Beyond Tenebrae

Beyond Tenebrae: Christian Humanism in the Twilight of the West
© 2019 Brad Birzer
258 pages

Most people, including myself until a few years ago, would describe humanism as a worldview championing the possibility of, and the need for, humans living moral, meaningful lives through and for wholly natural reasons. The word itself, though, has an older and broader meaning, and it’s that which Birzer addresses in Beyond Tenebrae. His Christian humanism is not secular humanism with a soft spot for Jesus, but rather a continuation of the medieval tradition (studia humanitas) — itself fusing Christianity and classical wisdom — that emphasized pursuing the edification of the individual and the polis through the study of the liberal arts (poetry, history, philosophy, etc) .In Beyond Tenebrae, Birzer comments briefly on the state of the west, before sharing reflections on the life and work of those who have lit up the darkness in their time. We live in a crumbling house whose beauty is marred by graffiti, its maintenance neglected by children too absorbed by their solipsistic screens to acknowledge anything besides themselves can exist, and Birzer hopes the example of these remarkable men and women from the past will encourage the reader to pick up the torch and carry on — or perhaps encourage those who feel it’s all hopeless to continue.

Although one expects from the arcane title and subject that Beyond Tenebrae would be heady, that’s not the case at all. Birzer offers the book as tribute to literary friends, authors who have fed his soul and strengthened his mind. As such, it can be conversational — but Birzer is chatty even when he’s lecturing, and his earnest pleasure in talking about these men and women and chewing over their ideas is why he’s one of my favorite people to listen to. The men and women saluted here include the expected (Russell Kirk & Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn) as well as more than a few surprises (…Margaret Atwood?) and names known only to scholars. These people did not share an ideology; they were, Birzer comments, all unique individuals, and some were outright characters despite their frequent disdain for Individualism as an ethos. Put them in a room together and one would probably have to look for the exit given the table-pounding arguing that would ensue. They were, however, bound together by the common pursuit of the good, the true, and the beautiful — and they all considered themselves nothing but links in a chain, bringing the past forward and promoting its wisdom to those who would make the future. Frequently, Birzer’s subjects are responding to the work of the other, as when Solzhenitsyn comments on Nicholas Berdyaez’ principled defiance of the Soviet state. We are here invited to eavesdrop on the Great Conversation.

The title of the book merits some looking-over: Tenebrae refers to the three days of Holy Week , beginning with Maundy Thursday, in which the lights of the altar are successfully dimmed until nothing remains but the darkness of Holy Saturday. It is in that growing darkness that we find ourselves today, Birzer writes. It is a darkness which has been growing for centuries, deepening every decade and never more rapidly than the 20th century. The catholicity of the human experience (catholic as in universal) was being fragmented: specialists studied aspects of human life, but never man in full. Man was being reduced to a thing to be managed by a totalitarian order, language and beauty and personality bulldozed over for the equivalent of parking lots: flat, grey, grim. Tolkien and Lewis both worked the passion of Christendom into their literature, creating the worlds of Middle-Earth and Narnia to illustrate the inner ogres the west faced, and the heroism needed to triumph over them. Many of the subjects themselves realized that they needed to organize and coordinate to better resist the growing tide: they needed to work together to rebuild the Republic of Letters. There were no institutions which could do it for them, least of all the inheritors of the humanist tradition, the Universities. No university today has ‘universal’ man at its heart: the holistic, classical program which began eroding away in the 19th century is almost wholly gone, save in islands like St. John’s, Hillsdale, and a few other places which make a classical education their aim. Instead, the universities produce ever-more arcane and sometimes absurd specializations, and their end products live so firmly in their minds that they’ve lost all touch with reality.

Birzer connects Christian humanism to the conservative tradition — that’s the conservatism of Burke and Kirk, not the bomb & bribe antics of the republican party — because it is the humanist tradition which they seek to conserve; that tradition holds the Permanent Things that Kirk wrote about. Happily, though, Beyond Tenebrae isn’t simply a collection of biographies of people brooding over virtue; instead, Birzer’s extensive reading of his subjects’ works allows him to bring both varied perspectives and and more unexpected merits to the table. A reader dimly familiar with Russell Kirk would expect to find him saluted here for his writings on culture and governance, but Birzer instead focuses on his anti-war writings, as Kirk believed the United States’ permanent war state was steadily eroding its character as a republican nation. (Bill Kauffman would agree.)

Beyond Tenebrae is a must-read for those who read the classics for their insight and edification, as Birzer’s reflection on Christian humanism reveals why the classics have their enduring appeal. For the serious classics reader, Birzer’s book is a extensive visitation and chat with friends, who share with us their wisdom, humor, and unique perspectives. I’ve continued to revisit it in the weeks since I first read it, and suspect I will continue to do so for some time to come. Don’t be surprised to see it a top-ten entry in December!

Literary Converts: Spiritual Inspiration in a World of Unbelief, Joseph Pearce
The Fellowship: The Literary Lives of the Inklings, Phillip & Carol Zaleski

About smellincoffee

Citizen, librarian, reader with a boundless wonder for the world and a curiosity about all the beings inside it.
This entry was posted in Classics and Literary, Religion and Philosophy, Reviews and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Beyond Tenebrae

  1. Sharon Barrow Wilfong says:

    Interesting. I have always loved Holy Week. We actually went to church every night that week. Maunday Thursday was a communion service and on Good Friday, the choir often sang a Passion cantata. My favorite ends with the words: “And the strong man sleeps.”

    I read an excellent collection of ghost stories by Russell Kirk and I also have a biography of his about T.S. Eliot. I need to read that one day.

    Your mentioning the US as in a permanent war state: I’m not sure that’s fair. In my opinion it ignores very real threats of groups that will not sleep until they’ve subdued our nation into an Islamist state. However, I don’t know what the answer is, because the cultures are so very different from ours and tribal based. Is it possible for certain countries to become democratic when the individual’s only concern is to their immediate tribal community and not the country as a whole?

    Sigh. Lord Jesus, come.

    • I’ve grown on Holy Week over the years. Advent was an easy sell — I love it as a antithesis to the frenzied consumerism of of the Hallothanksmas barrage — but I find it very hard to be solemn and penitent in spring. Easter is far more meaningful after seeing the altar stripped bare, though.

      “Ancestral Shadows” may be the Kirk book — I loved it, too. They weren’t ‘normal’ ghost stories, if that made any sense.

      There’s three factors involved in my regard of DC as a permanent war state — the influence of the military-industrial complex on DC’s policies, DC’s own geostrategic ambitions, and the actual problem of jihadism. I don’t want to write a book in the comments section, but this is something I’ve been known to get worked up about since 2006. 😉

      DC has used the wealth and bodies of the American people to make itself into a global policeman. Its military depending dwarfs every other nation’s, including dictatorshios. The world is literally covered in DC’s military bases. Even if we believe, as I once did, that DC acts with the best of intentions, I think we can agree that aggressive behavior does not promote peace. DC steadily push bases closer and closer into Russia’s neighbors and then wonder why Russia growls and lunges. Are Russia and China dangerous in themselves, even without aggression from DC? Absolutely: they, too, have their ambitions — but DC’s policies often needlessly escalate things.

      This global coverage presumably began cause of World War 2: DC had created bases throughout the world to fight a global war against powerful enemies in different hemispheres, and afterwards those same bases were used to keep Russian influence from turning more of the globe into a socialist graveyard. The enormous amount of material needed to support and maintain those bases has given military manufacturers an undue influence on DC — not only through lobbyists, but through the fact that military manufacturing can be used to provide “jobs”: spread out the piecework among various states, and you can lure their senators into advocating for policies that put your arms to work. The corporations get growing government contracts, the senators get job cred and campaign donations. Of course, the senators might want aggressive policies, anyway –to check perceived threats, to control key resources, etc.

      And THEN you have the actual jihadists: while they might very well want to turn the west into an Islamic state, that is not the conflict raging in the mideast. Bin laden explicility wanted to DC into a modern Vietnam, to waste its resources in the graveyard of empires, Afghanistan — and DC took the bait. I can’t blame them: I remember the fear and righteous anger of 2001, and when bin Laden was hunted down I laughed and hoped he died poorly. But Iraq was a colossal mistake, and it has created problems which have resulted in OTHER mistakes. DC’s mideast policy is a positive feedback loop of misery, chaos, and death.

      To your last question, I don’t think democracy is importable. It think it grows from culture, and that days that culture is thin on the ground even in the west.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s