Long & Short Reviews: Traditions

Today’s blogging prompt from Long and Short Reviews concerns Christmas holiday traditions. Christmas, for me, always began the day either after Thanksgiving, or when I came home from school, and saw the shed door open. Although it was a lot of work — and dirty work, too, given the amount of spiders and the like in that shed — that open door always got me excited given what it led to. Not the shed, but Christmas! The leaves were all gone from the trees by now, covering the yard like a crinkly brown rug, and we’d troop back and forth across them lugging in box after box of Christmas stuff. My mother was and remains an absolute nut for decorating. One of the boxes was always the tree, which we assembled and tried to repair. After that came the ornaments — tangled Christmas tree lights, balls that were invariably broken from transit, and then the few keepsake ornaments like a tattered little Santa Claus who used candy canes for arms and legs. We’d decorate together, listening to Christmas music from the radio. My second-grad teacher Mrs Walker gave that to me, and despite its raggedy nature I loved it. Once the insides of the boxes had been disgorged and filled our house, things just settled in until the 24th. Then, on Christmas Eve, we’d pile into the family vehicle that year and go looking at Christmas lights, listening to music on the radio. The one I remember most vividly was the year we didn’t have a working vehicle except for my dad’s truck, which didn’t have a working heater, so we all piled into the single front seat bundled up and smooshed together — which no one complained about, because at least we were warm. I vividly remember a long evening of driving around in that old truck and coming back through town that evening, listening to “Christmas in Dixie” and looking at the lights on shotgun house, feeling warm and so very, very content. Once we got home, we were given one present to open — always a book — and then it was off to bed. I’d barely managed to sleep, brimming over with excitement, and then as soon as I awoke (at the ungodly hour of five am, probably — how do kids manage that?) I’d race into the living room to see what “Santa” had left on the couch. My sisters and dad always slept in, so usually in those dark hours it was just my mom and myself. Breakfast was invariably “sausage rolls”, at by mid-morning we were packing up to go to my grandmother’s where we’d be for the next twelve hours. My dad had four siblings, all of whom had litters of kids, so I’d see hundreds of people throughout the course of the day. We had a set lunch time, but after that it was open grazing. The day was made complete by the adults participating in a gag-gift night, the humor of which they’d often find hysterical but we kids mystified by. Invariably, some uncles or cousins would be absent hunting, but they’d roll up in the evening wanting to show off the deer they’d bagged. At long last we were back home, and the next day brought the dreadful spectre of…..putting everything back in the boxes. Oh, brother.

These days things are more low-key, at least for me. My sisters and parents decorate, but I’m not involved: I like a small tree that fits on my chest of drawers and a little circle of Advent candles, but that’s about it. As the years have passed I find I dislike the consumer side of Christmas more and more: my nieces and nephews are all adults now, so there’s no magic in watching anyone open anything, except on the rare years when I’ve had an idea for a gift that someone will actually need and want. It’s usually just us exchanging clothing and random objects from the store that “I thought you might like”. (Or, you know, at least accept and acknowledge that yes, I tried.) To my annoyance, even though everyone else in the family expresses the same discomfort about the gift grudge, no one is willing to just….not do it. We have to give gifts, it’s not Christmas otherwise! Humbug. To me, Christmas is still a family day — but more importantly, over the years, I’ve oriented myself toward the original intent of the day — Christ’s Mass, and the annual Christmas Eve service has become a keystone part of the year for me. There is nothing quite like a church darkened save for a few hundred people holding candles and singing “Silent Night” together. One of my very best friends — before I met her — was invited by someone to experience the service and was so moved by it that she’s never stopped coming. I also love going to the Christmas service proper, though unless it’s a Sunday it’s a very low key affair and peopled only by the priest and people like myself who really want to be there. One of my favorite traditions in recent years is popping by a friends’ house who lives downtown: he and his wife have an all-day open door policy that begins with grits and tomato gravy at 10:00, and culminates in a big spread of ham, turkey, and homemade egg nog in the evening. Regrettably, the days of the Epic Family Gathering are over: my grandparents are both passed, and now their kids are the nucleii of their own smaller gatherings. However, my day is still filled with the warmth of friends, family, and faith regardless of the outside chill.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Hitlers amerikanische Freunde

Years ago when the History Channel was more interested in Hitler than aliens and ice road truckers, I happened upon a documentary there about German-Americans in the United States who supported the “New Germany” from their adopted country. I was young and had never thought about how immigrants’ native cultures could influence their politics, so it was fascinating. Hitler’s American Friends revisits that subject to some degree, though it examines the pro-German or pro-Nazi sympathies of various factions within the United States, not merely ethnic Germans. They include members of economic and political schools of thought sympathetic to various aspects of fascism, from its economic policies to institutionalized antisemitism; Americans who were studying in Germany to take advantage of its technical programs; corporate magnates whose business interests in Germany made them eager to work with the new regime and sharply critical of anything that would lead to war; and Americans of any stripe who opposed intervention.

The book is a mixed bag: it dwells on a lot of interesting characters like Father Charles Coughlin, and has many interesting revelations, like the fact that American car manufacturers kept trying to keep business as usual going in their European plants even after France had fallen and the war begun in earnest. I was not impressed, however, with the casual lumping of non-interventionists in with American fascists: Venn diagrams exist for a reason. Related and more substantial is the lack of context: Hart refers to fascism throughout the text, but never defines it and never explores why people might be attracted to its manner of political and economic organization, so he leaves the unlearned reader with the impression that there were just gogs of people in 1930s America who wanted to strut around in Hugo Boss uniforms and build death camps like Levittowns. This is most obvious in regards Father Coughlin, who was the 1930s version of a superinfluencer: he could command a fifth of America’s ears at any one time, and had his own ideas about politics and economics that made him a force against the New Deal, with a sixteen point plan that inspired a political party. Hart quotes one source dismissing these points as identical to fascism, but even a 1965 critic of Coughlin, Tull, described them as ‘mild socialism’ or ‘reform capitalism’. The closest thing I can find that shares the sixteen points is a list from the Holocaust Encyclopedia, and the most interesting part of the list is his attack on the public-private corrupter of American money, the Fed. Frankly, Hart tends to push every critic of Roosevelt and the New Deal into the “Hitler’s American Friends” camp, which is inaccurate. He likes to write with a bit of clickbait energy: at one point he declared that within a year of one man’s speech, his “scattered remains would be recovered in a Virginia field”, with mysteries remaining to this day. That sounds like a hell of a story, but when I did some digging I discovered that the fellow died in a plane crash. Fortunately, the book is salvaged somewhat by the many outrageous characters it covers, including one Hupa tribe member who went around calling himself Chief Red Cloud and giving pro-Hitler speeches. (He was under the influence of one Silver Legion fellow named Pelley, who argued that the Bureau of Indian Affairs was run wholly by Jews.) There were so many big personalities in the German-American Bund, Silver Shirts, and similar organizations that they continued creating drama and falling apart, so much so that Hitler and German consuls were actively disavowing connection with them and urging good Germans in the United States not to associate with them. Hart’s treatment of Charles Lindbergh is surprisingly charitable, treating him as someone who was naive, overly impressed by his experiences with modern German aviation, and who listened to entirely too many anti-Semitic friends.

This was an interesting if flawed read, but it did make me do some digging around some of the bizaare characters involved, and I suspect I shall be researching more into Coughlin: I’ve ILL’d a book on him and Huey Long to compare their particular brands of populism, and their policies compared against one another and Roosevelt’s own economic re-ordering.

Highlights:

“One cannot always be certain of what Pelley favors, but one is seldom left in doubt as to what Pelley opposes, and he opposes many things. The Jews, of course, are his chief objects of hatred. To Pelley, the Jews are the root of all evil. Whenever he is against anything, it is because Jews are connected with it, and if he can’t find Jews, he creates them. Thus, his chief objection to Communism is its alleged Jewishness.”

Pelley’s sudden interest in Native Americans stemmed from a supposed divine realization that the Bureau of Indian Affairs had been taken over by Bolsheviks. Native Americans were therefore natural allies for his political movement because they too were supposedly victims of the Jewish conspiracy Pelley saw everywhere. Among the many problems with this eccentric plan was the fact that Pelley did not actually know many Native Americans. His efforts to reach out by referring to himself as “Chief Pelley of the Tribe of Silver” and writing articles in prose that could have been lifted from the stock characters of Hollywood Westerns gained few supporters.

One Native American ally Pelley did manage to recruit was a mixed-race Portland attorney named Elwood A. Towner who soon took on a bizarre role. Adopting the “Indian title” of Chief Red Cloud, Towner began attending legion and Bund meetings up and down the West Coast and drew sizable crowds as he wore a stereotypical feather headdress and clothing covered in swastikas.

With a higher degree of personal discipline, Pelley might well have become the leader around which the far right could coalesce. With his ideological flexibility, flair for the dramatic, and ability to harness religious language (even in his own unique way), Pelley could have been formidable. As it turned out, he was merely a flash in the pan who ended up being exposed as an unscrupulous fraudster.

American businessmen with holdings in Germany had a vested financial interest in making peace, especially with the Royal Air Force starting to bomb German factories that might soon include their own. Remarkably, even after the war’s start American corporate bosses tried to maintain a sense of normalcy in relations with their German divisions. Ford’s Dearborn office continued to communicate with its Cologne factory, and even sent new equipment to the plant in 1941 to boost production for the German military.

Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

On the first tease of Tuesmas, my true love gave to me

Fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive GOLD-en RIIIIIINGS!

(ahem) Sorry. ‘Tis the season. Here’s a tease and then the top ten.

In order to become a swordsmith, Kevin had to be something of a Renaissance man: equal parts historian, artist, scientist, mathematician, and detective. Some of his replica swords are not just visual swords; they are authentically produced with metals that are scientifically accurate to their era. He will replicate the ancient process by digging his own ore out of the ground and smelting his own iron in an early type of charcoal furnace. History is not just the final object but the steps and processes that lead to it.

The Craftman’s Legacy, Eric Gorges

Today is a freebie and I was going to do my favorite substacks but it was hard to pick betwixt them. I may do that one randomly in the future. Going to go with “My Favorite New-to-Me Movies Watched in 2023”. I had trailers and moving scenes all embedded, but YouTube decided to be a total grinch and only allowed one.

A Man Called Otto. Based on the Swedish novel, Otto is about a widower named Otto (spoiler alert) whose punctiliousness and despair at the world has led him to trying to destroy himself. Connections with new neighbors keep preventing this.

Falling Down, 1993. Kirk Douglas plays a frustrated man who slips over the edge and tries to get ‘home’ to his ex-wife and child, taking out his frustrations with modernity along the way. Instant favorite, and one to rewatch.

American Graffiti, 1978. It’s like Dazed and Confused, but set in the 1960s. GREAT soundtrack, solid acting from Richard Dreyfuss and co. Enjoyed seeing Harrison Ford as a singing hick with a penchant for drag-racing.

Mr. Holland’s Opus, 1995. I’ve been wanting to watch this for ages, and knew I’d love it because I’ve watched clips from it on youtube so often. MHO begins with an aspiring composer taking a gig as a high school music teacher to keep bologna in the fridge while he’s pursuing his dreams. Instead, he finds Time and Responsibilities growing around him, in addition to the enormous challenge of raising a son who is hearing impaired. The challenge is both practical and emotional, as Mr. Holland is at a loss with how to relate to someone who can’t hear the music that so possesses his own soul. Very emotionally-laden film that ends with an appropriate crescendo.

Mon Oncle, 1958. An interesting French film about a young boy being raised in a brutalistic modern house by materialistic parents, who much prefers time spent with his uncle, a cheerful chap in a comfortable suit who lives in the old town. Loved the “modernity is inhumane” theme, as we frequently switch between the flawed but lovely to the perfect, clean, and brutal.

The music from it has been stuck in my head for months.

Stand by Me, 1985. A coming of age story about four young boys who hike into the woods trying to find the body of a kid their age who had gone missing. Interesting relationship between Will and Gordie, reminiscent of Ben Affleck and Matt Damon’s characters in Good Will Hunting – in that the ‘dumb, tough’ friend is extremely supportive of his friend’s intellectual/creative gifts and urges him to look for a life beyond where they grew up. There’s a lot of emotion in the boys’ relationships, which is unusual – I don’t know of many movies in which children, especially boys, get their souls plumbed the way we see here.

Umbrellas of Cherbourg, 1964. A beautiful French musical about young love, heartbreak, and human resilience. Everything is sung.

The Founder, 2016. A story about the origin and expansion of McDonalds, fueled by Ray Croc. I think he’s meant to be the villain. Great acting, loved the classic cars. Nick Offerman’s presence is an automatic 4 stars.

Mr. Right, Anna Kendricks. Watched for Anna Kendricks. Anna stumbles upon her boyfriend doing the tango with another woman and has a meltdown, but then meets a clown-assassin. It’s hilarious and it has Anna Kendricks. (And Anson Mount, if you’re nuts for Strange New Worlds like me.)

Cry-Baby, 1990. Another John Waters film, this one resembling a low-budget Grease. The nice square/soc girl fall and the drape/greaser boy fall for each other. The soundtrack has a lot of rockabilly, and has cameos from Iggy Pop and David “Yes, Ozzie and Harriet’s Son, David” Nelson.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | 13 Comments

November 2023 in Review

If October was a fun month, November was more of a …work month, as I was focused either on school projects (powerpoint presentation done tonight, final paper due Tuesday, yaaay) or tackling TBR titles. Presently, I need twelve more TBR titles down to hit my soft goal of 80 TBR books for the year, which is the majority of the pile: what remains is a solid foundation for next year’s Mount TBR to accumulate upon should be fairly easy to finish off in 2024. Last month I mentioned that I was thinking about sacking books I own, but have access to via libraries (obtaining grad school access to a university library has greatly expanded my options). I decided to go ahead and do that, and the titles are denoted with an asterisk.

Climbing Mount Doom:
The Outlaw Ocean, Ian Urbina
Hellfire, James Holland
Devil’s Pact, James Holland
The Moral Animal, Robert Wright
The Pilgrim’s Regress, C.S. Lewis
The Color of Law, Richard Rothstein
The Excluded Americans: Homelessness and Housing Policy, James Tucker
Asimov’s Inferno, Roger Allen. If I couldn’t get into this while spending 3 weeks recovering from a transplant, I ain’t gonna.
Asimov’s Paradise. Likewise.
*Life after Google: The Fall of Big Data and the Rise of the Blockchain Economy, George Gilder
*Teaching as a Subversive Activity, Neil Postman. 
*Tucket’s Travels:  Francis Tucket’s Adventures in the West, Gary Paulsen
*The Sunne in Splendour, Sharon Kay Penman 
*The Secret Chord, Geraldine Brooks



The Unreviewed:
Uhtred’s Feast, Bernard Cornwell. This is largely a book of medieval-esque recipes, with three short stories involving Uhtred. The short stories were enjoyable, especially the one set during Uhtred’s youth before his family was killed and he captured by the Danes.

The Moral Animal, Robert Wright. This one will probably get a review, as it’s one of my favorite topics — evolutionary psychology. The problem is that I read this slowly and piecemeal and didn’t take notes, and I’ve read into evo-psych so often previously that there weren’t many new ideas for me to fixate on and dive into.

Feminism against Progress. Review for this one is pending: I’ve just been fixated on a big social media, activism, and democracy project the last few weeks that limited my TBR progress and reading in general.

anti-social media: how facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. I may give this one a full review, but coming on the heels of Chaos Machine and The People vs Tech, it was a bit redundant for me. (I read the three back to back instead of spread out because of a class project on social media and activism.) I had very high hopes going in because Siva Vaidhyanathan was mentored by NEIL POSTMAN, but Vaidyanathan had a tendency to go off on irrelevant political tangents — devoting most of a page to explaining a reference to ‘The Alamo’ to a history of it that sounds like it was written by the dictator Santa Anna’s Ministerio de Propaganda. I think I may try more of Vaidhyanathan, at least his Anarchist in the Library, which…er, sounds like me.

Coming up in December….
The final assault (for 2023) on Mount Doom will begin. Once more into the breach, dear friends, once more, or close the wall up with our unread! Given that Advent starts Sunday, there may be a book or two on consumerism — something that started with Waste Away. I do like the fact that amid the superficial commercial whoring-out of Christmas there stands Advent in reproach.

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

Uncensored Memoirs of a Trailer Park Refugee

Ordinary, Average Guy: Uncensored Memoirs of a Trailer Park Refugee
© 2022 Michael Hankins
260 pages

Ahh, boyhood. A time for digging out forts in the sides of hills, running from water moccasins at the creek, and repeatedly bashing .45 ACP rounds to see what’s inside. I stumbled upon this book while researching a Selma suburb for a patron: it’s the childhood memories of an Air Force brat who lived everywhere from Florida to Alaska, including several years just outside of Selma in a trailer park near the now-defunct Air Force training base, Craig Field. Although I initially bought the book to experience the Selma stories, Hankins experienced life all over the country, from the Texas desert to the wilds of Alaska. He wrote this, he says at the outset, to prove that the average Joe has something to say, and to give his kids and grands some idea of their family’s life from the 1950s to the 1970s. The stories are presented largely chronologically, delivered in a personal tone, and run the gamut. Early on, it’s boyish antics: exploring, setting off explosives, building, tinkering, and getting into fights over girls with guys who will later become best friends. After the move to Alaska, where Hankins comes to maturity, we switch to stories about outdoors adventures (and misadventures, like escaping floods and moose), cars, guns, etc. He also includes one story written about his father and mother crash-landing a small plane into the mountains and then having to spend a bitterly cold night waiting for rescue. This is an easy read and enjoyable for me, but I’ll admit to be being predisposed to like it: my father worked at the same Air Force base, and my first six years of life were spent in a trailer park not a mile away from Hankins’ home, so I both knew the area and was utterly fascinated by seeing it differently in better years through his eyes — something he makes even better by including photos from the period!

Highlights:

Many kids, including myself, found M-80s the perfect propellant for homemade mortars. I’d take a piece of pipe then hammer a good portion of it into the ground. A lit M-80 would be dropped in the open end with a round rock to follow. With a loud explosion, the projectile would go flying completely out of sight. I always pointed my mortar into the woods to avoid hitting anyone, forgetting all about the resident moose, bear, and porcupines.

Related:
The author’s blog
The Other Side of Selma, R.B. “Dickie” Williams. Memories of living and working in Selma in this same period, but from a young adult. 2010 review here; 2019 re-read here.
Too Hill Too High for a Stepper, Mike Mahan. Boyhood memories of growing up in Montevallo in the ’40s and ’50s.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Best from Jack: C.S. Lewis Reading Day

Today is C.S. Lewis Reading Day, hosted by Pints with Jack, and participants are asked to share their favorite Lewisian quotes. I’m going to go with twelve Lewis quotes that are especially meaningful to me personally, or insightful enough that they’ve lodged in my mind.

When I first read Chesterton, I did not know what I was in for. God is, if I may say it, quite unscrupulous.

Surprised by Joy

The most dangerous thing you can do is to take any one impulse of your own nature and set it up as the thing you ought to follow at all costs. There’s not one of them which won’t make us into devils if we set it up as an absolute guide. You might think love of humanity in general was safe, but it isn’t. If you leave out justice you’ll find yourself breaking agreements and faking evidence in trials ‘for the sake of humanity’ and become in the end a cruel and treacherous man.”

Mere Christianity

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

God in the Dock

If we are all going to be destroyed by an atomic bomb, let that bomb when it comes find us doing sensible and human things—praying, working, teaching, reading, listening to music, bathing the children, playing tennis, chatting to our friends over a pint and a game of darts—not huddled together like frightened sheep and thinking about bombs. They may break our bodies (a microbe can do that) but they need not dominate our minds…

Present Concerns: Journalistic Essays

The safest road to Hell is the gradual one – the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.

The Screwtape Letters

The process of living seems to consist of coming to realize truths so ancient and simple that, if stated, they sound like barren platitudes. They cannot sound otherwise to those who have not had the relevant experience; that is why there is no teaching of such truths possible and every generation starts from scratch

The Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis

The books or the music in which we thought the beauty was located will betray us if we trust to them; it was not in them, it only came through them, and what came through them was longing. […] For they are not the thing itself; they are only the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have not yet visited. Do you think I am trying to weave a spell? Perhaps I am; but remember your fairy tales. Spells are used for breaking enchantments as well as for inducing them. And you and I have need of the strongest spell that can be found to wake us from the evil enchantment of worldliness which has been laid upon us for nearly a hundred years.

The Weight of Glory

To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything and your heart will be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact you must give it to no one, not even an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements. Lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket, safe, dark, motionless, airless, it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. To love is to be vulnerable.

The Four Loves

Indeed, if we consider the unblushing promises of reward and the staggering nature of the rewards promised in the Gospels, it would seem that Our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.

The Weight of Glory

We may be sure that the characteristic blindness of the twentieth century—the blindness about which posterity will ask, ‘But how could they have thought that?’—lies where we have never suspected it, and concerns something about which there is untroubled agreement between Hitler and President Roosevelt or between Mr. H. G. Wells and Karl Barth. None of us can fully escape this blindness, but we shall certainly increase it, and weaken our guard against it, if we read only modern books. Where they are true they will give us truths which we half knew already. Where they are false they will aggravate the error with which we are already dangerously ill. The only palliative is to keep the clean sea breeze of the centuries blowing through our minds, and this can be done only by reading old books. Not, of course, that there is any magic about the past. People were no cleverer then than they are now; they made as many mistakes as we. But not the same mistakes. They will not flatter us in the errors we are already committing; and their own errors, being now open and palpable, will not endanger us. Two heads are better than one, not because either is infallible, but because they are unlikely to go wrong in the same direction.

Present Concerns: Journalistic Essays

There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’

The Great Divorce

Those of us who have been true readers all our life seldom fully realize the enormous extension of our being which we owe to authors. We realize it best when we talk with an unliterary friend. He may be full of goodness and good sense but he inhabits a tiny world. In it, we should be suffocated. The man who is contented to be only himself, and therefore less a self, is in prison. My own eyes are not enough for me, I will see through those of others.

An Experiment in Criticism

Posted in General | Leave a comment

It’s the last tease of November, I’ll meet you at the station..

Today’s treble-T is “Top Ten Books Set in _________”. I haven’t thought of a topic yet, so I’ll edit this later. And now, the Tuesday tease!

If we let ourselves, we shall always be waiting for some distraction or other to end before we can really get down to our work. The only people who achieve much are those who want knowledge so badly that they seek it while the conditions are still unfavourable. Favourable conditions never come.

The Weight of Glory, C.S. Lewis

“Bart associated his responsible bill paying with having good credit, made possible by his regular income from the landfill. Yet his habit of financing large purchases, such as family vacations, simultaneously made his earned income, whether ‘twenty thousand…or a hundred and fifty thousand’ somewhat irrelevant. The more he paid off his debts, the more his credit allowed him the opportunity to spend however he liked, leaving him at risk of over-extending his family’s finances.”

Waste Away: Living and Working in a North American Landfill

Posted in General, Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Short rounds: C.S. Lewis and the anthropology of sanitation workers

First up, C.S. Lewis’ The Pilgrim’s Regress. Lewis dashed this off immediately after converting to Christianity in 1933, and it’s a fictional and fantastical rendering of his own journey throughout the twenties as he fell away from his childhood faith, explored modern philosophies and the occult, and finally found himself back where he’d started. This isn’t a book I’d planned to read, because over the years I’ve encountered Lewis panning it himself in letters and such to his friends: he wrote it too quickly and it was much too abstract, he commented. I found it at an estate sale for free, though. From its title and premise it definitely reminds one of The Pilgrim’s Progress, but whereas Progress was ‘just’ theological, Lewis has his fellow John running across ‘secular’ philosophies as well — though, depending on one’s definition of religion, Fascism and Socialism can both function as a religion, something I realized when exploring the latter back in ’08/’09. As with Bunyan, different philosophies and ideas are represented through personalities — but the story around them isn’t as interesting as Bunyan’s, and the story is more rushed: most people come and go with the turn of a page. The plot is largely driven by Lewis dreaming about a man named John, who grows up in a little place with a severe absent landlord who has many rules and threatens horrible punishments for breaking said rules, even those that seem benign. John is driven from his home, Puritania, not just by his fear and hate of the Landlord, but in pursuit of something beautiful — an Island — out there. His hunt for the island, Lewis’ ‘stabs of joy’, takes him all over the realm, meeting rationalists and idiots, noble warriors and dwarven savages, over and round and attempting to find a way to cross a great chasm. There’s a little woman named Mother Kirk who says she can help.

I’m something of a garbage book connoisseur, so on learning that I’d missed one in the last few years, naturally I had to hunt it down. It’s…an anthropological study of the men who work in landfills, and occasionally of the people who live around them. Imagine someone getting very pompous and academic about talking about people who work trash, and…well, there you are. That’s the book. There are several paragraphs given over to the importance of gloves, and the end-of-day ritual in which one’s gloves are disposed of, signifying both one’s freedom from the job of landfill worker, and the eternal cycle of trash: that which handled trash has now become trash — “the garbage keeps coming” is one mantra of the landfill managers. The book is less about trash and the handling thereof, and more about the men who work in the landfill, and those who live around it — who have, in the post industrial age, seen their cities dry up and had to trade keeping the roads paved by becoming the site of a mega landfill which they now attribute to rising health problems in the area. The most interesting chapter to me was “Smells Like Money”, in which we learn of how workers justify the indignity of handling other people’s trash (even Canadians‘) with the money they make, and how some who were pushed from the working to the ‘middle’ class in terms of income try to live up to expectations, creating a hedonic debt cycle that they can’t seem to escape from. Reno worked at the landfill as part of his graduate dissertation, but unlike Lawrence Oulett’s Pedal to the Metal, Reno is not only known to the landfill workers as a grad student but sticks out from them. (Oulett had driven trucks before he began studying drivers, so he blended right in.) Consequently, he catches a fair bit of hazing from the other san-men. Personally, though I have a great interest in the broader subject of waste and sanitation, I found Waste Away to be much too much impressed with itself.

More Trashy Books:
Rubbish! The Archaelogy of Garbage
Junkyard Planet: Travels in the Billion Dollar Trash Trade
Garbology: Our Dirty Love Affair with Trash
Picking Up: On the Streets and Behind the Trucks with the Sanitation Workers of New York City
Garbage Land: On the Secret Trail of Trash
Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage
Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash

Posted in Politics and Civic Interest, Religion and Philosophy, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Reflections on the Reading Life

As part of A Week with Jack, I’m going to respond to a few questions inspired by C.S. Lewis’ relationship with literature. These questions were presented to the reader at the end of The Reading Life, an anthology of Lewisian essays on literature, reading, and the meaning/value thereof. You are invited and welcome to participate, to whatever degree you feel comfortable.

List the ten books that have most shaped who you are today and write down a few sentences per book of how they have shaped you.

Neil Postman’s Technopoly has had a huge yet understated effect on my life and thought: it was the book that made me think about how our use of technology changes us, and it’s why despite being a tech geek, I’m also a quasi-luddite who only bought a smartphone in 2018, and then largely to serve as a camera. Erich Fromm’s essay “Ennui and Affluence”, included in For the Love of Life and then expanded into its own book, To Have or to Be? woke me up to the unhappiness caused by not just consumerism, but to material attachment, and along with Walden was the reason I began exploring voluntary simplicity and lived like a monk in college. The Meditations by Marcus Aurelius and The Consolations of Philosophy by Alain de Botton are must mentions, introducing me to a life inclined towards wisdom, and in Aurelius’ case, my engagement with his thinking made me realize and appreciate what religion felt like — the attempt to discern order in the Cosmos and then live by it. A Life of her Own by Emile Carles, which I read for a French history class, had a huge effect on my political thinking, introducing me to the libertarian left. The Death and Life of Great American Cities is one of the most important books I’ve ever read, introducing me to the concept of emergent order, and serving as the unwittingly catalyst for my transformation from a conflicted progressive into a conflicted libertarian. Robert Putnam’s Bowling Alone, like Kunstler’s Geography of Nowhere, brought into focus something I’d been aware of, but in a hazy, “can’t quite put my finger on it” sort of way, and it led to me engaging with conservative though, which I was starting to realize was more varied and substantive in quarters than I’d realized.

Lewis often describes the gift of reading as the opportunity to “see through others’ eyes.” Which books have you read that have revealed to you a very different view of the world from your own? How did these experiences change you? Which books should you read that would open up other worlds you are not familiar with—allowing that the differences could be cultural, racial, religious, historical, or something else?

This is a harder question to answer. given how many books I’ve read over the years — close to two thousand during this blog’s tenure. I’ve read books that would give me another perspective before — Destiny, Disrupted is a world history through Muslim eyes, for instance, and one of my favorite books in the for Dummies series is a British book whose history of the American Revolution allowed me to see the English perspective. I sometimes read war memoirs from different sides: Black Edelweiss remains one of the most chilling I’ve read, demonstrating how perfectly normal, middle-class Germans could willfully choose Hitler, not because they believed in him but because he was viewed as a necessary evil, a safeguard against worst fates like takeover by Communist gangs.

Lewis highly values re-reading old books, even books from childhood. Which books have you re-read, and why did you choose to re-read them?

I’ve re-read quite a few books from my youth, largely because I wanted to re-experience the stories again. Tom Sawyer and The Call of the Wild are books for me that will never grow old. Recently I re-read books from the 1990s, but not for any serious reason; it was more to dip into neon nostalgia for a little bit.

Which books have you read more than twice? How have these books affected you? Write down your earliest childhood memories of books that transported you and created in you a love of books? Have you re-read these titles lately? Were they still magical? How did these early experiences influence you?

The few. The battered. The very, very well-read.

I’ve read many books more than once. Before I became a working adult, I’d chronically re-read the books I had, so much so that those titles are a….wee bit battered. Now, as an adult, I rarely re-read books, but there are exceptions. I regularly re-read C.S. Lewis’ Surprised by Joy and The Screwtape Letters, the former because I enjoy Jack’s company and the latter as a devotional exercise of sorts. Asimov, Bill Kauffman, and Anthony Esolen are also revisited on a regular basis. Ditto Wendell Berry: I love putting on a chapter of my Jayber Crow audiobook and revisiting Port William. As far as books that transport me some place else — oh, Robinson Crusoe! I don’t remember how old I was when I read it — eight, maybe. It was a child’s version, but I was absolutely fascinated by it, and still remember walking down the street reading it, unable to wait to get to my ‘spot’ –a little area between some huge mounds of sand and the woodline, where there were a multitude of blackberry bushes and honeysuckles. It was cool in the summer heat, no one could see me behind the sand, and I could lose myself in reading. I also had a private spot in the woods behind a swamp that I’d forged a path to using..um, “borrowed” cinder blocks. Alas, I lost it when the woods were logged.

List the “old books” you will commit to read as a break from reading all contemporary ones.

While I’m not going to take a break from new reads, there are a few books from 2013 I’d like to re-visit: Crunchy Cons, which I read as a progressive moving into libertarianism, but which was about the conservative counterculture; The Death and Life of Great American Cities, not only because it was brilliant and mind-blowing but because I never reviewed it; The Age of Absurdity, which I read in the same year and again failed to review; and several of those world-view changing titles like small is beautiful.

What do you think of the genre of books called fairy stories or books of fantasy and magic—of which Lewis had much to say? Which titles have influenced you most and what do you think they have taught you about the “real” world?

I have enjoyed them, but they’re not a staple. I think I resonate more with Narnia and Middleearth because of who the authors were, and from the fact that they were drawing deeply from Western and Christian culture/lore to create this stories. Likewise for Mercedes’ Lackey “500 Kingdoms” series, which takes as its premise that The Tradition (of stories) is always trying to recreate itself by pushing people who fit certain types (like a stepmother or an orphan) into tropish storylines. Aesthetically, I like the world of Tolkienseque fantasy very much – -the psuedo-medieval setting is always easy to understand.

Lewis writes movingly about the discovery of his favorite author, George MacDonald. Who would you say is your favorite author, and what role has he or she played in your life?

A few years ago I would have described Isaac Asimov as my favorite author, simply because I’d read so much of him. These days, though, I’m torn between Wendell Berry and Jack himself. I could write essays on either — on my appreciation of Berry’s unique critiques about the industrial state, the destruction of human communities and the human person in the modern age, his beautiful recreation of the same in his Port Williams books, etc. Lewis had similar critiques about modernity, though he wasn’t so much thinking of a shift from agriculture to industrialism, or the takeover by agriculture by the machine: not only did that presumably happen at a different scale in England, but it was only starting in earnest in the US when he died. I think I’ll say Lewis, not because I like Berry less but because I feel I know more of Lewis: I’ve read his biography, his letters, his diaries, countless essays. Lewis isn’t just an author to me, he feels like a friend, one whose company I frequently seek out.

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nonfiction November, Question 4: Recent TBR Additions

This month some bloggers have been participating in Nonfiction November, a series of queries hosted by “Based on a True Story“. The last question asks for nonfiction titles that have recently found themselves on our to-be-read pile. I think it’s supposed to be the last ten books or so, but I’m going to publicly shame myself in the hopes of doing better. Consider this my “Books I Have to Read Before I Can Buy Any More Books, At Least Until my Resolve Weakens and I Surrender Like the Craven Addict I am”. Those with a purchase date past six months (everything after High Price of Materialism) are technically old enough to be Mount Doom titles, and will be considered such in 2024.

America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940, Claude S. Fischer.

Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone, Satya Nadella

Goodbye, Darkness: A Memoir of the Pacific War, William Manchester. Technically a re-read.

Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects us and Undermines Democracy. Purchased for class.

The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires. Purchased for class.

A Brief History of Nakedness, Philip Carr-Gomm. I was going to pair it with Naked at Lunch, but now it’s just standing awkwardly in the corner holding a magazine in front of itself.

The High Price of Materialism, Tim Kasser. Waiting for Advent so I can be all subversive and countercultural.

Plato, not Prozac: Applying Eternal Wisdom to Everyday Problems, Lou Marinoff

Live, From New York! An Uncensored History of Saturday Night Live, Tom Shales.

Sons of the Waves: The Common Seaman in the Heroic Age of Sail, Stephen Taylor. Purchased for Read of England.

The Stonemason: A History of Building Britain, Andrew Ziminski. Purchased for Read of England.

The Royal Society and the Invention of Modern Science, Adrian Tinniswood. Purchased for Read of England.

The Club: Johnson, Boswell, and the Friends Who Shaped an Age, Leo Damrosch. Purchased for Read of England.

The Vision: Reflections on the Way to the Soul, Kahlil Gibran

Human Scale Revisited: A New Look at the Classic Case for a Decentralist Future, Kirkpatrick Sale

Against the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob, Lee Siegel

The Lost City: The Forgotten Virtues of Community in America, Alan Ehrenhalt

Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language, Robin Dunbar. Purchased for science survey/anthropology.

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment