
I was surprised to spot this on the shelves, and intrigued enough to give it a go — especially since this is SF month, after all. It’s not that science fiction is not political: politics is arguably inseparable from SF to some degree, and many SF works are explicility political. George Orwell, Bob Heinlein, and Ray Bradbury come to mind, of course, as do cyberpunk and solarpunk as entire genres. It’s just that the Politically Incorrect Guide series is generally aimed at a conservative audience, and I rarely encounter conservative literary analysis of SF. Brad Birzer is a notable exception: he has a lecture series on SF from a libertarian perspective, enjoys discussing the works of Heinlein and Bradbury on podcasts, and has written a book (Mythic Realms) that includes reflections on SF&F. That could very well be me just not having encountered those perspectives, though. At any rate, this book proved to be unlike any other PiG in that it’s a straightforward introduction to SF&F, with the series’ normal edge nearly completely sheathed.
Butler begins from the first signs we have of the human power of wonder — strange cave paintings of human hybrids, and the stories of the Constellations themselves — and moves forward through European recorded fantasy. As we hit the industrial age, science fiction is incorporated as well, and the two are thereafter tracked separately under categories like Cyberpunk, etc. The PiG books are all on the slim side, 200 page or so, so most authors only get a paragraph or two. High-profile authors like Tolkien, Lewis, Heinlein, and le Guin get more attention, of course, but even here Butler has to be spare. The Space Trilogy, which was intended as SF, is ignored to chat about Narnia, instead. As he continues to move through to the present, there are frequent sidebars to discuss related topics: the rise and role of conventions and fan fiction, for instance, or the growth of tropes and character types like antiheroes. The author strives for comprehensiveness and includes authors he doesn’t like, and his attitude is largely neutral except on some occasions where he waspishly strikes at adult Harry Potter fans. (I should note that I can only vet the SF category’s range: my fantasy holdings take up less room than Twiggy standing sideways.)
As mentioned, this title is anomalous in the Politically Incorrect series in that it doesn’t have the aggressive edge of those books. They’re generally written to be provocative, some authors can be downright acerbic, which is why I have read so few of them. Aside from a few pointed remarks about cancel culture, though, Butler generally ignores politics. As the caption quote above says, this is largely Butler providing an introduction to books and authors, from the view of someone who is a published author himself. (Of……Mormon steampunk?) Around the 65-75% mark, Butler switches from introducing the reader to authors and concepts with SF&F and begins writing about current issues within the craft. He is concerned about the rise of “Hard magic”, for instance, magic with defined rules and quantifiable elements, and argues that it removes the mystery, and thus part of the attraction, from magic. Here, some politics does come up, but it’s not that pointed and is heavily mixed in a grab-bag of SF&F related thoughts, like how many authors have lapsed series these days, or trends in publishing.
This was a decidedly odd read: enjoyable enough, and there’s no shortage of new-to-me authors and books to learn about from here. The issue for me in recommending this, though, is that that’s all there is. Granted, there’s value in that: if I’d read this back in say, 2010 when I became more broadly interested in SF outside of Star Trek and Isaac Asimov, it would have given me a lot of ideas. As it is, though, it was a pleasant way to spend a few hours.
The desire to indict Tolkien also makes the choice between philosophies clear. Tolkien fought in the Great War. His boyhood friends died in the mud in France. He writes about the need for sacrifice and the urgency that the men of the west band together and stand against the mechanized evil of Mordor. Martin, on the other hand, claimed conscience objector status to avoid going to Vietnam and then made a career in Hollywood. He wants us to believe that there are no heroes, that everyone is a potential murderer, out for himself. I know which world I believe in, and which man I’d rather be.











