Bagombo Snuff Box

Posted on June 21, 2009 by smellincoffee

Bagombo Snuff Box: Uncollected Fiction

© 1999 Kurt Vonnegut
295 pages
For some reason, I enjoy reading Kurt Vonnegut. I find his novels and most of the short stories I’ve read of his hard to follow, but I enjoy them still. I was delighted to find this book a collection of very readable short stories — twenty-two, in fact, with an introduction by Vonnegut and a “Coda to my Career as a Writer for Periodicals” serving as literary bookends. He refers to them as a collection of “Buddhist catnaps”. The stories seem to be of his early works (pre-1953), and their settings are diverse. One takes place in Czechoslovaka as the war ends, while most seem to be set in immediate or early post-WW2 America. There is at least one speculative fiction story covering the otherworldly results from the US military’s attempt to put an intelligence operative into Earth orbit. Interestingly, three of the stories involve the same character — a high-school band teacher whose obsession with winning every band competition he can provides fuel for conflict. There are a lot of interesting stories here –what happens a brutal Godfather-type character who pretends to be Santa Claus is one of them. Most of the stories seem to be sly commentary about some issue or another, but even without this they would be quite enjoyable. If you can find it, do give it a try.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Jesus

Posted on June 18, 2009 by smellincoffee
Jesus: A Story of Enlightenment
© 2008 Deepak Chopra
273 pages
Yesterday I wandered about in my library’s fiction section with the intention of letting something capture my eye. This “when the reader is ready, the book will come” approach didn’t seem to be working, so I decided to find a book by Michael Crichton. He’s been recommended to me before, but I’ve never read him before. Because I did not know how his last name was spelled — thinking it had an “H” — I found myself looking at the wrong bookshelves altogether, but while I looked my eyes saw the title Jesus. “Hmm“, I thought, “Interesting.” The full title was Jesus: A Story of Enlightenment. It was by Chopra, which gave me pause, but I opened it up to see Judas fretting about Romans looking for Jesus. “Ooh,” I thought, “The story of the gospels related in novel form? I’ll give it a go.”
That is not quite the case. Chopra introduces the book by writing that we know little of Jesus’ life between his birth and the beginnings of his time as a teacher, aside from one odd story about him getting separated from his family and teaching the rabbis in a local synagogue. Chopra therefore decided that someone should try to tell the story. Because we have no evidence from which to work, Chopra decided to use an “archetypal pattern” of people who have found enlightenment: I assume this is something along the lines of Campbell’s “hero’s journey” archetype. This may be the reason the story seems to lack historical depth or texture: although this is technically historical fiction, it’s incredibly shallow in that you could write the same book but just change the name of the Romans to another villain, and the name of the Jews to the name of another downtrodden people. George Lucas used a pattern, but he made the developing story his own: that doesn’t happen here.
As mentioned, the book is not a novel form of the gospels: it concerns Jesus as he was in his twenties, as a troubled and intuitive youth who feels compelled to search for answers to the meaning of suffering. This will set him on a somewhat brief journey to find answers, and he finally does in a range of snow-covered mountains when he encounters an old mystic who both introduces and ends the story. He does encounter two NT personalities who accompany him part of the way, namely Judas and Mary Magdalene. Chopra seems to be drawing on the Gospel of Judas when writing the ending, although he does paint Mary as a prostitute. My only knowledge about that subject is that one character in The Da Vinci Code called it a deceitful fabrication.
Previously I said that the book’s plot is shallow, with no historical context to ground it. I think the same is true of Jesus: he appears to be a character with dimensions at the start, but about two-fifths of the way in, Chopra suddenly replaces him with a Jesus who says things that are seemingly out of character: it’s like the author directly started making him say things instead of letting the character develop on his own. The character is used to say the same things Chopra said in The Third Jesus, which isn’t that surprising but still seems muddled. What I can say positively about the book is that the “visions” were well done: I was very wary at first, but Chopra did them in a way that was not intrusive and even believable.
I can’t say I would recommend this to someone looking for a gripping story, but if people find the titular character interesting, they will probably be able to enjoy this to some degree.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 1 Comment

This Week at the Library (17/6)

Posted on June 17, 2009 by smellincoffee

Books this Update

  • Third Degree, Greg Iles
  • Turning Angel, Greg Iles
  • God’s Problem, Brad Ehrman
  • The Third Jesus, Deepak Chopra
  • Further Along the Road Less Travelled, M. Scott Peck
  • Sleep No More, Greg Iles
  • Boss of Bosses, Joseph O’Brien and Andris Kurins
Given that Greg Iles‘ books make up half of this week’s reading — more if you consider page numbers — I’m going to break from format and deal with them all at once. I didn’t intend to read three of his thrillers in a single week, but circumstances made it possible and a little inevitable. The three Iles books are alike in that each are southern gothic thrillers — genuine page-turners. There’s a reason I was able to go through them so quickly, and that is that they are so damned readable. When I begin reading Iles, I can’t really put the book down even when I’m growing tired of him — as was the case at the ends of books two and three when I realized I was reading too much of Iles at once. Two of the books — Turning Angel and Sleep No More — are both set in the same setting as The Quiet Game, in the town of Natchez, Mississippi. They all have fairly unique plots, although my chief problem with both of the mentioned books is that they seem to have more sex in them than Playboy. The focus tends to shift away from the story and to fanfiction-style depictions of intimacy. Even so, each of the three plots fascinated me: in one, a suburban housewife is held a terrorized hostage in her own home , in another the death of a promising high schooler leads to the invasion of her town by Biloxi-based gangsters, and in the third a man is haunted by a woman who claims to be possessed by the spirit of his dead lover. Interesting stuff.
After the first two Iles thrillers, I read Bart Ehrman’s God’s Problem, in which he examines biblical attitudes toward suffering. He identifies four general attitudes, three of which are explanations and one of which is “don’t bother, it’s all a mystery”. Ehrman is thorough, interesting, and fair. His focus on one of the explanations helped the whole of the New Testament make sense to me, as he explains in part how Judaism changed through its exposure to Babylonian and later Persian thinking.
Next I read a book by Deepak Chopra called The Third Jesus. I am trying to understand various approaches to interpreting the life of Jesus, as he has never formerly been a personality that particularly interested me — despite growing up in a fundamentalist home. Chopra’s book was of little help. His interpretation of Jesus is of a “Transcendental Teacher” who teaches God-consciousnesses. Chopra does not explain his terms, apparently leaving them to be understand on some mystical level. Despite dealing with scientific and historical topics, he footnotes nothing and his rebuttals of various arguments for and against traditional interpretations of Jesus (Jesus as enlightened rabbi and Jesus as God-in-flesh-come-to-save-all-humankind) are almost nonexistent. The book was confusing, sloppy, and uninteresting to me.
Returning to Scott Peck was an enjoyable change from trying to read Chopra. Peck was a retired psychiatrist who attempted in his books to approach spirituality from that angle, seeing spirituality and psychiatry as interrelated disciplines. My own approach to spirituality is naturalistic, which is why I appreciate the psychological angle — even though Peck views psychiatry and psychology as supernatural disciplines, given that their object of study is in his view a supernatural thing. What I like about Peck is that he looks at mental problems like depression, guilt, and anxiety from a “That doesn’t have to be the case” perspective. Although he is most concerned with fixing these problems by examining their source and dealing with it, theoretically you could nip problems in the bud before they start overtaking your life. He deals with a lot of topics, and even though I don’t agree with him on a lot of things, I find him provocative.
Lastly, I read Boss of Bosses, a memoir written by two FBI agents detailing the rise and fall of Paul Castellano, who is referred to by his men as both “The Godfather” and “The Pope”. The book, written in the third person, tries to tell two stories at the same time: while its authors tell us of their initial investigations against Castellano, they often take breaks to inform us of his rise to power. Once this secondary story is finished, it renews itself in tracking his political fall. While the police investigation continues and a case is built up — using a planted microphone to give the agents an ear inside Castellano’s home — the kingpin himself is becoming increasingly isolated from the world which he once dominated, infatuated by his Hispanic maid-turned-mistress and his “performance problems”. When his career ends, it is not at the hands of the FBI agents who have come to respect his genteelness and who have sympathy for him, but at the hands of an ambitious young capo who sees Castellano as being a liability to the five families. The book tells an interesting story and offers a look into the thinking of the mob.
Pick of the Week: Third Degree, Greg Iles. The whole of its plot takes place in one day and the book is not marred by either excessive violence or sex. (There are both, but they don’t dominate the book like they did the two other Iles books.)
Quotation of the Week: “We’re not children here. The law is –how should I put it? A convenience. Or, a convenience for some people, and an inconvenience for other people. Like, take the law that says you can’t go into a guy’s house. I got a house, so hey — I like that law. But the guy without a house, what’s he think of it? ‘Stay out in the rain, schnook!’ That’s what the law means to him.” – Paul Castellano. This was one of my favorite quotations before reading the book, but its original source is apparently this book: Castellano utters those words to the authorial agents in their car after his arrest.
Next Week:
  • Jesus, Deepak Chopra. Given that I just read a book about Jesus by Deepak Chopra and disliked it, why am I reading another? Because this one is a novel.
  • Black Holes, Baby Universes, and Other Essays; Stephen Hawking
  • Medical Firsts, Robert Adler
  • Blue Like Jazz: Nonreligious Thoughts on Christian Spirituality, Donald Miller
  • Bagombo Snuff Box, Kurt Vonnegut
Posted in Reviews | Leave a comment

Boss of Bosses

Posted on June 17, 2009 by smellincoffee

Boss of Bosses — the Fall of the Godfather: the FBI and Paul Castellano

© 1991 Joseph F. O’Brien and Andris Kurins
364 pages
A number of years ago I had a considerable interest in the Mafia, from an adolescent fascination with men of power and prestige and a less adolescent fascination with the darker side of human nature — the corrupting effect of power, and what it can drive people to do. This is not an expired interest, but it is one that is typically latent. Still, it arises every so often, and it did so while I was going through my public library’s discard bin in hopes of rescuing whatever science and history texts I could find. (I found none outside of Carl Sagan’s now probably irrevelant book on nuclear winter.) The bin was full of parenting books with some exceptions — like this, Boss of Bosses. The book is a memoir of sorts written by two FBI Agents who spent five years building a case against a real-world godfather, only to see their work rendered moot when the ambitious John Gotti decided to rid the “Five Families” of who they saw as a limiting liability.
The memoir is written in the third person, with emotional and intellectual context being given for both of the agents by themselves. The opening chapters go back and forth from the agents’ attempts to build a case against Castellano (interviewing people whose lives Castellano’s operations touch) to brief chapters that document Castellano’s rise to power. The authors obviously feel something for their prey: they develop respect and even sympathy for him, and moreso once they are able to plant a bug in his home. They aren’t cynical of their mission as government agents — they do believe Castellano is a criminal whose time has come, but at the same time they recognize he’s no hood. The character of Castellano that emerges from their book is of a gentlemanly rouge. He’s a cut above men like John Gotti; he believes in the old “code of honor” that Mafiosos like Joseph Bonanno claim to have kept. Interestingly, the FBI agents seem to believe in this old code, as well — or at least they believed it once existed in some form and that some men did keep it. Castellano, despite his attempts to legitimize the Mafia by shifting its interests to noncriminal enterprises, is depicted as a relic from days gone by.
The book has a lot to offer to anyone with any degree of interest in the Mafia: it’s a history of one don’s rise to power, a psychology of its members — people so removed from their past that they have to rely on the script of The Godfather to give them answers to police questions — and a story of how the FBI attempted to bring Castellano to justice, only to be thwarted by the “Pope’s” political enemies. The book read well and I’d recommend it.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sleep No More

Posted on June 16, 2009 by smellincoffee

Sleep No More

© 2002 Greg Iles
382 pages
Circumstances warranting my reading a third Greg Iles this book , which is a bit unusual. I have in times past read two books in one week by the same author, but I think reading multiple books by the same author in the same genre is a first. Iles makes it easy: his books are thrillers, genuine page turners. I can hammer through one in one day and not feel fatigued in the least. Sleep No More was the Iles book I’d intended to begin the week with, but my sister checked it out before I could and so I read Third Degree instead. As it happens, though, I’m babysitting for her and have her library books available for reading as well as mine.
Sleep No More is set in Natchez, Mississippi, as were The Quiet Game and Third Degree. Unlike the former Natchez books, however, this is not a first-person Penn Cage narrative. The book is written in the third person, and from the perspective of a husband and wife whose lives are thrown into confusion and chaos shortly after their daughter’s victorious soccer game. Was it the underdog team winning that threw the universe into chaos? No. Instead, a woman named Eve Sumner walks by main character John Waters and whispers in his ear a phrase known only to him and his college love — a woman whose passions consumed his life, in ways both good and bad. That was a love ended by her rape and death at the hands of unknown strangers in New Orleans.
Eve — and through her his former love Mallory — begin to haunt John. When he confronts Eve about the mystery phrase, she enrages him by telling him that she is his former love — come back from the dead. Such was the effect of Mallory on John during his college days that Eve has resurrection his obsession with her, and together they begin an affair even as John struggles with the truth of the matter. Is she really the soul of his former — and now present — love, or is this some elaborate scheme? His friend Penn Cage — hello, Penn, fancy seeing you here — seems to think so. Cage is not a believer in the supernatural, and he believes that Waters’ corrupt business partner Cole is trying to disrupt Water’s life in some way for his own selfish benefit. Things only grow more mysterious after Eve dies and Waters’ wife Lily begins acting like a woman posessed.
The book is a thriller: its opening premise is quite interesting, and Iles executes the tension well. I did not expect the plot to go the way it did. Like his previous offering, Sleep No More does not fail to entertain, although after three books of his in the same week, I am (understandably) growing weary of Iles‘ sexy southern gothics. A break may be recquired.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Further Along the Road Less Travelled

Posted on June 16, 2009 by smellincoffee

Further Along the Road Less Traveled: The Unending Journey Toward Spiritual Growth

© 1993 M. Scott Peck
255 pages
Peck is always an interesting author for me to read. He and I typically do not see eye to eye on many issues, but like Thomas Cahill, I find his work to be interesting regardless. Perhaps the interest I take in Peck is that he expresses opinions I don’t agree with, but he does so in a manner I can respect — most of the time. As mentioned before, Peck is a psychiatrist who attempts to combine it and spirituality, seeing spirituality as mental health and maturation. A note on the book identifies this as “Edited Lectures”, meaning that unlike The Road Less Traveled, this may not have been written as a book in itself — but that it consists of essays that have edited and fitted to one another. Although the lecture/essays were not written as a deliberate whole, the “space” in between them is not too jarring: the book flows fairly well, and is divided into three parts: “Growing Up”, “Knowing Yourself”, and “In Search of a Personal God”.
One trait of Peck’s writing that I like is that it tends to be widely focused. This book is an example of that, as individual essays see him writing on consciousness, forgiveness, death and meaning, mystery, self love versus self-esteem, mythology, spirituality, addiction, religion, the New Age movement, and sexuality. The strength of the essays varied for me: in general, I thought the first half of the book was strong and that it faded quickly, especially in the sexuality essay. That one was more than strange.
A good bit of the book is about religion, and it was this I enjoyed the most. I consider myself a nonreligious person, but lately I am trying to find the good in it. Admittedly, that’s a tricky direction in which to go, but I am interested in religion as a human endeavor, and I think that a genuine concern for human well-being and growth lies somewhere in them. I am not convinced that it is the heart of every religion, but I think it is least least a part — and I want to see if this is true and if so to what extent. It was the Dalai Lama that first set me on this course, but Gyatso and Peck are quite different: Gyatso’s approach to spirituality is simple, direct, and is aimed at cultivating happiness. Peck is more stern and less humanistic: he focuses on fixing problems, and believes we have to depend on God for growth.
The book is typical for Peck: I found it interesting, and will probably read more of Peck in the future, but I don’t recommend it to everyone. I think the book is valuable in making me consider ideas I’d never thought of before.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Third Jesus

Posted on June 16, 2009 by smellincoffee

The Third Jesus: the Christ We Cannot Ignore

© 2008 Deepak Chopra
241 pages
I’ve heard the name “Deepak Chopra” before, but never in a positive light. Still, given my interest in comparative religion and philosophy, and given that I don’t like having uninformed opinions about people, I decided to read The Third Jesus. Chopra’s thesis is this: there are two chief ideas about Jesus, the liberal version and the conservative version. The liberal version believes in the enlightened rabbi, the human teacher. The conservative version is the “WORSHIP ME, MORTALS!” one. Chopra says that the problem with this is that the gospels, when taken in full, invalidate both. His solution to this “problem” is to propose a third Jesus, a Transcendental Jesus who teaches the way to “God-consciousness”, which Chopra never really explains. Essentially, what he does is to quote text from five accounts of Jesus’ life (the traditional gospels and Thomas) and uses them to support his view.
It doesn’t seem to me that he’s doing anything different from what Fred Phelps and Marcus Borg are doing: applying their interpretation to the story. It seems to validate Albert Schweitzer’s idea that people who try to find the “True” Jesus only create narratives that satisfy their own desires. In general, I found the book to be a poor read: Chopra rarely explains his terms, and beyond the in-text verses from the gospels, nothing seems to be cited. This is particularly troublesome given that he writes on historical and scientific topics at times.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

God’s Problem

Posted on June 14, 2009 by smellincoffee

God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question — Why We Suffer
© 2008 Bart Ehrman
294 pages
While gazing at the library shelves in the “Religion” section attempting to find a book by Marcus Borg, I saw the title of this book and was immediately intrigued. The book description only confirmed my interest and I was soon reading it. Bart Ehrman is a New Testament scholar and former minister, his faith having been broken by the classical problem of religions with “good” deities at their center: if those gods exist, why is there suffering? How can evil flourish so well in a world supposedly built by good and powerful entities? This question has personal relevance to me, as I was never able to really trust God after reading Anne Frank’s diary and realizing how the Holocaust destroyed real people. Ehrman actually uses the Holocaust as an extended example.

This book grew out of a class he once taught about Biblical attitudes toward suffering, and the approach he takes is to identify three general explanations for evil, explain their origin and influence, and then to evaluate them from the perspective of someone who wants to believe but can’t. I say “three general explanations”, but this is my organization — not his. The first two explanations — suffering as a consequence of sin and suffering as being part of God’s Mysterious Plan ™ — need no explanation, either of what they are or of what’s wrong with them. It is the third general explanation — apocalyptic thinking* — that I found most intriguing. Here Ehrman not only explains what that thinking is and how it applies to the suffering question, but in so doing makes the whole of the New Testament make sense. Being familiar with history and with Judaism– having studied it in 2006 and 2007 — much of the New Testament has confused me. If it arose from Jewish/Hellenic culture, where did the New Testament characters get some of their ideas? Why were Pharisees suddenly talking about a Resurrection when OT Hebrews had never heard of such a thing? Why did people make such a big deal of Jesus’ ability to raise the dead? Fitting the New Testament into an apocalyptic context makes it make much more sense.

In addition to these three general explanations, Ehrman also points out that some of the Biblical authors felt that suffering just couldn’t be explained, and he uses Ecclesiastes and Job as its source. (Ehrman believes that Job contains two conflicting explanations for evil: the first is suffering-as-penalty and the second is the inexplicable.)

Given that I am not a religious believer struggling with the problem of suffering, I cannot comment on Ehrman’s ability to convince the audience. He writes well, uses familiar examples, and appears to be quite thorough: for instance, when writing on the explanation of “suffering as a penalty for sin”, he shows that this view influenced the entire historical narrative in the Hebrew scriptures. I think the book bears reading for those interested in what religious people coming from a Judeo-Christian background might say in defense of their God when asked to account for suffering.

He ends the book with an elegant defense of life in the face of continuing suffering, beginning with this: “I have to admit that at the end of the day, I do have a biblical view of suffering. As it turns out, it is the view put forth in the book of Ecclesiastes. There is a lot that we can’t know about this world. A lot of this world doesn’t make sense. Sometimes there is no justice. Things don’t go as planned or as they should. A lot of bad things happen. But life also brings good things. The solution to life is to enjoy it while we can, because it is fleeting. This world, and everything in it, is temporary, transient, and soon to be over. We won’t live forever — in fact, we won’t live long. And so we should enjoy life to the fullest, as much as we can, as long as we can. That’s what the author of Ecclesiastes says, and I agree. “

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Turning Angel

Posted on June 12, 2009 by smellincoffee

Turning Angel

© 2005 Greg Iles
501 pages
I didn’t intend to read two books by Greg Iles this week: frankly, I don’t want to exhaust my library’s Iles collection prematurely. As it happens, I finished Third Degree much more quickly than I anticipated and — as I happened to be at my sister’s house babysitting, and as she is similarly working her way through Iles — I decided to read from one of her checked-out Iles books. Turning Angel, like The Quiet Game, is a first-person thriller written from the eyes of Penn Gage, Houston prosecutor-turned-novelist. Turning Angel is set five years after the conclusion of The Quiet Game, but in the same town of Natchez, Mississippi. Gage’s hometown — to which he returned after the death of his wife — has deteriorated somewhat in those five years, as its major manufacturing employers have left, leaving the town with only tourism as its only viable source of income.
On the May afternoon that this book begins, though, such things are not on the minds of its citizens, particularly not those whose children go to St. Stephen’s Preparatory school, which is approaching its graduation ceremonies. The quiet anticipation is broken, however, when the body of a St. Stephen’s senior washes up on a creekbed in town — murdered. Victim Kate Townsend was a Natchez celebrity, headed for Harvard and the darling of the preparatory school. Her death is shocking enough, but soon rumors spread that Gage’s best friend and respected physician, Drew Elliot, was engaged in a romantic relationship with the not-quite-eighteen year old.
The plot-driving tension begins to build when Elliot asks Gage to once again pick up the lawyer-y banner and defend him against charges of sexual battery and murder — but things are not as simple as they might appear. The book’s title, Turning Angel, comes from a statue in town that seems to turn on its pedestal as pedestrians and cars pass nearby, its eyes following them. Appearances are not reality, and this Gage realizes as he sits in his car following the murder of a local police office with whom he was talking: the then-latest murder in a string of nearly a dozen murders that will result in a matter of days when the book’s plot is nearing its climax. The murders appear to be drug-related — but what does Kate Townsend have to do with drug lords from Biloxi?
While Gage investigates matters to build a defense of his friend, he finds he must contend with race politics — a theme repeated from The Quiet Game, but unfortunately true to real life — and the sexual nature of high school culture. The book, like Iles‘ other novels I’ve read, moves quickly and never loses my interest — although I liked this less than the others, chiefly because the sex seemed to be gratuitous after a while. If I were introducing someone to Iles, I would recommend something else as a first read. What did impress me was how many voices Gage had to assume in writing this book: an agnostic novelist, a fundamentalist preacher, a liberal Shelby-Spong-type preacher, a high school senior trying to talk to the novelist about the role of sex in high school culture, and more. What is most striking — especially when reading a eulogy given by the liberal preacher — was that he does this well. Granted, Iles consults with people in writing, but that he is able to render believable impressions of people who are so different from one another speaks highly to me of his writing ability.
On page 205, Gage consults with a civil rights lawyer from the 1960s about the declining quality of leadership among American blacks, and he says something interesting. Remember that this is written in 2005:
“There’s a crisis of black leadership in this country, Penn. The leaders of my era are relics of another age. A lost age, I’m sorry to say. […] You’ve basically got three types of black leaders today. There’s the managerial type, who pretends race isn’t even an issue. He wants a large white constituency, but he also wants to keep the loyal blacks behind him. […] Then you have your black protest leader. He’s black, loud, and proud. He casts himself in the image Malcolm and Martin, but deep down he’s nothing like them. He uses the ideals of those greater leaders only to get what he wants: personal status and power. Marion Barry, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan — the list is endless. They’re flashy, powerful, and dangerous. […] [The third type is] the prophetic leader. That’s Martin, Malcolm….Ellie Baker. The current generation has produced no leaders of this type, much less of that caliber. I’m watching Bara[c]k Obama, but I’m not sure yet.”
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Third Degree

Posted on June 11, 2009 by smellincoffee

Third Degree

© 2007 Greg Iles
385 pages
After being utterly captivated by The Quiet Game last week, reading more of Iles was a foregone conclusion. Although I had intended to read the fantasy-like Sleep No More, my sister — who introduced me to Iles — currently has the book checked out, and so I went with his Third Degree. Unlike The Quiet Game, Third Degree is written in the third person. What is most remarkable about the book, I think, is that its entire plot takes place within the span of one day — one day in a suburban household that begins on a slightly unusual note but which ends with a body floating in the river and a destroyed helicopter. The story is told primarily through the eyes of Laurel Shields — a special needs teacher whose household will be become a warzone as the plot develops — and Danny McDavitt, a retired combat pilot who now gives flight lessons and who has recently broken off a year-long affair with Laurel. (One other character develops a voice after the plot thickens.)
That Laurel has been engaged in an affair is one secret, but her husband Warren has skeletons in his closet as well, skeletons that will lead to arson and hospitalized federal agents — but today is when both secrets will come to the surface with terrifying and (for some) deadly results. Iles skillfully interweaves a marital drama with a crime-and-punishment police drama to create a story that recquires both to create a “perfect storm” of sorts. The result is also something of a psychological drama, as one of the characters goes through a developing mental hell that forces the reader to constantly reform how they perceive him. The book was as riveting as The Quiet Game, if not as textured: this was shorter and felt more like a Grisham–esque thriller. I enjoyed it tremendously.
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment