Today’s teaser comes from When the Earth Had Two Moons:
The lunar calendar is a living thing: when you try to write it down, it resists.
Today’s TTT is a love freebie, so I’m going to go with….ten love songs! I can’t “top ten”, because frankly books and music are my cardinal loves and I would have to spend six months actually listing and mulling over songs to create an “ultimate” list. So, what I’m going to do is slightly biographical; I am going to list ten love songs that were important to me from teen days onward.
(1) Just To See You Smile
When you said time was all you really needed I walked away and let you have your space ‘Cause leavin’ didn’t hurt me near as badly As the tears I saw rollin’ down your face
And yesterday I knew just what you wanted When you came walkin’ up to me with him So I told you that I was happy for you And given the chance, I’d lie again
Just to see you smile I’d do anything that you wanted me to When all is said and done I’d never count the cost, it’s worth all that’s lost
As a kid, I wasn’t allowed to listen to “worldly” music — which meant pretty much anything contemporary. I somehow got away with country, though. This was…..pretty formative, I think.
(2) Tell Laura I Love Her, Ricky Valens
It’s possible I found this by accident, because somebody on Limewire mistook Ricky Valens for Ricky Nelson. It’s possible. In actuality, I found the song by buying a CD, good and proper. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more! “Tell Laura I Love Her” is part of a frankly disturbing trend of “teen romances ruined by automobile wrecks” in the 1960s — along with tracks like “Teen Angels”, “Leader of the Pack”, and “Dead Man’s Curve”.
(3) Wouldn’t It Be Nice
You know, it seems the more we talk about it It only makes it worse to live without it But let’s talk about it…. wouldn’t it be nice?!
As a teenager who was more in love with being in love than actually….being in love with anyone. this song meant a lot to me until I read a criticism of it that was like “You know, if you’re not happy out of love, you’re not going to be happy in love, because you can’t expect one person to just…make you happy. That’s a ridiculous amount of pressure for one person to put on someone else.”
(4) You’re So Good to Me
You’re kinda small And you’re such a doll I’m glad you’re mine You’re so good to me How come you are?
Back in the day, I loved this song just for its….sweetness. These days it’s somewhat more relevant because my ladyfriend is a head shorter than me.
(5)Dela, Johnny Clegg
This remains the first and only song that made me watch the credits of a movie because I HAD TO KNOW WHO WAS SINGING THAT.
A blind bird sings inside the cage that is my heart The image of your face comes to me when I’m alone in the dark If I could give a shape to this ache that I have for you If I could find the voice that says the words that capture you!
I think I know, I think I know I think I know why the dog howls at the the Moon
(6) The Way You Look Tonight, Frank Sinatra
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine introduced me to Frank Sinatra, and I’m pretty sure that’s a sentence you’ll only find on this book blog. Do you doubt me?
to be honest (and sacrilegious) I prefer Darren’s version here to Frank’s.
(7)Never Be Anyone Else But You, Ricky Nelson
This is probably not surprising given my sheltered upbringing, but the first DVD I ever watched was episodes of The Ozzie and Harriet Show. As someone who was already raised primarily on 1950s/1960s pop, I loved Ricky Nelson.
There’ll never be anyone else But you for me Never ever be Just couldn’t be Anyone else but you
(8) REO Speedwagon
The less said about my emotional life in 2004, the better, but when I started playing GTA Vice City and heard these songs, I became an instant REO Speedwagon fan. (Yeah, sorry. GTA Vice City was my introduction to 1980s music in general.)
9, Operator. Jim Croce.
Operator — could you help me place this call? I can’t read the number you just gave me There’s something in my eyes You know, it happens every time I think about the love I thought would save me
Isn’t that the way they say it goes? Well, let’s forget all that And give me the number, if you can find it So I can call Just to tell `em I’m fine I’ve learned to overcome the blows, I’ve learned to take it well I only wish my words Could just convinced myself That it just wasn’t real But that’s not the way it feels.
Love isn’t always sugar and spice and all things nice. Sometimes it’s it’s “Operator”.
10. NUMBER TEN? I’m barely into the 2010s! And I’m starting to think I was remiss in ignoring songs like “Won’t Ever Be Lonely” by Andy Griggs, and “Would You Go With Me” by Josh Turner? WHAT AM I GOING TO DO?!
Folk music!
(10) Annie Laurie, performed by the Corries
Like dew on the gowan lying Is the fall o’ her fairy feet And like wind in summer sighin’ Her voice is low and sweet Her voice is low and sweet She’s a’ the world tae me And for bonnie Annie Laurie I’d lay me doon and dee
Bonus: “Heard it in a Love Song“, because it inspired my title.
A few weeks back this song was driving me crazy, and I was subsequently driving my friends crazy. “Have you ever heard a song that has a refrain that’s something like ‘sweet little love songs’, or ‘crazy little love songs’? …I hate to say it, but I think chatgpt was the one to guess what ear worm I was guessing after.
I heard it in a love song Heard it in a lo-ooo-oove song Can’t be wrong
Share a detail you love about the season of summer into fall
List at least 7 random/ specific things YOU love to read about in books, big or small
Tag 7 people who would enjoy taking part/whose answers you are curious to read!
One is done, ditto two and three. Four is funny because Alabama does not have a transition from summer into fall. We don’t even have a fall, really, there’s just this season where it’s still hot, but the leaves are dying and we are subject to both tornadoes and hurricanes. That lasts until January-February when it’s cold and rainy, and then we go back into Tornado and Flower season, also known as spring. One of these days I should go to Vermont or something in September to see what all the fuss is about autumn. I’m sure it’s lovely.
1. Curmudgeons. I love stories with curmudgeons, especially when they’re forced out of their comfort zone and get involved in the human race again. This particular devotion began with A Christmas Carol, but I’ve explored it in numerous books like A Man Called Ove, Fred and Red, etc. It’s a trope that comes up – slightly – in the short stories series I’m reading, because one principal character has serious curmudgeon tendencies but has never been able to surrender to them in full.
2. Stories where places matter. I like stories where places, and particularly buildings, are strong presences in the story – almost characters themselves. Russell Kirk’s Ancestral Shadows had a lot of this, and again it’s a heavy feature in the short stories I’m playing around with
3. Getting weird insight into other professions. This has been true since I began reading John Grisham and found I really enjoyed the under-the-hood look into law and even journalism – the latter, in the case of The Last Juror. Even weird stuff like cops scribbling down notes on the back of interview cards (stuff that’s context-useful but doesn’t fall into ‘official’ evidence) and then filing them away. (Yes, I’m reading a Connelly cop novel at the moment, how could you tell?)
4. I like authors who know strange and archaic words, and who – when they use them – do so with panache. Bill Kauffman is quite good at this: “fossicking about in tramontane sinkholes” is one memorable phrase. Bill (he told me to call him Bill, and no, I’m not kidding) has a gift for wordplay. To quote my review of Ain’t My America: The History of Antiwar Conservatism:
After recounting the life of a Congressional solon named Hoar, who a contemporary thought would be celebrated in statuary for standing against imperialism, Kauffman notes “Alas, the statues are all dedicated to Hoar’s homonyms.”
5. Characters that pop. I would venture to say that character drama is the heart and soul of my fiction enjoyment, across mediums: the movies I love are character dramas (Groundhog Day, A Man Called Ove), the books I love are character dramas (Jayber Crow, The Awakening of Miss Prim), and it’s not an accident that I’ve been playing Red Dead Redemption 2 nonstop since its release 7+ years ago. And sure, its graphics and ability to hog-tie people who have poor manners is part of its charm, but I spend most of my time re-experiencing the story, the people and passions inside it. So, I like strong characters and their interplay, especially when two compelling characters are moving in different directions and creating a story purely through chasing their passions – but I’m especially fond of characters who are truly unique and even weird in their thinking, their speaking, and so on.
6. Small-town dramas of varying kind; this is kinda linked to my love of place, but two series that come to mind are Mitford and the Rabbi Small mysteries. I like the intimacy of these stories, and the ability to start seeing the characters as 3D people as they’re encountered more and more. Again, this is something I am trying to replicate.
7. I like the way some books can say different things to us as we re-visit them, either because we’re at a different stage of our life and our mind has continued to simmer and change, or because we simply didn’t spot the entries before.
Nearly twenty years ago, before I donned my first cardigan and became Liberry Man (this phrase has been shouted at me in grocery store parking lots), I loved an online comic strip called Unshelved, which was set in a library and featured a main character named “Dewey”. (Like….Dewey decimel system. Sorry, I have to explain that now because some librarians think that the decimal system is sus and want to clap back and pretend we’re in a bookstore. Zoomers. ) Way back then, when we could find time between triceratop raids, Unshelved had a merchandise store that sold a shirt with the print, “FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS”. This past week I searched for that shirt or other iterations of the same, and lo! I found that there were printed versions of Unshelved comics! This is one of them, and it’s so dated that people pronouncing ‘lol’ was a thing, as was a series based on Jayne’s hat. It’s pretty cunning, I think. Frequently Asked Questions is one collection of many in the Unshelved series, and I enjoyed on several levels. These days, of course, I am a librarian, so I grokked the Unshelved cast’s problems more than I did twenty years ago — whether that be IT or patron problems. Library culture has changed so much in twenty years, though. Although this series does spotlight the variety of library offerings — audiobooks alongside physical books and movies — it’s mostly focused on books, whereas these days most libraries in the US appear to be reducing their physical holdings and re-orienting the space for other uses, like ‘makerspaces’ for people who are really into 3D printing and want fool around on the public dime. Cellphones, which Dewey sharply tackles in several strips, have also taken over pretty much everywhere: even churches and courtrooms are not spared the cursed things’ noise, though at least in courtrooms armed men will give you the business whereas librarians and priests are only allowed to look slightly peeved or exasperated. This was a fun look back, and I imagine I may check out the other collections. I don’t think there’s anything quite like Unshelved today, which is a shame. Modern libraries—where the likes of Dewey would be expected to function as social workers, teachers, and cops —are fairly wild places.
Hey, that was my experience with Gone Girl! Those were the days, my friend, we thought they’d never end….
…now we have to put up with those bloody things everywhere. Damn you, Steve Jobs!!!
Cassie Dewell is the new girl on the block, having just been hired as a senior investigator away from her former position in Montana. But that’s OK: that last position ended with her winning a shootout against corrupt cops, one of whom had been her partner. She could do with a fresh start in a new town, a place where the future is warm and bright and cl – ahh, crap. She’s been hired to work on a case independently of her new coworkers ….in North Dakota….in the winter. Can’t win `em all, I guess. Badlands takes us to a town that’s transformed from a dwindling backwater to a modern boomtown overnight, courtesy of the Bakken oil fields, and shows how quickly serious crime is taking root in the town as well. Box tells this story not simply through the detective who has to figure out who the rotter is on her team (hint: he’s the one who keeps glaring at her), but through a little boy who stumbles upon something dangerous on his paper route and unwittingly exposes himself and his mother to gangland warfare. While I doubt I’ll take to Dewell as readily as I did Pickett, this was still a compelling story that, in true Box fashion, uses the landscape and weather to shape the story, and uses then-contemporary events like the oil boom and the rise of cartel warfare in the US of A to thrill the reader. Giving us a kid character who has fetal alcohol syndrome and struggles to make himself understood by adults was an interesting touch, I thought, especially as the reader knows exactly what he’s meant to be saying and the misunderstanding — to us and the kid – appears to be solely on the adult’s part. It’s a sad look into how parents’ behavior can diminish their children’s lives, and as this story goes, it gets sadder.
Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is…..WILL YOU WATCH THE SUPER BOWL? The Super Bowl is literally the only football game I watch all year, any year: ever since 2012, I have attended a friend’s Super Bowl Party. The fun thing is that of the 5-6 regular guests, only one of us cares about NFL football at all; another guest only cares about college football, and the rest of us don’t care at all. For us, it’s an occasion to eat, drink, and scream at the TV. Fun story: last year we had streaming issues and thought we found it streaming on youtube; when the Halftime Show arrived, we were confused to see last year’s singer again, and those who had planned on getting irate every time the cameras swooned over Taylor Swift and her boyfriend were confused and frustrated that she wasn’t showing up at all. They had so been looking forward to being angry! Then we realized: WE WERE REWATCHING LAST YEAR’S GAME! This caused a bit of a rift between the P’O’d guy (the only one who cares about the NFL) and the rest of us, who thought it was hilarious that the same teams playing had led us into effectively missing The Big Game. This year it’s Bahston vs Seattle, so we won’t get fooled again.
And now, WWW Wednesday!
WHAT have you finished reading recently? Badlands, CJ Box. Part of his Cassie Dewell series. Also, technically, the APLS Guidebook for Library Board Trustees. Riveting stuff, that.
WHAT are you reading now? I’m still pecking at With Malice Toward None, but as mentioned I’m taking this week off from serious reads to relax a little. I’m also reading Cory Doctorow’s latest, a book on why the internet has gotten markedly bad in the last 10-15 years. (I’m bad at relaxing from serious reads.)
WHAT are you reading next? More Box or Connelly, I think.
Welcome to the first week of February! I am starting to feel a bit burned out on all the heavy history I’ve been reading, and am planning on reading some detective thrillers or other relaxing fiction this week.
Teaser Tuesday
“We don’t even know what our population is,” he said in answer to the question Cassie asked. “It’s growing that fast. A few months ago, I would have said thirty-five to forty thousand in the county. There are over ten thousand units in the main camps alone. But I was talking to the director at the water treatment facility and he says they’re handling sewage now for sixty thousand plus. Imagine that,” he said with a snort, “We guess how many residents we have by the sewage they produce.” – THE BADLANDS, CJ BOX
Don’t worry, I won’t be going on another multi-month long Box tear. There’re only six books in the Cassie Dewell series. That’s like, a week and a half of reading at most.
Classics Club Spin #43
The Classics Club Spin prompts us to take twenty of our upcoming CC reads, number them, and then wait for the spin to ‘pick’ a number. We are then compelled to read the book chosen. I have a slight problem in that I don’t have 20 books remaining on my list, just 16 or so, so I told Chatgpt to pick ten books at random: the way I’ll play with the rules is that if 1-10 are chosen, I’m fine; if 11 through 20 are chosen, I just subtract ten. It’s a bit like aces in blackjack, but without losing money. So, my list:
Resurrection — Leo Tolstoy
Paradise Lost — John Milton
On the Nature of Things — Lucretius (trans. Anthony Esolen)
“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back. Because the Cold War has been over for 20 years! ” – Barack Obama, 2012
“The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path, and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked.” —John J. Mearsheimer, 2014
“I knew Scott knew a lot of stuff. I didn’t know he could just sit there and go three hours like a James Michtener novel getting into the details, but without losing the audience. ” – Bob Murphy, 2024
“The title is PROVOKED, not JUSTIFIED.” – Scott Horton, 2024
Coming of age amid 9/11 and the terror war made me obsessed with DC’s foreign policy – understanding its actions in the world, and their consequences. The government’s line that “[terrorists] hate us for our freedoms” fell apart pretty quickly for me, as I read Zinn and Kinzer and began seeing how often DC has behaved like a bully while hiding under virtue’s cloak. Over the years I began realizing that news stories I encountered as fragments – war in Chechnya, some fracas over Georgia in 2008 – were really part of a larger story, and it was a story that made more sense as I encountered more pieces and puzzling out the order of them. Provoked is Scott Horton’s attempt to tell that story within a larger history of all that DC has done within Eurasia since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. It is a doorstopper of a book with over ten thousand endnotes, and some chapters that carrying a thousand endnotes on their own. The names, events, and interlocking crises can feel overwhelming at times, but Horton’s clear passion and command of the subject made this a much easier read than might be expected. I do not know how the Russo-Ukraine war, nearing its fourth year, will end – but Provoked is a solid introduction to how it started.
The western narrative regarding the war is a very tidy, neat, and emotionally suasive one. Poor, innocent Ukraine was shamelessly attacked by the nogoodnik Putin, intent on recreating the Russian Empire as though he’d been possessed by the spirit of Kaiser Wilhelm II. Horton regards this narrative as simplistic and naive, and – to those in authority doing the telling – self-serving. The history begins with the promising end of the 1980s: Reagan and Gorbachev agreeing to destroy 90% of the world’s nuclear arms; the fall of the wall in Germany; the dissolution of the Soviet Union observed by a savvy George H.W. Bush who promised not to dance on the remains of the Berlin wall. There were many in the United States who argued for a return to being a ‘normal country’ – but that did not happen. Blame it on the military industrial complex, or the hubris of DC’s elite who viewed this as America’s time to step fully into the sun and become the world power – the global peacemaker and arbiter of order. This had already begun by the end of Bush I’s administration, and the aggrandizement only intensified with every succeeding president. Horton attributes this to the ‘iron triangle’, a joint effort of think tanks, lobbying firms, and the defense industry.
We learn of Clinton openly sending people to involve themselves in Russia’s first elections, of dumping foreign aid carelessly into the hands of men who would become Russia’s oligarchs, and of Clinton taking advantage of Russia’s sudden withdrawal to begin meddling in Bosnia. At first, this Bosnian adventure seems like a strange detour, nowhere near the gates of Kiev or the Kremlin, but it serves two purposes in Horton’s narrative. First, it shows that rather than winding down NATO or becoming a “normal country,” DC chose to bask in its unipolar moment and rebrand itself as a global peacekeeper—resolving disputes largely in its own interests. NATO, in turn, became a tool to keep Europe aligned with DC’s strategic vision, just as the European Union was starting to take shape. It would be a bit and bridle keeping Europe trotting to DC’s lead. Second, the stated justification for U.S. and NATO intervention in the Balkans—the protection of an ethnic minority from a belligerent majority—is exactly the precedent Vladimir Putin cited when he announced the invasion of the Donbass to protect the lives of Russian Ukrainians from a hostile government.
I am not going to attempt to precis a book this large and so overflowing with details, but one running theme for me was how invasive and often destructive DC’s elites have been. I have been a cranky libertarian for fifteen years now; before that I was reading Howard Zinn and Stephen Kinzer. I thought I was as cynical about DC as it was possible to be, but Horton treated me to a new course in stunned outrage. Learning about the US role in how Russia stumbled from Soviet cronyism to kleptocratic cronyism was one thing, but seeing Clinton aiding and abetting jihadist groups in Yugoslavia – and ditto Bush in Chechnya later on – made me furious, frankly. In pursuit of “global dominance”, under the color of spreading “democracy”, DC has armed and funded bad actors year after year. There’s one shocking statement in here where, witnessing the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, a state department official muses that this situation could work quite well for us: Afghanistan might become another Saudi Arabia. We get oil and stability; the women get burkas. In addition to the main geopolitical coverage – covering how DC essentially resurrected NATO’s reason for being by antagonizing Russia into belligerence – Scott also looks at the way DC’s propaganda machine has managed public opinion at home. One golden example of this is the Washington Post crying foul because Trump was ending support to an “anti-Assad” group in Syria. The group? al-Queda. So much for “never forget”.
It should be noted that Horton writes not in defense of Russia’s actions, but as an explanation of how Putin came to a tipping point where he decided expending men and material to secure Russian interests in the Donbass was more prudent than not. It is an exercise in literary realpolitik. But just as Ron Paul was hissed at by John McCain for suggesting that US foreign policy had led to terrorism becoming an active threat, so too are any critics of the DC-Brussels narrative dismissed as Putin apologists. As Horton said in an interview about the book, though, “The title is Provoked – not Justified.” Time and again we see DC deliberately shoving its weapons into Russia’s personal space – in Georgia in 2008, and especially in Ukraine in 2014. The Maidan ‘coup’, or ‘revolution’ – which noun the reader uses depends on how seriously they take DC and its corporate media allies’ version of the facts – is most important here, because it led directly to the 2022 move by Russia. The democratically elected president of Ukraine was overthrown and a hostile anti-Russia figure installed in office: Russia, in response to a declared enemy on their borders, rushed to secure its bases in Crimea. Ever since then, Russians in the Donbass regions – regions appended to Ukraine by the Soviets, not historically connected to Ukraine – have been antagonized by ‘their’ government in Kiev. Readers may say Russia should have operated through diplomatic channels, but when the DC-Eurocracy is actively promoting anti-Russians on Russia’s borders, why are they surprised when Russia retaliates? DC even promoted Islamic terrorists within Russia during the early War on Terror! Provoke a bear, and it swats back angrily; it does not matter to the bear that you think it is somewhere it ought not to be. This is most visible when Hillary Clinton declared that Russia was doing things in NATO’s backyard – because NATO had pushed its backyard into Russia’s patio. Pray tell, what relation do Poland and Ukraine have to the North Atlantic?
Provoked is not an easy book: in size, in density, or in its challenge to mainstream narratives. There are many for whom Russia is simply the villain, full stop, and its geostrategic interests and fears do not concern them a wit. I doubt this book will sway them—not as though they’d pick up a 700-page book contra to their own opinion to begin with. But for those willing to sit with complexity, Horton offers something vital: a way to understand Putin’s actions without excusing them. The “Provoked, not Justified” distinction matters. One can recognize that DC spent three decades treating Russia like a defeated enemy rather than a potential partner, even laughing at its application to join NATO, and that it armed jihadists and staged coups and pushed NATO right up to Russia’s doorstep—and still condemn the invasion of Ukraine. Understanding why someone does something is not the same as endorsing it. But if we don’t understand the provocations, we’re left with a Saturday-morning-cartoon version of geopolitics where Putin is just a villain coldly swiveling around in his wingtip chair, stroking a cat, and that shallow narrative makes it impossible to prevent the next disaster.
I’ve listened to Scott’s podcast for years, so I thought I knew how the pieces fit together, more or less—but Scott goes into deep detail on ancillary things like Bosnia and the Balkans, all new terrain for me. Even those who think they know this story will find Provoked teaches them something. And for those coming to it fresh, willing to question what they’ve been told? It will both enrage and edify. For anyone trying to understand how the post–Cold War world curdled into a new cold war—and why Ukraine became the flashpoint—this is a daunting but monumentally useful account.
NOTE: Read in June 2025. Re-read in stages in the last six months. This is a big ol’ book.
January was….a serious month, movie-wise. Lot of emotional intensity. Perhaps that’s right for a month often defined by people taking stock of the past, looking for the future, and deciding how to navigate the bridge betwixt them. I almost had another for this list, but I fell asleep and woke up in February.
Train Dreams, 2025. I started my year off on an….interesting note. Rod Dreher recommended this movie to me (or, to his substack subscribers in general – although I’ve spoken with him a few times we do not exchange cinematic correspondence), describing it as something like a Wendell Berry story. As I watched, I could hear Berry in my mind: “‘That which cannot be helped must be endured,’ Mat said, and he was a man who knew.” Readers of Berry, of course, know the tragedies Mat Feltner endured; that line is one of the reasons Port William grows and grows and grows the more one reads its stories. Train Dreams is a story of endurance, and like Rod I will try desperately to avoid spoilers: let us say it is the story of a man who had happiness and a simple life, and yet lost it and was forced to endure and grapple for meaning in the present while haunted by the past. Excellent writing, acting, and cinematography. Like Wonka, I will venture to say this movie will be on my top ten list despite how early in the year it is. If you like thoughtful movies, deep character focus, and reflections on suffering, I can recommend this. It is NOT a “Friday night with beer and pizza” kind of film, though. I loved the writing and, like Rod, looked for the book which this is based. (It underwhelmed.) Will be looking into Joel Edgerton: he plays this gentle, melancholy Job so well. I cannot BELIEVE he was also in Great Gatsby: I did not recognize him at all. William Macy also appears in very fine form. Word of warning, this may be a movie to watch with kleenex: I had an allergic reaction that caused some eyeball leaking.
“There was Apostle Frank, a faller who spoke about the Bible with such familiarity as to suggest he’d been there when it was all written down.”
“This world is intricately stitched together, boys. Every thread we pull, we know not how it affects the design of things. We are but children on this Earth, pulling bolts out of a Ferris wheel thinking ourselves to be gods.”
“Beautiful, ain’t it?” “What is?” “Everthin’. Every last bit of it.”
“My family is…everywhere there’s a smiling face. Never been somewhere I didn’t have some family. Except for Kansas. That state is a collection of savage lunatics.”
“They told me about you, you know. The people who recommended you. Said you was different.” “Ain’t everybody different?” “No.”
“Sometimes it feels like the sadness will eat me alive. Sometimes it feels like it happened to somebody else.”
“I had more questions than answers…like nobody’d ever died before.”
“The world needs a hermit in the woods as much as it needs a preacher in the pulpit.
Home Again, 2017. Reese Witherspoon is a single mom who just hit forty; at least she has her late movie-producer’s daddy’s house. And guesthouse. At her 40th birthday party, she meets 3 aspiring filmmakers who are being kicked out of their digs, and her mother volunteers the guesthouse because one filmmaker is obsessed with mom’s acting career and knows how to flatter her. This is a sweet film about “found family”. Ladyfriend and I watched this because it was my turn to pick and I saw Reese Witherspoon.
Shall We Dance?, 1996. (Shall we ダンス?) A middle-aged Japanese accountant, going through the motions of a comfortable but joyless life, notices a woman gazing down from a ballroom dance studio during his evening commute. On impulse, he begins taking dance lessons. The effect on his spirits is immediate—and so noticeable that his wife grows suspicious. The film gently explains that ballroom dancing carries social stigma in Japan—public physical intimacy between spouses is rare, let alone with strangers—so dance here becomes a small, subversive act of self-discovery. While there is tension involving one of the instructors, this is not a story about infidelity; dance itself is the affair. Warm, funny, and humane, the film is enriched by small character touches, especially Mr. Aoki, an accountant by day who transforms into a passionate Latin dancer by night. A lovely, sweet movie about joy rediscovered. The trailer for the American version appears to lean more heavily into comedy than character drama, but I am still interested in watching it, if only for Stanley Tucci’s take on the memorable Mr. Aoki.
Our Little Sister, 2015. Three adult daughters receive word that their father, who had left their mother for another woman, has died. They travel to attend his funeral and there meet their effectively orphaned half-sister, Suzu. Although there’s obviously resentment toward their father for abandoning them, the sisters – Sachi, Yoshiko, and Chika – don’t hold it against young Suzu. Suzu, for her part, is deeply bothered by her father being a twice-over adulterer, who is described by his older daughters as “Kind, but useless” – a man who had a habit for falling for needy women. Plotwise, this is not a film in which A Succession Of Things Happen Leading to A Dramatic Conclusion: it’s more of….an immersion into the life of these women, watching how they sort out their own issues and their issues with others around one another. (This two hour movie was more like a 3.5 one for me, because I kept pausing to google things or query chatgpt. I learned a lot about chopsticks.) A very ‘human’ film, if that makes sense. My first but probably not my last Hirokazu Kore-eda.
Lincoln, 2012. I have resisted this film for some time, but the star talent onboard – Sally Field, Jared Harris, James Spader, David Straitharn, TOMMY LEE JONES! – combined with my current historical obsession finally put it before me. Daniel Day Lewis does an excellent portrayal of Abraham Lincoln attempting to pass the 13th amendment to ban slavery in early ‘65 during the war. Lewis is good at conveying Lincoln’s ‘folksiness’, his humor, his charisma, his expressed humility. There’s a lot of great acting going on, with a wide and deep bench: I laughed far too much at Sally Field (Mrs. Lincoln) sassing Tommy Lee Jones. Jared Harris was a surprise as Sam Grant, I will say. I love so many of these actors, making this a grand time despite its historical inaccuracies: the Capitol is shown in full form despite its new Dome still being under construction during the war years. (Definitely do not recommend watching movies with a history major.)
Lincoln: There was Jefferson City lawyer who had a parrot who started each day with TODAY IS THE DAY THE WORLD SHALL END, AS SCRIPTURES HAVE FORETOLD! Until one day the lawyer shot him – for peace and quiet, I presume – thus fulfilling, for the bird at least, his prophecy. Me: XD Everyone in Lincoln’s Oval Office: O_O
Tommy Lee Jones: It’s late. I am old. I am going home. Me: Hear hear!
Lincoln: The compass, I learnt when I was surveying, it’ll point you true north from where you’re standing – but it’s got no advice about the swamps, the deserts, and the chasms you’ll encounter along the way. If in pursuit of your destination, you plunge ahead heedless of obstacles, and achieve nothing more than to sink in a swamp… what’s the use of knowing true north?
Student: Sir, I don’t understand. Giamatti: THAT’s glaringly apparent. Student: Sir, I can’t fail this class! Giamatti: Oh, don’t sell yourself short! I truly believe you can!
The Holdovers, 2023. Paul Giamatti plays a curmudgeon (I’m sold already) who is forced to spend Christmas break with a rascal student named Tully (first name Marcus, last name Cicero?) Although at first they knock heads, as the weeks pass they develop a genuine bond – both men having their own inner demons. A sweet and delightful movie.
“Mr. Koontz, for most people, life is like a henhouse ladder – shitty and short. You were born lucky. Maybe one day you entitled little degenerates will appreciate that.”
“Stop RIGHT there. You know the gym is strictly off limits. This is your Rubicon. Do not cross the Rubicon.” “Alea iacta est!!”
(Giamatti is kissed) Female Teacher: Mistletoeeeeee!! Giamatti: You know, Aeneas brought mistletoe with him when he searched for his father in the underworld.
Giamatti: There is nothing new in human experience, Mr. Tully. Every generation thinks it invented debauchery, or suffering, or rebellion, but Man’s every impulse and appetite, from the disgusting to the sublime, is on is display right here [in this hall of antiquities]. All around you! So, before you dismiss something as boring or irrelevant, remember – if you truly want to understand the Present, or yourself, you must begin in the past. You see, history is not simply a study of the past: it is an explanation of the present.
The Young Mr. Lincoln, 1939. Henry Fonda plays the Young Mr. Lincoln. Directed by John Ford, this depicts “Honest Abe” as a twenty-something studying law and venturing into politics. We then see him stand against mob justice and demonstrate quick wit in courts of law, disarming his opponents with humor before he wallops them with argument. Most of the movie follows Lincoln through his ‘first trial’, a murder, and his future antagonist Judge Stephen Douglas presides. This is a nice nod for the history majors watching, though in truth Lincoln’s first case was a boring land-border dispute. There are some liberties taken with courtroom procedure; I was yelling “Objection! Defense counsel is testifying!” at the screen.
Lincoln: I’m not sayin’ you fellers aren’t right. Maybe these boys do deserve to hang. With me handlin’ their case, you probably don’t have much to worry about on that score. All I’m askin’ is,….. let it be done with some legal pop, some show! Mac: We’ve gone to a heap of trouble to not have at least one hangin’!
Lincoln: Trouble is, when men go to takin’ the law into their own hands, they go to hangin’ just for fun. We do things together we wouldn’t do ourselves.
Mary Todd: Well, Mr. Lincoln, I will say – you are a man of honor. You said you wanted to dance with me in the worst way, and that was the worst way I have ever danced. Shall we go outside instead of – dancing?
Enola Holmes, 2020. The ladyfriend thought I might like this, and she was right – what with the Sherlock connection, combined with bicycles and trains. Henry Cavill plays a young Sherlock Holmes, but he is not the main character. His sister Enola is: she was raised by their mother, Helena Bonham Carter, who is brilliant but eccentric; after HBC disappears, Sherlock’s big brother Mycroft takes over as Enola’s ward and tries to shove her in a boarding home, only she’s more interested in solving the mystery. Sherlock is her accomplice, though not very overtly: he tries to toe the line between being a dutiful brother to Mycroft and a helpful brother to Enola. Given the date of the movie, there’s abundant silliness – a teenage girl beating grown men in fights because she was taught jiu jitsu, that sort of thing – but I enjoyed it. The fourth wall is absent altogether.
After the Storm, 2016. A return to Kore-eda. A divorced writer, Ryota, has sunk into fairly low ground in life, throwing away his meager earnings as a private detective at the bicycle racing track. Between his gambling debts and his inability to commit to the detective job – he prefers working part-time and pretending he’s writing another great novel – his circumstances are pretty dismal, and everyone – his mother, his sister, his ex-wife, and his son – are disappointed in him. Knowing that his ex-wife Kyoko is about to bar him from seeing his son if he doesn’t pony up 100,000 yen, Ryoto has a desperate idea: use the arrival of an imminent typhoon to trap Kyoko and their son with him at his mother’s apartment. Surely he can get through to her before the dawn? This is a fairly melancholy and philosophical film, but as with Our Little Sister there’s pleasure in the saturation of real moments. This is not an action film, it’s not driving us somewhere – and yet the story does arrive. It’s ultimately about dealing with disappointment – not being crippled by it, but learning how to continue to strive. It’s sad, but sweet.
“At my age, making new friends just means going to more funerals.”
“It’s not that easy growing up to be the man you want to be.”
“Missing him after he’s gone won’t bring him back. You have to deal with people while they’re here.
“I’m not who I wanted to be, yet….but it doesn’t matter. What matters is to live my life trying to be the person I want to be.”
What kind of future was I dreaming of? Farewell to me from yesterday…
I can now say I have held a baby goat. I did not expect to do so at the library. This ‘Angel’ was a week old.
The first month of 2026 is now ‘in the books’ so to speak. In Alabama, winter finally came in and made itself comfortable — taking off its boots and growing to be a pest, ordering us to leave the water running and forcing us to leave bed early because we had to deice the car windshield. While my usual habit is for January to be a fairly diverse month, a showcase for the different kinds of books I read throughout the year, that did not happen this year. January was dominated by history: it was the only nonfiction I read! What I’ll remember most is diving into the catalogue of Los Angeles Theatre Works.. I listened to three of their two-hour plays this month, and angrily DNFd another. (The DNF was a play about Benedict Arnold, and I was really enjoying it until George Washington began making appearances: he’s portrayed as foul-mouthed and generally crass. As much as I enjoyed Richard Dreyfuss as Arnold, making Washington sound like a vulgar bar rat was enough for me to pull the plug.) I also enjoyed two of the Harry Potter full cast audio editions, both of which were great fun, as well as another play that I’ve seen on stage several times, “The Importance of Being Earnest”. The play is hilarious, of course, and Stephen Fry here features as Lady Bracknell, which was as entertaining as you can imagine.
In book news, Rod Dreher announced that his book proposal for The Totalitarian Temptation (or as he preferred, Warning to Weimar America) has been picked up by someone. It will be interesting to watch him “write” a book again from a substack window: he’s been writing about his Weimar reading for months now. It will be especially interesting when compared to his Live Not By Lies, on soft totalitarianism. (Criminy, I never reviewed that! Need to give it a reread. His premise is that American society meets many of the conditions Hannah Arendt argued fostered a totalitarian society — particularly widespread atomization, loneliness, and a meaning crisis.
Coming up in February…
Well, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire releases a full-cast audio edition, so I’ll be jumping on that. It should be longer than the three preceding ones, though, so I probably won’t wolf it down so quickly. Black Baseball in Alabama has been ordered by my library but not yet shipped, so I may see that one coming in. Michael Shermer just released a book called Truth: What It Is and How to Find It, which I want to read but am realizing I still haven’t read his last book on conspiracy thinking yet.
The aim of the Christian, after all, is to practice humility. This sounds nice on the surface, but in order to be humble, you first have to be humiliated, and none of us wants that part. – Paul Kingsnorth, “Of Slugs and Saints“.
“This world is intricately stitched together, boys. Every thread we pull, we know not how it effects the design of things. We are but children on this Earth, pulling bolts out of a Ferris wheel thinking ourselves to be gods.” (Train Dreams, movie)
“It sounds silly to say but I think a surprising amount of a good life is noticing what makes you feel worse and not doing it. Put simply, most of a good life is refusing to do what is bad.” – Tommy Dixon, “What is Social Media Good For?“
“Our discourse is so trivialised…I don’t think we can have something as serious as democracy when discourse is as trivial as ours. […] We’re in this strange paradox whereby people are less informed by politics and more interested in it.” “The Slopification of Literature“, Unherd. James Marriott.
Long-term illness, like baptism, is a form of rebirth. All of the saints in the Christian tradition speak to this reality, again and again. ‘It is absurd’, declared St Anthony the Great, ‘to be grateful to doctors who give us bitter and unpleasant medicines to cure our bodies, and yet to be ungrateful to God for what appears to us to be harsh, not grasping that all we encounter is for our benefit and in accordance with His providence.’ How could sickness be ‘providential’? It is hard to think of a notion that is likely to meet with more mockery or confusion in today’s world. But the Christian understanding has always been that illness can serve a purpose. Suffering changes you. Sickness knocks you down. Pride becomes harder when you’re largely useless to the world. I have been a Christian for years now, but I have never felt closer to Christ than I have these past three months. – Paul Kingsnorth, “Going Down, Coming Up“.
My thoughts, left unattended, behave like unruly children in a grocery store. They pull everything off the shelves. To be present with another person is a discipline, not a default setting. I begin to see how poorly I love, how naturally I love myself first and best, and how insistently Christ calls me to reverse the order. – Kenneth B, “Confession is Ruining my Self-Righteousness“.
When our heart is filled with anger when others are wrong the devils rejoice. We shouldn’t feel anger at others but sorrow towards their sin. Our calling is not to fight the evil in others but the evil in ourselves. – Alexandru Constantin, “An Apology to my Readers“
The question with fiction is not if it will shape you, but how? The fiction you read is molding your thoughts, behaviors, and attitudes, whether or not you realize it. It is incumbent upon the storyteller to direct its creation—and thereby, its readers—towards goodness, truth, and beauty, since storytellers are not only the custodians of the imagination; they are the custodians of the soul. – Liana Graham, “The Slopificiation of Women’s Literature“
Mickey Haller has been asked to do the unthinkable: to cross the aisle and serve as a prosecutor. The reason is simple: an old case is being re-tried, and for propriety’s sake, the City of Los Angeles wants to bring in someone who can work the case without any old prejudices and without suspicion of trying to hide any old mistakes. Mickey agrees on two terms: one, his ex-wife Maggie McPherson be his assistant counsel; and two, he gets to choose the police investigator who helps him build the case. His choice? Harry Bosch, the star of Connelly’s prior novels and Mickey’s half-brother. Haller and Bosch have run into each other a few times at this point in their respective series, but this is truly a family reunion with each brother’s daughters getting to be friends and sometimes sheltering together when it appears the case might be getting personal.
The Reversal is a legal novel, by and large, with some ‘creepy’ elements in that the accused has strange nocturnal habits; he parks in strange places around the city, sitting alone with a burning candle. Bosch has the grim suspicion that the accused was in fact a serial killer, and that the man is visiting sites related to his prior kills. Haller has a lot of his own plate, revisiting evidence that’s decades old, and trying to figure out what angle the defense might take. The pace is fast, spurred on by a judge with no tolerance for time-wasting theatrics, or for lawyers who play games – and the more the story develops, the more dangerous the circumstances grow for those involved in the case. The ending is right out of left field and is more in Bosch’s ballpark.
This was an enjoyable return to Bosch & Haller, though I imagine readers’ reactions to the end will vary wildly.