Booking through Thursday: Evolution

Booking through Thursday asks: Have your reading choices changed over the years? Or pretty much stayed the same? (And yes, from childhood to adulthood we usually read different things, but some people stick to basically the same kind of book their entire lives, so…)


My childhood reading consisted mostly of short fiction intended for children, books on animals, and collections of ghost stories. I liked trying to figure out what people might be experiencing other than shades of the deceased.   As I grew older I tended to read only from large series: Goosebumps in elementary school, Animorphs in middle school, and California Diaries during high school. I also read the occasional Star Trek novel (with increasing frequency after DS9 ended on TV and began again as a book series) and discovered John Grisham at some point, beginning with The Firm.

In gen-ed college, the idea of  learning finally became interesting to me. Two of my instructors were thorough-going intellectuals who delighted in introducing their students to the human experience. I think I read my first pop-history books here (Nothing Like it in the World: Building the Transcontinental Railroad, Stephen Ambrose), as well as finding other books that have remained favorites, like Jerry Flamm’s Good Life in Hard Times: San Francisco’s Twenties and Thirties.

In late 2005, my approach to reading changed rather dramatically. I left the fundamentalist sect of Christianity I’d been raised in, and religion all together at the same time:  I’d wanted to leave all throughout 2005, but stumbling across the word humanism made me bolt for freedom. Everything human-related was now gloriously fascinating. I suddenly realized what I wanted to do for a career, and started getting my stalled college career back on track. I started educating myself as best I could in the meantime, reading three to five books a week that were almost wholly nonfiction. In 2007 I started this blog, and those opening posts reflect that this nonfiction streak in my reading was still going strong. I focused on science, having discovered the world anew.

Once I entered formal university studies, the regimen was no longer necessary or possible. Classes, work, and outside research time — plus the joys and trivialities of college life, like hanging around campus with new friend — consumed most of my time. I still read before classes and during work as I could, and later on the weekends, but I shifted to lighter fare like Harry Potter. Nonfiction still remained a strong element in my reading, though, and during the summers I recommitted to it.

Since then, I’ve maintained a steady and possibly balanced diet of fiction and nonfiction, although every year has its flavor: I discovered Isaac Asimov in 2008, reading him almost every week of the summer, and in the next summer I gorged myself on religious philosophy, having become interested in Stoicism and Gandhighiri. My aim is to be well-read, being able to draw upon science, history, philosophy, sociology, and poetry in understanding the world. Along the way I want to enjoy good stories about the human experience.

Posted in General | Tagged | 2 Comments

This Week at the Library (11-8)

This Week:

  • Provenance of Shadows, a novel of Doctor McCoy split in time. While one thread of the novel follows McCoy from The City on the Edge of Forever onward to his death, in part novelizing the third season of TOS and its movies, the other thread follows McCoy as a man lost in 1930s America, forced to create a new life  in the American south amidst the Great Depression. Definitely of interest to Trek readers.
  • The 100 Most Influential Books Ever Written may be more properly titled Ranting While Reading.  Essays, though readable, tend toward the disorganized and often fall apart completely when the author begins ranting about unrelated subjects that struck his fancy. The rants grew repetitive and childish quickly. 
  • Give Me Back my Legions, a short but disappointing work by Harry Turtledove detailing one of Rome’s worst losses in the field. How Rome is lured into the ambush is made obvious at the outset, and the battle itself only comprises two chapters (one of confused Romans dying, the other of happy Germans  quartering Roman corpses). The rest is characters talking back and forth and adding nothing.
  • The End of the Beginning redeemed Turtledove for me,  telling the story of Hawaii’s occupation following the successful Japanese invasion of it in December 1941. With enjoyable characters,  an interesting setting, and few of Turtledove’s weaknesses, it’s easily one of the strongest Turtledove books I’ve read.

Quotation of the Week, from Provenance of Shadows

“Do you know I don’t believe in Heaven?” McCoy asked.

“I’m not surprised to find out,” Lynn said, “But even if there is no heaven, doesn’t that make this life even more precious?”

Potentials for Next Week:

  • Working IX to V, Vicki Leon
  • Heroes of History, Will Durant
  • Alexandria, Lindsey Davis  (Historical fiction, novel)
  • Don’t Know Much About Geography, Kenneth Davis
  • The Good that Men Do, a sci-fi/political intrigue work about a man who hears himself declared dead.  

Future Reads:

  • I’ve decided to go ahead and read the Destiny trilogy, as reading through the A Time To… and Titan series will take too long. They should be arriving in the post this week.
  • The sequel to Hitler’s War, West and East, is finally out. Although not too much impressed with the first novel in Turtledove’s new six-part series, the ending ensured that I’ll read West and East at the very least. 
Posted in Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

Teaser Tuesday (10-8)

I forgot it was Tuesday. How do you forget it’s Tuesday? Now this is Tardy Teaser Tuesday. :-/ (From ShouldBeReading.)

So this is what it’s like to be dead, he thought, really trying on the idea for the first time. Funny. Doesn’t hurt quite as much as I thought it would.

The Good that Men Do, Andy Mangels and Michael A. Martin

Posted in General | Tagged | 2 Comments

The End of the Beginning

The End of the Beginning
© 2005 Harry Turtledove
448 pages

The Empire of the Rising Sun has cast a dark shadow across the Pacific. On December 7th, 1941, the naval and air forces of Imperial Japan struck Pearl Harbor, disabling or destroying most of the US Pacific fleet at Pearl, and paving the way for the invasion forces that immediately followed. Unprepared for the assault, American troops were forced to abandon the island. Early in 1942, America launched an ill-considered attempt to regain the island, resulting in a disastrous naval battle that completed the Pacific Fleet’s destruction. Only one American carrier survived to limp back to drydock.  In the wake of their triumph, the Japanese have established a puppet government in the form of the newly-revived Kingdom of Hawaii. The Empire will soon learn, though,  that taking Hawaii and keeping it are different challenges altogether.

Although little remains of America’s surface fleet in the Pacific, her submarines still hunt the waters there — and Hawaii’s location at the end of a very long supply line makes the occupational forces even more vulnerable to their attacks than England in either world war. Hawaii’s soldiers, prisoners, and civilians need food and oil if they’re to maintain their newly acquired ‘shield’ against the United States, and the freighters that bring those supplies into Honolulu are ideal targets for submarines. While Japan’s occupational forces complete their subjugation of the islands and dig in in anticipation of future assaults, factories in the United States break records to produce another — and a far greater — fleet from scratch. The end result is inevitable, but exciting to see developed.

Turtledove relies on his usual structure, telling this story of Hawaii’s occupation and restoration through a diverse cast of characters from both sides of the conflict. Notable viewpoint characters include Joe Crosetti, a Hellcat pilot who’s itching for vengeance;  Army officer Fletch Armitage and his ex-wife Jane, who are both prisoners — one doomed to work to death in labor gangs, and the other forced into the role of comfort woman for the Imperials; Minoru Genda, the officer who planned Hawaii’s invasion; and the Takayashi family, including two boys who were raised American and their Japanese father, who eagerly provides whatever assistance he can to the men of his native country.  The villains here were not as sympathetic as most of Turtledove’s antagonists, almost always betrayed in the most sadistic light.  While I typically support one of Turtledove’s factions over another, I haven’t rooted for a villain’s defeat this enthusiastically since the large Timeline-191 series. The Imperials treat Hawaii as savagely as they treated China and the Philippines in reality.

The End of the Beginning is a strong book: the Armitages and Takayashi boys were especially sympathetic characters, and the Pacific theater is not one Turtledove has invested a lot of time in prior. Although the eventual outcome of the book is obvious — the cover of the novel depicts American forces attacking Japan’s forces in Pearl Harbor — the ride there was fun. He even avoided engaging in too much repetition: there were only two obvious offenders, and one of those (the emaciation of POWs) may be justified. I could’ve gone without reading abut Joe Crosetti hearing bullets rip into his plane, checking the gauges automatically, seeing that they were normal, and noting that Hellcats are built to last four times.

It doesn’t appear that Turtledove is expanding this series more, which may be wise:  given the United States’ industrial output and the scarcity of resources in Japan, the conflict can only end in defeat for the Empire; Turtledove even throws in foreshadowing to hint that the Empire’s surrender will follow a certain explosion in Hiroshima. I’d recommend this to both Turtledove fans and alternate history readers in general: it redeemed Give Me Back my Legions! for me.

———————————-
I picked this up from the library a few weeks back, not because I expressly wanted to read it but because I didn’t want to return from the library empty-handed. Purchasing and beginning to play Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault rekindled my interest given that its first level forces the player to survive the chaos of Pearl Harbor. I’d share a screenshot, but I haven’t been able to take one that gives the full scope. Here are a few, though:
Seeing the first wave of Zeros buzz Pearl Harbor, after which point I was forced to run across the base hiding from their strafing runs.
Using the deck guns of a PT boat to shoot (and miss by a large margin) Zeros while enroute to my post aboard the USS Arizona. (Yeah, that bodes well.)
Sailing down battleship row, which is quite an experience given the bombers, strafing runs, and ships that are falling down around me. 
Shooting at more planes while trying to find a ship that isn’t destroyed; the Arizona perished before my eyes.
And aboard the West Virginia,  defending it from the second wave of fighters after jumping aboard ship, saving it from sinking, waving an axe around, saving soldiers from dying, and nearly dying myself of smoke inhalation. The ship was morbidly detailed.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Give Me Back My Legions!

Give Me Back my Legions!
© 2009 Harry Turtledove
320 pages

Give Me Back My Legions! is a piece of historical fiction by Harry Turtledove, detailing the why and how of Rome’s savage defeat at the hands of German tribesmen in the Teutoburg Forest. I read it primarily for the Roman setting. While a mildly entertaining and quick read, the book is the weakest Turtledove I’ve yet read.

Give Me Back My Legions is limited in scope, following two main characters through three years of Roman history. Both are historical and less developed than Turtledove’s usual personalities. The first, Governor Varus of Rome, has been assigned to hasten Germany’s conversion into a Roman province. He earned this difficult task not through his experience and skill as a military commander, but because Augustus intends to invest the area with a tenth of Rome’s military and wants someone trustworthy to oversee them. Varus’ foe is Arminius, a German soldier in the Roman auxiliaries secretly devoted to Rome’s defeat. A citizen of the Empire after twenty years of service, Arminius used that time to study Roman military doctrine and tactics.. He intends to use that knowledge to defeat Rome on the battlefield: while German soldiers are superior in individual combat,  they are powerless against formations of highly trained and disicplined Roman legionnaires.  Varus and Arminius meet when Arminius’ father-in-law levies charges against him. Varus decides for Arminus after establishing a rapport with the young German, resulting in a cordial friendship that Arminius uses to undermine Varus and lead him into a trap. Although Varus is warned of Arminius’ treasonous intentions by his new friend’s father-in-law, he ignores the warnings — thinking them to be based on personal animosity. Such is Turtledove’s path leading into the Teutoburg Forest.

Give Me Back my Legions has Turtledove’s usual weaknesses, but none of his typical strengths. There’s no mystery as to what will happen: the reader knows from the outset that Rome will be defeated by the Germans, and the obvious means of their demise is established early on. Dialog is atypically stilted and wooden at times, especially Arminius’. This is unfortunate given that the book is essentially two hundred and fifty pages of dialog,  leaving the rest for  the battle, its aftermath, and Augustus feeling sorry for himself. The battle starts late and is over fairly quickly — as ambushes tend to be. Give Me Back my Legions just isn’t much of a story. I don’t miss the time I spent reading it, but I can’t reccommend it either.

Posted in historical fiction, Reviews | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

First Read, First Love

BookingThroughThursday poses the question: What was the first book you remember readingWhat about the first that made you really love reading?

It’s lightening today, so I figure I can post something intended to share on Thor’s Day.

In all likelihood, my first read was something by Dr. Seuss or a Sunday school book — you know, the kind that present the death of everything on Earth as a kid’s story. My parents encouraged reading in my sister and I, and were readers to varying extents themselves. Either my mom, my dad, or my sister would take me to the library once a week, where I would bolt upstairs and check out as many books as they would let me. I remember declaring early on that Beverly Cleary was my favorite author, so it is possible and likely that my first book of any substance came from her series about Henry Huggins, his friend Beatrice Quimby, her kid sister Ramona Quimby (who called Beatrice (“Beezus”), and Henry’s dog Ribsy.

I also enjoyed Gertrude Warner’s Boxcar Children series (mysteries) and R.L. Stine’s “Goosebumps” series. Goosebumps, a fantasy-horror-dark humor series aimed at kids, became an obsession in late elementary school.  I declared Stine, Cleary, and Warner my favorite authors at varying intervals. I also read a lot of Bruce Coville, who did science fiction for kids. One of his books, The Search for Snout, involved  an interplanetary crew searching for their apparently deceased, serious-minded friend Snout…..which now sounds vaugely familiar.

My first novel, though altered for children, was the Great Illustrated Classics version of Jack London’s Call of the Wild. I received it for Christmas and felt proud of myself for reading a “real” book. The first unaltered novel was Paul Zindel’s The Pigman, which may have been too serious or dark in theme for the child that I was.

Sorting out what book made me “love” reading is more difficult. I so much as a child because my parents believed televisions were unsuitable for Christians to have, so entertainment for me meant reading, playing with toys, or running around outside. Trying to figure when I began to love reading would be like figuring out when I began to enjoy sweet tea: I’ve been doing it for too long.  I do remember Brian Jacques’ Redwall making me value reading more, changing my perspective on what a book could be. Books like Goosebumps were light entertainment, but Redwall kept me spellbound for hours at a time. It did to me what Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter did for other generations of kids.

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

The 100 Most Influential Books Ever Written

The Most Influential Books Ever Written: the History of Thought from Ancient Times to Today
© 1998 Martin Seymour-Smith
498 pages

In retrospect, the introduction should have served as a warning to me.  Author Martin Seymour-Smith opened his The 100 Most Influential Books by elaborating on the subjectivity of terms like “best” and “greatest”, maintaining that he preferred to evaluate books from a more quantifiable or objective basis, that of influence. After this promising start, he chose to spend six paragraphs berating Richard Dawkins and making it dead clear that The Selfish Gene would not appear in his book.  The bewildering viciousness of the seemingly random assault left me a mite puzzled. My facial expression resembled that of an anime-inspired emoticon, “o_O”.  Yet for my love of the subject — for I consider myself a generalist, and enjoy the full buffet of human experience  — I pressed on.

The subject itself kept me reading the book, for it spans most human endeavors: philosophy, religion, history, science, literature, sociology, and psychology for starters. There were a few names on the list I’d never heard of, leading me onward — but after two hundred pages in, the book simply ceased to be a pleasant experience.  Seymour-Smith wrote interestingly enough, but tended to ramble on to the detriment of his essays. In one six-page essay, he devoted four pages to biography of his subject and two slim paragraphs to the actual book, and those paragraphs told me nothing. Too many of the essays simply gave a dictionary-type definition of the concept for which a given author might be best known for, although there are a few — mostly those concerning post-Enlightenment philosophy — where he treats the subjects properly.  They are unfortunate exceptions: his essay on the Hebrew scriptures consists of a formulaic definition of the Torah followed by his grievances with modern Christianity. While I might share his grievances, I wondered why I was reading them instead of about the influence of the Hebrew scriptures.   It’s not as if I’m keen on them, but I thought he might have some insight I had not heard. He didn’t even broach the subject.

Seymour-Smith’s unprofessionalism turned the already difficult process of reading his disorganized essays into an outright chore. Caustic tirades tended to erupt from his ramblings, confronting the reader with violent paragraphs with little to no connection to their source essays. For instance, while writing on Euclidean geometry Seymour-Smith decided to return to his rant against Dawkins.Christianity, atheism, clerks, and political correctness — an altogether nebulous term he used so broadly that it lost all cohesion — were favorite subjects of repeated scorn. The endless barrage of temper tantrums and petulant whining embedded inside paragraphs soured the experience for me, and became dull with repetition besides: how many times can a man refer to political correctness as “neo-Stalinist, tyrannical mediocrity” in one book? Where is his editor? .

One of the reasons I kept reading the book — especially after he bellowed about both organized religion and atheism —  was to figure out what he did like. Although Seymour-Smith liked to employ scientific methodology as a means of seeming objective, he is no fan of rationalism or materialism. He refers to Epicureanism as an anti-superstitious philosophy and does not mean it as a compliment.  He reveres Jesus, refers to the Kabbalah often and fondly, and seems to enjoy natural philosophers with a background in mysticism (Newton, and to a lesser degree Kepler).  I believe he conflates science and meaning. Like Carl Sagan’s fictional Joss Palmer, he rebukes science for failing to do something it was not designed explicitly to do: make people feel good. Science, Karl Popper be praised, isn’t bronze-age cosmology.

Enjoyable subject, miserable book. This is one of the few books I regret having read. There’s far too much childish kvetching and far too little thoughtful reflection.

Related:

Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Provenance of Shadows

Crucible, McCoy: Provenance of Shadows
© 2006 David R. George III
627 pages

Leonard McCoy is a man lost in time. Accidentally thrust into 1930s New York by the Guardian of Forever, McCoy befriends an idealistic young social worker named Edith Keeler, saving her life — and in so doing, destroys his own future. Although Kirk and Spock, temporarily protected by the Guardian, are able to restore the timeline,  McCoy still experienced that futureless life: in Crucible, McCoy: Provenance of Shadows,  McCoy lives two lives — one aboard the Enterprise in the 23rd century, going boldly where no man has gone before — and one in 1930s America, first in New York and eventually in a small southern town.

Their stories run concurrently, the author alternating settings after every chapter. While “Len” McCoy attempts in vain to find a way back to the future, migrating southward once he loses hope, Dr. McCoy continues as the Enterprise’s chief medical officer throughout Star Trek’s third season and movies. While he experiences all the curiosities and dangers of Enterprise’s various missions and attempts to solve a mystery of physics, “Len” McCoy enjoys a quiet existence in a small South Carolinian town, serving as the local doctor and cultivating new friendships. His contentment turns to horror when the version of World War 2 his fellow citizens experience diverts radically from the version he learned in the history books — to the detriment of humanity. Both struggle against McCoy’s ancient demons in coming to grips with his past and trying to learn to love again.

Provenance made for a quick read: George’s habit of switching back and forth did not distract, although I tended to see the novelization of TOS’s post-City on the Edge of Forever canon as a diversion. That thread picked up interest after The Undiscovered Country, as George explored new territory.  The hold that McCoy’s previous marriage held on him — in prompting him to join Starfleet, and which makes him reluctant to enter into romantic relationships — is explored in both books.

Enjoyable story; McCoy fans will especially appreciate it.

Related:

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

This Week at the Library (4/8)

This week at the library…

  • Alison Weir’s Captive Queen, a novel of Henry II and Eleanor. Straining conventions, two young aristocrats marry for love — but the problems of empire, politics, and family life may prove too much for them. Starts off like a supermarket pulp romance, but shapes up into an interesting read of historical fiction.
  • La Belle France by Alistair Horne covers French history from the Romans to Jacques Chiraq in a little over four hundred pages. An informal and swiftly-moving narrative gives readers a big picture that tends to prefer stories of strong leaders to mass action.
  • A Time to be Born is a TNG relaunch novel set shortly before Nemesis and leading up to it: Picard’s career hits a sour note when he is thrown into a difficult situation and inadvertently causes the destruction of a starship and the loss of a Federation ally. The ending was interesting enough to keep my interest in this series alive.

Quotation of the Week: “There are mysteries and oddities here, and we want to shed some light on them. There are rational explanations for the gravity sink, the wild antimatter, the Ontailians’ actions, and we should go and find them. We may fail, but we can no longer take ‘Oh, it’s haunted’ as an explanation.” Jean-Luc Picard tiring of “goddidit” in A Time to Be Born. p. 89, John Vornholt.

Pick of the Week: La Belle France, Alistair Horne. Although I prefer tales of popular revolt to strong leaders, reading the book was otherwise a treat.

Upcoming Reads:

  • Crucible: McCoy, Provenance of Shadows by David R. George III. Leonard McCoy is trapped in 1930s Earth after he inadvertently destroys his future. 
  • The 100 Most Influential Books Ever Written: a History of Thought from Ancient Times to Today, Martin Seymour-Smith
  • Galileo’s Daughter: a Historic Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love; Dava Sobel. I picked this up when doing research for a paper on the evolution of heliocentrism and the perception of a rational universe, but I want to give a proper reading. 
  • Give Me Back my Legions!, a rare bit of historical fiction by Harry Turtledove portraying one of Rome’s most staggering losses. 

Future Potentials:

  • My library doesn’t have Admiral Hornblower in the West Indies; To the Indies! is not, as I thought,  its alternative American title. (Forester’s books sometimes have different titles when republished for sale in the US.) I still want to read it, though.
  • I’ve decided to dive right into Star Trek’s much-lauded Destiny trilogy despite not having read all of the books that lead up to it. Destiny is worshiped at the TrekBBS, and I want to know what all the fuss is about. 
  • I’m interested in reading more from Alison Weir, Simon Schama, and Alistair Horne. 
Posted in Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

A Time to Be Born

A Time to Be Born
© 2004 John Vornholt
284 pages

On the cusp of their epic battle with Shinzon, many of Captain Jean-Luc Picard’s long-time crew were heading for new assignments and new challenges. Among the changes were William Riker’s promotion to captain and his new command, Riker’s marriage to Counselor Deanna Troi, and Dr. Beverly Crusher’s new career at Starfleet Medical. But the story of what set them on a path away from the Starship Enterprise has never been told.

           UNTIL NOW.

Captain Jean-Luc Picard and the Enterprise-E have been dispatched to the site of a terrible battle during the Dominion Wars, a site filled with dangerous anamolies and mysteries. His orders are to collect the dead from Starfleet vessels and, analyzing the site’s physicial remains and examining ships’ logs, attempt to explain what happened during the conflict. He is accompanied by the Juno, an older Excelsior-class starship, and a few new allies who appear to have ulterior motives for infiltrating the rubble. Picard needs the help of his comrades and allies, for an unexplicable gravity sink, apparantly sourceless energy discharges, and a swirling vortex of debris are not the only dangers: combative scavengers flit among the remains, stealing parts and ambushing the Starfleet crews.  In the perilous darkness, nothing is as it seems, and Picard will have to make quick choces that end his career in Starfleet.

I bought A Time to be Born four years ago, although my reading of it stalled half-way through. In trying to get back into Trek lit, I figured I’d give the A Time to… series another shot. The series consists of nine parts, the titles of each coming from the Hebrew book of Ecclesiastes — though that may be more familar to some readers as being from Pete Seeger’s “Turn, Turn, Turn”.  The series aims to bridge Insurrection and Nemesis, exploring character development, Alpha Quadrant politics, and answering questions about or mending mistakes of Nemesis.  The premise of this initial book is interesting, and I liked the ending, but the development of Picard’s time within the battleground was a struggle to read through. If I’d only wanted the general story or events of consequence, I could read the introductory chapters and then skip ahead to Picard’s trial.

Rough start but a promising ending. I intend on reading through the A Time To series, but not immediately.

Related

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment