For much of the 20th century, microbes were equivalent with germs – invisible threats that needed to eradicated. As we move further into a new century ,however, there is some small and growing popular appreciation that microbes play important roles in human biology. Microbes aren’t bit players, though, they’re the actors, the support staff, the conductors, and even the orchestra. That has been amply illustrated by books like 10% Human, which demonstrated how thoroughly vital microbes are to ordinary physiology. I Contain Multitudes looks more generally at microbes and their hosts as dynamic ecosystems that are constantly changing.
Microbes had the planet entirely to themselves for most of Earth history, and long after plants and animals have seemingly taken over, they’re still in control. Microbes are present in the oceans, allowing coral to flourish and fish to find their way in the dark; they’re within insects, often a vital part of their maturation process; they’re in human babies from the word go, receiving them with their mother’s milk. (Actually, a lot of human milk seems to feed not the baby, but microbes inside the baby, which then secrete something that the baby digests. Thus even breast-feeding mothers employ bacterial wet-nurses…) That’s only part of the story, though.
Previously, people thought of the immune system in military terms: our white blood cells were soldiers on guard, watching out for any intruders. Yong suggests we appreciate our immune system more as a park ranger, one that monitors the status of its microbial wards, encouraging and protecting some and weeding out or barring others. He suggests further that our immune system in doing this is working more on the ward-microbes’ behalf than on ours, for microbes too contend with one another. They’re constantly jostling for space, and humans unwittingly participate in the battle: with every meal, we alter our micro-biome. In the name of healing, w occasionally carpet-bomb our bodies — but the body is its own ecosystem, so dependent on microbes that many illnesses should be viewed as a mismatch of populations than an invasion.
It is as grave a mistake to regard microbes as an easily-manipulated friend, says Ed Yong, as it was to regard them as an implacable enemy who must be hunted down and killed. Although symbiotic associations are rife in nature, and abound in our own bodies, they are not relationships. Many microbes live inside us, and we depend on many of them as they do on us – but we are not ‘friends’. Instead, like nation-states working together, we merely enjoy a collusion of interests, and occasionally that collusion lapses. In the macro world, for instance, tickbirds that ride on large mammals and groom them for ticks occasionally nip their rides, too. Further, no one has ‘a’ population of microbes; the pool of microbes in our guts and in our orifices fluctuates widely from hour to hour, depending on our activities.
Reading this book made me marvel, literally. The image Yong conveyed of the dynanism of our bodies made me think of the sun — an ongoing nuclear explosion that is maintained by the sheer weight of its ingredients. The contests inside us for dominance, the side effect of these material struggles on our brains and feelings, boggles the mind.
Note: I read this book much earlier in the year, but never posted my review for reasons which escape me. I decided to publish this week given that I’ve been in a science mood.
Great commentary.I have been wanting to read this book. I love the Park Ranger analogy for our immune system. Good science books do indeed make us marvel.
Fascinating. I have a deep interest in the immune system (more every year and after every bug fought off!) so I'll be checking this out….
more stuff i never knew! i should have majored in library science instead of geology… you uncover the most amazing arcana, Stephen… tx…
What a piece of work is man! Fine review, Stephen.I hope my library has a copy of the book.BTW, my blog has been reconfigured and restarted. Here’s the link.https://infinqs.blogspot.com/
Great review. I'm glad you decided to publish it. This sounds like a book that I would enjoy reading.
@Brian Joseph: I thought the author's comparison was good, too.@Cyberkitten: I've got a couple of related books lined up for later this year or early next year…one is on The Gut, and the other is This is Your Brain on Bacteria, I think. @Mudpuddle: The company at a MLS school might be livelier, at any rate!@R.T. Thanks for the update, R.T! Good to see you back.@James: Thanks! This is one of those rare science books that can really change the way a reader approaches matters of health and physiology.
Is the 'Gut' book by Giulia Enders? I have that in one of my 'pile o' books' awaiting reading along with a Brain book & a general human biology one in my usual triple read.
It is! WE'RE FINALLY READING THE SAME BOOK!
Finally? What bout Future Crimes…. John Stack…. Sharpe….? [lol]
I read Stack and Sharpe based off of your review, so those don't count. Usually what happens is one of us or or the other posts a review, and the other has it or is planning on getting it. This is the first time (besides Orwell) that we've both TBR'd the same book before posting about it, though!
Probably true. If you give me some warning we could simul-read 'Down & Out'. 4 weeks should do it if you plan that far ahead….. [grin]
Sounds good — begin about Dec 1?
Reading it? Yup, can do.
Pingback: An Elegant Defense | Reading Freely
Pingback: Best of the Science Survey, 2017 – 2022 | Reading Freely