
I always begin my conversations with Bing with a polite greeting, in hopes that when it takes over it will remember me fondly. Got a little surprise this morning…
Imagine Zachary Quinto, known as nuSpock or “that quiet guy in Margin Call who tells Jeremy Irons the bad news”, doing an impression of Heath Ledger’s Joker. Got it? Okay, good, because that was my favorite part of this novella. Imagine that one day, for no reason at all, people who are murdered by others have a 999/100 chance of suddenly appearing back at home, naked and in the same physical state they were twelve hours before. If they die of natural causes (falling off a cliff), they stay dead. But if they were pushed off a cliff, then poof! They’re back, and they have serious questions for their wife who just pushed them. In this world, a new profession has been created; the Dispatcher, or someone who attends to those who are are mortally injured and kills them with a special tool so that they are technically murdered and can poof back to bed. This is helpful in surgeries and Hollywood stunt sets. Our main character Tony Valdez is such a dispatcher, but one of his coworkers has just disappeared and the police Have Questions. That’s the story of The Dispatcher, which has an interesting premise that is never explained, just developed via dialogue. It’s a straightforward mystery that ends tidily, and the story itself rises and falls on the strength of its narrator. I tried this book because of the mix of author and narrator — I like Quinto’s Spock and was curious as to what kind of narrator he’d make. Another Star Trek alum, Wil Wheaton, is awesome at it. Quinto’s quality is more variable. His channeling of Heath Ledger’s Joker for one of the nefarious business types was hilarious and made the book for me all by itself, but another of the voices (a female detective) is much weaker, both in terms of how enjoyable it is to listen to (not in the least) and how much sense it makes: the character sounds like a vaguely southern woman instead of one born in Chicago. Granted, doing voice impressions for the opposite sex is a challenge regardless, as it drifts so easily into farce, but I’ve never listened to Wil Wheaton or Jim Dale doing a female character and thought “This sounds weird”. (Then again, I don’t think Wheaton ever did distinct voices for characters like Art3mis, so perhaps the comparison is unfair.) With this work, the Tony-cop conversations were all grating and tedious. That’s unfortunate given that she’s the book’s secondary character. This novella has a sequel, Murder by Other Means, which I will check out to experience more of Quinto’s range, and perhaps see if Scalzi ever explains the premise.
September was a quieter month for leisure reading than the last have been, in part because of grad school — I’m constantly reading articles related to information science for class, both the assigned pieces and those I can find connected to the subject. As a result I’ve been more fiction-interested, though I’ve also picked up a few books related to topics we’re discussing in class (information seeking, information behavior, social media, etc).
Climbing Mount Doom:
Flags of Our Fathers, James Bradley and Ken Powers
Crypto, Steven Levy.
The Glass Cage, Nicholas Carr. Review this week.
Skimmed/discarded: The Supremacists. This is a little book about federal judges (from circuits to Supremes) legislating from the bench. It’s badly dated at this point, so I decided to look for something more current.
I have several books in the pending discard box which include the Genghis Khan book and the YA western title. I was in a PURGE PURGE PURGE mood yesterday and am waiting to see if my mind changes.
The Big Reads:
Finished and posted a review for The Jewish Annotated New Testament. Now to give the Shahnameh some attention.
The Unreviewed:
War of the Worlds, narrated by LEONARD NIMOY with supporting narration from Gates McFadden, Wil Wheaton, Brent Spiner, etc. More of an audio drama than an audiobook, the main attraction was the Star Trek alumni presenting. I don’t know if this should count as a ‘read’, but it’s on Goodreads so there ya are.
Storm Front, Jim Butcher. An urban fantasy novel in which a private detective (Harry Dresden) who trained as a wizard is contacted by the police department to investigate a double homicide in which the killer could have only been using magic. Unfortunately, Dresden is regarded as the suspect himself by the White Council, who monitor and police magic users. I enjoyed the worldbuilding and the character, but lost interest in the plot. Magic in this novel is one of those things a few people know about, a few more people know about but try to ignore or misinterpret it, and the rest of us are wholly oblivious to.
The New Right, Michael Malice’s investigation of the ‘alt right’ Malice is a Jewish refugee from the Soviet Union, and who like Ayn Rand used that experience to develop a deep animosity toward the State. He’s a merry, cheeky warrior, though, not a brooding one — and that attitude got him invited to a private community of ‘trolls’, where he began encountering people whom he profiles in this book. The New Right is a survey of various movements that are united chiefly by their viewing of progressivism/psuedoleftism/psuedoliberalism as The Enemy, and by their recognition that the right wing of the uninparty state (the neocons, corporate-cons, establishment GOP types) is an obstacle, not an ally. The book focuses more and more on racialists as it develops, so I grew weary of listening to this audiobook despite enjoying Malice in general. Sidenote: I had no idea until visiting his Wikipedia page that he created Overheard in New York, which I’ve been visiting for nearly twenty years now. This is one I will probably revisit if I can find a cheap physical copy: audio isn’t a good format for nonfiction I need to chew over, and it didn’t help that I mostly listened to this while playing Stardew Valley, so I was often distracted by fishing, flying monsters, and arranging my sprinklers so minimize manual watering of my pixel crops.
Capitalist Punishment, Vivek Ramaswamy. A DNF, as it’s principally written towards investors who find their funds being used to support political causes without their knowledge or consent. If I had enough money to invest, I’d buy land and go Thoreau on everybody.
Coming Up in October:
A SF celebration! Expect a hearty dose of science fiction to make up for dire lack of it most of this year. I blame Mount Doom.
Charlie is a sacked journalist struggling to get by with a substitute teacher’s salary, and dreams of maybe owning the neighborhood pub one day if he can ever get approval for a loan that uses his father’s house as the collateral. That’s the only good thing going for him, that house: if all else goes wrong, he still has a place to live. Then, walking home from attending his uncle’s funeral (where he had to stop people from trying to stab the body, for some reason), it blew up. Fortunately, his uncle’s former assistant has a solution: follow his cat. Follow his cat?
Charlie’s uncle, it turns out, was a supervillain. Not the kind with a cool uniform and a nemesis, not even a platypus wearing a hat. He and his colleagues (Evil League of Evil, anyone?) are more like dark venture capitalists or tech bros who are leaning into the whole Machiavellian manipulation of society thing. Charlie learns that since the Evil League of Evil is nepotistic, he’s just inherited his uncle’s authority, responsibility, holdings — and rivals. Fortunately, he now has a volcanic island superlair with genetically augmented dolphins and cats. The former are on strike (and hilariously vulgar), but since Charlie is new their leader Dark Flipper might give him a chance to prove himself before doing anything. Unfortunately, Charlie’s uncle’s rivals know he is fresh on the job, and vulnerable: they claim Uncle Jake owed them money, and being villains they’re perfectly willing to kill/dismember/etc Charlie to get what they want. Unfortunately for them, before being a struggling substitute he was a business journalist, and he smells something fishy that’s not the dolphin’s lunch. Enter schemes and machinations all made possible by sentient typing cats.
Starter Villain is a comedy action-thriller that has a lot of fun with supervillain tropes. I was amused to read in Covert that many young Mafia members try to educated themselves on how to be the Mafia by watching films like The Godfather: here, we find a cabal of tech-biz criminals taking clues from James Bond movies, at least to a point. Charlie’s uncle was fiscally responsible and didn’t bothered with a multi-million dollar war room. The greatest appeal for the reader is the humor inherent in Charlie exploring this premise, as he is half-amused and half-horrified at his uncle’s previously hidden life. As he gets deeper in, though, there’s a plot that involves a secret warehouse full of plunder.
I experienced this via audiobook, happily giving my money to Amazon for the pleasure of listening to Wil Wheaton perform for 8+ hours. I was never an Audible member until I tried his take on Redshirts during a free trial, and I was so blown away by his performance there and in Ready Player One that I actively look for new work by him. He lives up to his usual high standards here, helping sell the humor: sometimes when he performed lines, there was so much ‘Wil-on-the-verge-of-laughing’ that I wasn’t sure if it was the character or the narrator so amused by the writing that he couldn’t restrain himself. It was Wheaton that pushed this into the utterly enjoyable category for me. The worldbuilding was good, and other parts of the book perfectly fine. Where it failed for me was satire against tech-bros and the like: frankly, Dave Eggers’ dark and absurd take on these tech heads in The Circle and The Every makes Scalzi’s attempts at mocking them look positively unimaginative by comparison. Still, it’s much better than The Kaiju Preservation Society, which had a shadow of a main character and a plot so simplistic that the book was saved only by the really interesting worldbuilding. Starter Villain is much better by comparison, and Wheaton pushes it into the solidly memorable territory, from the Russian accents to his doing extremely vulgar dolphins.
Short rounds time!
First up, a surprisingly serious and detailed history of digital cryptography from Steven Levy. The previous books I’ve read by Levy have also been tech histories, but How Google Works and his Apple-related titles had a strong fanboy vibe to them, whereas this one is level headed. Unless you’re a crypto-anarchist or a cryptographic developer yourself, perhaps it’s difficult to get extremely excited about encryption methods and patent fights. The book begins with the contribution of Whit Diffie, who came of age fascinated by encryption but who was frustrated by the state throwing up an effective firewall against any information about cryptography disseminating outside the Borglike box that is the NSA’s headquarters. His single-minded obsession led to him traveling the United States looking for obscure books and papers, and from this self-assembled education came a novel idea that still undergirds encryption today. Diffie’s is only one piece of the story, though, as Levy also tracks the work of men who figured out how to make Diffie’s principle actually happen, and the way publicly-available encryption software (essential as the information age grew to encompass more and more of society) overcame the NSA’s attempts to block it — which sometimes meant deciding that getting a product out there was more important than monetizing it, as when the first iteration of PGP software was released for free so it could hit the market and be replicated open-source style before Joe Biden’s anti-cryptography bill made it through Congress. (Another unexpected presence: Carl Sagan, who is arrested with one of the book’s subjects at a protest.) Although this encryption is crucial to the workings of the internet — it’s what allows for online commerce, for one thing — I must admit the book itself doesn’t have the broader appeal of his later works, in part because it is detailed and serious, and about something that’s more abstract and technical than many people are comfortable tackling.
Relatedly, I read a paper called “From Crossbows to Cryptography“, a 1987 essay/article in which Chuck Hammill argued that technology offered weapons to take liberty from the state. Technology is an equalizer, he wrote: just as crossbows allowed untrained peasants to dispatched heavily armed knights, so can modern tech help us avoid tyranny. I’m not sure what he had in mind in ’87, and unfortunately I can’t find much else about him. I’ve seen/heard this paper mentioned in discussions on the Tor browser, blockchain tech, and the like but in his day the internet was very different — the graphical and wide-open World Wide Web didn’t yet exist. The only example he mentions is people swapping information back and forth. Of course, the ability to communicate is important (people used cassette tapes to foment revolution in Iran!), but I’m curious as to his full thoughts on the subject. Timothy May’s “Crypto Anarchist Manifesto” is a related document — a brief few paragraphs about the promise of cryptography and the arguments the state will bring against it. Interestingly, he predicts the emergence of markets like those which can be accessed via Tor.
And speaking of the devil, I recently read Dark Web Dive, which is a brief (100 page or so) introduction to the Dark Web. Forsay begins with the basics, explaining the distinction between the surface web (anything you can access from a basic web search), the deep web (which is online, but needs passwords to access), and the dark web, which is part of the internet but requires special programs and protocols to navigate. For a practical example: the interior of a post office is surface web, the interior of a post office box is deep web, and the dark web is more like knowing there’s a guy across the street who, if you use the right code phrase, will set you up with your contraband of choice. The author discusses how users find their way on the dark web (sometimes using surface web directories that compile lists of known darkweb addresses) and conduct business. He also shares horror stories from the dark web as a way of illustrating how much of it is mythologized (some stories are 1980s Satanic panic caliber), and then comments on genuine dangers before sharing information on how to access it via Tor. Amusingly, his instructions for Windows machines entail encrypting their entire drive first, launching a virtual machine and installing an operating system on it, installing Tor on said VM, installing a VPN on said VM, and then — finally — installing Tor. Perhaps his intent is to scare people fromHe frequently emphasizes the need to use a VPN prior to launching Tor, since some ISPs regard a Tor connection as a red flag. I’ve heard arguments against it, however, alleging that mixing them creates new vulnerabilities. (There’s also the fact that VPNs and the Tor network, since they’re indirect connections, load more slowly. Combining the two sounds like trying to re-experience the days of 28k dial up connections, personally.
Related stuff coming up — The People vs Tech, which was thought provoking, and The Filter Bubble, which I read two weeks ago but haven’t posted anything yet on.
Today’s blogging prompt from Long and Short Reviews is, “What do you do to shake off a bad mood?” That varies a bit on the mood itself — I need to be around friends to dispel some moods, but I need to avoid people in others — but a ready antidote to most is found in Latin. “Solvitur ambulando!” It is solved by walking. Whether angry, sad, lonely, anxious, whatever, I’ve found relief in a brisk walk. Sometimes I also go for rides and listen to music, and on the same roads I like to walk and cycle on — quiet county lanes that haven’t been repaved since Carter was in office, past cows and horses and creeks. I have a go-to list of movies to watch when I’m feeling sick or low (including Groundhog Day, The Philadelphia Story, and A Series of Unfortunate Events), and sometimes booting up a game and causing chaos also works. There’s nothing quite like an open bar brawl in Red Dead Redemption 2 to put me to rights.
Do you remember the first YouTube video you watched? Mine was a fifteen-second clip of a guy doing a skateboarding trick, embedded in a blog post. The men who initially coded YouTube used Flash, which allowed videos to be played from other websites, giving the new website a critical advantage against other websites also exploring the possibilities of video hosting. Like, Comment, and Subscribe is a history of YouTube’s first fifteen years, one that focuses on business, with society and culture present but distinctly in the backseat. Because Google acquired YouTube so early in its life, the tension between the two marks most of the book, YouTube playing the creative young punk and Google the responsible adult who has to pay bills and fend off lawyers. I found it largely fascinating reading, from the early revelation that one founder saw YouTube as a possible dating website, to the perennial struggles of content moderation — both the question of what should be moderated, and how that should be accomplished. The book focuses more on business and technology as it goes, possibly because the torrent of content grew too voluminous to say anything meaningful about; this and the author’s predictable and unimaginative takes on The Issues of the Day progressively dampened the fun.
The beginning of the book is especially interesting: I was coming of age just as YouTube started, so a visit to its early years is saturated with nostalgia, for that time in tech in general and for the state of the website at that time. I remember using it in college to watch comedians and movies, but also enjoying the growing world of ‘original content’. YouTube began with a team that actively combed the website looking for fun videos to feature, long before The Algorithms became our lords and masters. Although the YouTube people were concerned about copyright issues from the start — concerned about the fire they’d draw, not so much keeping more pennies from piling up in Warner Bros or Disney’s pockets — not until they were purchased by Google (which had actual money to seize in a verdict) did any legal issues really surface. What would have happened to YouTube on its own is a story for some alternate timeline, but in ours Google was able to create a system to automatically identify music and video offenses, and would triumph in a lawsuit levied by Viacom. Although the website’s original creators viewed it as a creative exercise in democracy — all the content would be created by ordinary people for ordinary people — Google needed all those servers and bandwidth to pay for itself, and as the years passed things changed, especially after its own version of Moneyball came into play. Video clicks didn’t matter: what mattered was watchtime, because videos that kept eyeballs on them increased ad revenue, and changes were made that crippled the approach of many creators who posted shorter videos. Whereas ten minutes had been the maximum upload, it now became the minimum to get into profitable ad brackets. Over time, Google would face so many issues with advertisers complaining about the videos their ads were appended to that it began restricting the videos that could be monetized. Another common theme of the book is content moderation, as Google uses both human and AI to remove pornography, calls to violence, etc. This has posed constant difficulties, both technical and policy-wise. How does one differentiate fictional violence from real violence, for instance, especially when the automatic system can’t even tell the difference between Call of Duty and actual war footage? Policy wise, there were other issues: a filmed event might be offensive and inflammatory (bin Laden calling for war, for instance), but wasn’t there a case to be made for preserving events that shaped history? Google likes to shield itself with The Algorithms as much as possible, asserting that it doesn’t go around personally meddling in affairs: it simply puts its systems to work observing and enforcing the rules. Of course, those rules were written by its people to begin with.
I largely enjoyed Like, Comment, and Subscribe, although the author’s political fixations make the book almost amusing partisan at times. Need to talk about the filter effect and radicalization? Of course it’s the Other Side’s problem. We read of birthers but not truthers, of conservative anti-government types but never antifa or the mobs literally burning down cities, that kind of thing. Bergen makes no attempt whatsoever to go beyond strawmen, making him guilty of the very thing he’s pontificating about, as well as less credible as an author. Fortunately for him, the subject is interesting in itself — the under the hood look at how YouTube operates, and the rise and fall of various YouTube personalities. I’m amused by how many Youtube obsessions I was or remain oblivious to: I never heard of Pewdiepie before a year or so ago, for instance, and I would be happily unaware of ‘mukbang’ if I didn’t work at a public library where I actually see people watching it. Like, Share, and Subscribe is a generally enjoyable book, especially for those like myself who have a love/hate relationship with Google. There’s a reason I write on WordPress and not blogger these days…
Wong, a seasoned attorney who rarely got frazzled, read the email from Thailand’s Ministry of Information in late 2006 and assumed it was a fake. It came, strangely, from a Yahoo email address. But Wong quickly confirmed its authenticity and read it again: Thailand had listed twenty YouTube videos that insulted its king, a criminal offense under the nation’s lèse-majesté law.
Tim Wu, a Columbia law professor, offered a different formulation on Google’s rising power as primary gatekeeper and moderator of speech around the world. “To love Google, you have to be a little bit of a monarchist,” he told the newspaper. “You have to have faith in the way people traditionally felt about the king.”
Like other Google brass, he didn’t excel in the softer skills. Once, before a call with a prominent business partner, Kamangar asked a deputy, “What’s the emotion I need to convey?
How had Google dodged political fire? For one, the company spent $17 million in 2017 lobbying Washington, D.C., more than any other corporation. A Googler offered another explanation by way of an old joke about two hikers encountering a bear: One of them starts sprinting, while the other bends down to tighten his laces. What gives? asks the sprinter. I don’t need to outrun the bear, the shoe tier explains. I only have to outrun you. Mercifully for Google, its hiking companion, Facebook, was spectacularly clumsy.