzzz

I’m sorry, I bored myself to sleep. Something about precinct maps? The author has done a full BOOK on Harrison’s election, I’m not sure why he decided to rewrite it in miniature. Part of the problem with this book is that I’m binging on Gilded Age politicians, and their resumes are like AI-generated “I Want to Be a Gilded Age President with Fine Facial Hair”. Grow up a farmer, become a lawyer, fight in the Civil War, get into politics, work with James Blaine and watch the poor guy AGAIN fail to be president despite being within grabbing distance. (Blaine is very much the Henry Clay of the Gilded Age: always the bridesmaid (or the priest), never the bride.

One thing that does mark Harrison is his full-throated defense of African-Americans, particularly in the South. A cynical soul might scoff and say “Of course he was courting them, they were the only hope Republicans had of winning in the South!”). This is far too cynical: Harrison appears to have been a sincere antagonist of slavery from the word GO, and a consistent champion of African-American rights. While this was in line with Republican policy at the time, Reconstruction ended in large part because the north was tired of dealing with the South, and his continuing to hold the line was, I think, a mark of integrity. He wasn’t just making speeches, but striving for legislation that would counteract the voter-suppressing measures of the Bourbons, and squelch the horrific enthusiasm for lynching. Some of the measures he advocated for in the ‘Force’ bill later became part of the Voting Rights Act, specifically Federal supervision of elections.

He was also a bit of a harbinger for going forth in search of monsters to destroy — or at least, markets to create, getting the US deeply involved in Samoa. The fever that possessed many in DC in the Gilded Age — that America had ARRIVED, and must needs make itself a world power with all the coaling stations The Influence of Sea Power Upon History might suggest.Was the Constitution made for such a Colossus? Could the “Empire of Liberty” remain a friend of Liberty after grasping the fasces of Empire? Do I like rhetorical questions? (Answers: no, no, and ‘mildly but only in moderation’.) Another ‘sign of the times’ was his interest in reigning in corporate power, supporting the Sherman Anti-Trust act, and if you’re really into monetary policy he also had opinions on the silver-and-gold argument. (I’m a libertarian with strong opinions about the Federal Reserve, and even I only have a faint appreciation of the silver vs gold argument. Basically the gist is that the gold-only standard was better for monetary integrity, buuuuuuuuuuuuut working silver into the currency was easier on the poor folk.)

Putting Finkelman’s treatment of Millard Fillmore aside (into the trash), this may be the most underwhelming biography I’ve read as part of this project. Part of that surely owes to repetition, but there’s such a tight focus on the political machinery that I don’t see the man, and that’s a strong part of why I’m doing this series. Yes, I’m absorbing a lot of American history via it– Whigs and Know-Nothings and Stalwarts, oh my! — but the most interesting biographies I’ve read have let me get an insight into the man. Pierce, seeking out his old friend Jefferson Davis in prison; Cleveland, embracing a woman who was scorned for having a child out of wedlock; Arthur, rising from infamy to become a real stalwart man, not merely a Stalwart Republican. I don’t really GET that from this book, though I do get inklings. Benjamin Harrison is there, but you have to storm into the Cabinet room, throw all the papers onto the floor, and make him present. I can see giving Benjy here a second chance once I finish the first run. (And yes, I know I read three books on Lincoln before moving on, but is Benjamin Harrison Lincoln? No. He’s a good egg, but Lincoln is one of the pivotal figures of America’s story.)

Next up….keepin’ cool with Coolidge! The taciturn Vermonter has just been made president so I probably won’t finish him before tomorrow, but 4/5 ain’t bad.

Quotations

Harrison convinced himself that a prolonged engagement would accelerate her decline. With a typically nineteenth-century mixture of romance and morbidity, he asked, “Shall I marry Carrie now and thus relieve her of those harassing doubts and fears which wear away her life, or shall I agree to stand aside and let her hasten to an early grave?”

Harrison gave an eloquent appeal for such action in his annual message. Blacks, he observed, “have their representatives in the national cemeteries, where a grateful Government has gathered the ashes of those who died in its defense.” In civil life, African Americans were “now the toilers of their communities, making their full contribution to the widening streams of prosperity which these communities are receiving.” And yet, “by various devices,” those same communities barred blacks from exercising their political rights.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jimmy

What do I know about Jimmy Carter? Carter is, interestingly, the first president who ever appeared on Reading Freely. I read his Peace Not Apartheid and Our Endangered Values in the very early months of the blog, possibly following up on my having read Gerald Ford’s A Time to Heal only a year or so before, pre-blog. I regard Carter, along with Ford, as a good, ordinary man who took high office and perhaps was not quite up to the task. I listened to his “Crisis of Confidence” speech many times when I first began obsessing over presidential rhetoric , and I still appreciate his earnestness and humility — his simple actions like wearing sweaters and trying to make the White House less of an energy hog — despite adult me realizing that people respond more readily to ‘vigah’, or at least the image thereof. As someone who slaloms between libertarianism and paleoconservatism, I appreciate Carter’s deregulation of the airline and telecom industries: getting soft-handed and softer-minded bureaucrats out of the way of doers and inventors is generally good policy. Does Carter deserve more than one little 200 page book? Very possibly, but this will be my first consideration of the man; let us sit down with Jimmy and see what he has to say.

Well….to be honest, I still don’t know what to say. Zelizer’s book didn’t substantially change my reading of Carter, though it made me realize he was a little grittier than his Mr. Rogers myth indicates — he said he’d “whip [Ted Kennedy’s ass]” if Kennedy ran, and he had to be a serious operator to unseat the prevailing Georgian establishment. The biography also makes it clear that Carter really was something of an outsider: that was an asset when he was running against Ford, who was still marked by the Nixon pardon and a struggling economy, but Carter’s desire to be his own man — sometimes relying more on Republicans in Congress than Democrats! — meant that he never built a secure seat of power among national Democrats. He enjoyed strong approval ratings early on, but continuing economic issues sapped that. Then, the fall of the Shah and the rise of the Grumpy Big-Beards happened, after which student followers seized the American embassy and kept 66 Americans hostage for 444 days. While Carter did plan a rescue mission, weather and happenstance made it turn SNAFU, and the Big Beards spitefully refused to release the hostages until Carter was out of office. I’d had some vauge impression that they were responding to an overt or implied Reagan threat that he’d get western on them if they didn’t release the hostages, but evidently it was Carter who made the deal, releasing some Iranian money back to them in exchange.

I definitely don’t feel satisfied with this as a Carter read; it was interesting, but I think Carter’s reputation as a maverick needs more plumbing. Will return to Jimmy via The Outlier once I’ve made more progress with Hail to the Chief as a whole. My plan for September has been to knock out some smaller fry (Taft, Carter, the Harrisons, etc) so I can give LBJ a good working-over in the last quarter of the year. He’s basically the Final Boss of presidential biographies.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hail to the WWW Wednesday

TWONKS cartoon. Panel one:  Blue character says to REd Character, "This book club is really intense". Panel two:  camera pans out to reveal a church,  wherein a preacher is preaching from the Bible

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Jimmy Carter, Julian Zelizer.

WHAT are you reading now? Coolidge, Amity Schlaes.

WHAT are you reading next? Benjamin Harrison, Charles W. Calhoun

My aim this week is to post a POTUS review….every single day. As of this writing (12:28 AM on Tuesday), three days are secured and two books are well on the way.

LBJ giving Dick Russell "The Treatment"
LBJ: Dick, I’m counting on you to make sure that boy gets around to readin’ ME! Now he spent all summer on Jack and his little brother, I expect MOVEMENT.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 5 Comments

TRUMAN

” I am here to make decisions, and whether they prove right or wrong I will make them.”

A new reader to this blog might ask, “SC, after cheerfully dismissing president after president with 200-page biographies from the American Presidents series, why did you decide to read a twelve hundred page treatment of Harry S. Truman?”  There are two reasons. One, David McCullough.  McCullough’s work on John Adams completely revolutionized my appreciation of the president; Mr. A has become one of my absolute favorite historic personalities, let alone presidents, and I’ve enjoyed McCullough in general.  Secondly, Truman is interesting in himself:   he was tapped as vice president because he was the least objectionable possibility, and he was forced into the big show after only a few months serving as vice president – and then asked to drop the Bomb, and to deal with the Soviet Union who had decided that the endgame of World War 2 was an excellent opportunity to recreate the Russian Empire, with secretary-generals and ugly uniforms instead of the tsar and fun ones. As huge as it is, Truman is eminently readable and exposes readers to a lot of detail about the game of politics, from county commissioners paving roads to deciding who would succeed Truman and carry on the legacy of the New Deal.

“If Harry Truman can be president, anyone can be president! Hell, my next door neighbor could be president!”   Such was exclaimed after Truman succeeded Roosevelt after FDR’s death early into his fourth and final term in office.   A common theme of this book is of Truman as Everyman – thoroughly middle class, forthright and plain-speaking. No one who heard Truman talk would refer to him as ‘melodious’ the way they did of FDR.  But Truman was a hard worker, and more – a fighter. A scrapper.  We meet Truman as the son of a struggling farm, who inherits his father’s labors both in the field and then in local politics.  Truman’s intelligence and reputation as a thorough worker caught the attention of the local Who’s Who, and he soon landed himself a position as a county judge – or rather commissioner –  and achieved success in bringing more paved roads to his county.  The outbreak of World War 1 took young Harry away from the farm, never to return again;  when he returned, he would work first in business and then in politics, relying on the local machine to propel him further. Truman, however, was not a machine-man despite what he owed to them: once in office, he refused to give out contracts and such to those who were affiliated with the machine on anything less than merit, and his integrity provoked admiration rather than retaliation.  Truman would eventually pursue politics into the Senate itself, and achieve acclaim chairing a committee to monitor defense spending.  There, his reputation would be enough that when FDR was looking for another VP placeholder, he was deemed acceptable given that the other candidates inspired partisan rejection. The new vice president was just getting used to the office when he was informed he’d inherited a new one – and all the problems of the world.

Thus Harry Truman – farmer, haberdasher,   hardworking politician – suddenly became President,  and at the worst possible time. World War 2  was ending.  Truman was about to learn about the Bomb, and was forced to decide whether he should use it:  he had to look to the Russians, who didn’t know him and didn’t respect him. Heck, Churchill didn’t trust or respect Truman, why would Stalin?   And so the average Joe suddenly began dealing with decisions that would impact not only Americans of his generation, but people the world over. How much to push back against the Soviets?  How much presidential authority to exercise here, or there? Can we defend South Korea against the Chi-Coms and their Russian allies without provoking World War 3?    

The amount of issues that beset Truman in his first term would send most ordinary men running for the hills, but Truman liked the fight and was particularly concerned that his kept going. He didn’t want someone like Robert Taft in office –  Taft didn’t believe in the international systems FDR had in mind and that Truman was carrying forward. The Republicans chose Eisenhower, a man Truman personally admired – and had even approached as a potential Democrat –  but who he did not think had the chops to go head to head with Stalin, et al in international affairs.  I think Eisenhower’s record demonstrates otherwise,  as he and Nixon were both more internationalist than Truman gave them credit for. (He did not, however, forgive them for tacitly supporting those who claimed his administration had “lost” China or been penetrated by Commies.) 

It’s not hard not to like Harry Truman, though this biography didn’t make me an Admirer of him the way McCullough’s treatment of Adams did.  I do admire Truman in many ways,  I just wouldn’t go to bat for him the way I will with Adams.  Part of the interest in Truman is how he never stopped being Harry S. Truman even when he was Mr. President;  he’d have his Army buddies visit him, slapping him on the back and calling him Harry, but then retreat into a room with Dean Acheson to make decisions changing world history.    If he was changed at all, I think his office simply made him more serious and dutiful – he seems to have avoided being dyed with the imperial dye,   and died as he lived – Harry S. Truman, an ordinary man who lived an extraordinary life.

Quotations

Looking at Truman, Churchill said slowly, “The last time you and I sat
across the conference table was at Potsdam, Mr. President.” Truman nodded.
“I must confess, sir,” Churchill went on, “I held you in very low regard
then. I loathed your taking the place of Franklin Roosevelt.” He paused. “I
misjudged you badly. Since that time, you more than any other man, have
saved Western civilization.”

“They want us to play Russian roulette with the foreign policy of the United States—with all the chambers of the pistol loaded.”

“I never gave ’em Hell! I gave ’em the Truth and they just THOUGHT it was Hell!”

On St. Patrick’s Day, he wrote again to tell Acheson he was thinking still
about the relationship between history and government. “Our tribal instinct
has not been eliminated by science and invention. We, as individuals, haven’t
caught up physically or ethically with the atomic age. Will we?”

Hearing that the Democratic Party, at Kennedy’s suggestion, was going to put on a $l,000-a-plate dinner, Truman was appalled. “If as and when that happens we’ll just quit being democrats with a little d.” Nobody had consulted him on the matter. “To hell with these millionaires at the head of things.”

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Top Ten Authors I’ve Met

Today’s prompt is….authors I’ve met! Well, this will be a short list. but first, a Teaser Tuesday!

On the morning of the first trip to school, it was icy, which meant a fast ride but a cold one. Coolidge and his father climbed into the sleigh while it was still dark. A calf happened to ride with them, going to market in Boston; John admonished his son that the animal would reach the great city now, but the boy would have to wait for years to be ready. COOLIDGE.

(1)  Tom Woods, sort of.   I mean, I’ve seen him in person and I’ve talked to him on Zoom, so by those powers combined….I have met Tom Woods?   Tom Woods is an historian, libertarian advocate, and podcaster who I’ve been listening to since 2013-2014.   I’m not sure how I found him, but his show is so varied (history, politics,  literature, etc) that he’s been a long habit. In 2015 I attended a Young Americans for Liberty conference (back when I qualified as young) where he spoke, and later I became a Supporting Listener of his show, so I get invited to monthly zoom chats and such. I’ve read most of Woods’ books, from Real Dissent to Diary of a Psychosis.  

(2)  Rod Dreher. Dreher is unique in that I’ve met him on multiple occasions,   first at a book launch event for Paul Kingsnorth, and then for the first public airing of a series based on his book, “Live Not by Lies”.  Dreher is a journalist, author, and substacker who has written for a variety of American and European institutions; his books focus heavily on meaning, religion, and culture. 

Dreher and Kingsnorth

(3) Paul Kingsnorth. I hadn’t actually read much of Kingsnorth beyond his preface to The World Ending Fire, a collection of Wendell Berry Essays, when I met him. I soon remedied that, though: I’ve since read all of his nonfiction.

(4) Wayne Flynt.  Flynt is an Alabama historian who has visited my library numerous times; my favorite work of his is Poor but Proud, on Alabama’s poor whites. 

(5) Jason M. Baxter. Author of The Medieval Mind of C.S. Lewis, I met him at the same Dreher-Kingsnorth event  and later read his book.

(6) Mike Bunn. Author of numerous works about the colonial Gulf, including Early Alabama and The Fourteenth Colony. Fun fact: I met him before I knew I’d read his books, because his name hadn’t registered in my memory. I arrived at an event he was doing in town (associated with America @ 250) and said “Huh, I’ve read some of the books on his table!” He does boat tours of the Mobile-Tenesaw delta, including one to a large Mississippi-culture mound, so I may see him again in future. 

(7) John Sledge, author of The Mobile River, Cities of Silence, etc. He visited the library for research and later did an author event here.

(8) Chuck Fager, author of Selma 1965.   I didn’t get to pester him with questions, but he spent a lot of time researching in the library when he was working on a third edition of his book, and we talked a bit.

(9) Susan Besser, author of Selma: An Architectural Field Guide.  I helped with fact-checking for her, and later met her when she did an author event. She also makes jewelry and gave me a necklace to give to my girlfriend! 

(10) Al Benn, author of Reporter. I didn’t know Al was an author when we met; he was just a guy at the church breakfast table with a lot of stories and a manner that some describe as ‘direct’ and others ‘abrasive’. He had worked as a reporter since the end of the Korean War, and loved talking about his adventures or misadventures. He was also a huge cinephile and would often have me over to his house to watch movies with him and his wife.

(11) I attempted to meet Frederica Mathews-Green at the Kingsnorth-Dreher event by hanging around the coffee urns. (I think I managed a hello at one point, but not an actual conversation.)

(12) I literally sat behind James Howard Kunstler eating breakfast but hadn’t  attended a lecture he’d give that night, so  I didn’t know who he was. Manalive, if I could go back –

Okay, that list wasn’t as short as I thought, and frankly more names are popping up as I sit here and reflect on how many authors have come to the library for research!

Posted in General | Tagged , | 22 Comments

William Howard “Chief Magistrate” Taft


Early on in the American republic, the office of president was referred to as the chief magistrate; William Howard Taft must have taken that on as a challenge, because after serving as President, he later became the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Taft is not a name known to most Americans today, unless it’s for fat jokes (he was a hefty boy, struggling with weight all his life and generally ranging from 270 to 340 in his adult life), but like Cleveland he was the last of his kind — a president who truly believed in his role as a protector of the Constitution. For Taft, who loved the law more than politics, who had been aspiring toward the Supreme Court since his 30s, the Constitution was sacrosanct. Fittingly, then, this biography is only half-over when Taft surrenders the One Ring to Woodrow Wilson: the rest is taken up with Taft as Chief Justice, since Warren Harding offered him the seat for the third and final time.

One thing I’m noticing about the American Presidents series is that authors are sometimes chosen for a unique vantage point — a surgeon writing about Garfield, who was killed by surgeons, for instance. Jeffrey Rosen is a lawyer and legal scholar who approaches Taft from a lawyer’s eye, and as such his childhood is almost entirely omitted save for learning that he was an overhealthy baby (by which we mean a porker) and that he was an accomplished student despite having attendance issues. Young Taft started in politics early, developing a contempt for corruption and a healthy respect for the horrors of mob violence. He became a man who put great stock by the rule of law, which would make him a cautious but superbly Constitutional executive: unfortunately for his close friendship with Teddy Roosevelt, it would also make him in Teddy’s eyes a dismal successor. Taft and Teddy agreed on some abstract things, like the need for the government to keep corporations from becoming overweening in themselves — but whereas Taft wanted to continually use constitutional powers to keep the corpos from growing large, Teddy wanted to expand the government so that it could keep pace with the corporations. Teddy was so irritated at Taft wanting to retroactively make Roosevelt policies lawful, and then moving cautiously in office, that he challenged Taft for election. This led to the triumph of god-king Wilson and ruptured their friendship. They barely reconciled before Roosevelt’s death, but not to the degree that Adams and Jefferson did in the “You were my brother, Anakin! I loved you!” sense.

There is more to Taft, however, than his presidency. His extreme interest in lawful constitutions and even temper made him an excellent civil governor of the Philippines when McKinley began the age of American Empire by planting the Flag all over creation. He worked with Filipinos to create a government that largely reflected the Bill of Rights, though not entirely: Americans did not view Filipinos as quite up to the labor of being self-governing, and so suffrage and gun ownership were both restricted. That said, Taft’s sincerity in creating a just state for the Philippines was such that when he was finally recalled to the states — after turning down Supreme Court appointments twice, despite his interest in the seats — the Filipinos cried out, “Queremos Taft!”. After his presidency, Taft finally achieved what he wanted: Chief Justice of the US of A. Having long idolized Judge Marshall, Taft became his first true successor — radically reforming the court and leading the charge to evacuate it from the Senate’s basement and create its own Temple of Justice, the present SCOTUS building. His love for the court and justice was such that decisions tended toward unanimity — 70-80% of the time. Today the average lingers around 30%. He greatly enhanced the Supreme Court and federal courts overall with an eye towards institutional integrity, independence, and efficacy.

I found Taft a very appetizing figure, a man who believed the Law transcends the government, and who took Constitutional limits seriously; he happily exercised his veto when he thought Congress was violating the Constitution, regardless of their good intentions. (They overrode the veto a few times, but it’s the thought that counts.) Unfortunately, this book was incredibly short, barely over a hundred pages: the rest were notes. I may have to read The Bully Pulpit, on his and Roosevelt’s relationship, to get closer to the man. (But….not immediately. I’ve got books on hand for Carter, the Harrisons, and Coolidge. September is going to be a “concentrate all firepower on the Presidential starship!” kind of month.)

Related:
Taft 2012: a speculative novel in which Taft, who mysteriously disappeared after his POTUS term, wakes up on the White House lawn during the Obama administration.

Quotations

Taft was always an excellent dancer and sometimes waltzed alone on the White House veranda.

Nellie especially remembered Will in a burlesque of The Sleeping Beauty, where he played the title role.

Their first lovers’ quarrel, remarkably, was on a constitutional question —Nellie pressed her policy views on abolitionism, and Will opposed her on constitutional grounds—and his early missives read less like billets-doux than judicial opinions. “I am prepared to submit a few questions of this tenor to the high court of friendship wherein let Mr. Justice Taft and Miss Justice Herron to determine such questions,”34 he wrote playfully. (Will was seeking Nellie’s advice about whether it was ethical of him to have voted for a friend’s father who sought a judgeship.

Why, I am not the man you want,” Taft declared. “To begin with, I have
never approved of keeping the Philippines.”
“You don’t want them any less than I do,” McKinley replied, “but we have got them and in dealing with them I think I can trust the man who didn’t want them better than I can the man who did.

“If only there were three of you!” Roosevelt added flatteringly. “Then I would have put one of you on the Supreme Court … one of you in Root’s place as secretary of war, when he goes out; and one of you permanently governor of the Philippines.”

Later that year, Taft and Nellie joined the Roosevelts for an intimate dinner at the White House, after which Roosevelt threw himself into a chair in the library and closed his eyes.
“I am the seventh son of a seventh daughter and I have clairvoyant powers,” he intoned melodramatically. “There is something hanging over his head. I cannot make out what it is.… At one time it looks like the Presidency, then again it looks like the chief justiceship.”
“Make it the presidency,” said Mrs. Taft.
“Make it the chief justiceship,” said Mr. Taft.

Taft insisted, “We have a government of limited power under the Constitution, and we have got to work out our problems on the basis of law. Now, if that is reactionary, then I am a reactionary.”

“Next to my wife and children,” the Court “is the nearest thing to my heart
in life,”he wrote. “The truth is,” he observed in 1925, “I don’t remember I ever was president.”

Taft’s judicial presidency was less successful than his presidential chief justiceship because, in attempting to govern the United States in the early twentieth century along the lines that the Framers clearly preferred, Taft was unable to grapple with forces that the Framers would have abhorred— including the democratization of politics and the increasing power of political parties. By creating an executive with energy, to use Hamilton’s term, the Framers left the office open to alterations that ran against their basic conceptions of how the entire federal government should operate.

Today, however, as new populist forces in America and around the world threaten principles of constitutionalism, limited government, democratic deliberation, checks and balances, and the rule of law, Taft’s conception of a vigorous but constrained presidency checked by similarly vigorous but constrained courts and Congress looks increasingly appealing. Taft would have been distressed by the spectacle of tweeting presidents and representatives: like Madison in Federalist 10, he believed that direct communication between representatives and their constituents was the democratic vice most to be avoided, since it promoted faction and discouraged reasoned deliberation.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Destiny of the Republic

When put on trial for the assassination of President James Garfield, Charles Guiteau protested that he’d merely shot Garfield: his doctors had killed him. As crazy as Guiteau was — and his membranes were definitely scrambled — he may have had a point. Destiny of the Republic is a fascinating look at the life of James Garfield that largely focuses on his medical trial after being shot, incorporating lengthy discussion of medicine and experimental technologies of the day. For all its coverage of Alexander Graham Bell’s attempts to fashion a metal detector of sorts to find bullets, though, this is a book of the human spirit — in its silly pride, its nobility, its capacity for love and work, and — sometimes — its sheer irrationality. While I’d first ignored this title when looking for a Garfield biography, watching Death by Lightning made it a must-read, and I’m glad I did. Every little bit of it was brimming over with interest for me.

James Garfield has one of the most extraordinary poverty-to-power stories I’ve read. While Andrew Johnson undoubtedly came from more adverse circumstances, Garfield was so admired he was nominated by acclamation to the presidency at a convention where he’d attended principally to nominate another member of the GOP. Garfield is raised on a struggling farm, runs off to become a boatman on the Canal, nearly drowns, then becomes a teacher, lawyer, and finally politician. He served in the American Civil War and earned lauds for frustrating an early Confederate incursion into Kentucky (splitting his troops into three parts to make the Confederate force think they were surrounded by a superior force) and later served nearly two decades in Congress before reaching the highest office in the land. Garfield came of age in a good time for Republicans: the Democrats, even in the North, were haunted by the ‘bloody flag’ of the Rebellion, so the GOP dominated national politics for decades. That meant an increasing level of corruption, however, and Garfield came to office when the Republicans were divided between the business-as-usual Stalwarts and the Reforming Half-Breeds. Garfield was slightly closer to the Half-Breeds, but was saddled with a Stalwart vice president to keep the New York election machine happy. Then, alas, he was shot — shot by a mentally unwell and frustrated office seeker with a wild biography. The life of Charles Guiteau would be hard to believe had it not been so public. He’s frequently a side-subject here as we witness his troubled relationship with the GOP establishment — first courting them in a pathetic way, then later deciding he was the Hand of God destined to shoot Garfield — but the meat of the book is poor Garfield’s poor medical predicament.

We know now that the bullet which entered Garfield’s body clipped a bone but otherwise did no damage, avoiding major organs and coming to rest near his spine. Had Garfield simply been left alone — the entry wound properly cleaned and dressed — he would have been able to recover, and like so many soldiers resumed life walking around with lead in him. As it happened, though, the doctors’ aggressive attempts to Find the Bullet — probing with dirty fingers and medical tools — widened the wound, turning a minor path into a highway for germs and other bacteria. Antiseptic theory and practice was known at the time, but rejected by the American medical establishment who thought it silly and prohibitively troublesome. Those familiar with the thesis of Kuhn’s Nature of Scientific Revolutions will see evidence here: younger doctors who were more familiar with Lister’s theory of antiseptic practice were appalled at Garfield’s treatment, but completely shut out by the now-notorious Doctor Bliss. (Doctor was, believe it or not, his first name.) Bliss had been practicing for decades and was completely entrenched in conventional practice, and to make matters worse he was a raging narcissistic who aggressively took over Garfield’s care and shut out all other input. Respectable physicians who had been serving the Garfield family, including Dr. Edson (Mrs. Garfield’s female doctor) were reduced to support staff. Bliss proved to be an absolute tyrant, demanding that Garfield be kept in isolation to prevent him from talking, and keeping the president from his family and staff despite the needs of the country and Garfield’s own desperate desire for companionship. It’s a bleak story on that front, but very interesting from a history-of-medicine angle.

What saves Destiny from being a depressing account of a good man dying of medical malpractice is both the ongoing looks at his assailant — whose cheerful self-delusion is abhorrent yet darkly funny — and the long appraisal of Garfield himself. Garfield must have known, at some point, that he was going to die. Was it right or just? No. He had been shot by a madman and sabotaged by another wearing a lab coat, doomed to be riddled with abscesses and pus and die in pain. And yet Garfield does not fall apart. He does not complain; he suffers silently. When he was shot, his first words were about others; despite the enormous fuss people were making about him (creating air-conditioning and metal detectors to help), he did not focus on his infirmity but did his best to maintain an upbeat, caring temperament. Only when the end drew near did he insist that he wanted to be taken to the ocean — the young farmboy who longed for the sailor’s life was now an older man who drew spiritual nourishment, if not medical recovery, from the wild and wasteful ocean. We are also treated to Chester Arthur’s fantastic redemption arc, as Garfield’s shooting forces him to consider how craven his ambitions have made him, how loathed he is by the American public. He is consumed by sorrow and self-loathing. And yet there is light in the darkness, a piercing ray of grace: one woman, an invalid named Julia Sand, began writing him letters to admonish and encourage him to redeem himself before the public, despite their and despite his own doubts. And…he did. She became to him a Beatrice, beckoning the Gilded Age Dante out of a very dark wood.

Quotations

For the past five years, she had felt “dead and buried,” but the attempt on Garfield’s life and Americans’ complete lack of faith in Arthur had inspired her to attempt to inspire him. She was as brutally honest in her assessment of the situation as she was galvanizing. “Your kindest opponents say: ‘Arthur will try to do right’—adding gloomily—‘He won’t succeed, though—making a man President cannot change him,’ ” she wrote. “But making a man President can change him! Great emergencies awaken generous traits which have lain dormant half a life. If there is a spark of true nobility in you, now is the occasion to let it shine. Faith in your better nature forces me to write to you—but not to beg you to resign. Do what is more difficult & more brave. Reform!”

Arthur not only read Sand’s letters, he kept them. Over the years, he would keep twenty-three of her letters, each one urging him to be a better man than he had once believed he could be. “It is not the proof of highest goodness never to have done wrong,” Sand assured him, “but it is a proof of it … to recognize the evil, to turn resolutely against it.” Arthur had been given an extraordinary opportunity, and he had found in Sand perhaps the one person in the nation who believed him capable of change. “Once in awhile there comes a crisis which renders miracles feasible,” she wrote. “The great tidal wave of sorrow which has rolled over the country, has swept you loose from your old moorings, & set you on a mountaintop, alone.”

Before the train could reach its final destination, however, it stopped short. The cottage sat at the top of a hill, and the engine was not strong enough to breach it. No sooner had the problem become apparent than, out of the crowd of people who had waited all day in the tremendous heat for Garfield’s arrival, two hundred men ran forward to help. “Instantly hundreds of strong arms caught the cars,” Bliss wrote, “and silently … rolled the three heavy coaches” up the hill.

(This latter part was amazing to me: the president was dying, people knew he was dying. His trip to the oceanside cottage was the last he’d ever take, and when the engine failed the people in their love pushed it the rest of the way. Incredible.)

Posted in General, history, Politics and Civic Interest, science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WWW Wednesday & Films Near Me

Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is “Films Filmed Near You”, and I think people will be surprised by how many there are. But first, WWW Wednesday!

WWW Wednesday

WHAT have you finished recently? Heroes, Stephen Fry.

WHAT are you reading now? Truman, David McCullough. I’m getting there!

WHAT are you reading next? Something that’s not so big it has its own satellite.

MOVIES FILMED NEAR ME

(1) The Heart is a Lonely Hunter, 1969. This is a special film for Selmians, because it makes heavy use of downtown Selma, filming in buildings that no longer exist, or showing streetscapes and interiors that are radically changed.

The most prominent, of course, is the Hotel Albert — that magnificent red building in the background. It was modeled on the Palace of the Doges in Venice, Italy, and if you are familiar with Selma’s reputation today (as a poor and rapidly shrinking site chiefly used by politicians for photo ops every campaign season), the fact that the city could attract such wealth and investment may be surprising. In the late 19th century, though, Selma was so prominent it claimed both of Alabama’s US senators, Edmund Pettus and John Morgan.

And then there’s this place, which began — believe it or not — as a steam laundry, but later became a series of restaurants. While the interior has changed a bit, you can stand in this exact spot and see that door. Only, these days it leads to a larger kitchen instead of the billards-and-illicit-whisky room. The current restaurant is called the Downtowner, and it’s a good place for meat-and-three and local color.

Said local color.

(2) Payday, 1973. This film is about a…country music singer whose life of excess is destroying him and all those around him. The most interesting bit for locals is when he goes to a local restaurant, and they have a gigantic map of Old Cahaba (the abandoned state capital 10 miles down the river from us) in the background. I have asked all the old-timers I know what happened to that map (it’s too big to disappear), but no leads. This film is funny to watch as a local because there are repeated bits of “Wait a minute, how did he get to the Flamingo from that place, on THAT road?!”

(3) Blue Sky,1994. This Tommy Lee Jone movie shows some of downtown Selma’s Water Avenue historical district during a chase scene, but it’s most notable for filming on the Air Force base and showing off the medical facilities there before they’d fallen into disrepair. Fun fact: when Jessica Lange was in town filming this, she lived in a great yellow house that I’ve dogsat for many times over the last few years.

(4) Body Snatchers, 1993. Filmed on said Air Force base, but I’ve not seen it and can’t tell you a blessed thing.

(5) Selma, 2015. Mostly not filmed in Selma. Georgia gives better tax credits, apparently, so the only scenes filmed here took place on the bridge. I was asked to be an extra in this but declined: they needed more Angry White Men in the background, and being a public librarian I didn’t exactly want to be filmed standing next to guys with nasty signs. The film made the choice of using some random courthouse in Georgia for their Dallas County courthouse, which is especially tragic because the courthouse is literally where ALL THE ACTION HAPPENED. All of the marches that took place in town in the months of early 1965 went to the courthouse; it was where Sheriff Jim Clark was hit by Annie Lee Cooper, etc. Even today, tourists never visit the courthouse where civil rights activists spent many cold, nervous hours — it’s always to walk across a bridge on which nothing happened. (“But the newspapers said –) Yeaah, the newspapers have been repeating that same a-historical nonsense since the late 1980s when they started doing bridge-crossing ‘commemorations’ and the bridge rather than the march to Montgomery to confront Governor Wallace became the fixed obsession. But, I digress and rant.

(6) Selma Lord Selma, 1999. Not one I’ve seen, so I can’t say anything aside from reviewing its Wikipedia article and saying that no, Jonathan Daniels certainly did NOT organize the Selma-Montgomery March: he came to Selma because he’d seen footage of the first march attempt and was responding to MLK’s request that clergy join the struggle.(Daniels is remembered as a saint in the Episcopal church for dying while protecting a young girl from a shotgun-wielding rando in Lowdnes County who alleged he saw Daniels pull a knife.)

(7) Big Fish. They built a town near Millbrook (a half hour or so from me) to use as the backdrop in this movie; the set is still standing. I keep meaning to go tour it.

(8) Fried Green Tomatoes. While I don’t live near the filming location of FGT (I have been there, it’s lovely), I do drive past the location that inspired it several times a month — the Irondale Cafe in Irondale.

(9) Just Mercy. Evidently parts of this were filmed in Montgomery, which is an hour or so away depending on how many state troopers there are on Highway 80.

(10) Talladega Nights did have some scenes filmed in Talladega. I have never been there; this film is the closest I have gotten to understanding why watching cars go in circles is entertaining. (Technically I’ve driven through Talladega on my way to Mount Cheaha, but did not stay in town.)

Posted in General | 11 Comments

Stephen Fry’s Heroes

Cover for Stephen Fry's Heroes

What do I know of the Greek heroes? Precious little. I recognize the phrase, Labors of Hercules, but could not tell you more than a couple of them – cleaning out stables and helping Atlas with the sky for some reason?  I know someone named Jason went after a golden fleece,  and that someone else fought a man-bull thing that demanded children be sacrificed to it, but that was about it.    Stephen Fry’s Heroes covers these heroes and more –  Perseus, Theseus, Orpheus, Bellerophon, Atalanta, etc –  in his usual winsome way, combining a perfect  style of narration with an enviable range of voices for characters.   Heroes managed to strike the perfect note between (“I don’t know these stories at all and am delighted to hear them”) and “THIS IS ENTIRELY TOO MUCH TO TAKE IN AT ONE TIME”.    As he said in his introduction to Jason and the Golden Fleece, the  story requires backstory upon backstory – but it’s all  juicy, so dig in!    I dug in, and it was juicy indeed.

What is a Hero, in the Greek sense? They’re generally men and some women who have a connection to the gods, and who lived and strove during a ‘transition point’. Whereas Mythos was agog with monsters and humans played a fairly small part, and Troy/Odyssey are   largely human dramas with the gods sticking their beaks in, here we have humans and gods working together,  the humans often helping rid the Earth of monsters who are still hanging around. Sometimes the humans are ordered to take care of the monsters to work off a debt;  sometimes they have to do it while trying to accomplish something else; sometimes, as in the case of Theseus, they do it for the love of the smiting. He came of age and was instructed to take a sword to Athens, there to be recognized by his father – – but rather than going by boat,  he insisted on taking the land route that was famously peopled by brigands and giants and such – so that he could arrive with a name and a blade already wet with accomplishments. 

Easily the most memorable part of Heroes for me was the story of Hercules – or Heracles, as he’s generally known here.  Heracles was re-named such – “Glory of Hera” –  in hopes of placating the  famously jealous goddess of marriage and the family after he was conceived by Zeus and one of the cloud-gatherer’s numerous earthly liaisons.  So furious was Hera that she tried to kill Heracles in the womb, then when he was born turned venomous vipers onto him while he was but an infant.   He grew up to be an accomplished young man with a wife and two young boys – but then Hera sent a delusion that provoked Heracles to strangle them, thinking they were monsters!  What a vile creature she was,  trying or causing the death of innocents. I’m very glad Mary took that ‘Queen of Heaven’ title away from her.  Heracles was forced into slavery to atone for his ‘crime’ – which was really Hera’s crime –  and thus we get the Labors of Heracles,  everything from cleaning out stables to fetching giant beasts and frightening the king who demanded Hercules bring the beasts to him.  While Heracles wasn’t wily like Odysseus ,  between his strength and his own cunning, he was able to knock them out – only for Hera to prolong his sentence. Frankly, I would have started razing her temples if I were Heracles, but he was a good sport (despite his frequent temper)  and even stopped her from being gang-raped by a bunch of giants, after which point they became besties. 

Speaking of,  the Greek myths are not for the faint of heart.  The versions I read as kids must’ve been hilariously stripped down, because this story included Orpheus being ripped to pieces by a gang of women who were outraged that the musician had spurned women after his wife died and turned to boys;   Medea casually murdering her own brother and throwing parts of his body into the water to help her and the Argonauts escape a pursuing ship; and far too much detail on how a woman cozened a pretty white bull into mating with her.  And yet between the stories and Fry’s delivery, the book abounds in laughs and wonder.  I don’t know how many liberties Fry took with some stories, but there were scenes that were so absurd they struck me as being out of Monty Python or something.  At one point a king is lying to the hero and expects his townspeople to agree with him; they do, but they’re so eager to out-do one another in currying favor they start making up details and getting into arguments, while the king and hero undoubtedly stand there wondering why the camera is drifting away from them.  It helped enormously, of course, that Fry has a huge range of voices – and here he relies heavily on a wide variety of British regional dialects, to great effect.

So ends my first trek through Stephen Fry’s Greek canon. It’s been a wild ride, I’ll tell you, especially this last one. It really drove home the pagan brutality of the ancient Greeks, but I’m glad to have really fleshed out my knowledge of the old stories.

Posted in Classics and Literary, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments