Short rounds: politics!

As mentioned yesterday I’m feeling burnt out between all the serious stuff I’ve been binging, global affairs, and ongoing drama with my computer (it was finally repaired and sent back from the manufacturer, but arrived in such a state that I had to take it to a local shop to be re-repaired), and really can’t get into review mode at the moment. However, I’m doing well on my goal of not leaving any books unreviewed this year and want that to continue, so here goes.

In The Return of Great Powers, CNN reporter Jim Sciutto reviews the outbreak of the Ukrainian war and the prospects of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. These are not as unrelated as a casual reader might suppose, as both Russia and China have been growing in confidence and assertiveness in the last fifteen years, increasingly willing to test the rules of the international order in pursuit of their own national interests. Here Sciutto covers the first two and a half years of the war in Ukraine, as well as developments on the Chinese side that indicate they’re maintaining high interest in taking Taiwan. Despite the fact that most war models show devastation on both sides with no actual conquest of Taiwan, China continues to design its war machine around neutralizing American advantages. Unlike Ukraine, writes Sciutto, there is more than American honor and lives at stake with defending Taiwan, which plays a vital role in the manufacturer of silicon chips and other important components Of the Ukraine war, Sciutto remarks that it’s an interesting mix of 21st century tech and early 20th century attrition. Most of the text is Sciutto interviewing officials and working their remarks into a general narrative, and he follows the same general line of thought (or non-thought) that one gets from the media at large, like confusing non-interventionism with isolationism. One unintentionally funny line was Zelensky, in late January 2022, huffily responding to the Biden administration and telling them that he lived in Ukraine and knew more of what was going on after they warned about sustained and rising Russian militarization.

One No, Many Yeses is a much different work, featuring a much different Paul Kingsnorth than I’m used to. While the Kingsnorth I read is mystical and more interested in compost than politics, this Kingsnorth is twenty years younger and still in set-the-world-on-fire mode. The book chronicles his global journeys tracking the “Global Resistance Movement”, which is not as unified as its name suggests; it is instead a blanket label thrown over a host of similarly-inspired but distinct reactions to the disruption of local societies by globalization. These disruptions not only changed local culture and economies, to the detriment of those protesting, but changed the balance of power so that more power shifted from people in their everyday lives to politicians and financial potentates ruling over the masses, managing and moving them around in the name of their best welfare and the common good. Although Paul originally began hanging out with people like the zapatistas out of solidarity for their protests against the nature-devouring global hegemon, he admits later in the book that he discovered that the protesters’ deep local connections — the way they lived deep within a culture, were vital members of it, could not conceive of themselves outside a culture that was itself wedded to the land around them — was far more intoxicating. Although twenty years old, the ongoing rise of populism — now rising in long-developed countries — testifies to its enduring reference, especially the contempt for bureaucratic grandees in isolated power centers running roughshod over the lives of ordinary people.

Posted in history, Politics and Civic Interest, Reviews, World Affairs | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

WWWednesday + Favorite Hobby Prompt

Today’s prompt from Long and Short Reviews is “What is your favorite hobby and why?” But first, WWWednesday!

WHAT have you finished recently? Both Return of the Great Powers and One No, Many Yeses, late last week.

WHAT are you reading now? The Last Tsar and the Selma architectural book. The problem with the architectural book is that — being the local history librarian — I keep wanting to research stuff it brings up. I also started The Half-Blood Heir, some historical fiction by Andrew Wareham, for a more ‘fun’ read. It’s about a major at the end of the Napoleonic wars who is struggling to figure out a path forward in peacetime receiving a letter that tells him, “Harry, yer a gen’l’man”.

WHAT are you reading next? ….something fun/relaxing. The only fiction I’ve done this month was 1984. I had started The End of the World is Just the Beginning, on the consequences for the ‘rules-based-international-order- as Americans are less and less interested in being the global sheriff in town, but I’m feeling burnt out at the moment; I can’t even stir myself to short-round the two books I mentioned above.

So, favorite hobby? That’s hard to say: there’s reading and writing, of course, but I do that constantly so I don’t know if it’s a hobby so much as a state of being. Before my ankle injury, walking and hiking were favorite ways to spend the weekend, and I’m also a raging shutterbug.

Posted in General | 13 Comments

Teaser Tuesday

Today’s TTT is favorite books set in another time, but I read entirely too much historical fiction to want to pore through and pick favorites.

I sat facing a flowering bougainvillea that covered the terrace, a shower
of pink blossoms on the ground next to it. After just a few seconds, I had
the impulse to take pictures with my phone. Hand in pocket, I stopped
myself. Was I even really seeing the flowers? Was I going to take a picture
so that I could look at the flowers later? When we click a photo, don’t we
mentally move on to the next thing? As if we are speed-dating reality, like
constantly swiping left on some dating app? Instead of click and move on,
why not just hang out with whatever strikes us as beautiful, then later,
remember the feeling? So, I kept my phone in my pocket, settled in and just
enjoyed the flowers. (The Mature Flaneur)

This quote stood out to me because it reminds me so much of Erich Fromm’s To Have or to Be, or his essay in For the Love of Life, where he wrote about the consumer/possessive impulse and how it often leads us to destroy things to own them. His example was actually a plucked flower, which is why it comes to mind with this. Freya India also writes on this a bit in her “You Don’t Need to Document Everything“.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 7 Comments

The Mature Flâneur

While rooting around for books for The Grand Tour, I spotted ‘flâneur’ and immediately went for the bait. I know this word from back in 2012 when I was an ardent Francophile and was reading books like French Women Don’t Get Fat and French Kids Eat Everything. It’s a beautiful word, meaning to meander or stroll through a city without intention, merely walking and observing and letting the life of the city take you where it will. For some reason I thought the author was going to flâner from Lisbon to Norway — i.e. walk — but that’s not the case. This is more of a travel memoir with frequent tangents — and that’s the point, since part of the attraction of flâneuring about is to be open to unexpected discoveries. After leaving Lisbon and Paris, though, there is very little strolling going on: there are instead train rides, EV treks to the Artic, and even kayaking. As Ward and his wife explore Lisbon, the Alps, etc, the reader is treated to all kinds of interesting sidetrails: rebellious art in Paris that resulted in an explosion of buildings decorated by female nudes; a library in Porto that inspired JK Rowling; the role of Wild Men in Europe’s mythology; the history and culture of the Sami people, who range across Scandinavia but who are treated most justly in Norway, etc. Portugal has a larger presence than any other country, bookending the collection of tales: this possible owes to Ward’s Portuguese wife, or perhaps his fondness for Portuguese vino. (I was surprised and amused to learn that ninety percent of European grapes are grafted on to American rootstocks because of aphid protection. That must be so very difficult for the French to live with.) It’s an entertaining read, for the most part, and interesting: Ward isn’t visiting the usual tourist spots in Europe, but rather pointing out strange and wonderful things he finds off the beaten track. It was nice bit of vicarious wandering, unpredictable and varied.

When we checked into our hotel, the Funken Lodge (more swanky than
funky), we were given the polar bear briefing by a cheerful young Irish
woman named Lisa. She told us bears only wander inside the town itself a
couple of times a year. “So, if you see a bear, immediately run into the
closest house or car. Everyone in town is very trusting, and no one locks
their doors,” she said with a smile.

It’s because of these early graves that it is now illegal to die in Svalbard.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Lisbon: War in the Shadows of the City of Light

Lisbon is a history of how Portugal’s president-dictator Antonio de Oliveira Salazar carefully navigated between his own Scylla and Charybdis, attempting to keep Portugal out of the Second World War despite its longstanding alliance with England, and the fact that Franco next door would might be delighted to unify Iberia with some nudging from the Nasties in Berlin. This wasn’t simply a question of picking teams: both the Allies and Germany had reasons for wanting their reins around Portugal’s head. The Germans needed tungsten that Portugal had in great supply, and the Allies saw control or use of the Azores as vital for projecting force. Salazar appears to have ably threaded the needle, not allowing the Allies to begin using the Azores until after the war’s midpoint when Hitler was spilling so much blood from the Baltic to Africa that he had to accept it as a fait accompli. (He also helped convince Franco that keeping Iberia out of the war was a better option for both nations.) Other issues that come up in this history are Portugal’s role in allowing refugees to escape Festung Europa, and its acceptance of Nazi gold, some of which was payment for tungsten but some of which was being evacuated out of the Reich and was stolen from Hitler’s victims. This is definitely a ‘serious’ title about 1940s foreign policy, not a sexy spy story despite the amount of espionage that went on. As an American whose knowledge of Portugal is limited to the Age of Discovery, learning about Salazar and his “New State” was also interesting.

Quotes:

Such was the concentration that Salazar devoted to steering Portugal through the war that, in addition to serving as prime minister for the duration of the war, he also served as minister of foreign affairs, minister of war, minister of the interior, and for the first part of the war, minister of finance. Salazar viewed it as his personal mission, and challenge, to prevent Portugal from being dragged into the war and repeating the mistakes of World War I.

The Germans sent him on his way in July 1941, but Pujol still got only as
far as Lisbon. Here he approached the British embassy again, but without
luck. Still based in Lisbon, Pujol pretended to be in Britain by creating a
fictitious set of characters and locations, and dispatched a mass of
misinformation to his Abwehr handlers.[….] From a German perspective, Pujol had seemingly become one of their most successful agents, running a network of some twenty-seven subagents, none of whom actually existed. In the three years in which GARBO was operative he sent some 1,399 messages and 423 letters to his extremely satisfied German handlers back in Madrid. His prose was never dull: He wrote with brio, always keen to seemingly praise the Germans and to attack the Jews wherever possible. The success of Pujol’s double life and value to the Allies is confirmed by the fact that he remains one of the few agents to be decorated by both sides in the war.

Posted in history, Reviews, World Affairs | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Red Dead’s History

We’re thieves in a world that don’t want us no more.

As a student of history who also plays a lot of video games which touch on history, I wonder sometimes what skewed version  of history unread players take from it.  Tore Olsson takes that same question and applies it to Red Dead Redemption 2, and finds the game surprisingly and refreshingly accurate,  albeit with quite a few provisos. Red Dead’s History is a curious mix of pop culture and history wherein Olsson uses the game to explore different aspects of American – mostly southern – history in the 1890s.   Although the book  frequently leans more into the game’s context than the game itself, and often bristles with politics,  I found it an enjoyable enough read – intriguing  enough that I may check out his book on Southern and Mexican agrarian reform later on.

For the uninitiated, Red Dead Redemption 2 follows the slow disintegration of a gang of outlaws in the last days of the Wild West: following a botched ferry job, the gang is chased into the mountains during a brutal blizzard: with the way West blocked by both the law and bounty hunters,  the van der Linde gang reluctantly descend eastward and are steadily pushed into an area that represents everything from Louisiana swamps to the Appalachians, where they become increasingly desperate and demoralized, plagued by both industrial-age law enforcement and their leader’s increasing mental instability. Along the way, they witness an America in transition, the rural and agricultural being replaced by the industrial and corporate powers.  As Olsson follows the story, he comments on the American frontier, the treatment of native Americans, the role mass-bison murder played in their displacement, race and economy in the south, the dawn of women’s suffrage movements, and the treatment of “hillbillies” in the game. Although Olsson is generally complimentary of RDR2’s faithfulness to history, he  notes that it’s more generally accurate to the 1870s, rather than the 1890s:  the postwar Klan would’ve been gone, Confederate redemptionists would have been fighting in politics, not in paramilitary groups, and Native Americans wouldn’t have had a presence at this point.  (The lack of Jim Crow laws in St. Denis/New Orleans is technically accurate for 1899, but would be highly off the mark by the game’s epilogue, at which point they’d become pervasive across the South.) 

As far as history goes, this has moments both high and low:  I was intrigued by his analysis of the Roanoke Ridge area as being a bad representation of southern Appalachia, replete with “hillbillies” who were a stereotype born of the 20th century desire to strip the Appalachians timber and mountains and shove the isolated and ignorant hillbillies out of the way.  There were some interesting sections in here, like on the growth of enclosure and convict labor,   which frankly only had a tangential connection to the game.   Olsson uses the brief mission in which the gang raids an island prison to free one of their number from the fields as an example of how “central” convict labor was to the South, which fails on two fronts:   first, it’s literally the only example of convict labor in the game,   only appears to allow for an easy rescue of John Martson, and is connected to a federal pen with no role within the southern economy. The convicts there are presumably working for their keep.  The “enclosure” section has an even weaker RDR2 connection: Olsson declares that when the gang moves into the South,  camping sites are much harder to find in the wild.  There are a lot more farms in Lemoyne than New Hannover or West Elizabeth, but as someone who’s played RDR2 pretty much every week since it released, I’ve never had a problem finding a place to camp there. Lemoyne is huge!

Another highlight for me was the fact that Olsson is aware that poor or middling whites existed: outsiders tend to think of the antebellum South as only containing black slaves and white Scarlett O’Haras, when in reality most southerners were white freeholders, most of whom (70%) didn’t own a single slave. Despite this, Olsson doesn’t bother probing into why they would have fought the Civil War: he spends no time discussing the prominent role States played in the antebellum constitution, ignores any sectional strife in the half-century leading up to the war, and dismisses any notion that southerners would have fought an armed invasion of their states simply for notions of honor or self-defense. I’d bet money he’s never read a single diary from a southern soldier, or entertained the wild idea that people might fight a war for reasons entirely unrelated to the war’s official causes. Did any British lad who was murdered by the state’s machines at the Battle of the Somme give a ha’pence about Serbian neutrality? Olsson has a dismal understanding of the Civil War, more clearly evidenced by his shock that Union generals who were so good on the Great Crusade to End Slavery were so cruel to the native Americans after the war. Perhaps, professor, the more plausible explanation is that the generals were merely agents of the DC state and pursued with equal vigor and mercilessness the Southerners fighting for independence during the War for the Union as they did the native Americans who were resisting their own conquest and subjugation by the state? (Again: I’d bet money he’s never read letters or diaries from Union soldiers, despite hailing from Massachusetts.)

Although I had more than a few gripes with the text, Roger Clark’s delivery was enjoyable to me as an RDR2 nut, especially when he repeats lines from the game in his Arthur Morgan voice. As shallow as I found the author’s take on some subjects, this was an interesting way to approach history.

Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WWW Wednesday

WHAT have you finished reading recently? Just yesterday, I finished reading One No, Many Yeses by Paul Kingsnorth. It’s one of his earlier books, set back when he was still more of an activist than a mystic-farmer-critic.

WHAT are you reading now? Still plugging along in Lisbon and the Selma architecture galley.

WHAT are you reading next? Very possibly Jim Sciutto’s The Return of Great Powers: Russia, China, and the Next World War. I began nosing into it the night before and am almost halfway through. Um, so this and the question above should probably swap places.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Savage Gods

Savage Gods is a challenging book to review because of its nature: it is a meditation, or perhaps a rumination, by the author on his continuing search for meaning and the role of writing and the word in that search. Paul Kingsnorth fell in love with Nature from an early age and got into the green movement owing to his love of its beauty; in his twenties, he was a firebrand activist, writing for The Ecologist magazine and in the habit of chaining himself to things to stop their being bulldozed for parking lots and the like He traveled the world meeting people who were also fighting back against — what was it? Globalization, corporate rule, McWorld, industrialism? Something he could see but not yet define, though later he would call it The Machine. He realized in his long visits with traditional societies, though, that there was something missing in the West, some life had gone out of it completely: the West was desecrated, dehumanized, and so he decided to retreat to create a more human life for himself, his wife Jyoti, and their children. They found a rural cottage in Ireland and began trying to live a plainer life.

It is there that Paul writes these meditations, telling part of that backstory even as he ponders at length over the power words and writing have over him — how they demand he serve them even as he wonders if the abstract nature of the written word, of language, separates him to some degree from reality, even as it gives him the capacity to understand and think about it. There’s a lot of mysticism in this: Paul, despite being raised thoroughly secular, is God-haunted, and he conveys some of his interior arguments as dialogues between himself and the Norse gods Loki and Freya. I don’t know what I would make of this if I stumbled upon it by itself: as someone who knows Paul’s story, though, I found it incredibly interesting to view him in a transition point. I know that Paul’s journey will lead him further away from the material to the transcendent — from Buddha to Wicca to eventually to an Eastern Orthodox monastery in Ireland, where suddenly The Word will become all the more interesting as a concept. This is a strange book, the thoughts of an artist in anguish because he longs to write but finds he can’t quite catch the wind in his sails, the thoughts of an activist who is now turning trying to restore earth rather than “set the world on fire“, as the against me! song put it. As someone who is just a little younger than the age Paul was, but who has already gone through that transition from ideologue-warrior to someone seeking meaning through stewardship and creation instead of politics, I found it compelling despite its strangeness. This is a fascinating piece, but it’s not for everyone.

Highlights:

Money whips us around like a tornado, money and capital, greed and ambition and hunger and power, they uproot people and scatter them about and we all keep our heads down as the Machine passes through, drizzling us across the landscapes of the world, breaking the link between people and place and time, demanding our labor and our gratitude, hypnotizing us with its white light, transforming us into eaters, consumers of experience and consumers of place, players of games, servants.

I had a plan. The plan was to settle, to have some land, to root myself and my family. To escape from the city, to escape from the traps. To grow our own food, educate our own kids, draw our own water, plant our own fuel. To be closer to nature and further from the Machine. To be freer, to be more in control. To escape and, at the same time, to belong. To learn things I didn’t know anything about but wanted to, because I felt they’d make me a better, rounder adult person: planting trees, keeping hens, managing woodland, carpentry, wiring, building, all the small skills required to run a few acres of land and to be part of it. On top of that, to bring up our young children at home. And on top of that, to write books: truer books than I had ever written before. To write something great, something real, something so intense that nobody could read it without dimming the lights first.

Something I’d been writing about for years, in that book and elsewhere: human cultures come from places. They arise from them, curl out of them like smoke from hot ash. People do too. We’re not free actors. We can’t just skip from peak to peak, buzz from city to city with no consequences. I knew this, so why didn’t I know it?

The middle-class Europeans blockading summits and waffling about Negri and Fanon bored me to tears. They were rootless; they were as lost as me.They came in by plane or train from some other European city, they put on their black masks and Palestinian scarves, shouted at some fat cats, got tear gassed and then went home. Empty gestures, empty words, and I was empty too. But in the Baliem Valley in Papua or the Lacandon jungle in Mexico found something else; something older, deeper, calmer and very much more real. I found people who belonged to a place. I had never seen this before. Where I grew up, there was nothing like it. It had—it still has—more meaning to me than any other way of human living I had seen. I wanted to know: what would that be like? And could I have it?

I wanted to be a tree, but I am not a tree. I wanted to sing to the forest, but no one ever taught me the words, and I don’t suppose they ever will because there is no one in my world to teach me. Nobody here has known the words for centuries. I was born in those rootless suburbs and they have given me a rootless soul. I am not a tree. I am some kind of slinking animal in the hedgerow. I am a seed on the wind. I am water. I am coming to the rocks at the lip of the fall.

Take a story from a place and drop it into another place and it doesn’t necessarily make sense, at least not at first.Like people, stories don’t always travel well. Nothing belongs everywhere, and some things only belong somewhere. But some stories, when they travel, can spark strange new things in unmeasured hearts.

We stumble on alone, and our smartphone apps and robots that can order a curry for us from the Internet and toy drones for Christmas and regular doses of antidepressants and celebrity TV—all the great swirling ocean of bullshit we have surrounded ourselves with in lieu of life, in lieu of living—this is our civilization’s equivalent of a middle-aged executive buying a red sports car and sleeping with his secretary.

I feel that words are savage gods and that in the end, however well you serve them, they will eat you alive.

I thought I could make it all fit if I could just muster enough cleverness. But the world is not short of cleverness and not much is right. Now I know this is a god my words refuse to serve. No more cleverness. No more opinions. Opinions are easy to come by. Stillness is the really hard work. Not knowing is the hardest work of all.

‘In Western Civilization,’ says the poet Gary Snyder, ‘our elders are books.’ Books pass on our stories. Books carry the forbidden knowledge and the true. Books are weird things, inhuman things, abstract things, but they are gateways, at their best, to the world to which the drum and the fire and the sweat lodge used to take us. The Otherworld. At her best, the writer is a shaman, a priestess, a summoner.

The only reason to write is because you can’t not write; because something sharp and heated is pushing you through. We write, I write, because of life’s brevity and the need to blaze.

Late May. I am in the field, scything the grass and the docks down. I am mowing shirtless in the rain and I remember why I came here and suddenly, in an instant and just for an instant, I am here. I am nowhere else. I am the field and the motion of the scythe and the falling of the rain and the movement of the muscles in my back and shoulders, the sideways motion of my stiff hips and I think nothing at all. I just mow. I just move. I just am. For a moment, I just am. Sometimes, when you least expect it, you are given a gift.

If you mistake the map for the territory, though—if you start to believe that reality will bend to your will if you just grip it hard enough—then you are asking for trouble.

Recently, at a conference in America, I watched Martin Shaw, my mythologist friend (everyone should have a mythologist friend), tell the story of The Odyssey over the course of a week to a crowd of 200 people. It was quite something. When you hear an accomplished oral storyteller tell a story, you are brought up hard against a fact that everyone in a pre-literate culture would have known from experience: a story is a living thing. When the storyteller begins, some strange animal lurches into the room, curls around the roof beams, intervenes, changes everything. A story is a summoning from the otherworld. And some tales want to have their way with you.

Posted in Religion and Philosophy, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Top Ten More Books I Didn’t Review

Today’s treble T is “Book we didn’t review”. In 2020 we did a similiar topic, “Books We Loved But Didn’t Review”, and I gaze upon that list I realize: I still haven’t reviewed `em. Well, most of them. I did get around to reviewing The Way of Men.That may change this year since I’m doing purposeful re-reading. Today, I’m going to list ten more books I haven’t reviewed, drawing on my “What I Read in ______” lists. The amount of unreviewed titles is….oof.

But first, three teases:

[Our friend] arrived late because he’d been arguing with a man selling red T-shirts with pictures of Stalin on them.
“Do you realize,” he had said, pointing at the merchandise, that this is the greatest mass-murderer of the twentieth century?”
“Don’t blame me,” said the man, “I just sell T-shirts.” – Paul Kingsnorth, One No, Many Yeses

This field: it belongs to us, to me and my wife, because we paid for it and we have a piece of paper lodged with a lawyer somewhere that proves it. But my lifetime will flicker out and this field will still be here, as it was before I came. I am passing through this field like the heron sometimes passes above it and foxes come through every night and red-tailed bumbles drone past on their way to the hedgebank petals. I am here now, and then I will be gone again. So the field does not belong to me, really. Do I belong to the field? Probably not that either. I would like to. But I have only been on this land for three years. I have only been in the country for three years. I am a blowin, as we are called in these parts. You can’t just turn up in a place and claim it. A place needs to claim you. – Paul Kingsnorth, Savage Gods

Observation can tell more about the observer than about the environment being observed. It reflects the values, beliefs, and worldview of the witness. We see through the lens of our interests, and understanding. […] Hiking with a birdwatcher is quite a different experience than hiking with a geologist — one points out the flicking wings of a Ruby-crowned Kingler, the other notes the lavender glint of Lepidolite mica. Neither may notice the changing cloud formations that spell tomorrow’s snow. […] What we see is largely who we are and what we have learned to see. There is no such thing as an objective observer.” – “Eyes Wide Open”, What We See: Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs

Feminism against Progress, Mary Harrington. A critique of the sexual revolution and related technologies from unexpected quarters.

The Hardest Job in the World: the US Presidency,  John Dickerson. An analysis of the post that argues that foreign policy consumes the office, and yet it’s rarely an issue that voters care about.

Several books by Anthony Esolen, whose writing I love but fear I can’t do justice to, despite re-reading them. Such books include Life under Compulsion, In Defense of Boyhood, and Ironies of Faith.

We Have Been Harmonized: Life in China’s Surveillance State, Kai Strittmatter. I have a great introduction written for a review of this, but I’ll need to go back and re-read it to write the actual review bit.

Men on Strike: Why Men are Boycotting Marriage, Helen Smith. I have a mostly-full review written for this, but don’t like it.

How Emotions are Made, Lisa Feldman Barrett. Such a good neurology read and I neglect it still.

Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian Dissidents, Rod Dreher. On the approach of soft totalitarianism.

The Professor in the Cage: Why Men Fight and Why We Like to Watch, Jonathan Gotschall

Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren’t Growing Up, Abigail Schrier.

Anxious Generation, Johnathan Haidt

Posted in General | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Sidetracks

Gary Oberg grew up in Minnesota hunting and fishing, and has continued to do so for seventy years — mostly for fun, but sometimes for business as he was also a mechanical engineer who designed reels and other sporting equipment. Here he shares forty stories of his adventures in the wild, set mostly in Minnesota and Canada but reaching Alaska, too. While I was expecting something like Giant Whitetails, this was more about mishaps and adventures Oberg and his friends got into while hunting and fishing. Moose appears to be Oberg’s prey of choice, at least in this collection: he and his friends are constantly making deep treks into the wilderness to find and shoot them. There are are fishing stories, too, both on land and sea and sometimes on ice: Oberg has special passions for walleye and halibut. Not all of the stories actually involve hunting and fishing: he includes, for instance, his memories of biking to Alaska with his wife on the Alaskan Highway, or the ALCAN. If you aren’t remotely interested in hunting or the outdoors, there are still amusing stories here — like Oberg doing some night fishing, and then being startled by the sight of a human head breaking the surface. Turns out a resident on the lake liked night swims and was curious about his floating neighbor! Another one sees Oberg and his hunting party arguing over whether they should duct-tape a failing part on their moose-meat wagon: Oberg and a friend make a trek to the nearest city, only for the mechanic to say, “Ehhh, duct tape would work, my welding options for this are pretty dismal.” All in all, an enjoyable if not memorable collection.

Related:
The Other Side of Selma, Dickie Williams. Many hunting stories mixed in with the “Selma in the 1960s” stories.
Giant Whitetails, Mark and Terry Drury

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | 4 Comments