Sharpe’s Eagle

Sharpe’s Eagle
© 1981 Bernard Cornwell
270 pages

The year is 1809, and much of western Europe has been subdued by the First French Empire. Napoleon Bonaparte rules as Europe’s greatest emperor, but there are those who resist. England stands apart from Europe  and has employed her mighty navy to forestall an invasion of the British isles. In Spain her armies stand beside those of the dons. Richard Sharpe of the 95th Rifles is an accomplished soldier, having spent half his life in uniform, and on the eve of one of the bloodiest battles of the war he’s been tasked with helping a newly-mustered battalion of troops destroy a bridge to make things more interesting for La Grande Armée .

Unfortunately for Sharpe — a man who rose through the ranks on merit and brazen accomplishments —  the officers in charge of the expedition are aristocrats more interested in playing soldier than learning how to fight. For them, a soldiering is a dashing affair involving men in bright uniforms marching to the sound of the fife and drums, scaring the enemy way by sheer presence. Their incompetence is matched only by their contempt for the men they lead and their own hubris. So woefully inadequate is one such man — Colonel Sir Henry Simmerson of the South Essex — that a simple expedition ends in humiliating failure. French horsemen route a force ten times their size and spirit away the King’s Colors: the regiment’s battle-standard. The actions of Sharpe salvage the affair somewhat, but make him an enemy of the Colonel.  In the larger battle to come, Sharpe must find a way to redeem the regiment’s honor despite its leadership.

Richard Sharpe is an interesting character to read about: closer to Han Solo or Malcolm Reynolds than to the archetype of the noble hero, beyond reproach. He cares for honor in his way and looks after those around him. Cornwell’s writing is up to the job of describing the toils of character and war. He portrays 19th century warfare well enough to make maneuvers clear to someone lacking particular interest in troop maneuvers, and unexpected humor abounds.

This went well for my first foray into the Sharpe series: it’s a fun read, and I’m hoping further books will give me an image of the peninsular war, something more or less unknown to me. (My knowledge of the Napoleonic wars is limited to Trafalgar, Austerlitz, and Waterloo.)

Related:

  • Sharpe’s Eagle on Youtube. The novels have dramatized, and I enjoyed the first one. The actor portraying Simmerson does a terrific job of making him loathsome. (He shows up in the beginning of this clip.)
  • Jeff Shaara’s  American Civil War novels. The style of warfare is somewhat similar, though cavalry’s role is much less prominent. Shaara uses a panel of viewpoint characters to portray the same events from multiple angles. 
Posted in historical fiction, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Gods of Night

Gods of Night
© 2008 David Mack
431 pages

“The moment I have dreaded for […] years has finally arrived. The Borg, our most lethal enemy, have begun an invasion of the Federation…and this time there may be no stopping them.” (Jean-Luc Picard, First Contact)

Since their introduction in “Q Who“, the Borg have remained the Federation’s greatest nemesis. They are remarkable villains not for their power or technological prowess, but for their soulnessness. The Borg embody passionless inhumanity: though they dominate nearly a quarter of the galaxy, their conquests have been achieved not through the zeal for power or glory. The Borg are ruthlessly pragmatic, acquiring and destroying species as needed to move forward towards their goal of perfection. Their every advance into the Federation sees fleets of starships destroyed — and every assault is more pointed, more dangerous than the last. As the Borg renew their goal of subduing the Federation, Captain Jean-Luc Picard fears in his bones that the coming battle is more than those who have come before: to him, the man who hears the Borg whispering in his thoughts at time, the coming conflict will be the last. The Borg are coming, and the Apocalypse is at hand.

Gods of Night is the first in a trilogy portraying this final, deadly grapple between the Federation and the Borg. It is the story of three crews:  in the Alpha Quadrant, Captain Picard and the Enterprise-E serve as the Federation’s greatest weapon against the increasingly frequent Borg incursions into Federation space. In the far reaches of the Beta Quadrant, Captain Riker of the USS Titan is engaged in an extended mission of scientific exploration, but he and his crew have found a way to contribute to the war effort by investigating a mysterious dark solar system that seems to be projecting transwarp lanes across the whole of the Milky Way. In the Gamma Quadrant, Captain Ezri Dax of the USS Aventine is investigating the wreck of the NX-02 Columbia, an Earthship more than 200 years old. The Columbia is far from home: too far to have made it there on her own.

Mack weaves these three stories together into one grand fabric of peril and mystery, and tacks on a fourth — the story of the Columbia’s crew, who were crippled at the outset of a great war at the birth of the Federation between Earth and the Romulan Star Empire — for good measure. Despite the abundance of characters and minor substories,  the novel remains impressively cohesive. Aside from history, scientific mysteries, and war, Mack gives time to personal issues. Picard is possessed by the war, Riker and Troi are struggling to have a child, and Dax is attempting to adjust to her new role as ship’s captain, haven taken over the Aventine when most of its senior staff perished in battle.

Destiny’s formidable hype is so far warranted, and Mack has my attention.

On the cover: Nicole de Boer as Captain Ezri Dax; Ada Maris’ ponytail as Captain Erika Hernandez’ ponytail.

Related:

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Admiral Hornblower in the West Indies

Admiral Hornblower in the West Indies
© 1957 C.S. Forester
250 pages

Although not the last Hornblower book published — Hornblower during the Crisis was a work-in-progress when Forester died — it is the novel set latest in Hornblower’s life. The Napoleonic wars are over: after twenty years of tumult, Europe is finally at peace. Owing to his many years of excellent service, Rear Admiral Hornblower has earned a position in the peacetime navy, keeping watch over Britain’s forces in the West Indies. Though described as a novel, West Indies is more kin to a book of interrelated short stories. Hornblower has no singular campaign to manage, but the storm-tossed seas of the tropical Atlantic give the admiral little rest. There are pirates and slavers afoot, and the Americas are awash in revolutions as various people attempt to rid themselves of colonial overlords.

West Indies has an altogether different tone from the rest of the books, save Midshipman Hornblower. While its stories offer drama, the consequences of failure are less severe than they would be in wartime. Instead of gathering intelligence and striking blows that will defeat a tyrant, Hornblower is kidnapped, chases pirates and slavers, and contends with a hurricane while settling into a contented old age.  It’s cozy, comfortable. For my own part I enjoyed it. Though not the great adventure that other books — Lord Hornblower, for instance — were, it’s a gentle farewell to the man whose adventures I’ve enjoyed reading so much through the spring and summer.

Fair winds and clear horizons, captain.

Posted in historical fiction, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Booking through Thursday: Reading Questions

From Booking Through Thursday:

1. Favorite childhood book?
The Pigman, Paul Zindel. I probably should not have read it as a kid, but I did.  The book is the story of two misfit teenagers who befriend a lonely old man and later accidentally set the stage for his death.

2. What are you reading right now?
Just finished Gods of Night by David Mack right last night. Picked it up and spent the next few hours utterly engrossed.

3. What books do you have on request at the library?
None currently.

4. Bad book habit?
Snacking while reading and accidently smudging the pages.

5. What do you currently have checked out at the library

  • Sharpe’s Eagle, Bernard Cornwell
  • Working IX to V, Vickie Leon
  • Alexandria, Lindsey Davis

    6. Do you have an e-reader?
    I take umbrage at the very idea. Harrumph!

    7. Do you prefer to read one book at a time, or several at once?
    I generally read one nonfiction book at a time and read from a fiction book to relax.

    8. Have your reading habits changed since starting a blog?
    Readers frequently recommend books. When I first started this blog, I focused heavily on nonfiction, but that is unrelated to my having the blog. So far this year, 60% of my reads are nonfiction and 40% are fiction. I know this only because I’m contributing to a book-thread at a forum where we list the books we read as we read `em. I updated my list yesterday and out of curiosity decided compare the fiction and nonfiction.

    9. Least favorite book you read this year (so far?)
    The 100 Most Influential Books Ever Written, Martin Seymour-Smith.  Tirades unrelated to the subject at hand bore me.

    10. Favorite book you’ve read this year?
    Red Emma Speaks, Emma Goldman; The Complete Robot, Isaac Asimov

    11. How often do you read out of your comfort zone?
    Not often. Citizens was out of my zone, but I decided to make the effort for Bastille Day.


    12. What is your reading comfort zone?
    History,  anything by Isaac Asimov, generally books under 600 pages,  some popular science.

    13. Can you read on the bus?
    I spent over two hours a day on a school bus back during elementary and high school. Had to do something to pass the time.

    14. Favorite place to read?
    There’s a certain tree on my university campus I can spend hours curled under, a discrete corner in the university library, and my own couch. It’s against the wall, and against two large windows, so I can pull back the shades and lounge comfortably reading in the daylight while enjoying all the perks of air conditioning.

    15. What is your policy on book lending?
    Same as Gollum’s policy on the One Ring, but with less murderous intentions.

    16. Do you ever dog-ear books?
    Not since childhood. Now I just note the page number .

    17. Do you ever write in the margins of your books?
    No, except to deliberately…dishonor the book, and even that feels childish of me.

    18. Even in college textbooks?
    Most of my college textbooks are regular books: The Trial of Madame Caillaux, From Dignity to Despair, Storm of Steel, The Road to Wigan Pier, and A Life of Her Own are all books I’ve read for class that I also commented on here.

    19. What is your favorite language to read in?
    English, seeing as I’m not too fluent in reading German. I can decode a sentence in German with a little help,  though not ones as developed as in Der Spiegel, say.

    20. What makes you love a book?
    Seeing humanity at its best.

    21. What will inspire you to recommend a book?
    Nonfiction: how well the material is organized and presented. I’m also picky about the author’s voice. I prefer for them to enjoy their subject matter. Fiction? How well it deals with human issues.

    22. Favorite genre?
    History, among nonfiction:  probably historical fiction for fiction, though I also read a lot of science fiction by way of Star Trek, Star Wars, and Asimov.

    23. Genre you rarely read (but wish you did?)
    Sociology. All of my sociology readings for classes are articles, not books, and librarians tend to be rather sketchy when sticking books into the sociological section of libraries. Best I can do is social criticism, and that’s taxing after a while.

    24. Favorite biography?
    I, Asimov. Isaac Asimov. I adore Asimov, I really do, and reading his autobiographies is like listening to him talk. Like sleeping, it’s hard to imagine getting tired of.

    25. Have you ever read a self-help book?
    Not unless Stoic philosophy counts.

    26. Favorite cookbook?
    Um, I don’t really have a favorite cookbook…

    27. Most inspirational book you’ve read this year (fiction or non-fiction)?
    Red Emma Speaks, Emma Goldman.

    28. Favorite reading snack?
    Pretzels.

    29. Name a case in which hype ruined your reading experience.
    Twilight. I probably won’t be able to approach that series for a decade.

    30. How often do you agree with critics about a book?
    What critics?  I visit Amazon.com after writing comments to see how my experience compared with others. I’m rather easy-going about books: I glean what good I can and tend to ignore the badly-done parts.

    31. How do you feel about giving bad/negative reviews?
    I don’t like it. I cringe at the idea of attacking work someone has invested their emotions into. When writing comments or reviews that other people will read, I try to find a balance between providing a useful review and   attacking the book. I’ll remark on weak elements of the book rather than referring to the book itself as weak — unless the book is a real stinker.

    32. If you could read in a foreign language, which language would you chose?
    German is fun, and Latin would be useful.

    33. Most intimidating book you’ve ever read?
    Citizens, Simon Schama

    34. Most intimidating book you’re too nervous to begin?
    The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Edward Gibbon.

    35. Favorite Poet?
    Kahlil Gibran.

    36. How many books do you usually have checked out of the library at any given time?
    Oh…three, four. Unless I’m working on a research paper, in which case it’s like “Oh…fifteen, twenty.”

    37. How often have you returned book to the library unread?
    Happens once or twice a month, I suppose. I always poke through a book before checking it out, but sometimes I lose interest or learn the book wasn’t as I thought it was. I sometimes return to these books and sometimes not.

    38. Favorite fictional character?
    I can’t choose.

    • Lemony Snicket, whose narrating style is darkly hilarious.
    • Gordianus the Finder, a strikingly decent man.
    • Horatio Hornblower, whose perpetual awkwardness in social situations is endearing.
    • Hermione Granger, a lovable know-it-all and smartass who also clocked Draco Malfoy.  


    In light of the evidence, Granger it is.

    39. Favorite fictional villain?
    Count Olaf, from The Series of Unfortunate Events. He’s more likable in the movie.

    40. Books I’m most likely to bring on vacation?
    I’d probably bring a couple of unread books, along with old favorites like something from the Black Widower  collections.

    41. The longest I’ve gone without reading.
    Ten hours if I sleep really late on Saturday morning.

    42. Name a book that you could/would not finish.
    What You Need to Know about Islam and Muslims. I thought it was a “In this day and age, Islam is in the news a lot. Here’s some context.” type book, but it was really more of a “In this day and age, Real True Christians need to know that Muslims are everywhere and they’re out to get us” book. It’s written for Jerry Falwell’s kind of audience.


    43. What distracts you easily when you’re reading?
    Having a song in my head, wanting to look up information online. Do you know how hard it is to concentrate on French history when you’re already prone to having “La Marseillaise” stuck in your head for hours at a time?

    44. Favorite film adaptation of a novel?
    A Christmas Carol with Patrick Stewart or A Series of Unfortunate Events.

    45. Most disappointing film adaptation?
    I’ve not seen it, but I’ve heard that the adaption of Percy Jackson and the Lightening Thief is as big a failure as one can imagine in terms of staying true to its source.

    46. The most money I’ve ever spent in the bookstore at one time?
    Trips to school bookstores in my youth — before I discovered Amazon’s marketplace — could run well over two hundred. As for myself…probably a little over thirty? I’m not one to spend a lot of money at one time.

    47. How often do you skim a book before reading it?
    Always as I’m able. I’d only go into a book blind if I knew the author.

    48. What would cause you to stop reading a book half-way through?
    Spilling milk on it, like I did with For Whom the Bell Tolls in eighth grade.

    49. Do you like to keep your books organized?
    I’m working on that. I’ve plans to buy a new bookcase, but I need to figure out which books I want where. I want to keep related books (history, science, reference, philosophy/poetry) together.

    50. Do you prefer to keep books or give them away once you’ve read them?
    I’m the kinda guy who would rent a two-bedroom apartment just for having a library/reading room, so guess.

    51. Are there any books you’ve been avoiding?
    I’ve put off reading The End of Eternity and The Gods Themselves by Isaac Asimov, as those are the only Asimov books in the library I’ve not yet read.  Instead I’ve been reading his other works, particularly essay collections. I’ve also taken an extended break from religious reading given how much of my attention that genre claimed last year.

    52. Name a book that made you angry.
    I nearly stopped reading The 100 Most Influential Books in History several times, so put-off was I by the author’s rants and whining.

    53. A book you didn’t expect to like but did?
    A Life of Her Own, which I read for a European history class. The diary of a French peasant? How exciting can that be? And yet, this is one of the books that stays with me. It’s an inspiring story:  a woman from an isolated mountain village, stifled by tradition, becomes a self-made freethinker and humanist. Her experience with socialists and anarchists changed the way I regarded socialism and communism: prior to this, I’d conflated the two with statism.

    54. A book that you expected to like but didn’t?
    Hornblower and the Hotspur, C.S. Forester. I’ve liked the Hornblower novels, but this one just fell flat for me.

    55. Favorite guilt-free, pleasure reading?
    Isaac Asimov short stories, preferably with forwords or afterwords. I love reading his commentary.

    Posted in General | Tagged | 2 Comments

    Working IX to V

    Working IX to V: Orgy Planners, Funeral Clowns, and Other Prized Professions of the Ancient World
    © 2007 Vicki Leon
    312 pages

    This amusingly-titled volume caught my eye more than a few times in the past, and with an itching to read something about Rome, I decided to delve into it. The book contains over 160 job descriptions from Greece and Rome, sorted into general categories (“Law and Disorder” contains sections on bureaucrats, policemen, bodyguards, and mercenaries, for instance). Occasionally Leon uses one particular individual from history to explore an occupation’s duties and hazards. Cicero’s faithful slave Tiro stars in the section devoted to scribes. The descriptions are laced with humor, often ribald. Leon is a casual author, constantly making sly jokes to the reader Illustrations abound, and more than a few of them sport humorous captions.

    Working IX to V is immensely detailed, and as every section is individually listed in the table of contents I can see the book being useful to someone writing historical fanfiction, though I suppose a for-profit author would prefer a more standard handbook.  I enjoyed the book:  although more pedestrian jobs are included (tax collectors and mercenaries), Leon delights in telling the reader about history’s bizarre and revolting occupations. Her book will considerably enrich the way I think about daily life in Rome, as the details go beyond just specific occupations. Every section contains information on how that job fit into the overall scheme of things, and I learned all manner of odd details. For instance, blue-blooded Roman ladies had specific slaves to carry around their shoes when they paid social visits: different shoes were required for different occasions. Apparently, wearing sandals with one’s toga was a major faux pas to the Romans. Playwrights were also expected to take active hands in performing and finding actors for their plays in Greece.

    For information on daily life in Rome, particularly concerning occupations, this book will serve and amuse amply.

    Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

    This Week at the Library: 11 Aug – 18 Aug

    This week:

    • Heroes of History by Will Durant is a brief summary of western history, though one introduced with chapters on India, China, and Egypt. Durant’s heroes are philosophers, theologians, poets, and an occasional political figure. 
    • West and East is second in Harry Turtledove’s The War that Came Early series, a planned six-part set that has World War 2 begin in 1938 at the Munich conference. Although the characters are interesting so far, the war remains unremarkable.
    • Don’t Know Much About Geography is a book of geographical trivia written for casual readers. Though enjoyable to read, it is more scattered than focused.

    Pick of the Week: Heroes of History, Will Durant. I will be investigating his Story of Civilization series.

    Quotation of the Week:
    Durant’s ending paragraphs for Heroes of History  resonated most with me, but I found the below passage amusing the first time I read it.

    Siberian mosquitoes were numerous, savage, and large. A Japanese joke said one of them had landed at an airstrip, and groundcrew men pumped a hundred liters of gasoline into it before they realized what it was. Fujita thought it was a joke.

    p. 98, West and East.

    Potentials for Next Week:

    • Finishing Working IX to V, which is all manner of casual, but fun so far.
    • Gods of Night by David Mack, the first book in the long-anticipated Destiny trilogy, finally arrived in the mail. 
    • Admiral Hornblower in the West Indies, a collection of short stories. I’ll miss ol’ Horny. 
    • Alexandria, Lindsey Davis. 
    • Sharpe’s Eagle, Bernard Cornwell. First in a series of books about a rifleman in England’s army during the Napoleonic wars. I’m thinking about trying the series because I’m about to finish the Hornblower books and yet don’t want to be finished with them. This is…somewhat similar. Of course, there are always the Aubrey-Maturin books by Patrick O’Brien…
    • The Lost World, Michael Crichton. When I arrived at the library to pick up West and East, this was also waiting on me. Turns out when I reported the library’s copy lost, they ordered another copy and reserved it for me. 

    And yet, in spite of the list above me, there’s this little voice in my head telling me to start Will Durant’s series of books. I don’t think it appreciates the fiction binge.

    Posted in Reviews | Tagged | 3 Comments

    Don’t Know Much About Geography

    Don’t Know Much about Geography: Everything You Need to Know about the World But Never Learned
    © 1992 Kenneth C. Davis
    384 pages

    I’ve taken several geography courses as part of my university education, a tribute perhaps to Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel — which made me regard geography as an essential part of understanding human history and behavior. The subject remains of interest to me, so Don’t Know Much about Geography seemed fair game. Written for a lay audience and replete with joking references,  it tends more toward light trivia than a thorough introduction, even one written for newcomers to the subject like myself. Davis organizes the book topically, although the first two chapters have unclear general subjects. The latter four focus on oceans, political history, meteorology, and astronomy. Each section of the book consists of a general statement or question — “What is a butte?”, “Where is the world’s most populous city?”, and “Major Historical Earthquake Disasters” are three examples.  He makes frequent uses of timelines and bullet lists, as well as direct quotations from historic documents like Lewis and Clark’s account of their expedition or Charles Darwin’s Voyage of the Beagle. Davis writes primarily for American readers: the first of his appendices includes information on the names and nicknames of the American states.

    Don’t Know Much about Geography is a casual read brimming with interesting trivia, though it may be too casual for serious students. Someone claiming to be Robert Adler (author of Science Firsts, which I read two years back) has taken issue with the book’s scientific trivia. Regardless of his identity, the page quotes he identifies and their issues appear to be valid, indicating more thorough factchecking might’ve been in order. The book, published in 1992, is also dated, which may mitigate its use for some readers. It’s also amusing to read of the booming Japanese economy on the cusp of the “Lost Decade”. The date also causes a slight inconsistency in the matter of Yugoslavia: it began disintegrating in 1991, and at times Davis refers to it as still in existence and at times as a defunct state.

    I don’t particularly regret having read it, as it provided me with information I did not know, but I will continue to look for a better general introduction to the field written for a larger audience. It’s a fun book, but limited. Although I doubt I will be able to take any more geography courses,  it is a field that will remain of interest to me.

    Posted in history, Reviews, science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

    West and East

    The War that Came Early: West and East
    © 2010 Harry Turtledove
    436 pages

    In 1938, the Munich Peace Conference ended in a general European war. Britain and France, outraged by Hitler’s transparent attempts to manipulate them, pledged to defend Czechoslovakia — resulting in a war that came early, with all sides largely unprepared. The conflict between Britain, France, and Germany widens into a two-front war for Hitler after Russia, discomfited by the Germano-Polish entente that emerged following their sacking of Czechoslovakia, invades his western neighbors. Imperial Japan seizes the opportunity to expand its puppet-state in Manchuria into Siberia.  So ended The War that Came Early: Hitler’s War.

    That last plot development ensured that I would read the second book in this series, West and East, for it had the potential to radically change the story of the war. While Turtledove’s eventual story may read quite differently from our own history books, West and East isn’t the book that does it. Though outfitted with interesting, mostly sympathetic characters and not being bogged down in too much trivia, West and East isn’t much of an “alternate” history novel. True,  Europe’s situation is different —  France, though partially occupied, has not fallen — but  Germany expanding then falling back against a two-front war isn’t much of a change. The most promising twist — a Russo-Japanese war — never amounted to much in this novel. The Japanese viewpoint character spends his chapters swatting mosquitoes, avoiding being hit by Russian bombers and mortars, complaining about the weather, and thinking patriotic thoughts about the Japanese race and empire. If Russia and Japan’s armies did something other than throw things at one another, it’s not apparent here. I was hoping for a wider altercation, but Japan is apparently too busy consolidating its rule in China, where a resistance movement has begun a terrorist campaign against Dai Nippon’s occupational forces.

    It’s a…fair read. I looked forward to hearing from some of the characters, especially the American communist fighting in the Internationals and a Czech soldier embedded inside France’s army, who uses an anti-tank rifle to duel with German snipers. The fate of Peggy Druce, an American stranded in Berlin after the war began, was also of interest. Other viewpoint characters include English, Welsh, French, German, and Russian military officials and a Jewish family in Germany. Though  the characters’ stories interested me, I’d hoped to see more overall plot development. This is the second of a planned six-book series, though, so it’s not altogether surprising development is so slow. Hopefully the events here will be the germ for more interesting developments later on. I’m especially interested on the Russo-Japanese war’s impact on Japan’s Pacific ambitions, and whether or not Germany will rally to continue to be the villain through the remaining four books. I’m sure Turtledove can pad out a long retreat through four books, but mixing things up — having an early German defeat followed by an immediate cold-war-turned-hot featuring Russia and Japan as twin evils, for instance — would be an improvement over a so-far predictable recounting of historical events with a slight twist. I’ll read the third when it comes out, but I’ll only finish the series if the divergence widens.

    Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

    Teaser Tuesday (17 August)

    Teaser Tuesday again, hos– waitaminute, who’d he say he was? 

    “Sind Sie Frau Druce?” A man’s voice.

    “Yes, I’m Peggy Druce. And who the devil are you?”

    “Adolf Hitler here,” the voice answered. 

    p. 170, The War that Came Early: West and East.  Harry Turtledove. 

    Posted in General | Tagged | 22 Comments

    Heroes of History

    Heroes of History: A Brief History of Civilization from Ancient Times to the Dawn of the Modern Age
    © 2001 Will Durant
    348 pages

    Will Durant is an author I’ve heard of but not yet read from, and this slim volume intended to summarize his large series on world history seemed a good way to introduce myself to his work.  Durant made it clear in his introduction that his purpose in writing history is to celebrate civilization, which he thinks of as “social order promoting cultural creation”, vital to domesticating more savage instincts and making life beautiful. Although initially concerned that this would be a book recounting “great kings”, Durant’s heroes are poets and saints; philosophers and theologians. He lavishes love on political figures and states then and again, but allows the text of poems like Shelley’s “Ozymandias” to use valuable page space. He sees civilization as forever veering toward decadence or puritanism, and holds high those individuals who strive to hold their lives in balance — and higher still those who help others right their own paths. Durant is a man plainly in love with human history, which heightens my interest in reading more of him.

    After the introductory chapter (“What is Civilization?”), Durant picks up the thread of human stories with Confucius, and from there moves through India and Egypt to Greece: the rest of the book is devoted toward western civilization, with great emphasis on Greece, Rome, Christianity, the Renaissance, and the Reformation. Durant died before completing his work; his last chapter is titled “Shakespeare and Bacon”. At 347 pages, this is a slender volume, and those well-read in western history may find nothing new of interest, although the book may serve to fill in gaps in the readers’ education. The ideal reader for this work would someone with a casual interest in western history, who only need a guiding hand to start exploring it in full.  Durant’s authorial voice is forever tender toward his subjects and friendly to his readers, although some may not appreciate his areas of emphasis. For my own part he conflated Epicureanism and more ‘decadent’ hedonism, and the praise he lavishes on the pre-Constantine church was a bit too intimate for my liking. Still, he honors hardened skeptics who call for people to let go of superstition with the same zeal he favors charitable figures who rooted their approach to helping others in a religious tradition.

    I imagine this would be a fair read for someone interested in history, but yet not introduced to it. The detail he gives to Greece, Rome, and the Renaissance may be particularly helpful to those with gaps.Though his summaries are quick, they’re by no means shallow: Durant spends considerable time on the culture and living conditions of the people who give rise to his ‘heroes’.  I recently finished a Renaissance and Reformation class, and Durant’s three chapters are detailed enough to increase my own appreciation of the period. Below is one of the first passages that grabbed me.

    “I will not subscribe to the depressing conclusion of Voltaire and Gibbon that history is ‘the record of crimes and follies of mankind’. Of course, it is partly that, and contains a hundred million tragedies — but it also the saving sanity of the average family, the labor and love of men and women bearing the stream of life over a thousand obstacles. It is the wisdom and courage of statesmen like Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt, the latter dying exhausted but fulfilled; it is the indiscouragable effort of scientists and philosophers to understand the world that envelops them; it is the patience and skill of artists and poets giving lasting form to transient beauty, or an illuminating clarity to subtle influence; it is the vision of prophets and saints challenging us to nobility.

    On this turbulent and sullied river, hidden amid absurdity and suffering, there is a veritable City of God, in which the creative spirits of the past, by the miracles of memory and tradition, still live and work, carve and build and sing. Plato is there, playing philosophy with Socrates; Shakespeare is there, bringing new treasures every day; Keats is still listening to his nightingale, and Shelley is borne on the west wind; Nietzsche is there, raving and revealing; Christ is there, calling to us to come and share his bread. These and a thousand more, and the gifts they gave, are the Incredible Legacy of the race, the golden strain in the web of history.

    We need not close our eyes to the evils that challenge us — we should work undiscouragingly to lessen them — but we may take strength from the achievements of the past; the splendor of our inheritance. Let us, varying Shakespeare’s unhappy king, sit down and tell brave stories of noble women and great men.” 

    – page twenty, concluding “What is Civilization”.

    Posted in history, Reviews | Tagged , | 3 Comments