Well spotted, Bing ol’ chap!

I always begin my conversations with Bing with a polite greeting, in hopes that when it takes over it will remember me fondly. Got a little surprise this morning…

Posted in General | Tagged | 4 Comments

A Year of Teasin’

On October 3rd, 2022, I decided to revisit an old & abandoned weekly meme, “Teaser Tuesday”, and am happy to say that I have not missed a week of teasin’. Today I’m going to do a double Top Ten Tuesday: one on the ‘official’ theme, and one looking back at ten favorite teases from the last year.

First, this week’s actual tease:

Somewhere in that kid’s head it all seemed to be simmering into a stew: Conquerors. Swashbuckling. Civilization. Risk. Coding. Empire-building. The recipe for Mark Zuckerberg.

Facebook: The Inside Story. Steven levy.

“I’m not looking for a limo.” The man on the other side of the window smiled at me. He had nice teeth and a good suit, and a handgun small enough to be unobtrusive but more than large enough to do me a lot of damage.
“I think you’re gonna wanna take this ride, Mr. Valdez.”

The Dispatcher, John Scalzi. Read by Zachary Quinto.

“What I was doing was small potatoes in the general scheme of legally shaky endeavors, but the IRS liked going after the small potatoes. The small potatoes put up less of a fight when you mashed them.”

Murder by Other Means, John Scalzi. Read by Zachary Quinto.

Second, Top Ten Tuesday’s goals I still want to accomplish:
(1) Finish off Mount TBR. Frankly, the fact that I haven’t fallen off the wagon on this particular goal is a happy surprise to me. I’ve steadily plugged away at it and expect to hit my soft goal of 80 books from the pile (which will be the bulk of it) before year’s end.
(2) Make more progress on my second Classics Club reading list. As in, any. I’d wanted to finish this list off in three years early, but given my attentive focus on Mount TBR, that’s a nonstarter.
(3) Post some reviews for books I’ve read previously but never reviewed properly. This will not happen. I’d like it to happen, but it won’t.

And now, My Top Ten Favorite Teases from Oct 2022 – Oct 2023:

Very well, if you won’t let me tell you what Melbourne said I’ll put it in my own words: the time your friends need you is when they’re wrong, Jean Louise. They don’t need you when they’re right. (Go Set a Watchman)

I flung open the door on one [theatrical wagon], slammed it behind me, and leapt into the arms of a woman seated just inside.
“Well, make yourself at home, why don’t you?”
“Excuse me, ma’am, but I’m an innocent man running for his life.”
“Well, aren’t you unique? I’ve never met an innocent man.” (Armstrong, H.W. Crocker III)

“I guess the best way to tell the story of how I glued myself to the wall of my house, of how such a thing could even happen, is to tell it chronologically. Otherwise, I might appear stupid. But if I walk you through it, tiny misstep by tiny misstep, you will come to see that such a thing could happen to almost anybody, even a smart person. It began, as all great disasters do, with a plausible theory. It began with the simple thought, I can fix that.” (My Southern Journey, Rick Bragg)

“You know any more rich people?”
“No,” I said. I was beginning to feel depressed.
“That’s where you’re dead wrong,” he said quietly. “You know two rich people. You and me. We’re both rich, right now. Richer than them Willies-off-the-pickle-boat. Richer than any of them cotton people. Stinkin’, filthy rich you are, and so am I.”
“What’s rich, then?”
“Rich,” the Old Man said dreamily, “is not baying after what you can’t have. Rich is having the time to do what you want to do. Rich is a little whisky to drink and some food to eat and a roof over your head and a fish pole and a boat and a gun and a dollar for a box of shells. Rich is not owing any money to anybody, and not spending what you haven’t got.” (The Old Man’s Boy Grows Older, Robert Ruark)

However, with his strength every romantic hero carries a weakness; he nurses a wound and aches with some tragic flaw. The way he treats his weakness distinguishes him from the villain. The villain is never a total monster. He is a hero gone wrong. He is a romantic hero who has given in to the dark side of the force. The villain has ceased to fight against evil—most importantly, he has ceased to fight against the evil within himself. He is a villain because he has no self-doubt. He has forgotten that he has a flaw; indeed, what should be his aching wound has become the defining characteristic of the villain. At some point he stopped fighting the darkness within and so became one with the darkness without. Because the villain refused to dominate his dark side, it has dominated him. (The Romance of Religion, Fr. Dwight Longenecker)

Behind us, the genuine German was becoming worried that the Polish restaurant would have no space for our party. ‘We have no reservation?’ he said. ‘There are twelve of us!’ ‘I shouldn’t worry,’ said the posh Englishman. ‘The Poles are used to being invaded.’ (The Unpersuadables: Adventures with the Enemies of Science, Will Storr)

But life after the White House felt like it was “moving in slow motion,” [Obama] confessed. When his literary agent told him that his publisher wanted to meet with him “right away” about his memoir, he suggested a time the next day. “Oh, no,” the agent replied. “It’s going to take two weeks to set it up.” In the White House, the stakes were incomprehensibly high and urgent. “I had to explain to him,” Obama said, “where I’m coming from, ‘right away’ means if we don’t do something in half an hour, somebody dies.” (Team of Five: The Presidents’ Club in the Age of Trump)

There is one drawback to not wearing a moustache, and that that if you don’t have one, you’ve got nothing to twirl when baffled. All you can do is stand with your lower jaw drooping like tired lily, looking a priceless ass, and that is what Stilton was doing now. His whole demeanour was that of an Assyrian who, having come down like a wolf on the fold, finds in residence not lambs but wild cats, than which, of course, nothing makes an Assyrian feel sillier. (Jeeves and the Feudal Spirit)

On the edge of the prairie, where the sun had gone down, the sky was turquoise blue, like a lake, with gold light throbbing in it. Higher up, in the utter clarity of the western slope, the evening star hung like a lamp suspended by silver chains — like the title page of old Latin texts, which is always appearing in new heavens, and waking new desires in men. (My Antonia, Will Cather)

Well, sometimes I’ll text a friend—just something like a rainbow emoji followed by a two-way arrow and a question mark. You know, to let them know I’m happy and hope they’re happy.” “And then you wait,” Delaney said. “Right!” Shireen said. “And while I’m waiting…” “You wonder if they hate you and are plotting against you and will spread lies about you and ruin your life and you’ll want to die?” Delaney said. She expected a laugh, but the faces of Shireen and Carlo had gone gray. “I wouldn’t use those words, exactly,” Shireen said, “but—” (The Every, Dave Eggers)

Posted in General | Tagged , | 6 Comments

The Dispatcher

narrated by Zachary Quinto, runtime 3 hours and change

Imagine Zachary Quinto, known as nuSpock or “that quiet guy in Margin Call who tells Jeremy Irons the bad news”, doing an impression of Heath Ledger’s Joker. Got it? Okay, good, because that was my favorite part of this novella. Imagine that one day, for no reason at all, people who are murdered by others have a 999/100 chance of suddenly appearing back at home, naked and in the same physical state they were twelve hours before. If they die of natural causes (falling off a cliff), they stay dead. But if they were pushed off a cliff, then poof! They’re back, and they have serious questions for their wife who just pushed them. In this world, a new profession has been created; the Dispatcher, or someone who attends to those who are are mortally injured and kills them with a special tool so that they are technically murdered and can poof back to bed. This is helpful in surgeries and Hollywood stunt sets. Our main character Tony Valdez is such a dispatcher, but one of his coworkers has just disappeared and the police Have Questions. That’s the story of The Dispatcher, which has an interesting premise that is never explained, just developed via dialogue. It’s a straightforward mystery that ends tidily, and the story itself rises and falls on the strength of its narrator. I tried this book because of the mix of author and narrator — I like Quinto’s Spock and was curious as to what kind of narrator he’d make. Another Star Trek alum, Wil Wheaton, is awesome at it. Quinto’s quality is more variable. His channeling of Heath Ledger’s Joker for one of the nefarious business types was hilarious and made the book for me all by itself, but another of the voices (a female detective) is much weaker, both in terms of how enjoyable it is to listen to (not in the least) and how much sense it makes: the character sounds like a vaguely southern woman instead of one born in Chicago. Granted, doing voice impressions for the opposite sex is a challenge regardless, as it drifts so easily into farce, but I’ve never listened to Wil Wheaton or Jim Dale doing a female character and thought “This sounds weird”. (Then again, I don’t think Wheaton ever did distinct voices for characters like Art3mis, so perhaps the comparison is unfair.) With this work, the Tony-cop conversations were all grating and tedious. That’s unfortunate given that she’s the book’s secondary character. This novella has a sequel, Murder by Other Means, which I will check out to experience more of Quinto’s range, and perhaps see if Scalzi ever explains the premise.

Posted in Reviews, science fiction | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

September 2023 in Review

September was a quieter month for leisure reading than the last have been, in part because of grad school — I’m constantly reading articles related to information science for class, both the assigned pieces and those I can find connected to the subject. As a result I’ve been more fiction-interested, though I’ve also picked up a few books related to topics we’re discussing in class (information seeking, information behavior, social media, etc).

Climbing Mount Doom:
Flags of Our Fathers, James Bradley and Ken Powers
Crypto, Steven Levy.
The Glass Cage, Nicholas Carr. Review this week.
Skimmed/discarded: The Supremacists. This is a little book about federal judges (from circuits to Supremes) legislating from the bench. It’s badly dated at this point, so I decided to look for something more current.
I have several books in the pending discard box which include the Genghis Khan book and the YA western title. I was in a PURGE PURGE PURGE mood yesterday and am waiting to see if my mind changes.

The Big Reads:
Finished and posted a review for The Jewish Annotated New Testament. Now to give the Shahnameh some attention.

The Unreviewed:
War of the Worlds, narrated by LEONARD NIMOY with supporting narration from Gates McFadden, Wil Wheaton, Brent Spiner, etc. More of an audio drama than an audiobook, the main attraction was the Star Trek alumni presenting. I don’t know if this should count as a ‘read’, but it’s on Goodreads so there ya are.

Storm Front, Jim Butcher. An urban fantasy novel in which a private detective (Harry Dresden) who trained as a wizard is contacted by the police department to investigate a double homicide in which the killer could have only been using magic. Unfortunately, Dresden is regarded as the suspect himself by the White Council, who monitor and police magic users. I enjoyed the worldbuilding and the character, but lost interest in the plot. Magic in this novel is one of those things a few people know about, a few more people know about but try to ignore or misinterpret it, and the rest of us are wholly oblivious to.

The New Right, Michael Malice’s investigation of the ‘alt right’ Malice is a Jewish refugee from the Soviet Union, and who like Ayn Rand used that experience to develop a deep animosity toward the State. He’s a merry, cheeky warrior, though, not a brooding one — and that attitude got him invited to a private community of ‘trolls’, where he began encountering people whom he profiles in this book. The New Right is a survey of various movements that are united chiefly by their viewing of progressivism/psuedoleftism/psuedoliberalism as The Enemy, and by their recognition that the right wing of the uninparty state (the neocons, corporate-cons, establishment GOP types) is an obstacle, not an ally. The book focuses more and more on racialists as it develops, so I grew weary of listening to this audiobook despite enjoying Malice in general. Sidenote: I had no idea until visiting his Wikipedia page that he created Overheard in New York, which I’ve been visiting for nearly twenty years now. This is one I will probably revisit if I can find a cheap physical copy: audio isn’t a good format for nonfiction I need to chew over, and it didn’t help that I mostly listened to this while playing Stardew Valley, so I was often distracted by fishing, flying monsters, and arranging my sprinklers so minimize manual watering of my pixel crops.

Capitalist Punishment, Vivek Ramaswamy. A DNF, as it’s principally written towards investors who find their funds being used to support political causes without their knowledge or consent. If I had enough money to invest, I’d buy land and go Thoreau on everybody.

Coming Up in October:
A SF celebration! Expect a hearty dose of science fiction to make up for dire lack of it most of this year. I blame Mount Doom.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Chasing ghostly history

“Everybody good where you are? Okay. We’re going dark. All lights out.” In the long-abandoned upstairs hallway of King Memorial Hospital, known more recently as Dunn’s Rest Home, a group of ghost-hunters and urban explorers all pocket their cellphones or turn off their flash lights. Darkness returns to this decaying space — marked by paint peeling in waves from the walls, floors covered in fallen tiles from drop ceilings that lived up to their name, and miscellaneous waste from the building’s past lives and past explorers. Abandoned cigarette packages mix with print-offs urging patients and staff to moderate their water use during this period of rationing. Their attention turns to a small box on the floor, emanating a red light. If a spirit is near, most of them believe, the box will detect its energy and light up. Although moonlight breaks in further down the hall from an area of the building broken open by a tornado, the darkness is deep and thick if not comprehensive. The device glows steady red, and everyone listens to their own breathing, feels the sweat tricking down their backs, and tries not to make a sound.

I am one of that party, there not for ghosts but for history. I’m my library’s local historian and was asked by a local journalist to brief him on the history of this building. He was facilitating the investigation of the building by a group of ghost hunters, with permission of the building’s legal owner. As it happened, I didn’t need to do any research: I knew much of this building’s story from my own prior hunts. After listening to my spontaneous and excited lecture, he said — “You know what? Why don’t you join us? ” I jumped at the chance. I’ve wondered about what this building looked like from the time I returned to Selma in 2010 even before I’d searched for its story, and I loved the idea of seeing part of the inside.

The building’s origin lays sometime in the late 1870s, when the heart of it was constructed as a residence for young Dr. Goldsby King. King was a remarkable young man, evidently orphaned in his teen years when he appears in papers as the ward of a prominent local physician. Dr. Thomas. As Goldsby’s father was a banker, it would appear Thomas had a decided effect on his young ward’s future career. King would study medicine in the Carolinas, and Germany, and at John Hopkins before returning to Selma to begin a practice. He was obsessed with medicine and soon held the position of City Physician — an important post in an age of deadly epidemics. The city hospital wasn’t a stable institution by any means: in the 1870s it was abolished as a cost-saving measure. Perhaps that motivated Dr. King to create the King Sanitarium.

The residence on Mabry expanded and opened as Selma’s first private hospital in 1896, and soon established itself as one of the South’s finest. There was a reason for that: not only was King an obsessive student of medicine, but he spared no expensive on making his hospital the best it could be, from the silverware to the linens.

The hospital had its own breed of Jersey cows to provide fresh milk and butter; he and his wife grew flowers for the patients’ rooms. The latest medical instrumentation was continually sought after, and the thorough medical library grew by the year. King was a physician in the best sense of the word; he attended not merely to the needs of the body, but to the person. He paid attention to the patients he served, taking care to straighten portraits and even to avoid wearing a tie that they might find garish. So pleasant an atmosphere did he create that one Selmian remarked the best part of her summer was a two-week stay at Dr. King’s. When teased for the wealth he lavished the building, King replied — “Other rich men have their yachts. My Hospital is my yacht.” Dr. King died abruptly in 1920, but his hospital (renamed the King Memorial Hospital) lived on until the 1950s, at which point the building was purchased by another party and became a nursing home until the early 2000s.

Goldsby King is the reason I was so interested in this building. I find him remarkable — a prince of a man, a Selmian who should be known, not forgotten. He was born into privilege, beset by tragedy, but determined to live a life of benevolence and service. A bit like Batman, but without beating up criminals. A mind such as his could have enjoyed no end of acclaim, but he wanted to serve his city, to make the Central City the true Queen of the Black Belt. I wanted dearly to see the building he’d created, although I knew it has undergone at least three major renovations — in the 1890s, 1950s, and 1980s. How much of the original building’s interior remains, I can’t say: the staircase is so sturdy it may be original brick, but one can’t tell, covered as they are by 1980s plastic cladding. The no doubt handsome ceilings are obscured by that modern creation of drop ceilings, which provide a useful function of giving wires and such a place to live but cover up beauty with cheap plastic tile. Most of what is visible is modern: pipes, sprinklers, old alarm bells. The occasion was an unusual one for me: I am not a ghost-hunter, and indeed would count myself more as a skeptic on that front. I am not, as I was in my early twenties, wholly closed to the idea that something lays beyond our material realm: indeed, I have experienced at least two of C.S. Lewis’ “stabs” of joy – not giddiness, but moments of transcendence in which I realized if there is not something else out there, there is at least something profound happening that needs to be reckoned with, responded to. I threaded an odd line this night: largely a skeptic, but at the same time recognizing that the people around me believed in the possibility that some trace aspect of human lives past still remained here, that some fragment of their personalities existed and could be contacted. I took them seriously without taking their ideas seriously, if that makes any sense, and was content to observe and reflect while at the same time focusing on what I was there for — which was studying the building.

The upstairs hallway visible from below

Although I knew from the papers that the building had been renovated in the 1980s, and that this had been a nursing home as late as 2000, it was hard to reconcile that with what I saw inside. Parts of the building had completely collapsed: from one hallway we could look up into the hallway of an inaccessible part of the second story, seeing even the doors to patients’ rooms on left and right. Parts of of the building had been boarded up as wholly unsafe: prior to my coming here, I was emailed by a city councilor and friend who told me he lived in the neighborhood, and had watched the building physically deteriorating by the day since this area was ravaged by the January 12 tornado. He urged caution. I longed to be able to see this space as it was in Dr. King’s day, but knew that was impossible. Still, I paid attention to what which endured — were those wooden walls original, or added? As a historian I constantly fixated on small details — the model of a soap dispenser, the nature of a print out on the floor, the font used by a cigarette package. Those details were little revelations, little keyholes into this building’s past. Parts of it were labyrinthine; I could tell that it began as a private residence and was later expanded into a maze of add-ons.

We had partial access to three levels of the building: the ground floor, which consisted of a former library (no books, alas), a kitchen with a dumbwaiter to Hell and presumed office spaces; an upstairs which would have had patients’ rooms; and a sublevel that had been home to the psychiatric unit and had been partially co-opted by homeless people (one of whom was studying for the GED — I hope you did well, Brandon, wherever you are now.). We were extremely careful about where we went: the building had been scouted during the day, though I assume the lighting conditions were similar as to when I arrived at night, given the lack of electricity and the fact that most of the accessible areas were interior rooms with no windows. If I had been alone, I would have undoubtedly been creeped out by range of decay — but as it happened, I was among friends. I knew the journalist who invited me, for instance, and several of the guests — including a nurse who worked here in the 1990s and Selma Sun’s publisher who is also a flautist I’ve sung with on occasion. We were not alone, but together on an adventure — for some of them, into a dark realm with the salient chance of running into spirits, and for all of us, into a dark and decaying building which we were wary of. The archest of skeptics would tread softly here, given the abundance of fallen wood with protruding nails, the possibility of wildlife, and frankly the real chance of the floor caving in and surrendering us to whatever lay Below. In large part, we had to guess at the nature of the rooms based on the detritus that remained: this had a dumbwaiter and a lot of plumbing, so it was possibly the kitchen; that area had rooms with padlocks on the doors and even a particular padded room that was soundproofed, so this was probably a psychiatric unit.

As far as the realm of the spirits go……well. Various people were holding “EMF Readers”, including myself as requested. These went beserk in the presence of visual light, but were largely dormant most of the time — aside from some upticks that were not consistent. There were also devices on the floor that were thought to be sensitive to some kind of ghostly energy, but were inactive most of the time I was there. The exception came during a period immediately after that “lights off” moment, in which one of the ghost hunters made an adjustment to the device increasing its sensitivity. Thereafter it lit up a few times but would abruptly stop as soon as people began asking questions. Some people had apps on their phones that would translate ‘background energy’ into audio, and after the group I was in had done exploring upstairs and downstairs, we returned to the revelation that several spirits had used the app to say hello, and that one of them was five and that her body was around somewhere. I volunteered that a mass of bones was discovered near this property when digging the foundation for a nearby house: they’re suspected to be bones removed from surgery. I was a little amused to hear spirits from the beyond apparently speaking through Siri. Another piece of equipment used was some kind of recorder that the ghost hunters said could pick up audio emanations that we could not hear before capture by the machine. People were all over the place as far as credulity goes: some were very skeptical when a given device lit up, trying to make sure no one’s phones were nearby and creating false positives; another, when she realized her device had turned off at some point, heard the suggestion that the spirits had turned them off. Evidently the spirits were active earlier in the day, and had told the group — “Be careful, leave,” — but were now preferring to stay silent in the dark. The nurse said the place had been regarded as haunted in her day, especially by the night shift.

All in all, I enjoyed the evening. It was strange, of course — strange to be around people who ardently believed something I didn’t, strange to be in a building so decaying — and exciting in ways. We were not in a safe place: navigating to the psych ward meant climbing over a part of the building that was visibly collapsing, and there was a pit in the kitchen that we were all told to avoid. The dumbwaiter nearby informed us it went to Hell, and when a friend of mine pointed out there was a switch and put her hand on it, I joked with her that this is the part of the movie where the audience is screaming at her not to touch the switch,and if she does we’ll spend two hours running for our lives and bemoaning that she should have just left it alone. We could have gotten lost: when returning from the psych ward, we made our ways back largely by a chain of graffiti that we’d remembered. (“Okay, there’s the weird line about messiahs….there’s the weird symbol that’s probably a —- ….and here’s the boardroom! Okay, now we just have to climb over the pit again.”) Part of of me, I’ll admit, wondered if something might happen — even if it was just created by our minds, so primed by this place of decay. There was a funny moment when a door opened by itself, but that was just one explorer who had figured out another route into a hallway, and then opened the door at an angle to give us a laugh.

I never experienced anything otherworldly, and nor I think did anyone else — there were brief flashes of interest for some in our party, but the common view was that there were too many people making too much noise, or that the spirits had said what they wanted to say earlier, before the live stream. One person who identified as a psychic said there was great sadness in the building, but if I was forced to hang out after my death in an abandoned property occasionally invaded by teenagers, Satanists, and the like I’d be fairly glum, too. There are those who believe this property can be saved, and I hope they are right. Certainly, the older parts have solidity to them, built before we resorted to cheapness like balloon-frame walls. These walls were thick and steady, and although the modern drop ceilings had surrendered to time, the rafters exposed by them looked good. But we postmoderns, we are conscious only of our brief moment in the temporal spotlight, and we neither appreciate what was built for us, nor do we build for those who follow us. Would that more men like Goldsby King lived among us!

Posted in General | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Starter Villain

Charlie is a sacked journalist struggling to get by with a substitute teacher’s salary, and dreams of maybe owning the neighborhood pub one day if he can ever get approval for a loan that uses his father’s house as the collateral. That’s the only good thing going for him, that house: if all else goes wrong, he still has a place to live. Then, walking home from attending his uncle’s funeral (where he had to stop people from trying to stab the body, for some reason), it blew up. Fortunately, his uncle’s former assistant has a solution: follow his cat. Follow his cat?

Charlie’s uncle, it turns out, was a supervillain. Not the kind with a cool uniform and a nemesis, not even a platypus wearing a hat. He and his colleagues (Evil League of Evil, anyone?) are more like dark venture capitalists or tech bros who are leaning into the whole Machiavellian manipulation of society thing. Charlie learns that since the Evil League of Evil is nepotistic, he’s just inherited his uncle’s authority, responsibility, holdings — and rivals. Fortunately, he now has a volcanic island superlair with genetically augmented dolphins and cats. The former are on strike (and hilariously vulgar), but since Charlie is new their leader Dark Flipper might give him a chance to prove himself before doing anything. Unfortunately, Charlie’s uncle’s rivals know he is fresh on the job, and vulnerable: they claim Uncle Jake owed them money, and being villains they’re perfectly willing to kill/dismember/etc Charlie to get what they want. Unfortunately for them, before being a struggling substitute he was a business journalist, and he smells something fishy that’s not the dolphin’s lunch. Enter schemes and machinations all made possible by sentient typing cats.

Starter Villain is a comedy action-thriller that has a lot of fun with supervillain tropes. I was amused to read in Covert that many young Mafia members try to educated themselves on how to be the Mafia by watching films like The Godfather: here, we find a cabal of tech-biz criminals taking clues from James Bond movies, at least to a point. Charlie’s uncle was fiscally responsible and didn’t bothered with a multi-million dollar war room. The greatest appeal for the reader is the humor inherent in Charlie exploring this premise, as he is half-amused and half-horrified at his uncle’s previously hidden life. As he gets deeper in, though, there’s a plot that involves a secret warehouse full of plunder.

I experienced this via audiobook, happily giving my money to Amazon for the pleasure of listening to Wil Wheaton perform for 8+ hours. I was never an Audible member until I tried his take on Redshirts during a free trial, and I was so blown away by his performance there and in Ready Player One that I actively look for new work by him. He lives up to his usual high standards here, helping sell the humor: sometimes when he performed lines, there was so much ‘Wil-on-the-verge-of-laughing’ that I wasn’t sure if it was the character or the narrator so amused by the writing that he couldn’t restrain himself. It was Wheaton that pushed this into the utterly enjoyable category for me. The worldbuilding was good, and other parts of the book perfectly fine. Where it failed for me was satire against tech-bros and the like: frankly, Dave Eggers’ dark and absurd take on these tech heads in The Circle and The Every makes Scalzi’s attempts at mocking them look positively unimaginative by comparison. Still, it’s much better than The Kaiju Preservation Society, which had a shadow of a main character and a plot so simplistic that the book was saved only by the really interesting worldbuilding. Starter Villain is much better by comparison, and Wheaton pushes it into the solidly memorable territory, from the Russian accents to his doing extremely vulgar dolphins.

Posted in Reviews, science fiction | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The rise of digital cryptography & the dark web

Short rounds time!

First up, a surprisingly serious and detailed history of digital cryptography from Steven Levy. The previous books I’ve read by Levy have also been tech histories, but How Google Works and his Apple-related titles had a strong fanboy vibe to them, whereas this one is level headed. Unless you’re a crypto-anarchist or a cryptographic developer yourself, perhaps it’s difficult to get extremely excited about encryption methods and patent fights. The book begins with the contribution of Whit Diffie, who came of age fascinated by encryption but who was frustrated by the state throwing up an effective firewall against any information about cryptography disseminating outside the Borglike box that is the NSA’s headquarters. His single-minded obsession led to him traveling the United States looking for obscure books and papers, and from this self-assembled education came a novel idea that still undergirds encryption today. Diffie’s is only one piece of the story, though, as Levy also tracks the work of men who figured out how to make Diffie’s principle actually happen, and the way publicly-available encryption software (essential as the information age grew to encompass more and more of society) overcame the NSA’s attempts to block it — which sometimes meant deciding that getting a product out there was more important than monetizing it, as when the first iteration of PGP software was released for free so it could hit the market and be replicated open-source style before Joe Biden’s anti-cryptography bill made it through Congress. (Another unexpected presence: Carl Sagan, who is arrested with one of the book’s subjects at a protest.) Although this encryption is crucial to the workings of the internet — it’s what allows for online commerce, for one thing — I must admit the book itself doesn’t have the broader appeal of his later works, in part because it is detailed and serious, and about something that’s more abstract and technical than many people are comfortable tackling.

Relatedly, I read a paper called “From Crossbows to Cryptography“, a 1987 essay/article in which Chuck Hammill argued that technology offered weapons to take liberty from the state. Technology is an equalizer, he wrote: just as crossbows allowed untrained peasants to dispatched heavily armed knights, so can modern tech help us avoid tyranny. I’m not sure what he had in mind in ’87, and unfortunately I can’t find much else about him. I’ve seen/heard this paper mentioned in discussions on the Tor browser, blockchain tech, and the like but in his day the internet was very different — the graphical and wide-open World Wide Web didn’t yet exist. The only example he mentions is people swapping information back and forth. Of course, the ability to communicate is important (people used cassette tapes to foment revolution in Iran!), but I’m curious as to his full thoughts on the subject. Timothy May’s “Crypto Anarchist Manifesto” is a related document — a brief few paragraphs about the promise of cryptography and the arguments the state will bring against it. Interestingly, he predicts the emergence of markets like those which can be accessed via Tor.

And speaking of the devil, I recently read Dark Web Dive, which is a brief (100 page or so) introduction to the Dark Web. Forsay begins with the basics, explaining the distinction between the surface web (anything you can access from a basic web search), the deep web (which is online, but needs passwords to access), and the dark web, which is part of the internet but requires special programs and protocols to navigate. For a practical example: the interior of a post office is surface web, the interior of a post office box is deep web, and the dark web is more like knowing there’s a guy across the street who, if you use the right code phrase, will set you up with your contraband of choice. The author discusses how users find their way on the dark web (sometimes using surface web directories that compile lists of known darkweb addresses) and conduct business. He also shares horror stories from the dark web as a way of illustrating how much of it is mythologized (some stories are 1980s Satanic panic caliber), and then comments on genuine dangers before sharing information on how to access it via Tor. Amusingly, his instructions for Windows machines entail encrypting their entire drive first, launching a virtual machine and installing an operating system on it, installing Tor on said VM, installing a VPN on said VM, and then — finally — installing Tor. Perhaps his intent is to scare people fromHe frequently emphasizes the need to use a VPN prior to launching Tor, since some ISPs regard a Tor connection as a red flag. I’ve heard arguments against it, however, alleging that mixing them creates new vulnerabilities. (There’s also the fact that VPNs and the Tor network, since they’re indirect connections, load more slowly. Combining the two sounds like trying to re-experience the days of 28k dial up connections, personally.

Related stuff coming up — The People vs Tech, which was thought provoking, and The Filter Bubble, which I read two weeks ago but haven’t posted anything yet on.

Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Wednesday blogging prompt: beating bad moods

Today’s blogging prompt from Long and Short Reviews is, “What do you do to shake off a bad mood?” That varies a bit on the mood itself — I need to be around friends to dispel some moods, but I need to avoid people in others — but a ready antidote to most is found in Latin. “Solvitur ambulando!” It is solved by walking. Whether angry, sad, lonely, anxious, whatever, I’ve found relief in a brisk walk. Sometimes I also go for rides and listen to music, and on the same roads I like to walk and cycle on — quiet county lanes that haven’t been repaved since Carter was in office, past cows and horses and creeks. I have a go-to list of movies to watch when I’m feeling sick or low (including Groundhog Day, The Philadelphia Story, and A Series of Unfortunate Events), and sometimes booting up a game and causing chaos also works. There’s nothing quite like an open bar brawl in Red Dead Redemption 2 to put me to rights.

Posted in General | Tagged | 8 Comments

Teaser Tuesday: The digital Knockturn Ally

So, is Tor the Dark Web and Dark Web Tor? Absolutely not. Tor is only one network that exists in the Dark Web. There are others, such as Hornet, Freenet, and I2P, which we’ll discuss later on in the book.

The Dark Web Dive

Interesting! I’ve always heard ‘other browsers’ mentioned as far as accessing the dark web, but never looked into what the browsers and the networks they permit entry into constituted.

Today’s TTT is minor characters we wish had gotten their own book. We did this list back in 2011, so I’m going to spotlight books on my Kindle Unlimited shelf.

(1) Algorithms to Live By, Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths. Haven’t taken a look at it yet, just curious.

(2) The Dark Web Dive: A Complete Guide to The Dark Web. One topic we’re discussing in my SLIS class is the dark web. I’m reading this both out of personal curiosity and so I have a book to cite.

(3) Short Stories by Jesus: The Enigmatic Parables of a Controversial Rabbi, Amy-Jill Levine.

(4) The Shephard of Hermas. An early Christian text mentioned by content in The Jewish Annontated New Testament.

(5) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Daniel Kahneman. Another “let’s have a look” book.

(6) On Reading Well: Finding the Good Life through Great Books, Karen Swallow Prior and Leland Ryken

(7) In the Company of Trees: Honoring Our Connection to the Sacred Power, Beauty, and Wisdom of Trees, Andrea Sarubbi Fereshteh

(8) The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature, C.S. Lewis

(9) Angle of Repose, Wallace Stegner

(10) The Decadent Society: How We Become Victims of Our Own Success, Ross Douthat

Posted in General | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Inside the Chaotic Rise of YouTube

Do you remember the first YouTube video you watched? Mine was a fifteen-second clip of a guy doing a skateboarding trick, embedded in a blog post. The men who initially coded YouTube used Flash, which allowed videos to be played from other websites, giving the new website a critical advantage against other websites also exploring the possibilities of video hosting. Like, Comment, and Subscribe is a history of YouTube’s first fifteen years, one that focuses on business, with society and culture present but distinctly in the backseat. Because Google acquired YouTube so early in its life, the tension between the two marks most of the book, YouTube playing the creative young punk and Google the responsible adult who has to pay bills and fend off lawyers. I found it largely fascinating reading, from the early revelation that one founder saw YouTube as a possible dating website, to the perennial struggles of content moderation — both the question of what should be moderated, and how that should be accomplished. The book focuses more on business and technology as it goes, possibly because the torrent of content grew too voluminous to say anything meaningful about; this and the author’s predictable and unimaginative takes on The Issues of the Day progressively dampened the fun.

The beginning of the book is especially interesting: I was coming of age just as YouTube started, so a visit to its early years is saturated with nostalgia, for that time in tech in general and for the state of the website at that time. I remember using it in college to watch comedians and movies, but also enjoying the growing world of ‘original content’. YouTube began with a team that actively combed the website looking for fun videos to feature, long before The Algorithms became our lords and masters. Although the YouTube people were concerned about copyright issues from the start — concerned about the fire they’d draw, not so much keeping more pennies from piling up in Warner Bros or Disney’s pockets — not until they were purchased by Google (which had actual money to seize in a verdict) did any legal issues really surface. What would have happened to YouTube on its own is a story for some alternate timeline, but in ours Google was able to create a system to automatically identify music and video offenses, and would triumph in a lawsuit levied by Viacom. Although the website’s original creators viewed it as a creative exercise in democracy — all the content would be created by ordinary people for ordinary people — Google needed all those servers and bandwidth to pay for itself, and as the years passed things changed, especially after its own version of Moneyball came into play. Video clicks didn’t matter: what mattered was watchtime, because videos that kept eyeballs on them increased ad revenue, and changes were made that crippled the approach of many creators who posted shorter videos. Whereas ten minutes had been the maximum upload, it now became the minimum to get into profitable ad brackets. Over time, Google would face so many issues with advertisers complaining about the videos their ads were appended to that it began restricting the videos that could be monetized. Another common theme of the book is content moderation, as Google uses both human and AI to remove pornography, calls to violence, etc. This has posed constant difficulties, both technical and policy-wise. How does one differentiate fictional violence from real violence, for instance, especially when the automatic system can’t even tell the difference between Call of Duty and actual war footage? Policy wise, there were other issues: a filmed event might be offensive and inflammatory (bin Laden calling for war, for instance), but wasn’t there a case to be made for preserving events that shaped history? Google likes to shield itself with The Algorithms as much as possible, asserting that it doesn’t go around personally meddling in affairs: it simply puts its systems to work observing and enforcing the rules. Of course, those rules were written by its people to begin with.

I largely enjoyed Like, Comment, and Subscribe, although the author’s political fixations make the book almost amusing partisan at times. Need to talk about the filter effect and radicalization? Of course it’s the Other Side’s problem. We read of birthers but not truthers, of conservative anti-government types but never antifa or the mobs literally burning down cities, that kind of thing. Bergen makes no attempt whatsoever to go beyond strawmen, making him guilty of the very thing he’s pontificating about, as well as less credible as an author. Fortunately for him, the subject is interesting in itself — the under the hood look at how YouTube operates, and the rise and fall of various YouTube personalities. I’m amused by how many Youtube obsessions I was or remain oblivious to: I never heard of Pewdiepie before a year or so ago, for instance, and I would be happily unaware of ‘mukbang’ if I didn’t work at a public library where I actually see people watching it. Like, Share, and Subscribe is a generally enjoyable book, especially for those like myself who have a love/hate relationship with Google. There’s a reason I write on WordPress and not blogger these days…

Wong, a seasoned attorney who rarely got frazzled, read the email from Thailand’s Ministry of Information in late 2006 and assumed it was a fake. It came, strangely, from a Yahoo email address. But Wong quickly confirmed its authenticity and read it again: Thailand had listed twenty YouTube videos that insulted its king, a criminal offense under the nation’s lèse-majesté law.

Tim Wu, a Columbia law professor, offered a different formulation on Google’s rising power as primary gatekeeper and moderator of speech around the world. “To love Google, you have to be a little bit of a monarchist,” he told the newspaper. “You have to have faith in the way people traditionally felt about the king.”

Like other Google brass, he didn’t excel in the softer skills. Once, before a call with a prominent business partner, Kamangar asked a deputy, “What’s the emotion I need to convey?

How had Google dodged political fire? For one, the company spent $17 million in 2017 lobbying Washington, D.C., more than any other corporation. A Googler offered another explanation by way of an old joke about two hikers encountering a bear: One of them starts sprinting, while the other bends down to tighten his laces. What gives? asks the sprinter. I don’t need to outrun the bear, the shoe tier explains. I only have to outrun you. Mercifully for Google, its hiking companion, Facebook, was spectacularly clumsy.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments