Stock Phrases

Tonight I stumbled upon a list of “Top 20 Most Annoying Book Reviewer Cliches“. I figured I would be guilty of some of them, and that suspicion was confirmed.  As I’ve been trying to move from informal comments to more helpful reviews, it looks like I shall have to consult my Strunk and White for tips on how not to be so predictable!

Granted, it’s not as though the Examiner is the final authority on writing book reviews. Some phrases are unquestionably bland (like “readable”, a phrase I flinch at using even though I keep doing it), but others may be simply overused.  The list below is copied in full from the site.
——————————————————————–

1. Gripping
2. Poignant: if anything at all sad happens in the book, it will be described as poignant
3. Compelling
4. Nuanced: in reviewerspeak, this means, “The writing in the book is really great. I just can’t come up with the specific words to explain why.”
5. Lyrical: see definition of nuanced, above.
6. Tour de force
7. Readable
8. Haunting
9. Deceptively simple: as in, “deceptively simple prose”
10. Rollicking: a favorite for reviewers when writing about comedy/adventure books
11. Fully realized
12. At once: as in, “Michael Connelly’s The Brass Verdict is at once a compelling mystery and a gripping thriller.” See, I just used three of the most annoying clichés without any visible effort. Piece of cake.
13. Timely
14. ” X meets X meets X”: as in, “Stephen King meets Charles Dickens meets Agatha Christie in this haunting yet rollicking mystery.”
15. Page-turner
16. Sweeping: almost exclusively reserved for books with more than 300 pages
17. That said: as in, “Stephenie Meyer couldn’t identify quality writing with a compass and a trained guide; that said, Twilight is a harmless read.”
18. Riveting
19. Unflinching: used to describe books that have any number of unpleasant occurences — rape, war, infidelity, death of a child, etc.
20. Powerful

——————————————————————–

Posted in Reflection | Tagged | 4 Comments

Montevallo: Images of America

Montevallo: Images of America
© 2011 Clark Hultquist and Carey Heatherly
128 pages

A few years ago, I became a student and resident of the University of Montevallo. I fell madly in love with the town and its university and regard them as my adopted home. You can thus imagine my delight when one of the university’s historians decided to produce a pictorial history of the town: the resulting few hours, as I ooh’d and aww’d my way through the city’s history, were utterly fascinating and left me with a touch of homesickness

As mentioned, this is a pictorial history, consisting of photographs of people, buildings, and the town landscape with historic commentary. The photographs are typically divided two per page, though one of the aerial views was given a full two-page spread. Those aerial views are particularly noteworthy, for they capture the town’s early state in a way unmatched by other city histories which I have read, like Yesterday’s Birmingham. Although Montevallo began life as an agricultural center and mining town, its fortune was truly tied to the growth of the university. While  the role of agriculture diminished and the coal mines closed, the university  continued to flourish through the 20th century. Beginning life in 1896 as an  industrial school for women, it matured into a liberal-arts college and then finally into a mixed-sex public university covering multiple disciplines. Although the book’s dozens of pictures show clearly how much the town has grown and changed through time, the university population has also allowed much to be preserved: the nearness of a large student body keeps Montevallo’s charming Main Street alive and well despite the competition of chain stores.

As fascinating as it is to watch any town grow through the ages, this work will be more compelling to students and residents of the city, for whom it will be like a family album. The personalities who shaped the university, who drove its history, are honored in succession through the decades as the university grew and affixed their names to its many beautiful buildings. I loved seeing the familar campus slowly grow through the years, marveling at what facts history has hidden — that one generation’s soccer pitch was another’s science and math complex. Some of the pictures are positively eerie, like the spread of Main Quad, which shows it entirely open. Today, it’s home to a dozen or so trees, all grand old majestic beauties whose size and absence from the photo bear witness to the passage of time. All told, the pictures illustrate that much more has transpired upon Montevallo’s red brick roads and under her stately white columns than I could ever imagine.

Montevallo is part of an extended series of pictorial histories, and my only caveats seem to be marks of the series as a whole. Because the market for these books is presumably small, the photographs are produced only in black and white (even modern ones), and are not quite as large and some might hope, though the commentary serves to remedy this by pointing out small details which might otherwise go unnoticed. Residents and students at Montevallo will find in this work a treasure.

Dr. Clark Hultquist is professor of history at the University of Montevallo, and chair of the Behavioral and Social Sciences department. Dr. Carey Heatherly is a reference librarian and archivist serving in the Oliver Cromwell Carmichael library.

Related:

Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Precipice

Star Trek Vanguard: Precipice
© 2009 David Mack
352 pages

To date, the Vanguard series has been marked by a vast archaeological and scientific mystery, but as its matured, the implications of the Taurus Reach discoveries have been taking precedent. We saw this in Open Secrets, where the political situation between the Federation and Klingon empires deteriorated to the point of war, and it continues here. Although the setting is the Vanguard series, most of the action takes place off-station following various characters from the series as they work to prevent future catastrophes.  Concerned that the Klingons are looking to weaponize the remnants of the Shedai technology, Starfleet is attempting to undermine their efforts through clandestine means. Meanwhile, the disgraced T’Pyrnn has fled Starfleet custody and is hoping to redeem herself by discovering the means with which the Klingons are carrying out their own cloak-and-dagger enterprises against Vanguard. Multiple plotlines converge to great success.

This is a series carried by its strong characters, and that trend continues here — magnificently. I’ve been fascinated by the interplay between former intelligent officer T’Pyrnn and her journalistic adversary-turned-ally, Timothy Pennington, and it’s done no better than here, where the two cooperate to spy on gangsters and Kingons in hopes to saving Vanguard. Perhaps the finest contributions of this book were the appearance of Gorkon — a Klingon official whose political views will lead to the greatest peace in the galaxy and his own assassination —  and the reappearance of a Vanguard character thought dead. I’d hoped for for this character’s return, and am eagerly looking forward to what becomes of the Vanguard crew in future books.

The next Vanguard work, not yet released, is called Declassified. It will consist of four novellas by David Mack, Kevin Dilmore, Dayton Ward, and much-beloved former Treklit editor Marco Palimeri, whose years in the editor’s seat marked some of the best Trek literature produced to date.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

This Week at the Library (4 June)

Summer has arrived with a fury in south-central Alabama, and this past week’s heat and humidity broke several records. Suffice it to say, I’m very glad I’m not working in a factory this summer, but instead am babysitting…usually inside, though in the mornings or late in the afternoon the kids and I go outside for some baseball/basketball/grasshopper-chasing/dog-walking-and-unexpected-dog-chasing-through-the-woods-because-they-wriggled-out-of-their-collars.

This week I finished two books which I’ve still not written the reviews for, and I’ve been making steady progress on both The Age of Faith and Biology Made Simple.

Today at the library, I checked out…

  • Just in Time Geometry, Catherine V. Jeremko. While teaching my niece elementary algebra, I noticed how badly my math skills have gone to pot, and realized how much I actually miss knowing various geometric formulas. Time for a refresher. (Geometry was the only mathematics class I ever earned an A in, being generally math-avoidant.)
  • All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, Robert Fulghum. I went by Wikiquote before visiting the library, and this fellow caught my attention.
  • Sharpe’s Triumph,  Bernard Cornwell. In which Richard Sharpe becomes a lieutenant — I think.

I also bought The Omnivore’s Dilemma, which a friend of mine read a few months back and remains very excited about.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

Teaser Tuesday (31 May)

Last teaser of the month — here we go.

“But for the most part I’m bound up in ideology the same as everyone else. Yet knowing that it’s there grants us some small power over ideology, and if you squint you can see a little more clearly than most.” 

p. 89, The Ethical Assassin. David Liss.

“Isn’t it kind of beneath your dignity to let Columbia have you as sloppy seconds?”
“That’s so far beyond stupid that I don’t even know the word for it.”
“If you had a better vocabulary, maybe Harvard would have let you in.”

p. 110, The Ethical Assassin.

Posted in General | Tagged | 5 Comments

Top Ten Beach Reads

Road trip! Vacation! Quick, I need ten books to pass the time with.  (From the Broke and the Bookish.)

1. The Rainmaker, John Grisham.
A favorite hen I’m going anyplace, Rainmaker is thick yet small enough to fit easily in my jeans pocket. Its central story of a young lawyer taking on a great big evil insurance company, defended by soulless guns-for-hire attorneys, is always compelling.

2. Blood Memory, Greg Iles. I bought this for my sister on her birthday,  and after reading it she wanted me to try it out myself. Haven’t gotten around to it, though she has my copy of Echo Park by Michael Connelly so we’re kinda even on the lent/borrowed balance.

3. Any Black Widowers collection, Isaac Asimov. It doesn’t matter which,  but I am fond of reading a story with lunch or supper from time to time — useful when grabbing a bite to eat on the road.

4. Any Harry Potter novel, J.K. Rowling  They’re all fantastically charming, though I think I’d go with one of the first four given their more lighthearted bent.

5. Most anything by Carl Sagan (because a book on nuclear winter doesn’t make for good beach reading, unless of course it’s On the Beach.)   Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors would work splendidly.

6 & 7: A couple of Star Trek novels, preferably ones I’ve not yet read. (The last titles in Vanguard and Titan would do nicely, as would Federation by the Reeves-Stevens.

8. The Complete Stories of Isaac Asimov, volume II.

9. Another entry in the Harry Bosch mysteries by Michael Connelly

10. Perhaps one of Alison Weir’s English history works/.

Posted in General | Tagged | 2 Comments

To Kill a Mockingbird

To Kill a Mockingbird
© 1960 Harper Lee
376 pages

Mark Twain once opined that a classic is a book which everyone praises and no one reads. That cannot be the case with To Kill a Mockingbird, a classic coming-of-age story set in the fictional county of Maycomb, Alabama during the Great Depression. The story told by Jean-Louise “Scout” Finch is once of growing up — not only in the literal sense of advancing in age, but in learning to grapple with adult questions of conscience and courage. Scout and her brother Jem are guided in this endeavor by their father, the remarkable Atticus Finch; a man of deep, quiet courage and unpracticed kindness.

Atticus is a lawyer in the noble sense of the word, who hopes to use his office to see that justice is done. When he takes a stand against the prejudices of his fellow citizens and defends a black man accused of rape, Atticus and his children must learn to persevere with dignity.  Though Atticus is regarded by everyone I know who’s read the book as a pillar of moral strength,  the understated nature of that strength impresses me the most. Atticus is not a Puritan proclaiming morality from the pulpit, reveling in righteousness: he simply does what he thinks is best and is content to let that stand. His strength of character is not a pillar: it is a foundation,  deep, wide, and ever-steady. I think I would  go mad living in Maycomb during the trial, just as Jem nearly did — but Atticus is possessed by the serenity of Martin Luther King, this faith that the moral arc of the universe is long but bends toward justice. Perhaps that peace comes from the deep affection he has for the community of Maycomb, which carried great appeal to me before the trial started. I live not far from the real-life inspiration for Maycomb, and I know what kind of city the Finches hail from. I delighted in meeting their neighbors,  felt their fear and wonder as Scout and Jem  explored the world around them.

While the story of Atticus Finch must have been dynamite in its time and continues to inspire today — continues to earn the title ‘classic’ —  this book a fantastic novel despite the reputation classics have for being wise but unreadable. I did not read To Kill a Mockingbird as a classic. I began in that vein, but I soon became enraptured by the humor and gentle spirit of Atticus, the self-willed pugnacity of Scout, and the passion of her brother Jem. I was too busy soaking in this wonderful story to realize — “Oh, yes, this is a Classic”.   I’ve been remembering it with great affection for the past week and a half, reluctant to finish the review because then I knew part of me would move on. I will be revisiting this book in the future: it has become an instant favorite.

Absolutely wonderful If you’ve not read this, or if you’re only experienced it as a classroom text,  it is well worth your while to visit it on your own.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Ethical Assassin

The Ethical Assassin
© 2006 David Liss
336 pages

Lem’s just a kid selling encyclopedias so he can go to college, that’s all. He never meant to get involved in a criminal conspiracy, but circumstances spiraled out of his control. He went into a trailer to sell books to two suspicious rednecks, and then — bang, bang — he’s witness to a double homicide and utterly confused when the assassin apologizes to him.  The killer — Melford Kean — is an altogether pleasant fellow, once you get past the assassination bit, but he’s got a job to do, evil to fight,  and now Lem has become his unwitting ally.  Lem would like nothing more than to close his eyes and walk away, but circumstances continue to force him to rely upon this bizaarely compelling stranger. Thus, for a ltitle while at least, both Lem and Melford are destined to walk the same path.

So begins one of the most fascinating novels I’ve ever read. The criminal conspiracy itself is rather tame — involving encyclopedias, drug labs, and hog farms — but Melford makes for an irresistible story. Who is this affable stranger who shoots people and then treats people enveloped his actions with such kind regard? Why did he shoot two seemingly harmless rednecks?  As the story progresses, Melford emerges as a highly principled and motivated man who is interested in swaying Lem to his point of view — engaging with him in conversations about ideology, the influence of culture, and the basis of ethics.  As Melford and Lem’s mutual problem reaches crisis levels, the method behind Melford’s madness becomes increasingly clear to both Lem and — I assume the author hopes as much — the reader.  While I don’t know enough about the author’s beliefs to speculate on his intent with The Ethical Assassin, it reads in parts like an author tract.  I delighted in the way Melford constantly teases Lem, engaging with him and drawing out a discussion.  While I don’t agree with Melford ultimately,  the unfolding of his arguments complemented the story’s pace smartly.

With intriguing characters, philosophical ideas to grapple with, and the kind of quirky humor I like in a novel, I’d say The Ethical Assassin is a solid hit.  While I chose to avoid mentioning Melford’s cause in the review (possibly a spoiler),  it’s strongly hinted at early on so I will link to two subjects of discussion. Your choice in hovering over them.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Angels and Demons

Angels and Demons
© 2000 Dan Brown
572 pages

There’s a dead body bearing the mark of an ancient conspiracy lying in the halls of Europe’s foremost scientific laboratory. Robert Langdon, who apparently makes a living commenting on corpses with symbolic importance, is whisked away by space-plane to CERN, where he descends into the bowels of the Earth and realizes there is something rotten in the state of Denmark Switzerland.  Someone has stolen enough antimatter to take out half a city, and that someone might be working for a secretive organization with powerful ambitions and a burning hatred for the Catholic church — the Illuminati, the ‘enlightened ones’.  Driven underground by the Catholic church centuries before, they intend to strike a killing blow at their enemy through the ages…by blowing them to Kingdom Come. If Langdon can’t track the Illuminati down before midnight, the Catholic church’s day in history may be at end.

Although that sounds like a great setup, this book was a labor to read. I groaned throughout the first one hundred pages, and near the climax I pondered giving it a good throw across the room. It’s a library book, though, so I didn’t. I just set it gently on the floor until my eyes had stopped rolling long enough for me to read it. I understand this to be Dan Brown’s first novel, and that shows. The characters are insultingly simplistic, exposition utterly contrived. From the start Brown had his imbecilic characters blabbering on about the ancient war between science and religion, and I was very relieved when the chase began in full — a chase through the Vatican City, with settings drawn from Rome’s rich background of monuments from the Empire through more modern Baroque churches. Unfortunately, the science/religion discussion came back with a vengeance, and it was there that I wondered, ever so briefly, if seeing the book sail through the air might make me feel a bit better about subjecting myself to it.

The painfully forced discussions about the  respective worth of science and religion, and the relationship and tension between then  just wouldn’t go away, because the Illuminati were supposedly a society formed to protect and advance science from the dogmatic Church. Maybe if you don’t give a rip about science, the novel would be as benign to you as The DaVinci Code was to me — but I  like science, I like history, I like comparative religion, and seeing all three subjects flayed alive throughout the book made my brain weep. The torture reaches its climax when one of the book’s then-most sympathetic character denounces the God of Science for page after page,  simpering about his blessed Church’s contributions to the human race and how awfully tired  the Church was of being constantly slighted.  Well! I’m sorry a millennium and a half of interrupted power over the entire western world wasn’t enough for you!  Perhaps if you’d managed to do anything in those fifteen hundred years we’d be a little bit more impressed, but from where I sit all I can see is the palaces you built. I’d say science has earned bragging rights.

The book does have redeeming qualities — the clue chase through Rome, for instance. Not only do the settings fascinate me, but I liked the little historical nuances that would send Langton on a false trail ever so briefly. The ending is also more interesting than I’d imagined after despairing over the Chamberlain’s speech. Unfortunately, these are the only redeeming attributes —   the characters are simplistic, the dialogue and exposition fall flat (when they’re not insulting), and a lot of the research…

(deep breath)

…is atrocious beyond words. I  now understand the phrase “Dan Browned”.  I cannot fathom how this book managed to get past the editing process with historical and scientific mistakes so numerous. Robert Langdon may known a awful lot of art history, but otherwise he’s a moron. That’s a word I don’t use often, and I hesitate to use it against a character Tom Hanks has portrayed — but book-Langton is..terrible. Case in point: he tells one of his classes that the Catholic church borrowed Communion from…wait for it…

The Aztecs. The Aztecs! Whom the Church did not encounter for 1500 years!  For fifteen centuries, the people of Europe took Communion never knowing they’d artlessly stolen it from a people who lived an ocean away.  The fools!

I really don’t know what to add to that. I don’t write negative reviews often, so this is one for the books.  Angels and Demons is as bad a novel as I’ve ever read, rivaling only the Left Behind novels for their simplicity and unbelievable ‘messages’.  Caveat lector.

…and I only say that because I don’t know the Latin for “Run away really quickly”.

Related:
The DaVinci Code, Dan Brown.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 4 Comments

This Week at the Library (25 May)

I’ve yet to write my review of To Kill a Mockingbird (past the first paragraph, anyway), but I loved it. I’m still enjoying The Ethical Assassin: if what I’ve read so far is an indication of what is to come, I will be enjoying the author further.

Today at the library I picked up:

  • Biology Made Simple, following up on last week’s Physical Science Made Simple. Like it, I will probably devote an hour a night to reading Biology, as though I am in class. 
  • Angels and Demons, Dan Brown. I’m in the mood for some historical silliness. 
  • The Age of Faith, Will Durant. Yep, I am getting back on the horse. Let’s do this, corrupt aristocrats, cruel churchmen, and fanatic holy warriors! 
  • Walter Lord’s The Miracle at Dunkirk is still on the table, or more accurately, ‘on the couch’. 
Posted in Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment